Dermatitis, AtopicNCT01737710
Atopic Dermatitis Research Network (ADRN) Influenza Vaccine Study
A study testing Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine and Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine in people with Dermatitis, Atopic, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Atopic dermatitis, also called eczema, is a disease in which the skin is dry and scaly with severe itching. People who have atopic dermatitis often have complications from skin infections; these can include eczema herpeticum after herpes simplex virus infection or eczema vaccinatum after smallpox vaccination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dermatitis, Atopic
- What is being tested?
- Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine and Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 368 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to May 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled in the ADRN Registry study;
- Active, mild to severe AD (lesions present) with or without a history of eczema herpeticum or who are non-atopic as diagnosed using the ADRN Standard Diagnostic Criteria; and
- Willing to sign the informed consent form prior to initiation of any study procedure.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating. Women of child bearing potential must avoid becoming pregnant (use of an effective method of contraception or abstinence) for the duration of their participation in the study;
- Have a known allergy to any component of the Fluzone® Intradermal or Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccines, including egg protein, or have had a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of any influenza vaccine;
- known or suspected congenital or acquired immunodeficiency or who have had immunosuppressive therapy (excluding steroids) such as anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the preceding 6 months;
- Received systemic steroid therapy for 2 or more weeks at a dose ≥ 20 mg/day prednisone equivalent within 1 month prior to the day of vaccination or expect to receive within 3 weeks post-vaccination;
- Received a cumulative dose of inhaled and/or intranasally administered corticosteroids ≥ 880 mcg/day fluticasone equivalent for 2 or more weeks within 1 month prior to the day of vaccination or expect to receive within 3 weeks post-vaccination;
- A chronic illness, including but not limited to, cardiac, renal, or auto-immune disorders, or diabetes, at a stage that could interfere with study conduct or completion, based on the opinion of the Investigator. Asthma and underlying allergic conditions such as allergic rhinitis are not exclusionary;
Show all 16Show fewer
- A neoplastic disease or any hematologic malignancy. Participants who have been disease free for at least six months will not be excluded;
- Participated in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or a medical procedure in the four weeks preceding the study vaccination or who plan to participate in another clinical trial during the present study period;
- Any skin disease other than AD that might compromise the stratum corneum barrier (e.g., bullous disease, psoriasis, cutaneous T cell lymphoma [also called Mycosis Fungoides or Sezary syndrome], dermatitis herpetiformis, Hailey-Hailey, or Darier's disease);
- Received blood or blood-derived products that might interfere with the assessment of immune response in the past 3 months prior to vaccination or who plan to receive such products during the study period;
- Received previous vaccination (Fluzone® or another vaccine) against influenza in the past 6 months prior to vaccination;
- Received any other live vaccines within 4 weeks or inactivated vaccines within 2 weeks prior to study vaccination or who plan to receive any vaccination during the study period;
- Thrombocytopenia or bleeding disorder in the 3 weeks preceding vaccination;
- Personal or family history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome;
- A first degree relative already enrolled in the study;
- Determined to be ineligible based on the opinion of the Investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
National Jewish Health
Denver, Colorado, 80206
Oregon Health & Science University
Protland, Oregon, 97239
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Open Label Mechanistic Study in Atopic Dermatitis to Assess the Immunogenicity of Fluzone® Intradermal and Intramuscular Vaccines
Atopic dermatitis, also called eczema, is a disease in which the skin is dry and scaly with severe itching. People who have atopic dermatitis often have complications from skin infections; these can include eczema herpeticum after herpes simplex virus infection or eczema vaccinatum after smallpox vaccination. People with atopic dermatitis may suffer from skin infections and may therefore respond differently to vaccinations.
A new flu vaccine which is injected into the skin instead of into muscle has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for vaccination of the general population including patients with atopic dermatitis. This new vaccine has been shown to work as well as the vaccine which is injected into muscle when tested in people without atopic dermatitis. The main purpose of this study is to compare how people with atopic dermatitis respond to this new flu vaccine compared to non-atopic volunteers without atopic dermatitis. The second purpose is to look at how people with atopic dermatitis respond to the new vaccine which is injected into the skin compared to the vaccine which is injected into muscle.
