Chronic Stable AnginaEuroCTONCT01760083
A Randomized Multicentre Trial to Evaluate the Utilization of Revascularization or Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions
A study testing Biolimus-eluting stent implantation in people with Chronic Stable Angina and Dyspnea, run by Euro CTO Club at 19 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
CTOs are common among patients with angina, and are detected in around 20% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Treatment of CTO has been found to constitute only 7% of PCI practice on average. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Stable Angina, Dyspnea, Coronary Occlusion
- What is being tested?
- Biolimus-eluting stent implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥ 18 years of age with written informed consent
- CTO in native coronary artery
- a) Stable angina, or b) myocardial ischaemia in a territory supplied by CTO, and c) viability in akinetic myocardium (<50% transmural late enhancement on MRI or normal resting perfusion scan)
- CTO located in segments 1-3 (RCA), 6-7 (LAD), 11-12 (LCx)
- target artery ≥2.5mm
Who cannot join
- AMI or NSTE-ACS within 1 month
- Significant untreated coronary stenosis in a territory other than CTO
- Patients with MVD and significant non-CTO stenoses where it is deemed unsafe to treat the non-CTO lesion first (e.g. Significant proximal LAD lesion with chronically occluded RCA)
- Patient unsuitable for 12 month dual anti-platelet therapy
- Any exclusion criteria for PCI or DES
- Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 6 countries.
19 sites in 6 countries
France5 sites
Clinique Saint-Augustin
Bordeaux, 33074
CH de Lagny
Lagny, 77405
Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier - ICPS
Massy, 91300
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076
Rangueil university hospital
Toulouse, 31076
Germany4 sites
Zentralklinik Bad Berka
Bad Berka, 99438
Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, 79189
Main Taunus Kliniken
Bad Soden, 65812
Klinikum Darmstadt
Darmstadt, 64283
Spain4 sites
Unidad de Cardiología Intervencionista Hospital de Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Clinic Villaroel
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
Galdakao, 48960
Cardiovascular Institute - Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040
United Kingdom4 sites
Royal Sussex County Hospital - Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals
Brighton, BN2 5BE
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, EH16 4SA
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leicester
Leicester, LE3 9QP
National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College
London, SW7 2AZ
Italy1 site
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Cardiovascular Interventional Unit Cannizzaro Hospita
Catania, 95126
Latvia1 site
Latvian Center of Cardiology Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga, 1002
About this study
CTOs are common among patients with angina, and are detected in around 20% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Treatment of CTO has been found to constitute only 7% of PCI practice on average. One of the reasons for the under-presentation of CTOs in PCI target lesions is the lack of evidence-based medical data on treatment indications, and the continued low level of accepted evidence for the treatment of CTOs by PCI in PCI guidelines.
Patients with a CTO represent patients with stable coronary artery disease. The COURAGE trial comparing PCI with optimal medical therapy in stable coronary disease did not show a difference in mortality or myocardial infarction between the two treatment options. However, CTOs were not included in the COURAGE trial. But that trial did confirm the superiority of PCI over OMT in controlling symptoms of angina, with a high cross-over rate to PCI. Whether PCI for CTO is superior to OMT in reducing MACE in those patients with a large ischaemic burden has never been tested in a randomized controlled trial.
Read more
While there is compelling evidence from registry studies of a clinical and prognostic benefit following successful PCI of CTO compared with PCI failure, there has been no randomized controlled trial of contemporary PCI using drug-eluting stents versus optimal medical therapy. The COURAGE trial nuclear sub-study confirms both that prognosis is closely related to the extent of residual ischaemia and that PCI is more effective in reducing residual ischaemia than optimal medical therapy alone. This confirms earlier retrospective data suggesting that the benefit of PCI is greatest in patients with moderate (10-20%) or severe (>20%) ischaemia.
