AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic RhinitisPhase 3GT-17NCT01728285

Compliance to the Treatment With GRAZAX® Tablets in Patients With Seasonal Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis

A Phase 3 study testing Electronic compliance device (Memozax®) in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Grass Allergy, run by ALK-Abelló A/S at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Adherence to treatment is crucial to the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy of allergic diseases. GRAZAX® is a registered drug in Europe, with established efficacy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, which has to be taken daily by patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Allergic Rhinitis, Grass Allergy
What is being tested?
Electronic compliance device (Memozax®)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
261 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Mar 2007to Oct 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A clinical history of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (with or without asthma) having received treatment during the previous grass pollen season.
  • Positive skin prick test (SPT) response (wheal diameter ≥3mm) to Phleum pratense
  • Positive specific IgE against Phleum pratense (IgE titer > class 2)

Who cannot join

  • Clinical history of chronic sinusitis during the last 2 years or of symptomatic perennial or seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma having received regular medication, due to another allergen during - or potentially overlapping - the grass pollen season.
  • Clinical history of severe asthma (GINA Step 4 and children with Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% of expected value after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and short-acting β2 agonists)
  • Previous treatment by immunotherapy with grass pollen allergen or any other allergen within the previous 5 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

    Pavia, PV, 27100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Multicentric Open Randomised, Cross-over Phase III Trial Assessing the Treatment Compliance With GRAZAX® in Subjects With Seasonal Grass Pollen Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis

Adherence to treatment is crucial to the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy of allergic diseases. GRAZAX® is a registered drug in Europe, with established efficacy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, which has to be taken daily by patients. This study was aimed to establish if a device with the characteristics of a mechanical dispenser (Memozax®) could improve adherence to treatment in subjects with hay fever due to allergy to grass

Being tested
Electronic compliance device (Memozax®)
Keywords
specific allergen immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, allergen tablets, compliance, electronic compliance device
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic, Patient Compliance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electronic compliance device (Memozax®)Device

    An electronic compliance device is distributed to patients allocated to the active arm

Study groups in NCT01728285
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Electronic compliance deviceActive comparatorPatients with grass allergy treated with allergen specific immunotherapy (GRAZAX®) using an electronic compliance device (Memozax®)
Receives: Device: Electronic compliance device (Memozax®)
No electronic compliance deviceNo interventionPatients with grass allergy treated with allergen specific immunotherapy (GRAZAX®) without any electronic compliance device (Memozax®)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To evaluate if compliance with grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet can be increased by providing an electronic compliance device (CED) (Memozax; a tablet-container with a programmable daily acoustic alarm)

    To evaluate if compliance of once daily dosing with Grazax in adult subjects with grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis can be increased by providing patients with an electronic compliance device. Compliance in the two groups (with Memozax and without Memozax) was evaluated by tablet counts

    Measured: up to 1 year per patient

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Impact of GRAZAX® treatment on QoL as compared to previous season

    To evaluate after one-year treatment with Grazax tablets the impact on quality of life in comparison with previous pollen seasons

    Measured: up to 1 year per patient

  2. Impact of GRAZAX® treatment on allergy symptoms as compared to previous season

    To evaluate after one-year treatment with Grazax tablets the impact on symptom score in comparison with previous pollen seasons

    Measured: up to 1 year per patient

  3. Impact of GRAZAX® on treatment acceptance as compared to previous season

    To evaluate after one-year treatment with Grazax tablets the impact on patient's acceptance in comparison with previous pollen seasons

    Measured: up to 1 year per patient

  4. Recording of all adverse events and serious adverse events

    The safety assessments included recording of all adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) findings from physical examinations and from vital signs

    Measured: up to 1 year per patient

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionJun 2009
  4. Study completionOct 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
261 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01728285
Sponsor's protocol ID
GT-17 ITALY
Other IDs
2006-004820-35
Acronym
GT-17
Status last verified
Nov 2012
First submitted
2 Nov 2012
Last updated
19 Nov 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Alesina R, Milani M, Pecora S. A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group trial assessing compliance, tolerability, safety, and efficacy to treatment with grass allergy tablets in 261 patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy (Cairo). 2012;2012:673502. doi: 10.1155/2012/673502. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

    PubMed 22131999

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Electronic compliance device (Memozax®) in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Grass Allergy, run by ALK-Abelló A/S at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To evaluate if compliance with grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet can be increased by providing an electronic compliance device (CED) (Memozax; a tablet-container with a programmable daily acoustic alarm) (time frame: up to 1 year per patient). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01728285, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in