EpilepsyPhase 4NCT01733394
Equivalence Among Antiepileptic Drug Generic and Brand Products in People With Epilepsy: Single-Dose 6-Period Replicate Design (EQUIGEN Single-Dose Study)
A Phase 4 study testing Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand" and lamotrigine in people with Epilepsy, run by University of Cincinnati at 8 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has specific rules which generic drug companies must follow to get a generic copy of a seizure medication approved. Currently, FDA approves generic drugs by requiring studies on normal volunteers who don't have epilepsy and who take just one dose of the generic drug… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Epilepsy
- What is being tested?
- Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand" and lamotrigine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Dec 2012to 26 Sep 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible subjects must satisfy the criteria below at the time of enrollment:
- 18 years or older.
- BMI not less than 18.5 and weight not less than 110 pounds.
- Not donated blood within the past 56 days before the first pharmacokinetic testing.
- Agrees not to donate blood at any time during the trial and for 56 days after the final PK in-facility admission.
- Has epilepsy for at least one year based on site PIs assessment.
Show all 26Show fewer
- Taking at least one AED, which is not the study medication (lamotrigine).
- No changes in AED regimen for at least 28 days prior to first pharmacokinetic testing.
- Have the ability to understand the informed consent form and be willing to provide informed consent.
- Willing to remain on same AED regimen through entire study. Subjects will be responsible to supply all of their concomitant medications (except for the study medication, lamotrigine).
- Willing to stay approximately 14 hours in the research facility on six separate occasions for pharmacokinetic testing.
- Willing to fast overnight and the morning of each of the six pharmacokinetic testing sessions.
- Willing to have at least 23 blood samples collected during the pharmacokinetic testing including the in-facility session and each of the following four mornings for 96 hours post the study medication dose to complete the sample collection for each of the 6 periods. The in-facility blood collections will mainly be performed using an inserted catheter. In the event of difficulty with the catheter, samples may be drawn by venipuncture. The outpatient collections will be drawn by venipuncture. The total amount of blood during each PK session will be equal to about 14 teaspoons (66.5 milliliters). The total amount of blood drawn throughout the entire study will be about 96 teaspoons (478.5 milliliters) or less. For reference, this amount is approximately equal to the quantity of blood drawn during a standard blood donation by the Red Cross.
- Willing to completely abstain from alcohol consumption for at least 24 hours prior to each pharmacokinetic testing admission until after the last sample is drawn for each period (~96 hours after the initial dose at each pharmacokinetic admission). We encourage no or minimal alcohol use throughout the study, but alcohol is not restricted at other times.
- Willing to remain on a consistent regimen of concomitant medications including over-the-counter drugs and herbal drugs, if they are being used and deemed to possibly affect the metabolism of the study medication.
- Willing to not eat grapefruit or drink grapefruit juice through the duration of the study.
- If a tobacco user, willing to continue with the same pattern of tobacco use, except that no tobacco use is permitted during the PK facility admissions of approximately 14 hours (includes all tobacco products).
- Willing to complete the subject diary as outlined in the protocol.
- Willing to adhere to all other protocol requirements as outlined in the informed consent document.
- Females must be either of non-childbearing potential (defined as having undergone surgical sterilization or postmenopausal (greater than 50 years old and amenorrhea for greater than or equal to 12 months) or must be using at least one acceptable method of contraception as follows:
- Double-barrier method (e.g. condom plus spermicide, condom plus diaphragm with spermicide)
- Hormonal contraceptive treatment (progesterone only agents - use of any agents containing estrogen are an exclusion for the lamotrigine testing)
- Intrauterine Device (IUD)
- Monogamous relationship with a vasectomized partner
- Abstinent for 8 weeks prior to and throughout the study.
- Subject must be at least 28 days from last participation in any other study.
Who cannot join
- Progressive CNS disorder that could influence adverse effects or seizure control.
- Known medication non-adherence. Non-adherence is assessed by the investigator based on the procedures defined in the manual of procedures.
- Taking the study medication (lamotrigine) within 28 days of enrollment.
- Use of valproate (as divalproex sodium or valproic acid), any form of estrogens, rifampin, orlistat, felbamate or sertraline within 28 days of study entry.