Study hypothesis: PCI with Biolimus eluting stent implantation plus OMT will be superior to OMT alone in improving health status at 12-month follow-up, and will be noninferior with respect to the composite of all cause death/ non fatal MI at 36-month follow up, in patients with a CTO in an epicardial coronary artery >2.5 mm diameter and chronic stable angina with evidence of ischemia and viability in the territory subtended by the CTO
- Conditions
- Chronic Stable Angina, Dyspnea, Coronary Occlusion
- Being tested
- Biolimus-eluting stent implantation
- Medical subject headings
- Angina, Stable, Dyspnea, Coronary Occlusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biolimus-eluting stent implantationDevice
Also called Biosensors Biolimus-eluting stents of all sizes and lengths
Recanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion and subsequent implantation of one or ore Biosensor stents
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Biolimus-eluting stent implantation | Active comparator | PCI of CTO using a Biomatrix drug-eluting stent system + optimal medical therapy. Receives: Device: Biolimus-eluting stent implantation |
| Medical therapy | No intervention | Optimal medical therapy. Subsequent PCI only if symptoms of angina persist despite optimal medical therapy. At least 2 anti-anginal agents or the maximum tolerated anti-anginal therapy should be used before crossover. Medical therapy should include adequate ventricular rate-limiting medication (i.e. Beta-blocker or rate-limiting calcium antagonist) where appropriate. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Life Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D for health outcomes measurement
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
Major cardiovascular events
Cumulative composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI at 3 years
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Safety and efficacy endpoints
All cause mortality Cardiac mortality Myocardial Infarction Any hospitalization due to cardiovascular events (angina, congestive heart failure, arrythmias) Repeat revascularization
Measured: 12 and 36 months
Procedural complications
Incl. periprocedural enzyme leak (defined by CK increase >3 times ULN); pericprocedural MI (new Q-wave or STEMI); pericardial tamponade, need for urgent CABG, CIN, death within 30 days, proven periprocedural cerebrovascular events
Measured: baseline upto 36 months
Protocol adherence
Need to cross from OMT to PCI in Group 2 (after escalation up to maximum tolerated anti-anginal therapy and persistent unequivocal symptoms)
Measured: 36 months
Per protocol analysis
primary endpoint comparison in patients who did have a successful revascularization compared to those patients treated medically who had no subsequent PCI
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionNov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Stable AnginaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Euro CTO Club
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- NHS Research and Development, Biosensors International, Asahi Intecc Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gerald S Werner, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01760083
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2011-005905-64
- Acronym
- EuroCTO
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 1 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, di Mario C, Hovasse T, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Bogaerts K, Goicolea J, Spratt JC, Gershlick AH, Galassi AR, Louvard Y; EUROCTO trial investigators. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 7;39(26):2484-2493. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy220.
PubMed 29722796Werner GS, Hildick-Smith D, Martin Yuste V, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, Di Mario C, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Galassi AR, Louvard Y. Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO). EuroIntervention. 2023 Sep 18;19(7):571-579. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00312.
PubMed 37482940Azzalini L, Vo M, Dens J, Agostoni P. Myths to Debunk to Improve Management, Referral, and Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion of an Epicardial Coronary Artery. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;116(11):1774-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.050. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
PubMed 26434510
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Multicentre Trial to Evaluate the Utilization of Revascularization or Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01760083
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EuroCTO / 2011-005905-64
- Conditions
- Chronic Stable Angina, Dyspnea, Coronary Occlusion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Euro CTO ClubUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- NHS Research and Development, Biosensors International, Asahi Intecc Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
CTOs are common among patients with angina, and are detected in around 20% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Treatment of CTO has been found to constitute only 7% of PCI practice on average. One of the reasons for the under-presentation of CTOs in PCI target lesions is the lack of evidence-based medical data on treatment indications, and the continued low level of accepted evidence for the treatment of CTOs by PCI in PCI guidelines.
Patients with a CTO represent patients with stable coronary artery disease. The COURAGE trial comparing PCI with optimal medical therapy in stable coronary disease did not show a difference in mortality or myocardial infarction between the two treatment options. However, CTOs were not included in the COURAGE trial. But that trial did confirm the superiority of PCI over OMT in controlling symptoms of angina, with a high cross-over rate to PCI. Whether PCI for CTO is superior to OMT in reducing MACE in those patients with a large ischaemic burden has never been tested in a randomized controlled trial.
While there is compelling evidence from registry studies of a clinical and prognostic benefit following successful PCI of CTO compared with PCI failure, there has been no randomized controlled trial of contemporary PCI using drug-eluting stents versus optimal medical therapy. The COURAGE trial nuclear sub-study confirms both that prognosis is closely related to the extent of residual ischaemia and that PCI is more effective in reducing residual ischaemia than optimal medical therapy alone. This confirms earlier retrospective data suggesting that the benefit of PCI is greatest in patients with moderate (10-20%) or severe (>20%) ischaemia.
