Colorectal CancerSTOPCRCNCT01742065
Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations
A study testing Auto Plus in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Kaiser Permanente at 8 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Only an estimated 50 million US adults aged 50-75 are up-to-date on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to guidelines set by the federal government. CRC is 90% curable with timely detection and appropriate treatment of precancerous polyps; increased screening could reduce incidence by up to 50%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 74 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Auto Plus
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62,155 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 74 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 50-74 with no evidence of a colonoscopy within 9 years or fecal testing within 11 months, and no history of colorectal disease will be eligible to receive a mailed FIT.
Who cannot join
- End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)
- Hospice/Nursing Home
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
United States8 sites
Open Door Health Center
Arcata, California, 95521
Mosaic Medical
Bend, Oregon, 97701
Benton and Linn County Health Centers
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330
Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center
Hillsboro, Oregon, 97124
La Clinica Health Care
Medford, Oregon, 97501
Community Health Center
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Multnomah County Health Department
Portland, Oregon, 97214
Oregon Health and Science University
Scappoose, Oregon, 97056
About this study
Only an estimated 50 million US adults aged 50-75 are up-to-date on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to guidelines set by the federal government. CRC is 90% curable with timely detection and appropriate treatment of precancerous polyps; increased screening could reduce incidence by up to 50%. Groups least likely to undergo screening, those with minimal education, low income, low access to health care, recent immigrants or Hispanics, are the same people who frequently receive care at Federally Qualified Healthcare Center's (FQHCs). The use of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) and fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) is exceedingly low in FQHCs (7-9% of patients in the past year) and far below national averages and target rates. Our results will provide valuable information on how to use electronic health record (EHR) resources to optimize guideline-based screening in FQHC clinics whose patient populations have disproportionately low CRC screening rates.
This project, in conjunction with the research team, will use an advisory panel to direct the research activities. The advisory panel will be made up of clinicians, leaders, researchers, and patients. The panel and team will guide the development of materials, the outreach to patients, and the research protocol to best reach FQHC patients who are due for colorectal cancer screening.
This project will be conducted in two phases, Phase I is conducting a pilot at two FQHC's, and Phase II is rolling out the intervention to between 20-30 clinics.
Read the detailed description
Phase I (Pilot Aims)
- Aim 1 Conduct preliminary analyses of EHR data at two pilot clinics.
- Aim 2: Use codes and methods developed in Aim 1 to test the feasibility, reach, effectiveness, and cost of an EHR-based CRC screening intervention using a subset of 100 patients at each of two pilot clinics. We will use codes defined in Aim 1 to create a Solutions-based, Epic-integrated system to track CRC screening, mail FIT kits, and track patient test results and receipt of follow-up care. The system will be pilot-tested in two clinics.
- Aim 3: Use results from the pilot intervention to prepare for a large-scale, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial across 18 OCHIN clinics (see Phase II).
Transition from Phase I to Phase II
-Changes to our original proposal include going from a three arm to a two-arm pragmatic cluster trial with revised evaluation and power calculation and refinements to the intervention components for both usual care (now described as enhanced usual care) and the intervention (now described as enhanced auto).
Phase II (Full trial Aims)
- Primary Aim 1. Assess the effectiveness of a large-scale, two-arm CRC screening program among diverse CLINIC patients, and assess difference in CRC screening outcomes (overall and by age, sex, insurance status, Hispanic ethnicity/race). The intervention will consist of an automated data-driven, EHR-linked program for mailing FIT kits (with linguistically appropriate pictographic instructions and return postage) to patients due for CRC screening.
- Primary Aim 2. Assess the costs and long-term cost-effectiveness of the automated program.
We have also included two secondary aims:
- Secondary Aim 1. Assess adoption, implementation, reach and potential maintenance and spread of the program, using a mixed-method rapid assessment process, field notes, and other ethnographic data.
