AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal DisordersAirSealNCT01740011

Prospective Randomized Trial on Comparison of Standard- Carbon Dioxide Pressure Pneumoperitoneum Insufflators Versus AirSeal

A study testing Laparoscopic surgery in people with Colorectal Disorders and Hernia, run by Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern Linz at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the present trial is to investigate, the mean operative time and to study the frequency and intensity of postoperative shoulder tip pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, i.e. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Laparoscopic surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
182 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Jan 2013to Mar 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients recruited for laparoscopic surgery i.e. cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery, hernia repair
  • Written informed consent
  • ≥ 18 years of age

Who cannot join

  • Patients with known immunological dysfunction (advanced liver disease, HIV, hepatitis C virus infection), drug addiction
  • ≤18 years of age
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Previous extensive abdominal surgery
  • Acute surgical intervention

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz

    Linz, Upper Austria, 4010

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Trial on Comparison of Standard- Carbon Dioxide Pressure Pneumoperitoneum Insufflators Versus AirSeal

The primary objective of the present trial is to investigate, the mean operative time and to study the frequency and intensity of postoperative shoulder tip pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, i.e. cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery, hernia repair with AirSeal® compared with standard pressure CO2 insufflation systems. The primary hypothesis is that patients operated with AirSeal® have a shorter mean operative time and decreased frequency and intensity of postoperative shoulder tip pain compared with patients undergoing surgery with standard pressure CO2 insufflation systems.

It is the secondary objective of the trial to evaluate immunologic and anaesthesiological aspects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery and laparoscopic hernia repair by observing the immune responses and volume of mechanical ventilation of the two groups through measuring various immunologic factors and ventilation volume/CO2 elimination volume. Surgical side effects will also be measured as secondary objective.

Being tested
Laparoscopic surgery
Medical subject headings
Hernia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laparoscopic surgeryProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01740011
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group AExperimentalLaparoscopic surgery with AirSeal CO2 pressure insufflation
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic surgery
Group SActive comparatorLaparoscopic surgery with standard CO2 pressure insufflation
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. time of surgery

    Time of surgery, expressed in minutes from the time of incising to suturing the skin.

    Measured: one year

  2. shoulder pain

    Postoperative shoulder tip pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS scale).

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Immunological aspects

    Examine changes in the concentration of certain cytokines and angiogenic factors serum levels in the early postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery procedures performed with AirSeal® versus standard- pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

    Measured: one year

  2. postoperative complications

    Haemorrhage, Wound infections, Intra-abdominal abscess, Anastomotic leakage, Deep vein thrombosis, Pulmonary embolism

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionMar 2014
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
182 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01740011
Sponsor's protocol ID
AT-1112-RL
Acronym
AirSeal
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
23 Nov 2012
Last updated
8 Sep 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gallioli A, De Lorenzis E, Lievore E, Boeri L, Colombo L, Fontana M, Breda A, Montanari E, Albo G. The Effect of CO2 Pressure and Flow Variation on Carbon Particles Spread During Pneumoperitoneum: An Experimental Study. J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):807-813. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0336. Epub 2022 May 17.

    PubMed 34779236
  • Luketina R, Luketina TLH, Antoniou SA, Kohler G, Konneker S, Manzenreiter L, Wundsam H, Koch OO, Knauer M, Emmanuel K. Prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of standard CO2 pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal(R). Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3670-3678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07846-4. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

    PubMed 32767145
  • Luketina RR, Knauer M, Kohler G, Koch OO, Strasser K, Egger M, Emmanuel K. Comparison of a standard CO(2) pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jun 20;15:239. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-239.

    PubMed 24950720

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laparoscopic surgery in people with Colorectal Disorders and Hernia, run by Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern Linz at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

time of surgery (time frame: one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01740011, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in