Study hypothesis: PCI with Biolimus eluting stent implantation plus OMT will be superior to OMT alone in improving health status at 12-month follow-up, and will be noninferior with respect to the composite of all cause death/ non fatal MI at 36-month follow up, in patients with a CTO in an epicardial coronary artery >2.5 mm diameter and chronic stable angina with evidence of ischemia and viability in the territory subtended by the CTO
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Biolimus-eluting stent implantation | Active comparator | Device: Biolimus-eluting stent implantationPCI of CTO using a Biomatrix drug-eluting stent system + optimal medical therapy. |
| Medical therapy | No intervention | –Optimal medical therapy. Subsequent PCI only if symptoms of angina persist despite optimal medical therapy. At least 2 anti-anginal agents or the maximum tolerated anti-anginal therapy should be used before crossover. Medical therapy should include adequate ventricular rate-limiting medication (i.e. Beta-blocker or rate-limiting calcium antagonist) where appropriate. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ≥ 18 years of age with written informed consent
- CTO in native coronary artery
- a) Stable angina, or b) myocardial ischaemia in a territory supplied by CTO, and c) viability in akinetic myocardium (<50% transmural late enhancement on MRI or normal resting perfusion scan)
- CTO located in segments 1-3 (RCA), 6-7 (LAD), 11-12 (LCx)
- target artery ≥2.5mm
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- AMI or NSTE-ACS within 1 month
- Significant untreated coronary stenosis in a territory other than CTO
- Patients with MVD and significant non-CTO stenoses where it is deemed unsafe to treat the non-CTO lesion first (e.g. Significant proximal LAD lesion with chronically occluded RCA)
- Patient unsuitable for 12 month dual anti-platelet therapy
- Any exclusion criteria for PCI or DES
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biolimus-eluting stent implantationAlso: Biosensors Biolimus-eluting stents of all sizes and lengthsRecanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion and subsequent implantation of one or ore Biosensor stents | Device | Biolimus-eluting stent implantation |
Primary outcome
Quality of Life Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D for health outcomes measurement
Major cardiovascular events
Time frame: 36 months
Cumulative composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI at 3 years
4 secondary outcomes
Safety and efficacy endpoints
Time frame: 12 and 36 months
Procedural complications
Time frame: baseline upto 36 months
Protocol adherence
Time frame: 36 months
Per protocol analysis
Time frame: 36 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 29722796Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, di Mario C, Hovasse T, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Bogaerts K, Goicolea J, Spratt JC, Gershlick AH, Galassi AR, Louvard Y; EUROCTO trial investigators. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 7;39(26):2484-2493. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy220.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37482940Werner GS, Hildick-Smith D, Martin Yuste V, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, Di Mario C, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Galassi AR, Louvard Y. Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO). EuroIntervention. 2023 Sep 18;19(7):571-579. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00312.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26434510Azzalini L, Vo M, Dens J, Agostoni P. Myths to Debunk to Improve Management, Referral, and Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion of an Epicardial Coronary Artery. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;116(11):1774-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.050. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
- Sponsor European CTO Club e.V. (ECC)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Chronic Stable Angina
Recruiting
Multivessel Balloon Occlusion to Investigate Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and aNgina
Stable Angina, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REDUCER-I: An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer™ System
Angina Pectoris, Angina Pectoris, Stable
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Lesion Characteristics in Coronary Plaques Using Multimodality Intravascular Imaging and Novel Photon-counting CT in Stable Angina
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Stable Angina Pectoris
RecruitingObservational study
Barts Revascularisation Registry
Myocardial Infarction, Stable Angina
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Evidence With Biomarker Confirmation for PPMI in PCI Clinical Trials Study
Peri-procedural Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure Hospitalization
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gerald S Werner, MD PhD principal investigator
Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt Germany
19 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biolimus-eluting stent implantation in people with Chronic Stable Angina and Dyspnea, run by Euro CTO Club at 19 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in France, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, Italy and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Life Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) (time frame: Baseline and 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01760083, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2019.