- Conditions
- Dermatitis, Atopic
- Being tested
- Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine, Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine
- Keywords
- Influenza Vaccines, Dermatitis, Injections, Intradermal, Injections, Intramuscular, Skin Diseases, Skin Diseases, Eczematous, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity, Immune System Diseases, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Skin Diseases, Genetic
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Influenza, Human, Dermatitis, Skin Diseases, Skin Diseases, Eczematous, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity, Immune System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluzone® Intradermal VaccineBiological
Also called Influenza Virus Trivalent Vaccine (Types A and B) (Avian), Influenza Virus Vaccine, 2012-2013 Formula
A 0.1mL single-dose, in a latex-free, pre-filled microinjection system with an ultra-fine micro-needle. The active substance is prepared from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. Fluzone® Intradermal is approved for use in persons 18 through 64 years of age and will be purchased from Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.
Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccineBiological
Also called Influenza Virus Trivalent Vaccine (Types A and B) (Avian), Influenza Virus Vaccine, 2012-2013 Formula
A 0.5 mL single-dose delivered via syringe using single-dose vials. The active substance is prepared from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. Fluzone® for intramuscular injection is approved for persons 6 months and older and will be purchased from Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 92 Non-atopic controls vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal | Experimental | Non-atopic controls who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® Intradermal influenza vaccine via a single-dose pre-filled microinjection system (0.1mL). Receives: Biological: Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine |
| Moderate to severe AD vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal | Experimental | 92 moderate to severe atopic dermatitis participants who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® Intradermal influenza vaccine via a single-dose pre-filled microinjection system (0.1mL). Receives: Biological: Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine |
| Moderate to severe AD vaccinated with Fluzone® (Intramuscular) | Active comparator | 92 moderate to severe atopic dermatitis participants who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® (Intramuscular) influenza vaccine from 0.5 mL single dose vials. Receives: Biological: Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine |
| Non-atopic controls vaccinated with Fluzone® (Intramuscular) | Active comparator | 20 non-atopic controls who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® (Intramuscular) influenza vaccine from 0.5 mL single dose vials. Receives: Biological: Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine |
| Mild AD participants vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal | Experimental | 20 mild atopic dermatitis participants who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® Intradermal influenza vaccine via a single-dose pre-filled microinjection system (0.1mL). Receives: Biological: Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Seroprotection, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza B
The difference in the percent of participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza B at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza B. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percent of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 post vaccination
Seroprotection, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H1N1
The difference in the percentage of participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza H1N1 at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H1N1. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroprotection, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H3N2
The difference in the percentage of participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza H3N2 at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H3N2. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Secondary outcomes (12)
Fold-difference in Geometric Mean Serum Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza B
The fold-difference (defined as a ratio to describe the change from baseline to Day 28) in geometric mean serum HAI antibody titers against influenza B between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. A fold-difference of greater than 1 indicated an increase in HAI antibody titers against influenza B as a result of vaccination; therefore, higher numbers indicate a greater probability of avoiding disease if infected with influenza B. Participants who achieved seroprotection (which is defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza B) prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis.
Measured: Day 28 post vaccination
Fold-difference in Geometric Mean Serum Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H1N1
The fold-difference (defined as a ratio to describe the change from baseline to Day 28) in geometric mean serum HAI antibody titers against influenza H1N1 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. A fold-difference of greater than or equal to 1 indicated an increase in HAI antibody titers against influenza H1N1 as a result of vaccination; therefore, higher numbers indicate a greater probability of avoiding disease if infected with influenza H1N1. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis, which is defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H1N1.
Measured: Day 28 post vaccination
Fold-difference in Geometric Mean Serum Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H3N2
The fold-difference (defined as a ratio to describe the change from baseline to Day 28) in geometric mean serum HAI antibody titers against influenza H3N2 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. A fold-difference of greater than or equal to 1 indicated an increase in HAI antibody titers against influenza H3N2 as a result of vaccination; therefore, higher numbers indicate a greater probability of avoiding disease if infected with influenza H3N2 Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis, which is defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H3N2.
