Ischemic Reperfusion InjuryPhase 2MENHIRNCT01726465
Methylprednisolone N Acetylcysteine in Hepatic Resections
A Phase 2 study testing Methylprednisolone and N-acetylcysteine in people with Ischemic Reperfusion Injury and Insufficiency; Hepatic, Postoperative, run by Istituto Clinico Humanitas at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This is a prospective double-blind randomized phase II clinical trial, with two groups of intervention (one with administration of N-acetylcysteine and the other with administration of methylprednisolone), and one group of placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemic Reperfusion Injury, Insufficiency; Hepatic, Postoperative, Liver Tumour
- What is being tested?
- Methylprednisolone and N-acetylcysteine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any sex, any race, any ethnicity
- Age > 18
- Primary and secondary liver tumors
- Normal renal function
- Anticipated Pringle's length > 30 minutes
Who cannot join
- Renal failure of any grade
- ASA 4
- Associate major surgery
- Intraoperative bleeding > 1500 ml
- Allergy to N-acetylcysteine or Methylprednisolone
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase II Randomized Double Blind Trial of Methylprednisolone and N-acetylcysteine in Hepatic Resections.
This is a prospective double-blind randomized phase II clinical trial, with two groups of intervention (one with administration of N-acetylcysteine and the other with administration of methylprednisolone), and one group of placebo. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of N-acetylcysteine and Methylprednisolone in the modulation of warm ischemia of the liver during hepatic resection. In fact to avoid massive blood loss in liver surgery, continuous or intermittent vascular clamping of the hepatic hilum ('Pringle maneuver') is generally used with good results. However, as a consequence, ischemia and subsequent reperfusion result in complex metabolic, immunological, and microvascular changes, which together might contribute to hepatocellular damage and dysfunction. This phenomenon, known as ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury of the liver, is a complex multi-path process leading to the activation of some inflammatory pathways. Any patient candidate to liver resection will be enrolled in the study based on the aforementioned criteria. The primary objective of the study is to assess the real efficacy of Methylprednisolone and N-acetylcysteine in reducing the secondary damage from ischemia reperfusion injury in liver resection and in reducing inflammatory response. Secondary objective of the study is whether the reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury results in: lower incidence of postoperative liver failure, improvement of postoperative liver function, and reduction of blood components transfusions. The randomization will be done the day before the operation. The drugs will be prepared in a blind fashion by the hospital pharmacy. The hospital pharmacy will provide to each patient a drip to make bolus of about an hour before the start of the liver resection and a syringe pump for an infusion of approximately 6 hours. If the patient is enrolled and randomized in the placebo arm, he/she will receive 250 ml of glucose 5% plus the infusion of 100 ml of glucose 5% If the patient is randomized in the Methylprednisolone arm, he/she will receive a dose of 500 mg in 250 ml of glucose 5% plus 100 mg of glucose 5%. If the patient is randomized in the N-acetylcysteine arm, he/she will receive a dose of 150 mg/kg in 250 ml of glucose 5% plus N-acetylcysteine 50 mg/kg in 100 ml glucose 5%. Systematic sampling of liver function tests will be done the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7.
Read the detailed description
Elective liver resection is performed mainly for benign and malignant liver tumors. The malignant tumors may arise primarily within the liver (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma) or represent metastases from malignancies of other organs. During hepatic resection, the risk of severe intraoperative bleeding represents a major risk. To avoid massive blood loss, continuous or intermittent vascular clamping of the hepatic artery and portal vein ('Pringle maneuver') is an efficient method to reduce hemorrhage. However, as a consequence, ischemia and subsequent reperfusion result in complex metabolic, immunological, and microvascular changes, which together might contribute to hepatocellular damage and dysfunction. This phenomenon, known as ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury of the liver, is a complex multi-path process leading to the activation of inflammatory pathways, in which cellular injury results from events occurring during both the ischemic and reperfusion phases. The key mechanism of tissue injury is the intense and excessive inflammatory response to reperfusion. Although initially considered a condition mediated by innate immune responses, IR injury also triggers adaptive immunity, such as activated Kupffer cells that express cytokines and chemokines thereby leading to further neutrophils activation and recruitment. Neutrophils inflict tissue damage on the liver through the generation of some reactive oxygen-species (ROS) and of some proteolytic enzymes. Various methods and many