ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)Phase 2REFLO-STEMINCT01747174
REperfusion Facilitated by LOcal Adjunctive Therapy in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
A Phase 2 study testing IC Adenosine, IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and Standard PCI in people with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), run by University Hospitals, Leicester at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether intra-coronary adenosine or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) delivered selectively via a thrombus aspiration catheter (or if unsuccessful via a coronary microcatheter) following thrombus aspiration in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (P-PCI) reduces microvascular… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
- What is being tested?
- IC Adenosine, IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and Standard PCI
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 247 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥ 18 years age.
- Informed ASSENT (verbal consent) prior to angiography.
- STEMI ≤ 6 hrs of symptom onset, requiring primary reperfusion by PCI.
- Single-vessel coronary artery disease (non culprit disease ≤70% stenosis at angiography)
- TIMI flow 0/I at angiography.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to: P-PCI *, CMR, contrast agents, or study medications: Adenosine*, SNP****, Aspirin, Thienopyridine and Bivalirudin.
- SBP ≤ 90mmHg
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Previous Q wave myocardial infarction
- Culprit lesion not identified or located in a by-pass graft
- Stent thrombosis.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Left main disease.
- Known severe asthma.
- Known stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (eGFR<30ml/min).
- Pregnancy.
- Notes:
- * Exclusion criteria for P-PCI (presentation timing, inadequate arterial access etc); patient unable to tolerate "prolonged" PCI procedure (in operators' opinion).
- ** Absolute contra-indication to CMR (Pacemaker, ICD, intra-cranial metal clips).
- *** Contraindications to Adenosine (known hypersensitivity to Adenosine, sick sinus syndrome, second or third degree atrio-ventricular block - except in patients with functioning artificial pacemaker, long QT syndrome has been defined as QTc > 450 ms at baseline). ECG will be undertaken just after the first dose of the study drug and QT/QTc will be recorded and compared to the baseline. If the QTc recorded after the first dose of the study drug exceeds 450ms or there is an increase in the QT/QTc of > 60 ms from baseline, the second dose will be abandoned and this will be recorded.
- **** Contraindications to SNP (known hypersensitivity to SNP, compensatory hypertension - as may be seen in arteriovenous shunts or coarctation of the aorta, high output failure, congenital optic atrophy or tobacco amblyopia).
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom4 sites
University Hospital
Coventry, West Midlands, CV2 2DX
Leeds General Infirmary
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS1 3EX
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE3 9QP
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE7 7DN
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intracoronary Administration of Adenosine or Sodium Nitroprusside to Control for Attenuation of Microvascular Obstruction During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
The purpose of this study is to determine whether intra-coronary adenosine or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) delivered selectively via a thrombus aspiration catheter (or if unsuccessful via a coronary microcatheter) following thrombus aspiration in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (P-PCI) reduces microvascular obstruction (MVO) parameters and infarct size as measured with cardiac MRI, compared with standard treatment following thrombus aspiration in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Read the detailed description
>100,000 patients suffering STEMI present in the UK each year. P-PCI in the UK is increasing exponentially. In 2004 there were <1500 P-PCI and in 2007 and 2008 these figures had increased to 5902 and 9224 respectively (BCIS database).
Although P-PCI delivered quickly is more effective than thrombolysis, the efficacy of this, essentially mechanical, technique is limited by the unpredictable phenomenon of no-reflow and the under-stated lesser degrees of MVO. As more UK centres adopt P-PCI the dilemma of how to attenuate MVO will remain. Currently there is no consensus on the optimal management to prevent or attenuate MVO particularly when thrombus laden lesions are treated with P-PCI.
There is divergent clinical practice, even within institutions, in the UK and worldwide. This is because there is no solid evidence base to inform clinicians. The current options for interventional cardiologists are:
- Routinely aspirate thrombus and give IC vasodilator during the intervention but only in high burden thrombus formation lesions.
- Perform a standard P-PCI only and then give IV vasodilator if angiographic no-reflow develops.
- Routinely consider that angiographically silent MVO (i.e a grade below true "no-reflow") may have important impact on infarct size and clinical outcome and treat prophylactically.
