Immune ThrombocytopeniaNCT01727999
Genome-Wide Gene Expression Profiling of Patients With ITP Receiving Thrombopoietin Mimetics
An observational study of Immune Thrombocytopenia, run by Stanford University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Introduction: Ineffective platelet production has been proven to play a role in the etiology of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in addition to increased platelet destruction. The second-generation thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics have shown good efficacy in boosting platelet counts in the great majority of patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Immune Thrombocytopenia
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Feb 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with ITP receiving TPO agonists
Who may be able to join
- clinical diagnosis of ITP TPO treatment
Who cannot join
- thrombocytopenia not due to ITP
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Weill Medical College, Cornell University
New York, New York, 10065
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Introduction:
Ineffective platelet production has been proven to play a role in the etiology of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in addition to increased platelet destruction. The second-generation thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics have shown good efficacy in boosting platelet counts in the great majority of patients with chronic ITP in several clinical trials.1, 2 Nevertheless, about 20% of patients with ITP fail to respond to the TPO mimetic treatment. Those treatment-resistant patients are un-characterized and the reasons for the lack of response have not been studied. The identification of predictive blood biomarkers of patients' response to treatment will be useful in reducing both cost and potential side effects; and it will be of equal importance and interest to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the patients' heterogeneous responses to TPO mimetic treatment.
Read more
Specific Aims:
- To identify blood classifier genes which correlate with patients' response to TPO mimetic treatment.
- To compare the blood gene expression changes in responders and non-responders after TPO mimetic treatment and explore the possible molecular mechanisms accounting for the non-responsiveness to the treatment.
Read the detailed description
- Identification and validation of response-predictive genes. The normalized pre-treatment microarray data of the training set is retrieved from SMD for statistical analysis. The supervised analysis SAM (Significance Analysis of Microarrays, two class unpaired) is performed to identify genes whose expression is significantly different between responders and non-responders. Then a Leave-one-out cross-validated gene-expression predictor for the 2 response classes is devised by the PAM (Predication Analysis of Microarrays) method based on nearest shrunken centroids. The unsupervised clustering of the independent test set is performed using the predictive genes and the prediction accuracy is calculated. Quantitative real-time PCR is performed as further validation using the un-amplified RNA samples and Taqman gene expression assays (Applied Biosciences).
- Gene expression changes correlated with TPO mimetic treatment and pathway analysis.
2.1. Hypothesis: The transcriptional profile of patients who respond to TPO agonists is different than those who do not respond.
Plan: The expression data of pre-treatment as well as the 1-week and 1-month after initiation of treatment samples is retrieved from SMD. The two class paired SAM analysis is performed to compare pre-treatment samples with samples collected at either 1-week or 1-month after initiation of treatment in responders and non-responders. The two class unpaired SAM analysis is also used to compare post-treatment samples of responders and non-responders at the same time point. The significant genes (q value<0.05, fold change>2.5) are subsequently analyzed by IPA (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis) system to be transformed into a set of relevant networks based on the extensive records maintained in the Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base. The statistically significant networks, molecular and cellular functions, top canonical pathways and toxicity lists associated with each pair of dataset will be recognized through this analysis. Hypothesis on non-response to TPO mimetics can be generated based on the different functional subsets of significant genes. Genes involved in important pathways identified by IPA analysis will be validated by QRT-PCR as in our recent publication on oxidative stress pathways in ITP4. Our goal is to develop biomarkers which predict likelihood of response to therapy and identify pathways associated with resistance to therapy which could be targeted.
2.2 Hypothesis: Since available TPO agonists have different mechanisms of action, there may be differences in responders and non-responders between the different drugs.
Plan: We recognize that TPO agonists have different mechanisms of action which could affect downstream signaling pathways and transcriptional responses. For this reason in addition to evaluating the TPO agonists as a group in 2.1 above, patients will also be analyzed by type of agonist. The conclusions of this type of analysis will be limited by the numbers of individuals treated with a particular drug but could be useful for hypothesis generation and confirmation in a larger cohort.