pharmacological agents have been attempted to decrease the IR injury associated with prolonged duration of vascular occlusion, no one is a standard of care in protocols for liver resection. After a tough review of the literature we considered the most promising data on two drugs: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and Methylprednisolone (MET). NAC seems more active in ischemic phase and in the early reperfusion period. In fact when blood flow is interrupted cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is depleted and there is a buildup of adenosine monophosphate, which is catabolized to hypoxanthine that is oxidized to xanthine by the enzyme xanthine oxidase, generating ROS in the process. Glutathione (GSH), that is an antioxidant present in the liver, offers protection against oxygen free radicals. During hypoxia, GSH stores are consumed, which predisposes to oxidative injury. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) serves as a precursor to GSH and can replenish intracellular GSH stores, it directly scavenge hydrogen peroxide. It has also been shown to impair the chemo taxis and generation of oxygen radicals by human phagocytic cells through an anti-inflammatory action, inhibit cytokine-mediated induction of nitric oxide synthase in human hepatocytes in vitro and have probably an anti-inflammatory mechanism of hepatoprotection against oxidative injury from nitric oxide (NO). So there is a substantial body of experimental work evaluating the role of NAC in liver I/R injury, but these studies are small in terms of patients, and more importantly they utilize a widely disparate range of protocols of administration. Yet, there is only one small study describing the outcome of a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing liver resection. Thus, we decide, after the 'a priori' sample power calculation, to investigate the effect of NAC in patients submitted to hepatic resection systematically performed with the 'Pringle maneuver' using the same loading dose and subsequent infusion of some Randomized Clinical Trial in liver transplantation. Together with NAC we decide to investigate the effects of MET, which is a glucocorticoid steroid that acts as an anti-inflammatory agent, reducing inflammatory markers and apoptotic cell count in experimental liver IR injury. To our knowledge, there are only three published studies that evaluated the role of MET in liver resection, but only one of those was associated to a significant decrease of transaminase enzymes (AST and ALT). The basic hypothesis is that the protective effects of Methylprednisolone may become more apparent as the extent of liver resection and/or the duration of vascular occlusion increases. Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized controlled trial with adequate sample size with the aim to recognize in the intervention groups, one with NAC and one with MET, a statistically significant reduction of ALT and AST (100U/L) compared with the placebo group. No stratifications are planned. Two comparisons are planned Experimental (MET+NAC) vs. Standard and MET vs. NAC. A randomization ratio MET:NAC:STD=1:1:1 is planned; for the Experimental (EXP) Vs Standard (STD) comparison the allocation ratio is therefore 2:1. In order to verify the superiority of EXP (MET+NAC) it was assumed that with the standard treatment the mean value of ALT was 800 units with a standard deviation (SD) of 100, as reported in literature. the investigators decided to consider of interest a reduction of 100 for the experimental treatments leading to consider a value of 700 as desirable. Considering α value of 0.025 (one-sided) and a power of 90%, a total of 48 evaluable patients are required (16 in each arm). If the test results in a statistical significant advantage for EXP arms (MET+NAC), the study will continue the accrual for MET and NAC only, with the aim of comparing MET vs. NAC, considering a difference of interest of 50 units, with α value of 0.05 (two-sided) and a power of 80%. Further 94 Pts need to be enrolled for a total of 126 evaluable patients available for the comparison of MET vs. NAC. The total sample size will be 142 (63 treated with MET, 63 treated with NAC and 16 treated with standard therapy).
- Being tested
- Methylprednisolone, N-acetylcysteine
- Keywords
- N-Acetylcysteine, Methylprednisolone, Liver ischemia reperfusion injury, Pringle manoeuvre, Hepatic resection
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Also called methylprednisolone sodium succinate
Methylprednisolone is a glucocorticoid, which is an adrenocortical steroid. The chemical name for methylprednisolone is pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione, 11,17,21-trihydroxy-6-methyl-, (6α,11β)-and the molecular weight is 374.48. It is an analog of naturally occurring glucocorticoid (hydrocortisone and cortisone), which also have salt-retaining properties, are used as replacement therapy in adrenocortical deficiency states. Methylprednisolone is used for their potent anti-inflammatory effects in disorders of many organ systems, it modify the body's immune responses to diverse stimuli. The usual dosage of medication varies in relation to pathology for which is prescribed: normally varies from about 40-60 mg per day up to very high doses of 30 mg/kg bolus as used in spinal cord injury.
