AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainPhase 4KTcesarNCT01751256

Additional Effect of Wound Infiltration After Cesarean Section With Optimal Standard Analgesia

A Phase 4 study testing Continuous wound infiltration in people with Postoperative Pain and Anesthesia, Local, run by Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine wether wound infiltration brings additional analgesia effect after cesarean section with optimal standard postoperative analgesia Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
What is being tested?
Continuous wound infiltration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jun 2010to Dec 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Scheduled cesarean section

Who cannot join

  • Emergency cesarean section
  • Contraindication to opioids, paracetamol, or local anaesthetic
  • Ongoing infection
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Diabetes treated with insulin
  • Chronic opioid use

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Poissy Saint Germain en Laye Hospital

    Poissy, 78300

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Levobupivacaine Continuous Wound Infiltration and Optimal Standard Analgesia Versus Optimal Standard Analgesia Alone After Cesarean Section.

The purpose of this study is to determine wether wound infiltration brings additional analgesia effect after cesarean section with optimal standard postoperative analgesia

Read the detailed description

Continuous wound infiltration with local anaesthetic has been shown as a safe and opioid-sparing analgesic method after caesarean section with minimal standard analgesia. We aim to evaluate if this benefit remains when an optimal analgesia is used.

Primary outcome is morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes is pain scores, maternal recovery including breastfeeding, side effects of morphine, nurse workload and maternal satisfaction.

Patients scheduled for caesarean delivery will be eligible for the study.

Patients with emergency caesarean delivery, contraindication to analgesic drugs, hemostasis disorder, ongoing infection, diabetes treated with insulin or chronic opioid use will be excluded from the study.

One group will receive standard analgesia including celecoxib and intravenous morphine for 24 hours with Patient Controlled Analgesia pump. The other group will receive the same standard analgesia with additional levobupivacaine initial bolus followed by a continuous subfascial infiltration of 1.25 mg/ml at 5 ml/h for 48 hours through a multiperforated catheter connected to an elastomeric pump.

Total morphine consumption, pain and any associated complications will be recorded for 72 hours. Women wil be asked to fulfill a questionnaire on the second day after cesarean section, assessing recovery, satisfaction and breastfeeding comfort.

Being tested
Continuous wound infiltration
Keywords
Postcesarean Section, Postoperative Pain, Care, Postoperative, Anesthesia, Local, Breast Feeding, Morphine, Pain Measurement, levobupivacaine
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Breast Feeding

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Continuous wound infiltrationDevice

    Subfascial continuous wound infiltration with Levobupivacaine: bolus 50mg and 6.25mg/h for 48 hours through a multiperforated catheter, in addition to Celecoxib 200mg twice a day, paracetamol 1g four times a day, Nefopam 20mg four times a day, and intravenous morphine for 24 hours with Patient Controlled Analgesia pump (1.2mg by bolus, 7 minutes lockout period).

Study groups in NCT01751256
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Continuous wound infiltrationExperimentalSubfascial continuous wound infiltration with Levobupivacaine: bolus 50mg and 6.25mg/h for 48 hours through a multiperforated catheter, in addition to Celecoxib 200mg twice a day, paracetamol 1g four times a day, Nefopam 20mg four times a day, and intravenous morphine for 24 hours with Patient Controlled Analgesia pump (1.2mg by bolus, 7 minutes lockout period).
Receives: Device: Continuous wound infiltration
ControlNo interventionCelecoxib 200mg twice a day, paracetamol 1g four times a day, Nefopam 20mg four times a day, and intravenous morphine for 24 hours with Patient Controlled Analgesia pump (1.2mg by bolus, 7 minutes lockout period).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative morphine consumption

    Quantity of morphine injected by the patient controlled analgesia pump

    Measured: 24 first hours after cesarean section

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Pain at mobilization

    Numerical pain scale during mobilization

    Measured: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 48 and 78 hours after skin closure, entrance and exit from the recovery room

  2. Early walking

    Time taken for early walking

    Measured: in the 72 first hours after skin closure

  3. Resumption of gastrointestinal function

    Interval from the end of surgery until the first gas from the intestinal tract

    Measured: First 72 hours after skin closure

  4. Treatment tolerance

    Nausea, vomiting, pruritus, excessive sedation

    Measured: First 72 hours after skin closure

  5. Maternal satisfaction

    Analogic numerical scale on a specific form

    Measured: 2 days after skin closure

  6. Health staff workload

    Number of intervention for nursing, breastfeeding help, and cesarean wound dressing change

    Measured: For the 48 first hours after skin closure

  7. Wound infections

    Number of wound infection needing specific cares appeared during the observation time

    Measured: the first 10 days after skin closure

  8. Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity

    Every adverse effect attributed to local anaesthetic by an skilled anesthesiologist

    Measured: During the first 48 hours after skin closure

  9. Discomfort due to material

    Discomfort caused by the material and pain at retrieval of the catheter, assessed by an analogic scale on a specific form

    Measured: At catheter retrieval

  10. Technical problems related to the catheter

    Premature withdrawal or occlusion of the catheter

    Measured: During the 48 first hours after skin closure

  11. Pain at rest

    Numerical pain scale at rest

    Measured: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 48 and 78 hours after skin closure, entrance and exit from the recovery room

  12. Comfort with Breast Feeding

    Analogic numerical scale on a specific form

    Measured: For the the 48 first hours after skin closure

  13. All cause morbidity

    Postpartum hemorrhage or every adverse event occurred during the observation period.

    Measured: For the first 10 days after skin closure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01751256
Sponsor's protocol ID
PoissyStGermainH
Acronym
KTcesar
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
13 Dec 2012
Last updated
17 Dec 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Continuous wound infiltration in people with Postoperative Pain and Anesthesia, Local, run by Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative morphine consumption (time frame: 24 first hours after cesarean section). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in