- Secondary Aim 2. Adapt and pilot-test the adaptation of STOP CRC in an alternate EHR platform, Allscripts, and develop an implementation guide to assist sites in adopting the program.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Auto Plus
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Screening, Pragmatic Trial
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Auto PlusOther
Clinics randomized to the Auto-Plus arm will engage in all activities in the Auto arm (send an introductory letter to participants, then a FIT Kit, then a reminder letter encouraging the return of the FIT Kit) in addition to one other outreach effort.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | No intervention | Clinics in usual care will go about clinic practices to complete recommended screening for colorectal cancer. |
| Auto Plus | Active comparator | Clinics randomized to the Auto-Plus arm will engage in all activities (send an introductory letter to participants, then a FIT Kit, then a reminder letter encouraging the return of the FIT Kit) in addition to a PDSA (Plan Do Study Act) cycle to refine or improve their process. Receives: Other: Auto Plus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FIT Completion
Binary indication of FIT completion within 12 months or through August 3, 2015 (when usual care clinics received access to study tools). Proportion of completed FIT is represented below with a confidence interval of the difference in completed FIT.
Measured: Completed FIT kits sent back within 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Any CRC Screening
Binary indication of any CRC screening (fecal test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy) during the evaluation interval.
Measured: Any CRC screening complete within 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionFeb 2016
- Study completionAug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Kaiser PermanenteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 62,155 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kaiser Permanente
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gloria Coronado, PhD, Principal investigator, The Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestBeverly Green, PhD, Principal investigator, Kaiser Permanente
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01742065
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UH3CA188640
- Other IDs
- 1UH2AT007782-01
- Acronym
- STOPCRC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Coronado GD, Sanchez J, Petrik A, Kapka T, DeVoe J, Green B. Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar;29(1):86-90. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0551-4.
PubMed 24057692Coronado GD, Vollmer WM, Petrik A, Taplin SH, Burdick TE, Meenan RT, Green BB. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
PubMed 24937017Coronado GD, Vollmer WM, Petrik A, Aguirre J, Kapka T, Devoe J, Puro J, Miers T, Lembach J, Turner A, Sanchez J, Retecki S, Nelson C, Green B. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 26;14:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-55.
PubMed 24571550Coronado GD, Schneider JL, Sanchez JJ, Petrik AF, Green B. Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center. Transl Behav Med. 2015 Mar;5(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0276-x.
PubMed 25729454Coronado GD, Burdick T, Petrik A, Kapka T, Retecki S, Green B. Using an Automated Data-driven, EHR-Embedded Program for Mailing FIT kits: Lessons from the STOP CRC Pilot Study. J Gen Pract (Los Angel). 2014 Jan 5;2:1000141. doi: 10.4172/2329-9126.1000141.
PubMed 25411657Coronado GD, Petrik AF, Spofford M, Talbot J, Do HH, Taylor VM. Clinical perspectives on colorectal cancer screening at Latino-serving federally qualified health centers. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Feb;42(1):26-31. doi: 10.1177/1090198114537061. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
PubMed 24952378Coronado GD, Retecki S, Schneider J, Taplin SH, Burdick T, Green BB. Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC. Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):214-22. doi: 10.1177/1740774515608122. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
PubMed 26419905Johnson KE, Tachibana C, Coronado GD, Dember LM, Glasgow RE, Huang SS, Martin PJ, Richards J, Rosenthal G, Septimus E, Simon GE, Solberg L, Suls J, Thompson E, Larson EB. A guide to research partnerships for pragmatic clinical trials. BMJ. 2014 Dec 1;349:g6826. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6826. No abstract available.
PubMed 25446054Coronado GD, Petrik AF, Vollmer WM, Taplin SH, Keast EM, Fields S, Green BB. Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
PubMed 30083752Coronado GD, Nielson CM, Keast EM, Petrik AF, Suls JM. The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May;32(5):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01408-2. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
PubMed 33687606Petrik AF, Keast E, Johnson ES, Smith DH, Coronado GD. Development of a multivariable prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test in community clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05883-2.