Measured: Day 28 post vaccination
Seroprotection, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza B
The difference in the percentage of moderate to severe AD participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza B at Day 28 between those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine and those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone (Intramuscular) vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza B. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 post vaccination
Seroprotection, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H1N1
The difference in the percentage of moderate to severe AD participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza H1N1 at Day 28 between those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine and those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone (Intramuscular) vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H1N1. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroprotection, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H3N2
The difference in the percentage of moderate to severe AD participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza H3N2 at Day 28 between those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine and those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone (Intramuscular) vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H3N2. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza B
The difference in the percentage of participants that achieved seroconversion at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination-inhibition [HAI] antibody titers against influenza B compared to baseline values, which represents the minimum intended effect of vaccination. Participants who achieved seroprotection, defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza B, prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe AD, Intradermal - Influenza H1N1
The difference in the percentage of participants that achieved seroconversion at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination-inhibition [HAI] antibody titers against influenza H1N1 compared to baseline values, which represents the minimum intended effect of vaccination. Participants who achieved seroprotection, defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H1N1, prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H3N2
The difference in the percentage of participants that achieved seroconversion at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination-inhibition [HAI] antibody titers against influenza H3N2 compared to baseline values, which represents the minimum intended effect of vaccination. Participants who achieved seroprotection, defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H3N2, prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza B
The difference in the percentage of moderate to severe AD participants that achieved seroconversion at Day 28 between those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine and those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone (Intramuscular) vaccine. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination-inhibition [HAI] antibody titers against influenza B compared to baseline values, which represents the minimum intended effect of vaccination. Participants who achieved seroprotection, defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza B, prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H1N1
The difference in the percentage of moderate to severe AD participants that achieved seroconversion at Day 28 between those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine and those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone (Intramuscular) vaccine. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination-inhibition [HAI] antibody titers against influenza H1N1 compared to baseline values, which represents the minimum intended effect of vaccination. Participants who achieved seroprotection, defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H1N1, prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H3N2
The difference in the percentage of moderate to severe AD participants that achieved seroconversion at Day 28 between those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine and those given a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone (Intramuscular) vaccine. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in serum hemagglutination-inhibition [HAI] antibody titers against influenza H3N2 compared to baseline values, which represents the minimum intended effect of vaccination. Participants who achieved seroprotection, defined as having a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H3N2, prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Measured: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dermatitis, AtopicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 368 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Atopic Dermatitis Research Network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Donald Leung, MD, PhD, Study chair, National Jewish Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01737710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DAIT ADRN-05
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Leung DY, Gao PS, Grigoryev DN, Rafaels NM, Streib JE, Howell MD, Taylor PA, Boguniewicz M, Canniff J, Armstrong B, Zaccaro DJ, Schneider LC, Hata TR, Hanifin JM, Beck LA, Weinberg A, Barnes KC. Human atopic dermatitis complicated by eczema herpeticum is associated with abnormalities in IFN-gamma response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Apr;127(4):965-73.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.010.
PubMed 21458658Prymula R, Siegrist CA, Chlibek R, Zemlickova H, Vackova M, Smetana J, Lommel P, Kaliskova E, Borys D, Schuerman L. Effect of prophylactic paracetamol administration at time of vaccination on febrile reactions and antibody responses in children: two open-label, randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1339-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61208-3.
PubMed 19837254Pulendran B, Li S, Nakaya HI. Systems vaccinology. Immunity. 2010 Oct 29;33(4):516-29. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006.
PubMed 21029962Schneider L, Weinberg A, Boguniewicz M, Taylor P, Oettgen H, Heughan L, Zaccaro D, Armstrong B, Holliday A, Leung DY. Immune response to varicella vaccine in children with atopic dermatitis compared with nonatopic controls. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Dec;126(6):1306-7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.010.
PubMed 20889193Leung DYM, Jepson B, Beck LA, Hanifin JM, Schneider LC, Paller AS, Monti K, David G, Canniff J, Lorenzo MG, Weinberg A. A clinical trial of intradermal and intramuscular seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1575-1582.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.952. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
PubMed 28209343Jalbert E, Lussier S, Johnson MJ, Jepson B, Calatroni A, David G, Leung D, Weinberg A. Lower influenza-specific cell-mediated immune responses in individuals with atopic dermatitis compared with healthy controls. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1;16(11):2727-2735. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1747374. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
PubMed 32347777
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Open Label Mechanistic Study in Atopic Dermatitis to Assess the Immunogenicity of Fluzone® Intradermal and Intramuscular Vaccines
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01737710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DAIT ADRN-05
- Conditions
- Dermatitis, Atopic
- Keywords
- Influenza Vaccines, Dermatitis, Injections, Intradermal, Injections, Intramuscular, Skin Diseases, Skin Diseases, Eczematous, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 368 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Atopic Dermatitis Research Network
- Study start
- Oct 2012
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atopic dermatitis, also called eczema, is a disease in which the skin is dry and scaly with severe itching. People who have atopic dermatitis often have complications from skin infections; these can include eczema herpeticum after herpes simplex virus infection or eczema vaccinatum after smallpox vaccination. People with atopic dermatitis may suffer from skin infections and may therefore respond differently to vaccinations.