- Conditions
- Immune Thrombocytopenia
- Keywords
- TPO response, ITP, immune thrombocytopenia
- Medical subject headings
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TPO responder | Patients with therapeutic response to TPO | |
| TPO non-responder | Patients not responding to TPO agonists |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1. To identify blood classifier genes which correlate with patients' response to TPO mimetic treatment.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionFeb 2017
- Study completionFeb 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Immune ThrombocytopeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, James L Zehnder, Stanford University
- Investigators
- James L Zehnder, MD, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01727999
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPO 105489
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bussel JB, Cheng G, Saleh MN, Psaila B, Kovaleva L, Meddeb B, Kloczko J, Hassani H, Mayer B, Stone NL, Arning M, Provan D, Jenkins JM. Eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2237-47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073275.
PubMed 18046028Zhang B, Lo C, Shen L, Sood R, Jones C, Cusmano-Ozog K, Park-Snyder S, Wong W, Jeng M, Cowan T, Engleman EG, Zehnder JL. The role of vanin-1 and oxidative stress-related pathways in distinguishing acute and chronic pediatric ITP. Blood. 2011 Apr 28;117(17):4569-79. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-304931. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
PubMed 21325602Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T, Michel M, Provan D, Arnold DM, Bussel JB, Cines DB, Chong BH, Cooper N, Godeau B, Lechner K, Mazzucconi MG, McMillan R, Sanz MA, Imbach P, Blanchette V, Kuhne T, Ruggeri M, George JN. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood. 2009 Mar 12;113(11):2386-93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
PubMed 19005182Kuter DJ, Bussel JB, Lyons RM, Pullarkat V, Gernsheimer TB, Senecal FM, Aledort LM, George JN, Kessler CM, Sanz MA, Liebman HA, Slovick FT, de Wolf JT, Bourgeois E, Guthrie TH Jr, Newland A, Wasser JS, Hamburg SI, Grande C, Lefrere F, Lichtin AE, Tarantino MD, Terebelo HR, Viallard JF, Cuevas FJ, Go RS, Henry DH, Redner RL, Rice L, Schipperus MR, Guo DM, Nichol JL. Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Feb 2;371(9610):395-403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60203-2.
PubMed 18242413
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Genome-Wide Gene Expression Profiling of Patients With ITP Receiving Thrombopoietin Mimetics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01727999
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPO 105489
- Conditions
- Immune Thrombocytopenia
- Keywords
- TPO response, ITP, immune thrombocytopenia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Study start
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction:
Ineffective platelet production has been proven to play a role in the etiology of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in addition to increased platelet destruction. The second-generation thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics have shown good efficacy in boosting platelet counts in the great majority of patients with chronic ITP in several clinical trials.1, 2 Nevertheless, about 20% of patients with ITP fail to respond to the TPO mimetic treatment. Those treatment-resistant patients are un-characterized and the reasons for the lack of response have not been studied. The identification of predictive blood biomarkers of patients' response to treatment will be useful in reducing both cost and potential side effects; and it will be of equal importance and interest to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the patients' heterogeneous responses to TPO mimetic treatment.
Specific Aims:
- To identify blood classifier genes which correlate with patients' response to TPO mimetic treatment.
- To compare the blood gene expression changes in responders and non-responders after TPO mimetic treatment and explore the possible molecular mechanisms accounting for the non-responsiveness to the treatment.
Detailed description
- Identification and validation of response-predictive genes. The normalized pre-treatment microarray data of the training set is retrieved from SMD for statistical analysis. The supervised analysis SAM (Significance Analysis of Microarrays, two class unpaired) is performed to identify genes whose expression is significantly different between responders and non-responders. Then a Leave-one-out cross-validated gene-expression predictor for the 2 response classes is devised by the PAM (Predication Analysis of Microarrays) method based on nearest shrunken centroids. The unsupervised clustering of the independent test set is performed using the predictive genes and the prediction accuracy is calculated. Quantitative real-time PCR is performed as further validation using the un-amplified RNA samples and Taqman gene expression assays (Applied Biosciences).
- Gene expression changes correlated with TPO mimetic treatment and pathway analysis.
2.1. Hypothesis: The transcriptional profile of patients who respond to TPO agonists is different than those who do not respond.
