AzTrials
AzTrials

Enterobacteriaceae InfectionsNCT01725841

The Prevalence of Extend-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Producing Isolates Among Common Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan

An observational study of Enterobacteriaceae Infections, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins through the acquisition and expression of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) among Enterobacteriacea is increasing. The clinical implications of ESBLs are extremely serious and sensitive diagnostic methods are urgently needed to guide therapy, monitor resistance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Enterobacteriaceae Infections
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
Apr 2009to Sep 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: ENTEROBACTERIACEAE FROM TSAR COLLECTION

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 100

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins through the acquisition and expression of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) among Enterobacteriacea is increasing. The clinical implications of ESBLs are extremely serious and sensitive diagnostic methods are urgently needed to guide therapy, monitor resistance development and implement intervention strategies. Conventionally, detection of expression of ESBLs was based on reduction of ceftazidime of cefotaxime MICs by ≥ 3 two fold dilutions in the presence of clavulanic acid. However, the use of the above method was limited to cover only some of the bacterial species, including predominantly E. coli and Klebsiella spp., or tested strains which were all transconjugants generated in vitro. ESBLs are now reported in a growing number of genera other than E. coli or Klebsiella spp., and Serratia marcescens.

Carbapenems, including ertapenem, imipenem and meropenem, are the drugs of choice used for severe ESBL-producing bacterial infections. Failure to detect ESBL at the presence of AmpC β-lactamase might result in an important clinical concern because 4th generation cephalosporins, which are stable to AmpC β-lactamase, is not a drug of choice for severe infections caused by ESBLs-producing isolates. Fluoroquinolone-resistance in ESBL-producing Enterobacteriacea is common. In this study, the investigators will use isolates of Enterobacteriacea collected from different hospitals (isolates offered by the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance [TSAR] program) to investigate the susceptibility of ertapenem and five other antimicrobial agents against ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriacea.

Read the detailed description

Materials and Methods

  1. Collection of bacterial isolates The staffs in National Health Research Institute have established a long term surveillance of antimicrobial resistance from 22 to 44 hospitals distributed in all parts of Taiwan-Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) since 1998. It has been conducted five times in year 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006 and were named as TSAR-I, TSAR-II, TSAR-III, TSAR-IV and TSAR-V. In this study, isolates of Enterobacteriaceas from TSAR-IV will be recruited. Each 50 isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, and Morganella morganii will be enrolled (about 10% of the TSAR IV collected isolates) for the following microbiological studies. Isolates will be divided to ESBL-producing or non-producing groups by screening tests. All the available isolates were identified to the species or genus level by means of conventional methods. Isolates with same species recovered from the same an individual patient, are considered one isolate. The isolates were all stored at -70℃ in trypticase soy broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) supplemented with 15% glycerol before being tested.
  2. Data Collection Information collected for each isolate included: collection date, test date, identification, site of infection, hospital unit of the patient, and whether the isolate was acquired in the community (i.e., specimen obtained <48 hours after admission), the length of patient's hospital stay. The susceptibility of all the isolated against targeted antimicrobial agents will be determined by their Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC values) follow the CLSI breakpoints for respective antimicrobial agent.
  3. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
  • Inoculums preparation Sterile saline (0.85% NaCl), suitable buffer or broth for inoculums preparation, depending on the organism. The CLSI inoculums procedure for aerobes and other microorganisms should be used. 0.5 McFarland turbidity will be used as the standard for aerobes.
  • Inoculation Use sterile loops/swabs to obtain optimal amount of inoculums suspension. Swab the entire agar surface three times; rotating the plate approximately 90 degrees each time to ensure an even distribution of inoculums. Allow excess moisture to be absorbed for about 10-15 minutes so that the surface is completely dry before applying E test strips.
  • Application of E test strips Ensure that the inoculated agar surface is completely dry before applying E test strips. Use a Etest applicator or use a forceps to grip the handle of the strip (are labeled E) and place them on to the inoculated agar surface, ensuring that the MIC scale is facing upwards and that the concentration maximum is nearest to the rim of the plate. Make sure the whole strip is in complete contact with the agar surface. Once applied, the strip cannot be moved because of the instantaneous release of antibiotic into the agar. It is recommended to apply 4-6 different E test strips onto a 150 m agar plate. In this study, the E test strips of six antimicrobial agents, including cefepime, cefepime plus clavulanic acid (for the identification of ESBL producing isolates), ciprofloxacin, cefmetazole, amikacin, tigecycline will be applied in addition to ertapenem.
  • Incubation The incubation temperature and atmosphere used must be optimal for growth of particular bacterial species and the antibiotic being tested. CLSI recommend 35℃/16-18 hours/ambient atmosphere for non-fastidious aerobes and facultative anaerobes.
  • Reading of the MIC After complete the period of incubation and when bacterial growth become distinctly visible, read the MIC value at the point of intersection between the inhibition ellipse edge and the E test strip. Use the E test reading Guide and other technical guides to correctly read different patterns. Etest strip (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) containing cefepime (MIC test range, 0.25-16 mg/L) and cefepime (MIC test range, 0.064-4 mg/L) plus 4 mg/L clavulanic acid will be used to detect the expression of ESBL according to the manufacturer's instruction.reduction of MIC by ≥3 two-fold dilutions in the presence of clavulanic acid is indicator of ESBL production. Deformation of the ellipses or the presence of "phantom" zone is also indicator of ESBL production even if the MIC ratio is <8 or can not be read.
  • Quality control In order to check the system with respect to correct handing, quality and consistency of materials and methods, test quality control strains with the antibiotics concerned. S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae can be determined by broth microdilution under ambient incubation. The following organisms are included as control strains: S. aureus ATCC 29213, E. faecalis ATCC 29212, S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619, E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603, and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. For every 500 Etests performed, a control test including the above 5 control strains will be done.
  • Molecular studies Isolates with expression of ESBLs will be further typed using Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) method. The detailed procedures of PFGE and the interpretations of PFGE banding patterns are as the description in our previous report (13).

Data Analysis

Isolates are categorized into susceptible, intermediate, and resistant according to the guidelines provided by the CLSI. Isolates intermediate or resistant to antimicrobial agents are also categorized as nonsusceptible to the agents. The rates of nonsusceptibility among major bacterial pathogens will be analyzed according to the different sites of infection and origin of the isolates. The associations between geographic area, hospital types from whom these isolates were obtained against the antimicrobial susceptibility will be analyzed.

Keywords
To determine the prevalence of ESBL-producing among Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Taiwan, To determine the susceptibility of ertapenem and other antimicrobial agents against Enterobacteriaceae isolates with and without expression of ESBLs, To determine the molecular typing of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates with expression of ESBLs, To analyze the association between geographic area, hospital types against the antimicrobial susceptibility
Medical subject headings
Enterobacteriaceae Infections

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To determine the prevalence of ESBL-producing among Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Taiwan

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionAug 2009
  4. Study completionSep 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01725841
Sponsor's protocol ID
200809012R
Status last verified
Nov 2012
First submitted
8 Oct 2009
Last updated
14 Nov 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Enterobacteriaceae Infections, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To determine the prevalence of ESBL-producing among Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Taiwan (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in