A new flu vaccine which is injected into the skin instead of into muscle has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for vaccination of the general population including patients with atopic dermatitis. This new vaccine has been shown to work as well as the vaccine which is injected into muscle when tested in people without atopic dermatitis. The main purpose of this study is to compare how people with atopic dermatitis respond to this new flu vaccine compared to non-atopic volunteers without atopic dermatitis. The second purpose is to look at how people with atopic dermatitis respond to the new vaccine which is injected into the skin compared to the vaccine which is injected into muscle.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 92 Non-atopic controls vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal | Experimental | Biological: Fluzone® Intradermal VaccineNon-atopic controls who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® Intradermal influenza vaccine via a single-dose pre-filled microinjection system (0.1mL). |
| Moderate to severe AD vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal | Experimental | Biological: Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine92 moderate to severe atopic dermatitis participants who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® Intradermal influenza vaccine via a single-dose pre-filled microinjection system (0.1mL). |
| Moderate to severe AD vaccinated with Fluzone® (Intramuscular) | Active comparator | Biological: Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine92 moderate to severe atopic dermatitis participants who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® (Intramuscular) influenza vaccine from 0.5 mL single dose vials. |
| Non-atopic controls vaccinated with Fluzone® (Intramuscular) | Active comparator | Biological: Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine20 non-atopic controls who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® (Intramuscular) influenza vaccine from 0.5 mL single dose vials. |
| Mild AD participants vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal | Experimental | Biological: Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine20 mild atopic dermatitis participants who will receive a single dose of the seasonal 2012-2013 Fluzone® Intradermal influenza vaccine via a single-dose pre-filled microinjection system (0.1mL). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Enrolled in the ADRN Registry study;
- Active, mild to severe AD (lesions present) with or without a history of eczema herpeticum or who are non-atopic as diagnosed using the ADRN Standard Diagnostic Criteria; and
- Willing to sign the informed consent form prior to initiation of any study procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating. Women of child bearing potential must avoid becoming pregnant (use of an effective method of contraception or abstinence) for the duration of their participation in the study;
- Have a known allergy to any component of the Fluzone® Intradermal or Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccines, including egg protein, or have had a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of any influenza vaccine;
- known or suspected congenital or acquired immunodeficiency or who have had immunosuppressive therapy (excluding steroids) such as anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the preceding 6 months;
- Received systemic steroid therapy for 2 or more weeks at a dose ≥ 20 mg/day prednisone equivalent within 1 month prior to the day of vaccination or expect to receive within 3 weeks post-vaccination;
- Received a cumulative dose of inhaled and/or intranasally administered corticosteroids ≥ 880 mcg/day fluticasone equivalent for 2 or more weeks within 1 month prior to the day of vaccination or expect to receive within 3 weeks post-vaccination;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluzone® Intradermal VaccineAlso: Influenza Virus Trivalent Vaccine (Types A and B) (Avian), Influenza Virus Vaccine, 2012-2013 FormulaA 0.1mL single-dose, in a latex-free, pre-filled microinjection system with an ultra-fine micro-needle. The active substance is prepared from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. Fluzone® Intradermal is approved for use in persons 18 through 64 years of age and will be purchased from Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. | Biological | 92 Non-atopic controls vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal, Mild AD participants vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal, Moderate to severe AD vaccinated with Fluzone® Intradermal |
| Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccineAlso: Influenza Virus Trivalent Vaccine (Types A and B) (Avian), Influenza Virus Vaccine, 2012-2013 FormulaA 0.5 mL single-dose delivered via syringe using single-dose vials. The active substance is prepared from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. Fluzone® for intramuscular injection is approved for persons 6 months and older and will be purchased from Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. | Biological | Moderate to severe AD vaccinated with Fluzone® (Intramuscular), Non-atopic controls vaccinated with Fluzone® (Intramuscular) |
Primary outcome
Seroprotection, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza B
Time frame: Day 28 post vaccination
The difference in the percent of participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza B at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza B. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percent of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Seroprotection, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H1N1
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
The difference in the percentage of participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza H1N1 at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H1N1. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
Seroprotection, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H3N2
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
The difference in the percentage of participants that achieved seroprotection against influenza H3N2 at Day 28 between non-AD and moderate to severe AD participants, following a single dose (0.1mL) of the seasonal 2012 - 2013 Fluzone Intradermal vaccine. Seroprotection is defined as having a serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer of 1:40 or greater, which represents a sufficient antibody amount to avoid disease in half of the individuals infected with influenza H3N2. Participants who achieved seroprotection prior to vaccination were excluded from the analysis. The goal was to examine whether there was a difference between the two groups in the percentage of participants who achieved seroprotection at Day 28 who were not seroprotected prior to vaccination.
