AzTrials
AzTrials

Length of AdmissionNCT01723449

Predictors for Admission to Emergency Department More Than 48 Hours

An observational study of Length of Admission, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In Demark acutely admitted patients are supposed to stay in the Emergency Department (ED) bed ward if the anticipated duration of stay is less than 48 hours. However, it is not a trivial matter to estimate duration of stay for emergency patients. a number of factors affect this, eg. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Length of Admission
How many people
730 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Nov 2012to Oct 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: all admissions to Emergency department

Who may be able to join

  • all patients admitted to the Emergency Department -

Who cannot join

  • Children less than 15 years patients transferred from other hospitals
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Aabenraa Sygehus Emergency Department

    Aabenraa, 6200

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

In Demark acutely admitted patients are supposed to stay in the Emergency Department (ED) bed ward if the anticipated duration of stay is less than 48 hours.

However, it is not a trivial matter to estimate duration of stay for emergency patients. a number of factors affect this, eg. social background, disease, hospital organisation.

The aim of this study is to analyse whom are the best among the health staff to predict the length of stay: ED nurses, admitting doctors og the specialist, and to analyse if a number of variables can be used to improve the prediction.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. length of admission in hours

    participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 76 hours

    Measured: admission to discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionSep 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
730 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01723449
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHS-ED-01-2012
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
24 Oct 2012
Last updated
17 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Length of Admission, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

length of admission in hours (time frame: admission to discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in