Few if any clinicians follow this thinking. Indeed, it appears impossible to predict the incidence of (no-reflow/MVO) from the presenting angiogram (pre- or post- wire or balloon) and it can be argued that irrespective of thrombus burden it would be better to undertake prophylactic treatment in all patients, following the use of aspiration catheter, with delivery of agents able, in theory at least, to reduce (angiographically undetectable) MVO. Several studies of IC adenosine or SNP have shown favourable effects in attenuating MVO. However, the size of effect with either drug and whether indeed there is a difference between them in reducing MVO and infarct size is undetermined.
The objectives of our proposed study are to determine:
- Whether adjunctive pharmaco-therapy at time of P-PCI and following thrombus aspiration, reduces CMR-determined MVO and infarct size.
- Whether there is a difference between adenosine and SNP in reducing CMR-detected MVO and infarct size, both given selectively and distally via a thrombus aspiration catheter or a coronary microcatheter.
- The correlation of angiographic, including the recently designed computer-assisted myocardial blush quantification 'Quantitative Blush Evaluator'(QuBE), and other myocardial perfusion markers, with CMR detected MVO and infarct size, as well as with clinical outcome (MACE) at 30 days.
- Being tested
- IC Adenosine, IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP), Standard PCI
- Keywords
- STEMI, Microvascular Obstruction, No-reflow, Adenosine, Sodium Nitroprusside
- Medical subject headings
- ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IC AdenosineDrug
Also called Adenocor
IC Adenosine 1mg injected distally via micro-catheter in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further dose (1mg if IRA is RCA otherwise 2mg) via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP)Drug
Also called Sodium pentacyanonitrosylferrate(II), Sodium nitroferricyanide, Sodium pentacyanonitrosylferrate, SNP
IC SNP 250mcg injected distally via micro-catheter distally in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further 250 mcg dose delivered via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
Standard PCIProcedure or surgery
PCI procedure with thrombectomy (via aspiration catheter) and bivalirudin given as standard.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Std PCI + Intra-coronary (IC) Adenosine | Experimental | IC Adenosine in to IRA (following thrombus aspiration) with further dose via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment. Receives: Drug: IC Adenosine; Procedure: Standard PCI |
| Std PCI + IC Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) | Experimental | IC SNP in to IRA (following thrombus aspiration) with further dose via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment. Receives: Drug: IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP); Procedure: Standard PCI |
| Std PCI | Active comparator | Standard PCI only Receives: Procedure: Standard PCI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CMR measured infarct size (% LV mass)
Measured: 48-72 hours post procedure
Secondary outcomes (9)
CMR incidence and extent of MVO (% LV mass)
Measured: 48-72 hours post procedure
CMR measured myocardial salvage index, haemorrhage, LV EF and volumes
Measured: 48-72 hours post procedure
Myocardial Blush Grade assessed by validated computer software 'Quantitative Blush Evaluator' (QuBE
Measured: During P-PCI
Incidence pre- and post- procedure angiographic true "no-reflow"
Measured: During P-PCI
Any in-patient clinical events
Includes: coronary artery re-occlusion, need for repeat PCI, recurrent chest pain with new ECG changes, incidence of clinical heart failure (symptoms plus basal crackles plus X-ray evidence of pulmonary congestion) and proven cerebrovascular accident (CVA).
Measured: Within 6 months from presentation with, and PCI for, STEMI
Overall MACE
MACE: composite of death, need for target lesion revascularization, recurrent MI, severe heart failure, and CVA.
Measured: 1 month
Degree of ST segment resolution on ECG
Measured: Assessed immediately following P-PCI (expected on average 1 hour)
Echocardiographic assessment of LV
To include end systolic/diastolic volumes, EF +/- wall motion index
Measured: 6-8 weeks post-procedure/MI
Corrected TIMI Frame Count
TIMI frame count or TFC is defined as the number of cineframes required for contrast to reach a standardized distal coronary landmark in the culprit vessel.