Plan: The expression data of pre-treatment as well as the 1-week and 1-month after initiation of treatment samples is retrieved from SMD. The two class paired SAM analysis is performed to compare pre-treatment samples with samples collected at either 1-week or 1-month after initiation of treatment in responders and non-responders. The two class unpaired SAM analysis is also used to compare post-treatment samples of responders and non-responders at the same time point. The significant genes (q value<0.05, fold change>2.5) are subsequently analyzed by IPA (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis) system to be transformed into a set of relevant networks based on the extensive records maintained in the Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base. The statistically significant networks, molecular and cellular functions, top canonical pathways and toxicity lists associated with each pair of dataset will be recognized through this analysis. Hypothesis on non-response to TPO mimetics can be generated based on the different functional subsets of significant genes. Genes involved in important pathways identified by IPA analysis will be validated by QRT-PCR as in our recent publication on oxidative stress pathways in ITP4. Our goal is to develop biomarkers which predict likelihood of response to therapy and identify pathways associated with resistance to therapy which could be targeted.
2.2 Hypothesis: Since available TPO agonists have different mechanisms of action, there may be differences in responders and non-responders between the different drugs.
Plan: We recognize that TPO agonists have different mechanisms of action which could affect downstream signaling pathways and transcriptional responses. For this reason in addition to evaluating the TPO agonists as a group in 2.1 above, patients will also be analyzed by type of agonist. The conclusions of this type of analysis will be limited by the numbers of individuals treated with a particular drug but could be useful for hypothesis generation and confirmation in a larger cohort.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TPO responder | – | –Patients with therapeutic response to TPO |
| TPO non-responder | – | –Patients not responding to TPO agonists |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with ITP receiving TPO agonists
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- clinical diagnosis of ITP TPO treatment
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- thrombocytopenia not due to ITP
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
1. To identify blood classifier genes which correlate with patients' response to TPO mimetic treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2017.
- Background: PubMed 18046028Bussel JB, Cheng G, Saleh MN, Psaila B, Kovaleva L, Meddeb B, Kloczko J, Hassani H, Mayer B, Stone NL, Arning M, Provan D, Jenkins JM. Eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2237-47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073275.
- Background: PubMed 21325602Zhang B, Lo C, Shen L, Sood R, Jones C, Cusmano-Ozog K, Park-Snyder S, Wong W, Jeng M, Cowan T, Engleman EG, Zehnder JL. The role of vanin-1 and oxidative stress-related pathways in distinguishing acute and chronic pediatric ITP. Blood. 2011 Apr 28;117(17):4569-79. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-304931. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
- Background: PubMed 19005182Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T, Michel M, Provan D, Arnold DM, Bussel JB, Cines DB, Chong BH, Cooper N, Godeau B, Lechner K, Mazzucconi MG, McMillan R, Sanz MA, Imbach P, Blanchette V, Kuhne T, Ruggeri M, George JN. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood. 2009 Mar 12;113(11):2386-93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
- Background: PubMed 18242413Kuter DJ, Bussel JB, Lyons RM, Pullarkat V, Gernsheimer TB, Senecal FM, Aledort LM, George JN, Kessler CM, Sanz MA, Liebman HA, Slovick FT, de Wolf JT, Bourgeois E, Guthrie TH Jr, Newland A, Wasser JS, Hamburg SI, Grande C, Lefrere F, Lichtin AE, Tarantino MD, Terebelo HR, Viallard JF, Cuevas FJ, Go RS, Henry DH, Redner RL, Rice L, Schipperus MR, Guo DM, Nichol JL. Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Feb 2;371(9610):395-403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60203-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Tolerability of Ianalumab (VAY736) With Investigator's Choice Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist (IC TPO-RA) in Patients With Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), Primary Evans Syndrome (ES)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Pirtobrutinib in Participants With Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Tafasitamab in Adult Participants With Primary Autoimmune Blood Cell Disorders
Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Follow-up Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James L Zehnder, MD principal investigator
Stanford University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Immune Thrombocytopenia, run by Stanford University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1. To identify blood classifier genes which correlate with patients' response to TPO mimetic treatment. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01727999, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2017.