- Subject has a history of alcohol or substance abuse within 1 year prior to screening for study participation, or is currently using alcohol, drugs of abuse, or any prescribed or over-the-counter medication in a manner, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, indicates abuse.
- History of psychogenic seizures within the past 2 years.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Any clinically significant psychiatric illness or psychological or behavioral problem which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the subject being able to participate in the study or comply with the study requirements. .
- Any clinically significant laboratory abnormality or illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the conducting or interpretation of the study or put the subject at risk.
- History of allergic reaction with past use of the study medication (lamotrigine).
- More than two allergic reactions (actual allergy, not medication intolerance) to an AED or one serious hypersensitivity reaction to an AED.
- History of adverse effect associated with past use of the study medication (lamotrigine) which, in the opinion of the investigator, could pose substantial risk to the subject if it occurred during the trial.
- Pregnant or lactating within 56 days of enrollment.
- Unstable seizure control that makes AED changes likely during the course of the study.
- Use of rescue AEDs (e.g. benzodiazepines) during more than two weeks of the 2 months prior to enrollment.
- Subject is in the process of quitting smoking within 28 days of study entry or plans to quit smoking during the period of time the study will be conducted.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
United States8 sites
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0525
Drake University
Des Moines, Iowa, 50311-4505
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Kansas
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642-8673
About this study
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has specific rules which generic drug companies must follow to get a generic copy of a seizure medication approved. Currently, FDA approves generic drugs by requiring studies on normal volunteers who don't have epilepsy and who take just one dose of the generic drug followed by a series of blood tests. Some people with epilepsy and their physicians have complained about side effects or loss of seizure control when taking generic drugs, but no one knows if these complaints are truly because of problems with the generic drugs.
This research is to determine whether several different generic versions and the brand version of the medication lamotrigine perform in a similar way when given to people with epilepsy.
The study drug Lamictal® (lamotrigine) and both of the generic forms of lamotrigine to be tested are approved by the FDA for the treatment of seizures.
Read the detailed description
The study proposed in this protocol will determine if bioequivalence testing performed for the FDA translates into similar bioequivalence in a population of people with epilepsy when switching among different generics of the anti-epileptic drug (AED). Based on a variety of pharmacokinetic (PK) data and clinical reports of concern, the example anti epilepsy drug (AED) used for this study will be lamotrigine (LTG).
In this single dose study, people with epilepsy taking AEDs, but not currently taking the test medication, lamotrigine, will be studied. We will use an order-randomized three-sequence six-period replicate design with the two most disparate generics studied in two replicate periods each and the brand (reference) product studied in two additional periods. A standard single dose of the test drug (lamotrigine 25mg) will be administered under controlled conditions (fasting with subsequent standardized meals) with a 12-hour in-facility blood sample collection followed by a collection every 24 hours for a total of a 96 hour sample collection that will be used to establish the pharmacokinetic measures of Cmax, AUC96 and AUC∞. Each period will be separated by at least a 12 day washout interval.
The replicate studies will be used to determine the intra-individual variability of the pharmacokinetic responses of the brand and the two generic products, as well as subject-by-formulation interaction variances. The data will also be used to calculate simultaneously all parameters that are needed to compare the 3 products in average and individual bioequivalence and outlier analyses. The differences between the disparate generics will be used to establish if the current standards translate to equivalence within the limits of the brand intra-subject variation.
The factors we will use to determine the most disparate generics include the results from the in vivo data from the ABE studies submitted to the FDA in the ANDA and in vitro chemical assay (potency) and dissolution data performed on several currently available lots. The intent is to study the specific lot of the generic product predicted to result in the lowest levels and compare it to the specific lot from another generic product predicted to result in the highest levels. Similarly, if multiple lots of the brand products are available, we will perform in vitro testing to establish the most desirable lot to study.
Factors that alter metabolism, including concomitant AEDs that may have hepatic enzyme induction effects will be tracked but not excluded, as long as the dose remains constant, as the goal is to reproduce the 'real life' situation as closely as possible within the practical limits of funding and study size. Subjects receiving valproate as concomitant medication will be excluded because the prolongation of half life would not allow LTG to reliably be completely cleared by 13 days. The criteria that establish an enriched population will also be tracked and used in a secondary analysis, but will not be used as an inclusion requirement. The enriched population is defined as people who experienced an otherwise unexplained increase in seizures or adverse effects, or a substantial change in AED level after a switch in AED products.