N-acetylcysteineDrug
Also called N-acetyl cysteine
Acetylcysteine is the N-acetyl derivative of the naturally occurring amino acid, L-cysteine. Chemically, it is N-acetyl-L-cysteine. The compound is a white crystalline powder which melts at 104°-110°C and has a very slight odor. Acetylcysteine may form cysteine, disulfides, and conjugates in vivo (N, N'-diacetylcysteine, N-acetylcysteine- cysteine, N-acetylcysteine-glutathione, N-acetylcysteine-protein, etc). No metabolites were identified. Acetylcysteine likely protects the liver by maintaining or restoring the glutathione levels, or by acting as an alternate substrate for conjugation with, and thus detoxification of, the reactive metabolite.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| N-acetylcysteine | Experimental | Patients were randomized to this arm will receive a bolus of N-acetylcysteine in an hour of 150 mg/kg after the beginning of the operation. After the bolus will start a 6-hour infusion of 50mg/kg/h of N-acetylcysteine. Receives: Drug: N-acetylcysteine |
| Methylprednisolone | Experimental | Patients were randomized to this arm will receive a bolus of methylprednisolone in an hour of 500 mg after the beginning of the operation. After the bolus will start a 6-hour infusion of placebo (Ringer's acetate). Receives: Drug: Methylprednisolone |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Patients were randomized to this arm will receive placebo (Ringer's acetate) in an hour after the beginning of the operation. After the bolus will start a 6-hour infusion of placebo (Ringer's acetate). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A decrease of 100 UI/L of AST and ALT compared with placebo.
The primary endpoint of the study is the modulation of the IR injury made by NAC and/or MET in patients undergoing liver surgery. For this purpose a decrease of 100 UI/L of AST and ALT is expected compared with placebo.
Measured: Systematic sampling of liver function tests the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7
Secondary outcomes (2)
Difference in total bilirubin expression.
This secondary endpoint want to assess difference in total bilirubin expression between the intervention groups and the placebo group.
Measured: Systematic sampling of liver function tests the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7
Difference in blood transfusions.
This secondary endpoint want to assess difference in blood transfusion between the intervention groups and the placebo group.
Measured: Systematic sampling of liver function tests the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Why it stopped: The first phase was completed
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ischemic Reperfusion InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istituto Clinico HumanitasThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istituto Clinico Humanitas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Guido Torzilli, PhD, Principal investigator, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia dell'Università degli Studi di MilanoGiovanni Bordone, PhD, Principal investigator, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia dell'Università degli Studi di Milano
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01726465
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CE ICH 178-12
- Acronym
- MENHIR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2013
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Randomized Double Blind Trial of Methylprednisolone and N-acetylcysteine in Hepatic Resections.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01726465
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MENHIR / CE ICH 178-12
- Keywords
- N-Acetylcysteine, Methylprednisolone, Liver ischemia reperfusion injury, Pringle manoeuvre, Hepatic resection
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The first phase was completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istituto Clinico HumanitasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective double-blind randomized phase II clinical trial, with two groups of intervention (one with administration of N-acetylcysteine and the other with administration of methylprednisolone), and one group of placebo. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of N-acetylcysteine and Methylprednisolone in the modulation of warm ischemia of the liver during hepatic resection. In fact to avoid massive blood loss in liver surgery, continuous or intermittent vascular clamping of the hepatic hilum ('Pringle maneuver') is generally used with good results. However, as a consequence, ischemia and subsequent reperfusion result in complex metabolic, immunological, and microvascular changes, which together might contribute to hepatocellular damage and dysfunction. This phenomenon, known as ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury of the liver, is a complex multi-path process leading to the activation of some inflammatory pathways. Any patient candidate to liver resection will be enrolled in the study based on the aforementioned criteria. The primary objective of the study is to assess the real efficacy of Methylprednisolone and N-acetylcysteine in reducing the secondary damage from ischemia reperfusion injury in liver resection and in reducing inflammatory response. Secondary objective of the study is whether the reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury results in: lower incidence of postoperative liver failure, improvement of postoperative liver function, and reduction of blood components transfusions. The randomization will be done the day before the operation. The drugs will be prepared in a blind fashion by the hospital pharmacy. The hospital pharmacy will provide to each patient a drip to make bolus of about an hour before the start of the liver resection and a syringe pump for an infusion of approximately 6 hours. If the patient is enrolled and randomized in the placebo arm, he/she will receive 250 ml of glucose 5% plus the infusion of 100 ml of glucose 5% If the patient is randomized in the Methylprednisolone arm, he/she will receive a dose of 500 mg in 250 ml of glucose 5% plus 100 mg of glucose 5%. If the patient is randomized in the N-acetylcysteine arm, he/she will receive a dose of 150 mg/kg in 250 ml of glucose 5% plus N-acetylcysteine 50 mg/kg in 100 ml glucose 5%. Systematic sampling of liver function tests will be done the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7.
