AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)EPOPNCT01747759

Evaluation of a Preoperative Education in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A study testing Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters in people with Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA), run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The benefit of preoperative rehabilitation treatment combining physiotherapy and targeted education for patient undergoing Total Knee replacement (TKR) is now well known. Thus, there is lack of validated booklet containing evidence based informations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
What is being tested?
Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Nov 2010to Mar 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ranging from 55 to 75 Planned total knee arthroplasty

Who cannot join

  • Age under 55 or above 75 Patients institutionalized Patients who have received a total knee arthroplasty of the ipsilateral knee Patient not affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or assignee) Patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatism Cognitive and behavioral issues Disorders of understanding and expression of the French language TKR on complex knee

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

Other trials in France

About this study

The benefit of preoperative rehabilitation treatment combining physiotherapy and targeted education for patient undergoing Total Knee replacement (TKR) is now well known. Thus, there is lack of validated booklet containing evidence based informations.

Our aim is to assess the impact of an evidence based education pre-operative booklet on patient's knowledge and beliefs. The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of the booklet on patient's satisfaction on the information received, the length of stay in orthopedic surgery and the transfer rate to rehabilitation wards.

Read more

To show a difference of 2 points on the knowledge score (range 0-10) between the two groups, with a = 0.05 and a power of 90%, we considered that 44 patients are needed. The evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test.

The study protocol was approved by the local Ethic Committee.

Read the detailed description

The benefit of preoperative rehabilitation treatment combining physiotherapy and targeted education for patient undergoing Total Knee replacement (TKR) is now well known. Thus, there is lack of validated booklet containing evidence based informations.

Our aim is to assess the impact of an evidence based education pre-operative booklet on patient's knowledge and beliefs. The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of the booklet on patient's satisfaction on the information received, the length of stay in orthopedic surgery and the transfer rate to rehabilitation wards.

To show a difference of 2 points on the knowledge score (range 0-10) between the two groups, with a = 0.05 and a power of 90%, we considered that 44 patients are needed. The evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test.

The study protocol was approved by the local Ethic Committee.

Being tested
Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters
Keywords
Total knee arthroplasty, Selfcare, Booklet, Rehabilitation, Knee oesteoarthritis
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parametersOther

Study groups in NCT01747759
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parametersOtherThe evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test
Receives: Other: Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters
Fisher exact testOtherThe evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test
Receives: Other: Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. knowledge score

    Measured: at day 1

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. pain

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Primary disability

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Duration of hospitalization surgery

    Measured: at day 1

  4. Transfer rate in acute care and rehabilitation, and length of stay

    Measured: at week 6

  5. Patient's overall satisfaction towards the information received

    Measured: at week 6

  6. Patient's confidence in its own ability to achieve rehabilitation

    Measured: at day-1

  7. Patient's knowledge and beliefs about his condition

    Measured: Baseline, at day-1 and week 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2010
  3. Primary completionAug 2011
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01747759
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHU-0133
Acronym
EPOP
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
10 Dec 2012
Last updated
10 Aug 2026
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Eschalier B, Descamps S, Pereira B, Vaillant-Roussel H, Girard G, Boisgard S, Coudeyre E. Randomized blinded trial of standardized written patient information before total knee arthroplasty. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0178358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178358. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28678854

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters in people with Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA), run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

knowledge score (time frame: at day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01747759, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in