The discovery of any subject-by-formulation interaction outliers (i.e. subjects with differential pharmacokinetic reactions to a pair of formulations) will raise considerable concerns about equivalence. Recently established methods in the statistical analysis of outliers in crossover studies will be used to determine if any outliers are present.
Qualified subjects will be screened and upon fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria and signing the informed consent will be enrolled in the study and enter the randomization phase (2-30 days). Subjects will be randomized according to a sealed allocation list that will be balanced for sequence and provided to each site prior to the first subject enrollment. Subjects that withdraw prior to completing the third period will be replaced in a randomized manner. The randomization list will be generated by the study statistical group. There are six test periods in three sequences for a sequence-randomized study. During two test periods subjects will receive a single dose of the brand AED and during the other four test periods subjects will receive a single dose from one of the two investigated generics (each twice). The single doses will be administered in the fasting state during an in-facility 12-hour pharmacokinetic session to collect samples to determine Cmax and AUCs. Four additional samples will be drawn at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after the dose as an outpatient (making each pharmacokinetic test last for 4 days). Each in-facility pharmacokinetic testing will be separated by a 12-23 day washout period; consistent washout periods of 14 days will be preferred. A final follow-up phone evaluation will be conducted 12-16 days (target 14 days) after the last dose. During the study the subjects will continue their usual concomitant medications, including AEDs, without change.
Investigators will compare the AED levels as measured by Cmax and AUC in each group using average bioequivalence (ABE) and individual bioequivalence (IBE) criteria. Average bioequivalence will be established if the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean of Cmax and AUCs for the most disparate generic products compared to each other are entirely within the 80%-125% range (the FDA criteria for bioequivalence) using the two one-sided standard analyses. Otherwise the products will be considered to not be bioequivalent. Similarly, the products will be considered to not be bioequivalent if the criteria for IBE for each generic product compared to the brand product are not met.
Study Population: Approximately 54 subjects (45 subjects to completion).
Number of centers: 3 sites enrolling approximately 18 subjects each.
Duration of study: Approximately 1 year.
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Being tested
- Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand", lamotrigine
- Keywords
- Epilepsy, Generic
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand"Drug
Also called Lamotrigine
lamotrigineDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Brand - Generic B | Experimental | Sequence 1 Receives: Drug: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand"; Drug: lamotrigine |
| Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Generic A - Brand | Experimental | Sequence 2 Receives: Drug: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand"; Drug: lamotrigine |
| Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic B- Generic A | Experimental | Sequence 3 Receives: Drug: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand"; Drug: lamotrigine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bioequivalence for generic 1 compared to generic 2
To determine if Cmax or AUC are significantly different in the high generic product compared to the low generic product taking one as the reference and the other as the test product. Bioequivalence will be established per the current FDA ABE criteria if the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean of Cmax and AUC for the high generic product compared to the low generic product are entirely within the 80%-125% range using the two one-sided standard analyses
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Intra-subject variances
To measure the intra-subject variances of the investigated REFERENCE (BRAND) AND generic products, as well as subject-by-interaction variances, by using two replicate periods for THE REFERENCE PRODUCT AND TWO REPLICATE PERIODS FOR each generic product. These estimated variances will be used to investigate individual bioequivalence and detect subject-by-formulation interaction outliers
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study start12 Dec 2012
- Primary completion26 Sep 2016
- Study completion26 Sep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CincinnatiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cincinnati
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Epilepsy Society, Epilepsy Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Privitera, University of Cincinnati
- Investigators
- Michael D. Privitera, MD, Principal investigator, University of CincinnatiMichel J Berg, MD, Principal investigator, University of Rochester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01733394
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EQUIGEN Single Dose Protocol
- Other IDs
- 005-1005
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Berg M, Welty TE, Gidal BE, Diaz FJ, Krebill R, Szaflarski JP, Dworetzky BA, Pollard JR, Elder EJ Jr, Jiang W, Jiang X, Switzer RD, Privitera MD. Bioequivalence Between Generic and Branded Lamotrigine in People With Epilepsy: The EQUIGEN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Aug 1;74(8):919-926. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0497.
