AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT01726998

Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Subacute Stroke

A study testing Robot-assisted gait therapy and conventional gait training in people with Stroke and Hemiparetic Patients After Subacute Stroke, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators aimed in this study to investigate the effects of 4 weeks robot-assisted locomotor training on motor recovery of lower extremities and walking ability compared with the conventional gait training in subacute post-stroke non-ambulatory hemiplegic patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Robot-assisted gait therapy and conventional gait training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Mar 2012to May 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hemiparesis as result of 1st stroke
  • No other neurologic or orthopedic disorder
  • Independent ambulation before the stroke
  • No severe medical illnesses
  • Hemiparesis: lower extremity strength graded ≤ 3 in more than 2 muscle groups
  • Functional ambulation classification (FAC) ≤ 1 : indicating a need for personal assistance in ambulation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • The interval between stroke and start of the treatment
  • Time since stroke onset < 6 months
  • age: 20-80yrs old

Who cannot join

  • Unstable fractures
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Severe skin problems
  • Severe joint problems
  • Major difference in leg length,
  • Body weight over 130 kg,
  • Orthostatic circulatory problem
  • Severe cognitive impairment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Severance hospital

    Seoul, Seoul, 120-752

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

The investigators aimed in this study to investigate the effects of 4 weeks robot-assisted locomotor training on motor recovery of lower extremities and walking ability compared with the conventional gait training in subacute post-stroke non-ambulatory hemiplegic patients.

72 first-ever stroke patients who could not walk independently (FAC < 2), and suffered within 6 months were enrolled and randomly assigned into 2 groups. The subjects with congestive heart failure, malignancies, cardiopulmonary dysfunctions, and who could not walk independently before stroke attack were excluded.

Two groups received 30 minutes conventional gait training including Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT) basically. The robotic assisted locomotor training group received additional robotic-assisted gait therapy for 30minutes with Lokomat® (Hocoma, Zurich, Switzerland) daily for 4 weeks, and the conventional gait training group received additional daily conventional gait training with NDT for the same periods. The independent walking ability(FAC ≥ 3), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), Motricity index (MI), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Medical Research Council (MRC) for each lower extremity muscles were assessed before, during (2weeks) and after training. And the independent walking ability were followed until 3 months.

Being tested
Robot-assisted gait therapy, conventional gait training
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Robot-assisted gait therapyOther

    Two groups received 30 minutes conventional gait training including Neurodevelopmental Treatment(NDT) basically. Robot-assisted gait therapy for 30 minutes with Lokomat® (Hocoma, Zurich, Switzerland) daily for 4 weeks, and the conventional gait training group received additional daily conventional gait training with NDT for the same periods.

  • conventional gait trainingOther

    Two groups received 30 minutes conventional gait training including Neurodevelopmental Treatment(NDT) basically. Robot-assisted gait therapy for 30 minutes with Lokomat® (Hocoma, Zurich, Switzerland) daily for 4 weeks, and the conventional gait training group received additional daily conventional gait training with NDT for the same periods.

Study groups in NCT01726998
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lokomat GroupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Robot-assisted gait therapy
conventional gait training groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: conventional gait training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change of functional ambulation category point

    FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This is an 6-point scale.

    Measured: baseline, during training (2weeks), post training (4weeks) & followed for 2months after training

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionMay 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01726998
Sponsor's protocol ID
4-2012-0005
Status last verified
Feb 2014
First submitted
7 Nov 2012
Last updated
19 Feb 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Robot-assisted gait therapy and conventional gait training in people with Stroke and Hemiparetic Patients After Subacute Stroke, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change of functional ambulation category point (time frame: baseline, during training (2weeks), post training (4weeks) & followed for 2months after training). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in