Sacroiliac Joint PainiMIANCT01741025
iFuse Implant System® Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis
A study testing iFuse Implant System and Conservative Management in people with Sacroiliac Joint Pain, run by SI-BONE, Inc. at 9 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes when patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain undergo either SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System or undergo conservative management of the SI joint Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sacroiliac Joint Pain
- What is being tested?
- iFuse Implant System and Conservative Management
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to 24 Sep 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 21-70 at time of screening
- Patient has lower back pain for >6 months or >18 months for pregnancy induced lower back pain
- Diagnosis of the SI joint as the primary lower back pain generator based on ALL of the following: a. Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test), and b. Patient has at least 3 of 5 physical examination maneuvers specific for SI joint pain, and c. Patient has improvement in lower back pain NRS of at least 50% of the pre injection NRS score after fluoroscopic controlled injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint(s) (including previous documented test <6 months ago)
- Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of at least 30%
- Baseline lower back pain score of at least 50 on 0-100 point VAS
- Patient has signed study-specific informed consent form
- Patient has the necessary mental capacity to participate and is physically able to comply with study protocol requirements
Who cannot join
- Severe lower back pain due to other causes, such as lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, and lumbar vertebral body fracture
- Sacroiliac pathology caused by auto-immune disease (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis) and/or neoplasia (e.g. benign or malignant tumor) and/or crystal arthropathy
- History of recent (<1 year) fracture of the pelvis with documented malunion, non-union of sacrum or ilium or any type of internal fixation of the pelvic ring.
- Spine surgery during the past 12 months.
- Previously diagnosed or suspected osteoporosis (defined as prior T-score <-2.5 or history of osteoporotic fracture)
- Documented osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disease
Show all 15Show fewer
- Any condition or anatomy that makes treatment with the iFuse Implant System infeasible
- Known allergy to titanium or titanium alloys
- Use of medications known to have detrimental effects on bone quality and soft-tissue healing
- Prominent neurologic condition that would interfere with physical therapy
- Current systemic infection or local infection at the SI joint
- Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next year
- Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse
- Diagnosed psychiatric disease (e.g., schizophrenia, major depression, personality disorders) that could interfere with study participation
- Patient is participating in an investigational study or has been involved in an investigational study within 3 months of surgery
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 4 countries.
9 sites in 4 countries
Germany3 sites
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 12200
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Praxisgemeinschaft "Leben in Bewegung"
Hilden, 40721
Italy3 sites
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, 40136
Ospedale Civile Di Legnano
Legnano, 20025
IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100
Belgium2 sites
OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst
Aalst, 9300
La Clinique de l'Espérance
Montegnée, 4420
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Post-market Clinical Follow-up Trial Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of the iFuse Implant System® Versus Conservative Management for Patients With Chronic, Disabling SI Joint Pain.
The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes when patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain undergo either SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System or undergo conservative management of the SI joint
Read the detailed description
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled, post-market clinical follow-up clinical trial of the iFuse Implant System for SI joint fusion vs. conservative management. Subjects assigned to conservative management may cross over to iFuse after a minimum of 6 months of conservative treatment. Conservative management does not include interventional procedures such as prolotherapy, steroid injections and/or RF ablation.
- Conditions
- Sacroiliac Joint Pain
- Being tested
- iFuse Implant System, Conservative Management
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iFuse Implant SystemDevice
Placement of iFuse implant system via surgery
Conservative ManagementOther
Medications for pain, physical therapy, cognitive behavour therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| iFuse Implant System | Experimental | Surgical placement of iFuse implants in the affected SI joint Receives: Device: iFuse Implant System |
| conservative management | Active comparator | Medications, physical therapy, information Receives: Other: Conservative Management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The change in lower back pain as rated by the study subject using a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 months after initiation of treatment
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change from baseline in lower back pain (VAS)
Measured: 1, 3, 12 and 24 months
Change from baseline in leg pain (VAS
Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in disability due to back pain (ODI
Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in quality of life (EQ-5D
Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in ambulatory and work status
Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in depression score (Zung Depression Scale
Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in objective functional test (ASLR
Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in walking distance
Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Patient satisfaction and self-rating of disease state
Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Serious adverse events
Measured: during 24 months
Device breakage, loosening and migration
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completion15 Dec 2015
- Study completion24 Sep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sacroiliac Joint PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SI-BONE, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daniel Cher, Study director, SI-BONE, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01741025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 300134
- Acronym
- iMIA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dat KO, Cher D, Polly DW. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines. Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
PubMed 38081463Dengler JD, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Gaetani P, van Eeckhoven E, Cher D, Sturesson B. 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain. Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550.
