Pre-diabetesCGM PreDMNCT01741467
The Effect of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Subjects With Pre-diabetes
A study testing RT-CGM in people with Pre-diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance, run by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will investigate whether real-time continuous glucose monitoring can be used as a tool for behavior change in people with pre-diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pre-diabetes, Impaired Glucose Tolerance
- What is being tested?
- RT-CGM
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2012to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 or older
- Newly diagnosed with pre-diabetes (within the previous 6 months) with a FPG of > or = 110-125mg/dl or an A1c > or = 6% - 6.4%
- Able to independently measure and read finger stick blood glucose levels
- Willing to wear the CGM device for up to 12 weeks during the study period
- Willing to test blood sugar by fingerstick twice per day while wearing the CGM
- DEERS eligible
Who cannot join
- Using medication for pre-diabetes
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant, or without a safe contraceptive method; all female subjects will undergo pregnancy testing via a serum HcG with their initial blood testing.
- Subjects who are taking glucocorticoids, amphetamines, anabolic, or weight-reducing agents during the course of the study.
- Active Duty service members likely to be deployed during the 18-month study period.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889-5600
About this study
This study will investigate whether real-time continuous glucose monitoring can be used as a tool for behavior change in people with pre-diabetes.
Read the detailed description
The protocol is a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled study in persons with newly diagnosed pre-diabetes comparing the effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) combined with diet and lifestyle education to those who have diet and lifestyle education alone. During a "wash-in" phase both groups will wear a masked CGM for 1 week at baseline and again after 12 weeks. Those randomized to the RT-CGM will wear it for 4 cycles of 2 week on/1 week off over the next 12 weeks. Both groups will follow-up with their primary care providers as clinically indicated over the next year with quarterly measurements of blood pressure, weight, and BMI. At the end of this period, they will wear a masked CGM for 1 week.
- Conditions
- Pre-diabetes, Impaired Glucose Tolerance
- Being tested
- RT-CGM
- Medical subject headings
- Glucose Intolerance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RT-CGMBehavioural
Dexcom Seven+
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RT-CGM | Experimental | Patients using the RT-CGM for the intervention portion of the study. Receives: Behavioral: RT-CGM |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Differences in blood glucose
Changes in A1c and fasting blood glucose over time and between the intervention and control groups.
Measured: baseline, 18 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Impact of lifestyle changes
Evaluating the impact of lifestyle changes on levels of glycemic control in the control and experimental groups.
Measured: baseline, 18 months
Changes in Glucose dynamics
Comparison of intervention and control group on standard measures of glucose dynamics.
Measured: baseline, 18 months
Differences in blood pressure.
Objective comparison between the control and experimental group in changes in blood pressure.
Measured: baseline, 18 months
Differences in lipids.
Objective comparison between the control group and the experimental group on changes in lipids.
Measured: baseline, 18 months
Differences in weight
Objective comparison between the control group and the experimental group on changes in weight.
Measured: baseline, 18 months
Changes in medication use
An objective comparison between the control and experimental group on changes in medication use.
Measured: baseline, 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2012
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pre-diabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alicia L. Warnock, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
- Investigators
- Robert Vigersky, Principal investigator, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01741467
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 369196
- Acronym
- CGM PreDM
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The prevalence of retinopathy in impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabet Med. 2007 Feb;24(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02043.x.
PubMed 17257275Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
PubMed 11832527Yamaoka K, Tango T. Efficacy of lifestyle education to prevent type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2780-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2780.
PubMed 16249558Salpeter SR, Buckley NS, Kahn JA, Salpeter EE. Meta-analysis: metformin treatment in persons at risk for diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2008 Feb;121(2):149-157.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.09.016.
PubMed 18261504DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D, Schwenke DC, Banerji M, Bray GA, Buchanan TA, Clement SC, Henry RR, Hodis HN, Kitabchi AE, Mack WJ, Mudaliar S, Ratner RE, Williams K, Stentz FB, Musi N, Reaven PD; ACT NOW Study. Pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1104-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010949.
PubMed 21428766Chiasson JL. Acarbose for the prevention of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: the Study to Prevent Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (STOP-NIDDM) Trial. Endocr Pract. 2006 Jan-Feb;12 Suppl 1:25-30. doi: 10.4158/EP.12.S1.25.
PubMed 16627376Van de Laar FA, Lucassen PL, Akkermans RP, Van de Lisdonk EH, De Grauw WJ. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for people with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting blood glucose. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD005061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005061.pub2.
PubMed 17054235Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase HP, Clemons R, Fiallo-Scharer R, Fox LA, Gilliam LK, Hirsch IB, Huang ES, Kollman C, Kowalski AJ, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Lee J, Mauras N, O'Grady M, Ruedy KJ, Tansey M, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer S, Wilson DM, Wolpert H, Wysocki T, Xing D. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1464-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
PubMed 18779236Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, Nimri R, Oskarsson P, Bolinder J. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):795-800. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1989. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
PubMed 21335621Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Bode B, Beck RW, Xing D, Gilliam L, Hirsch I, Kollman C, Laffel L, Ruedy KJ, Tamborlane WV, Weinzimer S, Wolpert H. Sustained benefit of continuous glucose monitoring on A1C, glucose profiles, and hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):2047-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0846. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
PubMed 19675193Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM. Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35(1):32-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1438. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
PubMed 22100963Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):723-30. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1468.