Detailed description
Elective liver resection is performed mainly for benign and malignant liver tumors. The malignant tumors may arise primarily within the liver (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma) or represent metastases from malignancies of other organs. During hepatic resection, the risk of severe intraoperative bleeding represents a major risk. To avoid massive blood loss, continuous or intermittent vascular clamping of the hepatic artery and portal vein ('Pringle maneuver') is an efficient method to reduce hemorrhage. However, as a consequence, ischemia and subsequent reperfusion result in complex metabolic, immunological, and microvascular changes, which together might contribute to hepatocellular damage and dysfunction. This phenomenon, known as ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury of the liver, is a complex multi-path process leading to the activation of inflammatory pathways, in which cellular injury results from events occurring during both the ischemic and reperfusion phases. The key mechanism of tissue injury is the intense and excessive inflammatory response to reperfusion. Although initially considered a condition mediated by innate immune responses, IR injury also triggers adaptive immunity, such as activated Kupffer cells that express cytokines and chemokines thereby leading to further neutrophils activation and recruitment. Neutrophils inflict tissue damage on the liver through the generation of some reactive oxygen-species (ROS) and of some proteolytic enzymes. Various methods and many pharmacological agents have been attempted to decrease the IR injury associated with prolonged duration of vascular occlusion, no one is a standard of care in protocols for liver resection. After a tough review of the literature we considered the most promising data on two drugs: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and Methylprednisolone (MET). NAC seems more active in ischemic phase and in the early reperfusion period. In fact when blood flow is interrupted cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is depleted and there is a buildup of adenosine monophosphate, which is catabolized to hypoxanthine that is oxidized to xanthine by the enzyme xanthine oxidase, generating ROS in the process. Glutathione (GSH), that is an antioxidant present in the liver, offers protection against oxygen free radicals. During hypoxia, GSH stores are consumed, which predisposes to oxidative injury. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) serves as a precursor to GSH and can replenish intracellular GSH stores, it directly scavenge hydrogen peroxide. It has also been shown to impair the chemo taxis and generation of oxygen radicals by human phagocytic cells through an anti-inflammatory action, inhibit cytokine-mediated induction of nitric oxide synthase in human hepatocytes in vitro and have probably an anti-inflammatory mechanism of hepatoprotection against oxidative injury from nitric oxide (NO). So there is a substantial body of experimental work evaluating the role of NAC in liver I/R injury, but these studies are small in terms of patients, and more importantly they utilize a widely disparate range of protocols of administration. Yet, there is only one small study describing the outcome of a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing liver resection. Thus, we decide, after the 'a priori' sample power calculation, to investigate the effect of NAC in patients submitted to hepatic resection systematically performed with the 'Pringle maneuver' using the same loading dose and subsequent infusion of some Randomized Clinical Trial in liver transplantation. Together with NAC we decide to investigate the effects of MET, which is a glucocorticoid steroid that acts as an anti-inflammatory agent, reducing inflammatory markers and apoptotic cell count in experimental liver IR injury. To our knowledge, there are only three published studies that evaluated the role of MET in liver resection, but only one of those was associated to a significant decrease of transaminase enzymes (AST and ALT). The basic hypothesis is that the protective effects of Methylprednisolone may become more apparent as the extent of liver resection and/or the duration of vascular occlusion increases. Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized controlled trial with adequate sample size with the aim to recognize in the intervention groups, one with NAC and one with MET, a statistically significant reduction of ALT and AST (100U/L) compared with the placebo group. No stratifications are planned. Two comparisons are planned Experimental (MET+NAC) vs. Standard and MET vs. NAC. A randomization ratio MET:NAC:STD=1:1:1 is planned; for the Experimental (EXP) Vs Standard (STD) comparison the allocation ratio is therefore 2:1. In order to verify the superiority of EXP (MET+NAC) it was assumed that with the standard treatment the mean value of ALT was 800 units with a standard deviation (SD) of 100, as reported in literature. the investigators decided to consider of interest a reduction of 100 for the experimental treatments leading to consider a value of 700 as desirable. Considering α value of 0.025 (one-sided) and a power of 90%, a total of 48 evaluable patients are required (16 in each arm). If the test results in a statistical significant advantage for EXP arms (MET+NAC), the study will continue the accrual for MET and NAC only, with the aim of comparing MET vs. NAC, considering a difference of interest of 50 units, with α value of 0.05 (two-sided) and a power of 80%. Further 94 Pts need to be enrolled for a total of 126 evaluable patients available for the comparison of MET vs. NAC. The total sample size will be 142 (63 treated with MET, 63 treated with NAC and 16 treated with standard therapy).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| N-acetylcysteine | Experimental | Drug: N-acetylcysteinePatients were randomized to this arm will receive a bolus of N-acetylcysteine in an hour of 150 mg/kg after the beginning of the operation. After the bolus will start a 6-hour infusion of 50mg/kg/h of N-acetylcysteine. |