PubMed 33172444Petrik AF, Green B, Schneider J, Miech EJ, Coury J, Retecki S, Coronado GD. Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06186-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
PubMed 33107003Schneider JL, Rivelli JS, Gruss I, Petrik AF, Nielson CM, Green BB, Coronado GD. Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Colonoscopy Completion for Safety Net Clinic Patients. Am J Health Behav. 2020 Jul 1;44(4):460-472. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.44.4.8.
PubMed 32553027O'Connor EA, Vollmer WM, Petrik AF, Green BB, Coronado GD. Moderators of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening through mailed fecal immunochemical test kits: results from a pragmatic randomized trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 15;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4027-7.
PubMed 31941527Thompson JH, Schneider JL, Rivelli JS, Petrik AF, Vollmer WM, Fuoco MJ, Coronado GD. A Survey of Provider Attitudes, Beliefs, and Perceived Barriers Regarding a Centralized Direct-Mail Colorectal Cancer Screening Approach at Community Health Centers. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719890950. doi: 10.1177/2150132719890950.
PubMed 31779517
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01742065
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STOPCRC / UH3CA188640
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Screening, Pragmatic Trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 62,155 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kaiser PermanenteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Only an estimated 50 million US adults aged 50-75 are up-to-date on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to guidelines set by the federal government. CRC is 90% curable with timely detection and appropriate treatment of precancerous polyps; increased screening could reduce incidence by up to 50%. Groups least likely to undergo screening, those with minimal education, low income, low access to health care, recent immigrants or Hispanics, are the same people who frequently receive care at Federally Qualified Healthcare Center's (FQHCs). The use of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) and fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) is exceedingly low in FQHCs (7-9% of patients in the past year) and far below national averages and target rates. Our results will provide valuable information on how to use electronic health record (EHR) resources to optimize guideline-based screening in FQHC clinics whose patient populations have disproportionately low CRC screening rates.
This project, in conjunction with the research team, will use an advisory panel to direct the research activities. The advisory panel will be made up of clinicians, leaders, researchers, and patients. The panel and team will guide the development of materials, the outreach to patients, and the research protocol to best reach FQHC patients who are due for colorectal cancer screening.
This project will be conducted in two phases, Phase I is conducting a pilot at two FQHC's, and Phase II is rolling out the intervention to between 20-30 clinics.
Detailed description
Phase I (Pilot Aims)
- Aim 1 Conduct preliminary analyses of EHR data at two pilot clinics.
- Aim 2: Use codes and methods developed in Aim 1 to test the feasibility, reach, effectiveness, and cost of an EHR-based CRC screening intervention using a subset of 100 patients at each of two pilot clinics. We will use codes defined in Aim 1 to create a Solutions-based, Epic-integrated system to track CRC screening, mail FIT kits, and track patient test results and receipt of follow-up care. The system will be pilot-tested in two clinics.
- Aim 3: Use results from the pilot intervention to prepare for a large-scale, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial across 18 OCHIN clinics (see Phase II).
Transition from Phase I to Phase II
-Changes to our original proposal include going from a three arm to a two-arm pragmatic cluster trial with revised evaluation and power calculation and refinements to the intervention components for both usual care (now described as enhanced usual care) and the intervention (now described as enhanced auto).
Phase II (Full trial Aims)
- Primary Aim 1. Assess the effectiveness of a large-scale, two-arm CRC screening program among diverse CLINIC patients, and assess difference in CRC screening outcomes (overall and by age, sex, insurance status, Hispanic ethnicity/race). The intervention will consist of an automated data-driven, EHR-linked program for mailing FIT kits (with linguistically appropriate pictographic instructions and return postage) to patients due for CRC screening.
- Primary Aim 2. Assess the costs and long-term cost-effectiveness of the automated program.
We have also included two secondary aims:
- Secondary Aim 1. Assess adoption, implementation, reach and potential maintenance and spread of the program, using a mixed-method rapid assessment process, field notes, and other ethnographic data.