PubMed 28654954
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Equivalence Among Antiepileptic Drug Generic and Brand Products in People With Epilepsy: Single-Dose 6-Period Replicate Design (EQUIGEN Single-Dose Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01733394
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EQUIGEN Single Dose Protocol
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Keywords
- Epilepsy, Generic
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CincinnatiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Epilepsy Society, Epilepsy Foundation
- Study start
- 12 Dec 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has specific rules which generic drug companies must follow to get a generic copy of a seizure medication approved. Currently, FDA approves generic drugs by requiring studies on normal volunteers who don't have epilepsy and who take just one dose of the generic drug followed by a series of blood tests. Some people with epilepsy and their physicians have complained about side effects or loss of seizure control when taking generic drugs, but no one knows if these complaints are truly because of problems with the generic drugs.
This research is to determine whether several different generic versions and the brand version of the medication lamotrigine perform in a similar way when given to people with epilepsy.
The study drug Lamictal® (lamotrigine) and both of the generic forms of lamotrigine to be tested are approved by the FDA for the treatment of seizures.
Detailed description
The study proposed in this protocol will determine if bioequivalence testing performed for the FDA translates into similar bioequivalence in a population of people with epilepsy when switching among different generics of the anti-epileptic drug (AED). Based on a variety of pharmacokinetic (PK) data and clinical reports of concern, the example anti epilepsy drug (AED) used for this study will be lamotrigine (LTG).
In this single dose study, people with epilepsy taking AEDs, but not currently taking the test medication, lamotrigine, will be studied. We will use an order-randomized three-sequence six-period replicate design with the two most disparate generics studied in two replicate periods each and the brand (reference) product studied in two additional periods. A standard single dose of the test drug (lamotrigine 25mg) will be administered under controlled conditions (fasting with subsequent standardized meals) with a 12-hour in-facility blood sample collection followed by a collection every 24 hours for a total of a 96 hour sample collection that will be used to establish the pharmacokinetic measures of Cmax, AUC96 and AUC∞. Each period will be separated by at least a 12 day washout interval.
The replicate studies will be used to determine the intra-individual variability of the pharmacokinetic responses of the brand and the two generic products, as well as subject-by-formulation interaction variances. The data will also be used to calculate simultaneously all parameters that are needed to compare the 3 products in average and individual bioequivalence and outlier analyses. The differences between the disparate generics will be used to establish if the current standards translate to equivalence within the limits of the brand intra-subject variation.
The factors we will use to determine the most disparate generics include the results from the in vivo data from the ABE studies submitted to the FDA in the ANDA and in vitro chemical assay (potency) and dissolution data performed on several currently available lots. The intent is to study the specific lot of the generic product predicted to result in the lowest levels and compare it to the specific lot from another generic product predicted to result in the highest levels. Similarly, if multiple lots of the brand products are available, we will perform in vitro testing to establish the most desirable lot to study.
Factors that alter metabolism, including concomitant AEDs that may have hepatic enzyme induction effects will be tracked but not excluded, as long as the dose remains constant, as the goal is to reproduce the 'real life' situation as closely as possible within the practical limits of funding and study size. Subjects receiving valproate as concomitant medication will be excluded because the prolongation of half life would not allow LTG to reliably be completely cleared by 13 days. The criteria that establish an enriched population will also be tracked and used in a secondary analysis, but will not be used as an inclusion requirement. The enriched population is defined as people who experienced an otherwise unexplained increase in seizures or adverse effects, or a substantial change in AED level after a switch in AED products.
The discovery of any subject-by-formulation interaction outliers (i.e. subjects with differential pharmacokinetic reactions to a pair of formulations) will raise considerable concerns about equivalence. Recently established methods in the statistical analysis of outliers in crossover studies will be used to determine if any outliers are present.
