AzTrials
AzTrials

Infantile ColicPhase 2/3ACU-COLNCT01761331

Acupuncture in Infantile Colic - a Three Armed Randomized Multi Center Trial (ACU-COL)

A Phase 2/3 study testing Acupuncture in people with Infantile Colic, run by Lund University at 4 sites in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this prospective randomized three armed, multi center study is to compare the effect of two types of acupuncture and no acupuncture in 2-8 weeks old infants with infantile colic. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 8 weeks
Conditions the study is for
Infantile Colic
What is being tested?
Acupuncture
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
147 participants
Where
4 sitesSweden
Study dates
Jan 2013to May 2015
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 8 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • otherwise healthy infants
  • crying/fussing more than three hours/day more than three days in the same week
  • has tried cow´s milk protein free diet for at least five days

Who cannot join

  • born before week 36
  • has tried acupuncture treatment
  • dont gain weight properly
  • taking other medicine than dimethicone or lactobacillus reuteri
  • parents who don´t understand Swedish

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Sweden4 sites
  • Arlöv vårdcentral, BVC

    Arlöv, Skåne County, 232 38

  • Askims vårdcentral, BVC

    Askim, Västra Götaland County, 436 32

  • Tullgårdens BVC

    Karlskrona, 371 85

  • Valla Vårdcentral, BVC

    Linköping, Östergötland County, 582 16

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Acupuncture in Infantile Colic - a Three Armed Randomized Multi Center Trial Comparing Acupuncture in a Standardized Point, Acupuncture in Individually Chosen Points and no Acupuncture

The purpose of this prospective randomized three armed, multi center study is to compare the effect of two types of acupuncture and no acupuncture in 2-8 weeks old infants with infantile colic. Group A will get standardized minimal acupuncture in LI4, group B will get individualized acupuncture in different points according to symptoms and group C will not get acupuncture. Parents (who register the infants crying) and the nurse they meet at the study CHC are blinded.

Read the detailed description

Infantile colic is a common problem, affecting 10-20% of newborns. Both the baby and the parents are suffering and there is a risk that the early relationship is disturbed. There is no safe and effective drug and the use of complementary medicine is increasing in spite of weak or no evidence. Acupuncture releases different neurotransmitters and hormones, is calming, gives pain reduction and affects digestion. Therefore it is reasonable that acupuncture can have effect in colic. Acupuncture in infantile colic has shown promising results in the few scientific trials conducted. These trials have evaluated the effect of standardized minimal acupuncture in the acupuncture points Large Intestine 4 (LI4) (two trials) or Stomach 36 (ST36) (one recent trial). In this prospective randomized three armed, multi center study performed at Child Health Centers in three towns, the effect of acupuncture in reducing symptoms in infants, 2-8 weeks old, with colic will be investigated. Two types of acupuncture: standardized minimal acupuncture in LI4 and individualized acupuncture in different points according to symptoms will be compared to an untreated group. Parents (who register the infants crying) and the nurse they meet at the study CHC are blinded.

Parents will get information about the trial from nurses and doctors at Child Health Centers (CHC) or from a web-site (www.spädbarnskolik.se). Parents who are interested in letting their infant participate in the trial get further information and sign informed consent. The trial is approved by the ethical board at Lund University.

Infant´s crying, fussing, sleep, feeding and stooling will be registered in a diary during a baseline week. Infants who cry/fuss more than three hours/day, more than three days during this week is included and randomized. Beside their ordinary contacts with their Child Health Center (CHC), infants and their parents are invited to visit a study CHC twice a week for two weeks, where they meet a nurse for about 20 minutes. Parents can describe their situation, discuss the infant´s symptoms and get advice. This nurse is blinded to which group the infant is randomized to. She carries the baby to another room and hands over the infant to a nurse, trained in acupuncture. The acupuncture nurse randomizes the infants to one of three groups, following a randomization list produced by the research department at Lund University Hospital. Group A will get standardized minimal acupuncture: one needle is inserted about 3 mm in the point LI4 on the infants hands, unilaterally, for 2-10 seconds and then withdrawn. Group B will get individualized acupuncture in points chosen by the acupuncturists according to symptoms: maximum 5 needles are inserted about 3 mm in points recommended in a guideline produced for the trial after discussions with experienced pediatric acupuncturists. Needles are retained for maximum one minute. Group C will not get acupuncture but will otherwise be treated similarly: they will be with the acupuncture nurse for five minutes while she holds the hand of the baby and talks to it in a calm voice. The acupuncture nurse make notes about bleeding and other possible side effects, and if the baby is crying. After approximately five minutes the acupuncture nurse calls the study nurse who carries the baby back to the parents. At every visit the study nurse asks parents if they have noticed any side effects, and asks if parents believe their baby gets acupuncture or not.

