Symptoms on AdmissionNCT01747434
Complaints and Presumptive Diagnosis in a Danish Emergency Department
An observational study of Symptoms on Admission and Presumptive Diagnosis on Admission, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Acute patients in Denmark are often admitted to Emergency Departments by their General Practitioner with a presumptive diagnosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of the pre-admission presumptive diagnosis and to assess if the presumptive diagnosis could be replaced by a number of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Symptoms on Admission, Presumptive Diagnosis on Admission, Final Diagnosis
- How many people
- 10,070 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: all acute admissions to a Danish Emergency Department in 2010
Who may be able to join
- all acute patients admitted to emergency department
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Acute patients in Denmark are often admitted to Emergency Departments by their General Practitioner with a presumptive diagnosis.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of the pre-admission presumptive diagnosis and to assess if the presumptive diagnosis could be replaced by a number of symptom-based groups.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
action diagnosis
Measured: 0-48 hours after admission
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Symptoms on AdmissionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Southern DenmarkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 10,070 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern Denmark
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christian Backer Mogensen, University of Southern Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01747434
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SLB-ED-05-2012
- Status last verified
- Dec 2012
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Carter-Storch R, Olsen UF, Mogensen CB. Admissions to emergency department may be classified into specific complaint categories. Dan Med J. 2014 Mar;61(3):A4802.
PubMed 24814917
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Dec 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Complaints and Presumptive Diagnosis in a Danish Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01747434
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SLB-ED-05-2012
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10,070 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern DenmarkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute patients in Denmark are often admitted to Emergency Departments by their General Practitioner with a presumptive diagnosis.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of the pre-admission presumptive diagnosis and to assess if the presumptive diagnosis could be replaced by a number of symptom-based groups.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- all acute admissions to a Danish Emergency Department in 2010
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all acute patients admitted to emergency department
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
action diagnosis
Time frame: 0-48 hours after admission
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Dec 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24814917Carter-Storch R, Olsen UF, Mogensen CB. Admissions to emergency department may be classified into specific complaint categories. Dan Med J. 2014 Mar;61(3):A4802.
Related trials for Symptoms on Admission
Recruiting
Effect of Rutin and Vitamin C on Outcomes in Adults With Sepsis Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
Influence of FreeO2 on Percentage of Time Within Oxygen Saturation Target Using Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for Patients Admitted for AECOPD or Bariatric Surgery
COPD Exacerbation, Oxygen Toxicity
Recruiting
Amnioinfusion's Protective Effects on Respiratory and Longitudinal Pediatric Outcomes After Intrapartum Meconium Exposure
Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions, Meconium
RecruitingObservational study
IMMUNOREA - Immunological and Inflammatory Determinants Associated With the Prognosis of Intensive Care Patients
Critical Illness, Intensive Care Patients
Active, not recruiting
Emergency Department Triage of Patients With Acute Chest Pain Based on the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm (PRESC1SE-MI)
Acute Chest Pain, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Symptoms on Admission and Presumptive Diagnosis on Admission, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
action diagnosis (time frame: 0-48 hours after admission). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01747434, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2012.