12 secondary outcomes
Fold-difference in Geometric Mean Serum Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza B
Time frame: Day 28 post vaccination
Fold-difference in Geometric Mean Serum Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H1N1
Time frame: Day 28 post vaccination
Fold-difference in Geometric Mean Serum Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H3N2
Time frame: Day 28 post vaccination
Seroprotection, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza B
Time frame: Day 28 post vaccination
Seroprotection, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H1N1
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroprotection, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H3N2
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza B
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe AD, Intradermal - Influenza H1N1
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza H3N2
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza B
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H1N1
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Seroconversion, Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intramuscular - Influenza H3N2
Time frame: Day 28 Post Vaccination
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21458658Leung DY, Gao PS, Grigoryev DN, Rafaels NM, Streib JE, Howell MD, Taylor PA, Boguniewicz M, Canniff J, Armstrong B, Zaccaro DJ, Schneider LC, Hata TR, Hanifin JM, Beck LA, Weinberg A, Barnes KC. Human atopic dermatitis complicated by eczema herpeticum is associated with abnormalities in IFN-gamma response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Apr;127(4):965-73.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.010.
- Background: PubMed 19837254Prymula R, Siegrist CA, Chlibek R, Zemlickova H, Vackova M, Smetana J, Lommel P, Kaliskova E, Borys D, Schuerman L. Effect of prophylactic paracetamol administration at time of vaccination on febrile reactions and antibody responses in children: two open-label, randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1339-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61208-3.
- Background: PubMed 21029962Pulendran B, Li S, Nakaya HI. Systems vaccinology. Immunity. 2010 Oct 29;33(4):516-29. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006.
- Background: PubMed 20889193Schneider L, Weinberg A, Boguniewicz M, Taylor P, Oettgen H, Heughan L, Zaccaro D, Armstrong B, Holliday A, Leung DY. Immune response to varicella vaccine in children with atopic dermatitis compared with nonatopic controls. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Dec;126(6):1306-7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.010.
- Results publication: PubMed 28209343Leung DYM, Jepson B, Beck LA, Hanifin JM, Schneider LC, Paller AS, Monti K, David G, Canniff J, Lorenzo MG, Weinberg A. A clinical trial of intradermal and intramuscular seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1575-1582.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.952. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32347777Jalbert E, Lussier S, Johnson MJ, Jepson B, Calatroni A, David G, Leung D, Weinberg A. Lower influenza-specific cell-mediated immune responses in individuals with atopic dermatitis compared with healthy controls. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1;16(11):2727-2735. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1747374. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Atopic Dermatitis Research Network (ADRN) websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Dermatitis, Atopic
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Roflumilast Cream 0.3% for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Analytical Validation Study of the Replior ScratchSense
Atopic Dermatitis, Pruritus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Afimkibart (RO7790121) in Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Baricitinib in Patients With Job Syndrome With Lupus-Like Disease and/or Atopic Dermatitis
Hyper IgE Syndrome From STAT3 Mutation, Job s Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1/1b Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of ZL-1503 in Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Donald Leung, MD, PhD study chair
National Jewish Health
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine and Fluzone® (Intramuscular) vaccine in people with Dermatitis, Atopic, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Seroprotection, Non-Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Intradermal vs. Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Intradermal - Influenza B (time frame: Day 28 post vaccination). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01737710, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2017.