| Methylprednisolone | Experimental | Drug: MethylprednisolonePatients were randomized to this arm will receive a bolus of methylprednisolone in an hour of 500 mg after the beginning of the operation. After the bolus will start a 6-hour infusion of placebo (Ringer's acetate). |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | –Patients were randomized to this arm will receive placebo (Ringer's acetate) in an hour after the beginning of the operation. After the bolus will start a 6-hour infusion of placebo (Ringer's acetate). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Any sex, any race, any ethnicity
- Age > 18
- Primary and secondary liver tumors
- Normal renal function
- Anticipated Pringle's length > 30 minutes
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Renal failure of any grade
- ASA 4
- Associate major surgery
- Intraoperative bleeding > 1500 ml
- Allergy to N-acetylcysteine or Methylprednisolone
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MethylprednisoloneAlso: methylprednisolone sodium succinateMethylprednisolone is a glucocorticoid, which is an adrenocortical steroid. The chemical name for methylprednisolone is pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione, 11,17,21-trihydroxy-6-methyl-, (6α,11β)-and the molecular weight is 374.48. It is an analog of naturally occurring glucocorticoid (hydrocortisone and cortisone), which also have salt-retaining properties, are used as replacement therapy in adrenocortical deficiency states. Methylprednisolone is used for their potent anti-inflammatory effects in disorders of many organ systems, it modify the body's immune responses to diverse stimuli. The usual dosage of medication varies in relation to pathology for which is prescribed: normally varies from about 40-60 mg per day up to very high doses of 30 mg/kg bolus as used in spinal cord injury. | Drug | Methylprednisolone |
| N-acetylcysteineAlso: N-acetyl cysteineAcetylcysteine is the N-acetyl derivative of the naturally occurring amino acid, L-cysteine. Chemically, it is N-acetyl-L-cysteine. The compound is a white crystalline powder which melts at 104°-110°C and has a very slight odor. Acetylcysteine may form cysteine, disulfides, and conjugates in vivo (N, N'-diacetylcysteine, N-acetylcysteine- cysteine, N-acetylcysteine-glutathione, N-acetylcysteine-protein, etc). No metabolites were identified. Acetylcysteine likely protects the liver by maintaining or restoring the glutathione levels, or by acting as an alternate substrate for conjugation with, and thus detoxification of, the reactive metabolite. | Drug | N-acetylcysteine |
Primary outcome
A decrease of 100 UI/L of AST and ALT compared with placebo.
Time frame: Systematic sampling of liver function tests the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7
The primary endpoint of the study is the modulation of the IR injury made by NAC and/or MET in patients undergoing liver surgery. For this purpose a decrease of 100 UI/L of AST and ALT is expected compared with placebo.
2 secondary outcomes
Difference in total bilirubin expression.
Time frame: Systematic sampling of liver function tests the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7
Difference in blood transfusions.
Time frame: Systematic sampling of liver function tests the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The first phase was completed). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2013.
Related trials for Ischemic Reperfusion Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Inflammatory Markers and Prognosis After Cerebral Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Large Vessel Occlusion
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safely Quenching Complement in Stroke Survivors
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Cerebral Infarction
Not yet recruiting
Head Cooling in Ischaemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy (COOLHEAD-2b)
Stroke, Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Reperfusion Injury After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Calcineurin Inhibitor in NEuRoloGically Deceased Donors to Decrease Kidney delaYed Graft Function (CINERGY)
Organ Transplant Failure or Rejection, Brain Death
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guido Torzilli, PhD principal investigator
Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia dell'Università degli Studi di Milano
Giovanni Bordone, PhD principal investigator
Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia dell'Università degli Studi di Milano
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Methylprednisolone and N-acetylcysteine in people with Ischemic Reperfusion Injury and Insufficiency; Hepatic, Postoperative, run by Istituto Clinico Humanitas at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The first phase was completed). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A decrease of 100 UI/L of AST and ALT compared with placebo. (time frame: Systematic sampling of liver function tests the day before the operation, at the end of the operation, as well as in postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.