Measured: During procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 247 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals, Leicester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anthony H Gershlick, MBBS, FRCP, Principal investigator, University of Leicester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01747174
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLRN 53469
- Other IDs
- 2010-023211-34, 09/150/28
- Acronym
- REFLO-STEMI
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Nazir SA, McCann GP, Greenwood JP, Kunadian V, Khan JN, Mahmoud IZ, Blackman DJ, Been M, Abrams KR, Shipley L, Wilcox R, Adgey AA, Gershlick AH. Strategies to attenuate micro-vascular obstruction during P-PCI: the randomized reperfusion facilitated by local adjunctive therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jun 21;37(24):1910-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw136. Epub 2016 May 4.
PubMed 27147610Nazir SA, Khan JN, Mahmoud IZ, Greenwood JP, Blackman DJ, Kunadian V, Been M, Abrams KR, Wilcox R, Adgey AA, McCann GP, Gershlick AH. The REFLO-STEMI trial comparing intracoronary adenosine, sodium nitroprusside and standard therapy for the attenuation of infarct size and microvascular obstruction during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Sep 25;15:371. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-371.
PubMed 25252600
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intracoronary Administration of Adenosine or Sodium Nitroprusside to Control for Attenuation of Microvascular Obstruction During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01747174
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REFLO-STEMI / CLRN 53469
- Keywords
- STEMI, Microvascular Obstruction, No-reflow, Adenosine, Sodium Nitroprusside
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 247 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals, LeicesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether intra-coronary adenosine or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) delivered selectively via a thrombus aspiration catheter (or if unsuccessful via a coronary microcatheter) following thrombus aspiration in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (P-PCI) reduces microvascular obstruction (MVO) parameters and infarct size as measured with cardiac MRI, compared with standard treatment following thrombus aspiration in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Detailed description
>100,000 patients suffering STEMI present in the UK each year. P-PCI in the UK is increasing exponentially. In 2004 there were <1500 P-PCI and in 2007 and 2008 these figures had increased to 5902 and 9224 respectively (BCIS database).
Although P-PCI delivered quickly is more effective than thrombolysis, the efficacy of this, essentially mechanical, technique is limited by the unpredictable phenomenon of no-reflow and the under-stated lesser degrees of MVO. As more UK centres adopt P-PCI the dilemma of how to attenuate MVO will remain. Currently there is no consensus on the optimal management to prevent or attenuate MVO particularly when thrombus laden lesions are treated with P-PCI.
There is divergent clinical practice, even within institutions, in the UK and worldwide. This is because there is no solid evidence base to inform clinicians. The current options for interventional cardiologists are:
- Routinely aspirate thrombus and give IC vasodilator during the intervention but only in high burden thrombus formation lesions.
- Perform a standard P-PCI only and then give IV vasodilator if angiographic no-reflow develops.
- Routinely consider that angiographically silent MVO (i.e a grade below true "no-reflow") may have important impact on infarct size and clinical outcome and treat prophylactically.
Few if any clinicians follow this thinking. Indeed, it appears impossible to predict the incidence of (no-reflow/MVO) from the presenting angiogram (pre- or post- wire or balloon) and it can be argued that irrespective of thrombus burden it would be better to undertake prophylactic treatment in all patients, following the use of aspiration catheter, with delivery of agents able, in theory at least, to reduce (angiographically undetectable) MVO. Several studies of IC adenosine or SNP have shown favourable effects in attenuating MVO. However, the size of effect with either drug and whether indeed there is a difference between them in reducing MVO and infarct size is undetermined.
The objectives of our proposed study are to determine:
- Whether adjunctive pharmaco-therapy at time of P-PCI and following thrombus aspiration, reduces CMR-determined MVO and infarct size.
- Whether there is a difference between adenosine and SNP in reducing CMR-detected MVO and infarct size, both given selectively and distally via a thrombus aspiration catheter or a coronary microcatheter.
- The correlation of angiographic, including the recently designed computer-assisted myocardial blush quantification 'Quantitative Blush Evaluator'(QuBE), and other myocardial perfusion markers, with CMR detected MVO and infarct size, as well as with clinical outcome (MACE) at 30 days.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Std PCI + Intra-coronary (IC) Adenosine | Experimental | Drug: IC Adenosine, Procedure: Standard PCIIC Adenosine in to IRA (following thrombus aspiration) with further dose via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment. |
| Std PCI + IC Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) | Experimental | Drug: IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP), Procedure: Standard PCIIC SNP in to IRA (following thrombus aspiration) with further dose via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment. |
| Std PCI | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard PCIStandard PCI only |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ≥ 18 years age.