During the two intervention weeks and one week after the last visit to the study CHC parents register the infants behavior daily in a diary. Statistical analyses will be made from the diaries.

Conditions
Infantile Colic
Being tested
Acupuncture
Keywords
infant, colic, crying, acupuncture, stooling, sleep
Medical subject headings
Colic, Crying

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AcupunctureOther

    Minimal standardized acupuncture: one needle is inserted about 3 mm in the point LI4 on the infants hands, unilaterally, for 2-10 seconds and then withdrawn.

    Individualized acupuncture: maximum 5 needles are inserted, about 3 mm deep, in points chosen by the acupuncturists according to symptoms, in points recommended in a guideline produced for the trial. Needles are retained for maximum one minute.

Study groups in NCT01761331
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Standardized acupunctureActive comparatorInfants come to the clinic twice a week for three weeks. Parents meet a nurse and hand the infant to her. The nurse brings the infant to a room where another nurse, trained in acupuncture, is alone with the infant for five minutes. Intervention: Infants in the standardized acupuncture group get minimal acupuncture: one needle is inserted about 3 mm in the point LI4 on the infants hands, unilaterally, for 2-10 seconds and then withdrawn.
Receives: Other: Acupuncture
Group B: Individualized acupunctureActive comparatorInfants come to the clinic twice a week for three weeks. Parents meet a nurse and hand the infant to her. The nurse brings the infant to a room where another nurse, trained in acupuncture, is alone with the infant for five minutes. Infants in the individualized acupuncture group get acupuncture in points chosen by the acupuncturists according to symptoms: maximum 5 needles are inserted about 3 mm in points recommended in a guideline produced for the trial. Needles are retained for maximum one minute.
Receives: Other: Acupuncture
Group C: No acupunctureNo interventionInfants come to the clinic twice a week for three weeks. Parents meet a nurse and hand the infant to her. The nurse brings the infant to a room where another nurse, trained in acupuncture, is alone with the infant for five minutes. The nurse hold the infant´s hand and talks to it but no acupuncture is given.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change in crying

    Difference over time and between groups in reduction in % of colicky crying, crying and fussing in minutes/day

    Measured: mean values for crying during the baseline week, during each of the two intervention weeks and during the week after the last treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. change in stooling

    The frequency of stooling per day

    Measured: mean values for stooling during the baseline week, during each of the two intervention weeks and during the week after the last treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionMay 2015
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
147 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01761331
Sponsor's protocol ID
LU-HSC-KL2013
Acronym
ACU-COL
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
29 Dec 2012
Last updated
28 Jun 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Landgren K, Hallstrom I, Tiberg I. The effect of two types of minimal acupuncture on stooling, sleeping and feeding in infants with colic: secondary analysis of a multicentre RCT in Sweden (ACU-COL). Acupunct Med. 2021 Apr;39(2):106-115. doi: 10.1177/0964528420920308. Epub 2020 May 6.

    PubMed 32375501
  • Landgren K, Hallstrom I. Effect of minimal acupuncture for infantile colic: a multicentre, three-armed, single-blind, randomised controlled trial (ACU-COL). Acupunct Med. 2017 Jun;35(3):171-179. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2016-011208. Epub 2017 Jan 16.

    PubMed 28093383
  • Landgren K, Tiberg I, Hallstrom I. Standardized minimal acupuncture, individualized acupuncture, and no acupuncture for infantile colic: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial - ACU-COL. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Sep 14;15:325. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0850-x.

    PubMed 26370560

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Acupuncture in people with Infantile Colic, run by Lund University at 4 sites in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change in crying (time frame: mean values for crying during the baseline week, during each of the two intervention weeks and during the week after the last treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01761331, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in