- Secondary Aim 2. Adapt and pilot-test the adaptation of STOP CRC in an alternate EHR platform, Allscripts, and develop an implementation guide to assist sites in adopting the program.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | No intervention | –Clinics in usual care will go about clinic practices to complete recommended screening for colorectal cancer. |
| Auto Plus | Active comparator | Other: Auto PlusClinics randomized to the Auto-Plus arm will engage in all activities (send an introductory letter to participants, then a FIT Kit, then a reminder letter encouraging the return of the FIT Kit) in addition to a PDSA (Plan Do Study Act) cycle to refine or improve their process. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients aged 50-74 with no evidence of a colonoscopy within 9 years or fecal testing within 11 months, and no history of colorectal disease will be eligible to receive a mailed FIT.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)
- Hospice/Nursing Home
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Auto PlusClinics randomized to the Auto-Plus arm will engage in all activities in the Auto arm (send an introductory letter to participants, then a FIT Kit, then a reminder letter encouraging the return of the FIT Kit) in addition to one other outreach effort. | Other | Auto Plus |
Primary outcome
FIT Completion
Time frame: Completed FIT kits sent back within 12 months
Binary indication of FIT completion within 12 months or through August 3, 2015 (when usual care clinics received access to study tools). Proportion of completed FIT is represented below with a confidence interval of the difference in completed FIT.
1 secondary outcome
Any CRC Screening
Time frame: Any CRC screening complete within 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24057692Coronado GD, Sanchez J, Petrik A, Kapka T, DeVoe J, Green B. Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar;29(1):86-90. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0551-4.
- Background: PubMed 24937017Coronado GD, Vollmer WM, Petrik A, Taplin SH, Burdick TE, Meenan RT, Green BB. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
- Background: PubMed 24571550Coronado GD, Vollmer WM, Petrik A, Aguirre J, Kapka T, Devoe J, Puro J, Miers T, Lembach J, Turner A, Sanchez J, Retecki S, Nelson C, Green B. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 26;14:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-55.
- Background: PubMed 25729454Coronado GD, Schneider JL, Sanchez JJ, Petrik AF, Green B. Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center. Transl Behav Med. 2015 Mar;5(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0276-x.
- Background: PubMed 25411657Coronado GD, Burdick T, Petrik A, Kapka T, Retecki S, Green B. Using an Automated Data-driven, EHR-Embedded Program for Mailing FIT kits: Lessons from the STOP CRC Pilot Study. J Gen Pract (Los Angel). 2014 Jan 5;2:1000141. doi: 10.4172/2329-9126.1000141.
- Background: PubMed 24952378Coronado GD, Petrik AF, Spofford M, Talbot J, Do HH, Taylor VM. Clinical perspectives on colorectal cancer screening at Latino-serving federally qualified health centers. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Feb;42(1):26-31. doi: 10.1177/1090198114537061. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
- Background: PubMed 26419905Coronado GD, Retecki S, Schneider J, Taplin SH, Burdick T, Green BB. Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC. Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):214-22. doi: 10.1177/1740774515608122. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
- Background: PubMed 25446054Johnson KE, Tachibana C, Coronado GD, Dember LM, Glasgow RE, Huang SS, Martin PJ, Richards J, Rosenthal G, Septimus E, Simon GE, Solberg L, Suls J, Thompson E, Larson EB. A guide to research partnerships for pragmatic clinical trials. BMJ. 2014 Dec 1;349:g6826. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6826. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30083752Coronado GD, Petrik AF, Vollmer WM, Taplin SH, Keast EM, Fields S, Green BB. Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33687606Coronado GD, Nielson CM, Keast EM, Petrik AF, Suls JM. The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May;32(5):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01408-2. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33172444Petrik AF, Keast E, Johnson ES, Smith DH, Coronado GD. Development of a multivariable prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test in community clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05883-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33107003Petrik AF, Green B, Schneider J, Miech EJ, Coury J, Retecki S, Coronado GD. Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06186-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gloria Coronado, PhD principal investigator
The Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
Beverly Green, PhD principal investigator
Kaiser Permanente
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Auto Plus in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Kaiser Permanente at 8 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FIT Completion (time frame: Completed FIT kits sent back within 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01742065, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2019.