- Informed ASSENT (verbal consent) prior to angiography.
- STEMI ≤ 6 hrs of symptom onset, requiring primary reperfusion by PCI.
- Single-vessel coronary artery disease (non culprit disease ≤70% stenosis at angiography)
- TIMI flow 0/I at angiography.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Contraindications to: P-PCI *, CMR, contrast agents, or study medications: Adenosine*, SNP****, Aspirin, Thienopyridine and Bivalirudin.
- SBP ≤ 90mmHg
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Previous Q wave myocardial infarction
- Culprit lesion not identified or located in a by-pass graft
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IC AdenosineAlso: AdenocorIC Adenosine 1mg injected distally via micro-catheter in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further dose (1mg if IRA is RCA otherwise 2mg) via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment. | Drug | Std PCI + Intra-coronary (IC) Adenosine |
| IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP)Also: Sodium pentacyanonitrosylferrate(II), Sodium nitroferricyanide, Sodium pentacyanonitrosylferrate, SNPIC SNP 250mcg injected distally via micro-catheter distally in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further 250 mcg dose delivered via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment. | Drug | Std PCI + IC Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) |
| Standard PCIPCI procedure with thrombectomy (via aspiration catheter) and bivalirudin given as standard. | Procedure or surgery | Std PCI, Std PCI + IC Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP), Std PCI + Intra-coronary (IC) Adenosine |
Primary outcome
CMR measured infarct size (% LV mass)
Time frame: 48-72 hours post procedure
9 secondary outcomes
CMR incidence and extent of MVO (% LV mass)
Time frame: 48-72 hours post procedure
CMR measured myocardial salvage index, haemorrhage, LV EF and volumes
Time frame: 48-72 hours post procedure
Myocardial Blush Grade assessed by validated computer software 'Quantitative Blush Evaluator' (QuBE
Time frame: During P-PCI
Incidence pre- and post- procedure angiographic true "no-reflow"
Time frame: During P-PCI
Any in-patient clinical events
Time frame: Within 6 months from presentation with, and PCI for, STEMI
Overall MACE
Time frame: 1 month
Degree of ST segment resolution on ECG
Time frame: Assessed immediately following P-PCI (expected on average 1 hour)
Echocardiographic assessment of LV
Time frame: 6-8 weeks post-procedure/MI
Corrected TIMI Frame Count
Time frame: During procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27147610Nazir SA, McCann GP, Greenwood JP, Kunadian V, Khan JN, Mahmoud IZ, Blackman DJ, Been M, Abrams KR, Shipley L, Wilcox R, Adgey AA, Gershlick AH. Strategies to attenuate micro-vascular obstruction during P-PCI: the randomized reperfusion facilitated by local adjunctive therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jun 21;37(24):1910-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw136. Epub 2016 May 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25252600Nazir SA, Khan JN, Mahmoud IZ, Greenwood JP, Blackman DJ, Kunadian V, Been M, Abrams KR, Wilcox R, Adgey AA, McCann GP, Gershlick AH. The REFLO-STEMI trial comparing intracoronary adenosine, sodium nitroprusside and standard therapy for the attenuation of infarct size and microvascular obstruction during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Sep 25;15:371. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-371.
Related trials for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
RecruitingPhase 2
Prevention of Reperfusion Injury Outcomes Through Effective Cardioprotection Targeting Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction, Reperfusion Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Incremental Prognostic Utility of CBC-derived Inflammatory Indices After Incomplete Coronary Revascularization: Association With 12-months Cardiovascular Outcomes
STEMI, High Risk NSTEMI
RecruitingObservational study
SuperSaturated Oxygen Comprehensive Observational Registry
STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, AMI
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anthony H Gershlick, MBBS, FRCP principal investigator
University of Leicester
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing IC Adenosine, IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and Standard PCI in people with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), run by University Hospitals, Leicester at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CMR measured infarct size (% LV mass) (time frame: 48-72 hours post procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01747174, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2015.