PubMed 28934785Dengler J, Sturesson B, Kools D, Prestamburgo D, Cher D, van Eeckhoven E, Erk E, Pflugmacher R, Vajkoczy P; the iMIA study group. Referred leg pain originating from the sacroiliac joint: 6-month outcomes from the prospective randomized controlled iMIA trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Nov;158(11):2219-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2953-7. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
PubMed 27629371Sturesson B, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Dengler J. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management. Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):708-719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9. Epub 2016 May 14.
PubMed 27179664
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Post-market Clinical Follow-up Trial Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of the iFuse Implant System® Versus Conservative Management for Patients With Chronic, Disabling SI Joint Pain.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01741025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iMIA / 300134
- Conditions
- Sacroiliac Joint Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SI-BONE, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes when patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain undergo either SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System or undergo conservative management of the SI joint
Detailed description
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled, post-market clinical follow-up clinical trial of the iFuse Implant System for SI joint fusion vs. conservative management. Subjects assigned to conservative management may cross over to iFuse after a minimum of 6 months of conservative treatment. Conservative management does not include interventional procedures such as prolotherapy, steroid injections and/or RF ablation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| iFuse Implant System | Experimental | Device: iFuse Implant SystemSurgical placement of iFuse implants in the affected SI joint |
| conservative management | Active comparator | Other: Conservative ManagementMedications, physical therapy, information |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age 21-70 at time of screening
- Patient has lower back pain for >6 months or >18 months for pregnancy induced lower back pain
- Diagnosis of the SI joint as the primary lower back pain generator based on ALL of the following: a. Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test), and b. Patient has at least 3 of 5 physical examination maneuvers specific for SI joint pain, and c. Patient has improvement in lower back pain NRS of at least 50% of the pre injection NRS score after fluoroscopic controlled injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint(s) (including previous documented test <6 months ago)
- Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of at least 30%
- Baseline lower back pain score of at least 50 on 0-100 point VAS
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Severe lower back pain due to other causes, such as lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, and lumbar vertebral body fracture
- Sacroiliac pathology caused by auto-immune disease (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis) and/or neoplasia (e.g. benign or malignant tumor) and/or crystal arthropathy
- History of recent (<1 year) fracture of the pelvis with documented malunion, non-union of sacrum or ilium or any type of internal fixation of the pelvic ring.
- Spine surgery during the past 12 months.
- Previously diagnosed or suspected osteoporosis (defined as prior T-score <-2.5 or history of osteoporotic fracture)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iFuse Implant SystemPlacement of iFuse implant system via surgery | Device | iFuse Implant System |
| Conservative ManagementMedications for pain, physical therapy, cognitive behavour therapy | Other | conservative management |
Primary outcome
The change in lower back pain as rated by the study subject using a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 months after initiation of treatment
Time frame: 6 months
11 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in lower back pain (VAS)
Time frame: 1, 3, 12 and 24 months
Change from baseline in leg pain (VAS
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in disability due to back pain (ODI
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in quality of life (EQ-5D
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in ambulatory and work status
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in depression score (Zung Depression Scale
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in objective functional test (ASLR
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in walking distance
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Patient satisfaction and self-rating of disease state
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Serious adverse events
Time frame: during 24 months
Device breakage, loosening and migration
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38081463Dat KO, Cher D, Polly DW. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines. Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28934785Dengler JD, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Gaetani P, van Eeckhoven E, Cher D, Sturesson B. 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain. Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27629371Dengler J, Sturesson B, Kools D, Prestamburgo D, Cher D, van Eeckhoven E, Erk E, Pflugmacher R, Vajkoczy P; the iMIA study group. Referred leg pain originating from the sacroiliac joint: 6-month outcomes from the prospective randomized controlled iMIA trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Nov;158(11):2219-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2953-7. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27179664Sturesson B, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Dengler J. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management. Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):708-719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9. Epub 2016 May 14.
Related trials for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Does Injection Target Matter in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction?
Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction, Multifidus
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Ketorolac Versus Corticosteroid Injections for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Sacro-iliac Joint Pain
Not yet recruiting
Postural Correction and Lumbar Stabilization vs MET for Postpartum Pain
Postpartum
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Intervention For Mobility, Pain Relief, and Lasting Improvement in Functional Recovery "SIMPLIFY"
Degenerative Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Cher study director
SI-BONE, Inc.
9 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iFuse Implant System and Conservative Management in people with Sacroiliac Joint Pain, run by SI-BONE, Inc. at 9 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Germany, Italy, Belgium, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The change in lower back pain as rated by the study subject using a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 months after initiation of treatment (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01741025, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2017.