Qualified subjects will be screened and upon fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria and signing the informed consent will be enrolled in the study and enter the randomization phase (2-30 days). Subjects will be randomized according to a sealed allocation list that will be balanced for sequence and provided to each site prior to the first subject enrollment. Subjects that withdraw prior to completing the third period will be replaced in a randomized manner. The randomization list will be generated by the study statistical group. There are six test periods in three sequences for a sequence-randomized study. During two test periods subjects will receive a single dose of the brand AED and during the other four test periods subjects will receive a single dose from one of the two investigated generics (each twice). The single doses will be administered in the fasting state during an in-facility 12-hour pharmacokinetic session to collect samples to determine Cmax and AUCs. Four additional samples will be drawn at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after the dose as an outpatient (making each pharmacokinetic test last for 4 days). Each in-facility pharmacokinetic testing will be separated by a 12-23 day washout period; consistent washout periods of 14 days will be preferred. A final follow-up phone evaluation will be conducted 12-16 days (target 14 days) after the last dose. During the study the subjects will continue their usual concomitant medications, including AEDs, without change.
Investigators will compare the AED levels as measured by Cmax and AUC in each group using average bioequivalence (ABE) and individual bioequivalence (IBE) criteria. Average bioequivalence will be established if the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean of Cmax and AUCs for the most disparate generic products compared to each other are entirely within the 80%-125% range (the FDA criteria for bioequivalence) using the two one-sided standard analyses. Otherwise the products will be considered to not be bioequivalent. Similarly, the products will be considered to not be bioequivalent if the criteria for IBE for each generic product compared to the brand product are not met.
Study Population: Approximately 54 subjects (45 subjects to completion).
Number of centers: 3 sites enrolling approximately 18 subjects each.
Duration of study: Approximately 1 year.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Brand - Generic B | Experimental | Drug: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand", Drug: lamotrigineSequence 1 |
| Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Generic A - Brand | Experimental | Drug: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand", Drug: lamotrigineSequence 2 |
| Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic B- Generic A | Experimental | Drug: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand", Drug: lamotrigineSequence 3 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (26 listed)
- 18 years or older.
- BMI not less than 18.5 and weight not less than 110 pounds.
- Not donated blood within the past 56 days before the first pharmacokinetic testing.
- Agrees not to donate blood at any time during the trial and for 56 days after the final PK in-facility admission.
- Has epilepsy for at least one year based on site PIs assessment.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Progressive CNS disorder that could influence adverse effects or seizure control.
- Known medication non-adherence. Non-adherence is assessed by the investigator based on the procedures defined in the manual of procedures.
- Taking the study medication (lamotrigine) within 28 days of enrollment.
- Use of valproate (as divalproex sodium or valproic acid), any form of estrogens, rifampin, orlistat, felbamate or sertraline within 28 days of study entry.
- Subject has a history of alcohol or substance abuse within 1 year prior to screening for study participation, or is currently using alcohol, drugs of abuse, or any prescribed or over-the-counter medication in a manner, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, indicates abuse.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand"Also: Lamotrigine | Drug | Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic B- Generic A, Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Brand - Generic B, Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Generic A - Brand |
| lamotrigine | Drug | Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic B- Generic A, Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Brand - Generic B, Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Generic A - Brand |
Primary outcome
Bioequivalence for generic 1 compared to generic 2
Time frame: 18 months
To determine if Cmax or AUC are significantly different in the high generic product compared to the low generic product taking one as the reference and the other as the test product. Bioequivalence will be established per the current FDA ABE criteria if the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean of Cmax and AUC for the high generic product compared to the low generic product are entirely within the 80%-125% range using the two one-sided standard analyses
1 secondary outcome
Intra-subject variances
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28654954Berg M, Welty TE, Gidal BE, Diaz FJ, Krebill R, Szaflarski JP, Dworetzky BA, Pollard JR, Elder EJ Jr, Jiang W, Jiang X, Switzer RD, Privitera MD. Bioequivalence Between Generic and Branded Lamotrigine in People With Epilepsy: The EQUIGEN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Aug 1;74(8):919-926. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0497.
Related trials for Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trial of SEEG for Drug-resistant Epilepsy
Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Carisbamate as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With LGS in Children and Adults
Seizures, Lennox Gastaut Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael D. Privitera, MD principal investigator
University of Cincinnati
Michel J Berg, MD principal investigator
University of Rochester
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand" and lamotrigine in people with Epilepsy, run by University of Cincinnati at 8 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 26 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bioequivalence for generic 1 compared to generic 2 (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01733394, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2017.