Cervical StenosisPhase 4NCT01754649
Use of Misoprostol in Case of Insertion Failure of Intrauterine Contraceptives
A Phase 4 study testing Misoprostol in people with Cervical Stenosis, run by Luis Bahamondes at 2 sites in Brazil.
Trial summary
To assess the usefulnes sof misoprostol versus placebo (in a double-blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial)to facilitate the insertion of copper-IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in cases of failure due to cervical stenosis in either nulligravidas and parous women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Misoprostol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBrazil
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women aged > 18 and <50 years old; Requesting insertion of and IUD or an LNG-IUS Failure of IUD insertion
Who cannot join
- Refuse to participate Lost to follow-up at the return visit
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Brazil2 sites
Family Planning Clinic, University of Campinas
Campinas, São Paulo, 13084-971
University of Campinas
Campinas, São Paulo
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Use of Misoprostol to Facilitate the Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptives After Failure of Insertion. A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial
To assess the usefulnes sof misoprostol versus placebo (in a double-blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial)to facilitate the insertion of copper-IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in cases of failure due to cervical stenosis in either nulligravidas and parous women. Additionally to evaluate the side-effects of the misoprostol. The hypothesis is that misoprostol may be better than placebo.
Read the detailed description
Women attended at the Family Planning clinic of the University of Campinas who requested the insertion of a copper-IUD or an LNG-IUS and who failed in the attempt due to cervical stenosis will be randomized in two groups (1:1). The study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion and the control group will receive placebo in the same schedule. The sample will be 50 women in each group. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not. The data will be analyzing with χ2 test for independent samples. After that a multiple logistic analysis will be perform to evaluate the associated variables with the result (failure or successful) insertion. The level of significance will be established at P<.005.
- Conditions
- Cervical Stenosis
- Being tested
- Misoprostol
- Keywords
- intrauterine device, insertion failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MisoprostolDrug
Also called PROSTOKOS
The study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| misoprostol vaginal 200 mcg | Active comparator | The study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not. Receives: Drug: Misoprostol |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | The placebo group will receive two doses of placebo vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not. Receives: Drug: Misoprostol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ease of insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
The study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion and the control group will receive placebo in the same schedule. The sample will be 50 women in each group. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Side-effects of misoprostol
To assess the side-effects of misoprostol versus placebo
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Luis Bahamondes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Luis Bahamondes, University of Campinas, Brazil
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01754649
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Unicamp/2012/LB
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bahamondes MV, Espejo-Arce X, Bahamondes L. Effect of vaginal administration of misoprostol before intrauterine contraceptive insertion following previous insertion failure: a double blind RCT. Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1861-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev137. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
PubMed 26040478
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Use of Misoprostol to Facilitate the Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptives After Failure of Insertion. A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01754649
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Unicamp/2012/LB
- Conditions
- Cervical Stenosis
- Keywords
- intrauterine device, insertion failure
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Luis BahamondesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To assess the usefulnes sof misoprostol versus placebo (in a double-blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial)to facilitate the insertion of copper-IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in cases of failure due to cervical stenosis in either nulligravidas and parous women. Additionally to evaluate the side-effects of the misoprostol. The hypothesis is that misoprostol may be better than placebo.
Detailed description
Women attended at the Family Planning clinic of the University of Campinas who requested the insertion of a copper-IUD or an LNG-IUS and who failed in the attempt due to cervical stenosis will be randomized in two groups (1:1). The study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion and the control group will receive placebo in the same schedule. The sample will be 50 women in each group. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not. The data will be analyzing with χ2 test for independent samples. After that a multiple logistic analysis will be perform to evaluate the associated variables with the result (failure or successful) insertion. The level of significance will be established at P<.005.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| misoprostol vaginal 200 mcg | Active comparator | Drug: MisoprostolThe study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not. |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: MisoprostolThe placebo group will receive two doses of placebo vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women aged > 18 and <50 years old; Requesting insertion of and IUD or an LNG-IUS Failure of IUD insertion
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Refuse to participate Lost to follow-up at the return visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MisoprostolAlso: PROSTOKOSThe study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not. | Drug | misoprostol vaginal 200 mcg, placebo |
Primary outcome
ease of insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
Time frame: 12 months
The study group will receive two doses of misoprostol (200mcg each tablet) vaginal 12 and 4 hours prior insertion and the control group will receive placebo in the same schedule. The sample will be 50 women in each group. After 24 hours of the insertion failure the women will return to the clinic and a new attempt of insertion will be done. At this time we will evaluate if the insertion was able to do or not.
1 secondary outcome
Side-effects of misoprostol
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26040478Bahamondes MV, Espejo-Arce X, Bahamondes L. Effect of vaginal administration of misoprostol before intrauterine contraceptive insertion following previous insertion failure: a double blind RCT. Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1861-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev137. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Related trials for Cervical Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Statistical Validity of Cervical Spine Measurements-Including Range of Motion, Strength, and Functional Test Results-for Return to Sport in Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Cervical Stenosis and/or Herniation.
Cervical Stenosis, Cervical Spine
Enrolling by invitation
Assessing Microbiome in Primary Anterior Cervical Fusion Patients
Cervical Stenosis, Myelopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Enzalutamide for Patients With Androgen Receptor Positive Salivary Cancers
Androgen Receptor Positive, Locally Advanced Salivary Gland Carcinoma
Recruiting
Hard Cervical Collar Use Following Posterior Cervical Fusion
Spinal Stenosis Cervical, Radiculopathy, Cervical Region
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Misoprostol in people with Cervical Stenosis, run by Luis Bahamondes at 2 sites in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ease of insertion of intrauterine contraceptives (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01754649, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2015.