PubMed 22442395American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S011. No abstract available.
PubMed 21193625
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Subjects With Pre-diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01741467
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CGM PreDM / 369196
- Conditions
- Pre-diabetes, Impaired Glucose Tolerance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.
- Study start
- May 2012
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will investigate whether real-time continuous glucose monitoring can be used as a tool for behavior change in people with pre-diabetes.
Detailed description
The protocol is a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled study in persons with newly diagnosed pre-diabetes comparing the effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) combined with diet and lifestyle education to those who have diet and lifestyle education alone. During a "wash-in" phase both groups will wear a masked CGM for 1 week at baseline and again after 12 weeks. Those randomized to the RT-CGM will wear it for 4 cycles of 2 week on/1 week off over the next 12 weeks. Both groups will follow-up with their primary care providers as clinically indicated over the next year with quarterly measurements of blood pressure, weight, and BMI. At the end of this period, they will wear a masked CGM for 1 week.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RT-CGM | Experimental | Behavioral: RT-CGMPatients using the RT-CGM for the intervention portion of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 or older
- Newly diagnosed with pre-diabetes (within the previous 6 months) with a FPG of > or = 110-125mg/dl or an A1c > or = 6% - 6.4%
- Able to independently measure and read finger stick blood glucose levels
- Willing to wear the CGM device for up to 12 weeks during the study period
- Willing to test blood sugar by fingerstick twice per day while wearing the CGM
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Using medication for pre-diabetes
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant, or without a safe contraceptive method; all female subjects will undergo pregnancy testing via a serum HcG with their initial blood testing.
- Subjects who are taking glucocorticoids, amphetamines, anabolic, or weight-reducing agents during the course of the study.
- Active Duty service members likely to be deployed during the 18-month study period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RT-CGMDexcom Seven+ | Behavioural | RT-CGM |
Primary outcome
Differences in blood glucose
Time frame: baseline, 18 months
Changes in A1c and fasting blood glucose over time and between the intervention and control groups.
6 secondary outcomes
Impact of lifestyle changes
Time frame: baseline, 18 months
Changes in Glucose dynamics
Time frame: baseline, 18 months
Differences in blood pressure.
Time frame: baseline, 18 months
Differences in lipids.
Time frame: baseline, 18 months
Differences in weight
Time frame: baseline, 18 months
Changes in medication use
Time frame: baseline, 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2016.
- Background: PubMed 17257275Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The prevalence of retinopathy in impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabet Med. 2007 Feb;24(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02043.x.
- Background: PubMed 11832527Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
- Background: PubMed 16249558Yamaoka K, Tango T. Efficacy of lifestyle education to prevent type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2780-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2780.
- Background: PubMed 18261504Salpeter SR, Buckley NS, Kahn JA, Salpeter EE. Meta-analysis: metformin treatment in persons at risk for diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2008 Feb;121(2):149-157.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.09.016.
- Background: PubMed 21428766DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D, Schwenke DC, Banerji M, Bray GA, Buchanan TA, Clement SC, Henry RR, Hodis HN, Kitabchi AE, Mack WJ, Mudaliar S, Ratner RE, Williams K, Stentz FB, Musi N, Reaven PD; ACT NOW Study. Pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1104-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010949.
- Background: PubMed 16627376Chiasson JL. Acarbose for the prevention of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: the Study to Prevent Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (STOP-NIDDM) Trial. Endocr Pract. 2006 Jan-Feb;12 Suppl 1:25-30. doi: 10.4158/EP.12.S1.25.
- Background: PubMed 17054235Van de Laar FA, Lucassen PL, Akkermans RP, Van de Lisdonk EH, De Grauw WJ. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for people with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting blood glucose. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD005061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005061.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 18779236Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase HP, Clemons R, Fiallo-Scharer R, Fox LA, Gilliam LK, Hirsch IB, Huang ES, Kollman C, Kowalski AJ, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Lee J, Mauras N, O'Grady M, Ruedy KJ, Tansey M, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer S, Wilson DM, Wolpert H, Wysocki T, Xing D. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1464-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 21335621Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, Nimri R, Oskarsson P, Bolinder J. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):795-800. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1989. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
- Background: PubMed 19675193Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Bode B, Beck RW, Xing D, Gilliam L, Hirsch I, Kollman C, Laffel L, Ruedy KJ, Tamborlane WV, Weinzimer S, Wolpert H. Sustained benefit of continuous glucose monitoring on A1C, glucose profiles, and hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):2047-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0846. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
- Background: PubMed 22100963Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM. Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35(1):32-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1438. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 22442395Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):723-30. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1468.
Related trials for Pre-diabetes
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Food-i-Sense Analytics: Integrating AI Into Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis for Precision Nutrition.
Prediabetes (Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance), Artificial Intelligence Mobile Application
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron in Participants With Overweight at Risk of Development of Obesity-Related Complications or Progression to Class 1 Obesity
Overweight, Prediabetic State
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Enrolling by invitationEarly Phase 1
Truway Diagnostic Tools in Primary Care
Chronic Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Vigersky principal investigator
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RT-CGM in people with Pre-diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance, run by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Differences in blood glucose (time frame: baseline, 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01741467, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2016.