AzTrials
AzTrials

Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis CPhase 3NCT01762761

Eltrombopag Phase III Study In Chinese Chronic ITP Patients

A Phase 3 study testing eltrombopag in people with Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis C, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 18 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
eltrombopag
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
155 participants
Where
18 sitesChina
Study dates
18 Feb 2013to 22 Nov 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is ≥18 years old.
  • Diagnosed with ITP for at least 12 months prior to screening, and have a platelet count of <30 X109/L on Day 1 (or within 48 hours prior to dosing on Day 1).
  • Patients who have no response or relapsed after splenectomy. Or patients who have not been splenectomised and have either not responded to one or more prior therapies (except splenectomy), or who have relapsed prior therapy.
  • Previous therapy for ITP including rescue must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Subjects treated with maintenance immunosuppressive therapy must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 1 month.
  • No pre-existing cardiac disease within the last 3 months. No arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thrombolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or patients with a Corrected QT interval (QTc) >450msec or QTc >480 for patients with a Bundle Branch Block.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • No history of clotting disorder, other than ITP.
  • A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range, with the following exceptions:
  • Platelets <30×109/L on Day 1 (or within 48hours of Day 1) is required for inclusion,
  • Hemoglobin: females and males 10.0 g/dl are eligible for inclusion,
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500/µL (1.5×109/L) is required for inclusion
  • Blood chemistry test result no exceed normal by more than 20%. Total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%.
  • Subject is non-childbearing potential of childbearing potential and use acceptable methods of contraception from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis, AND ≥ two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, antiphospholipid syndrome, etc).
  • Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP,which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study.
  • Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
  • History of alcohol/drug abuse or dependence within 12 months of the study.
  • Treatment with thrombopoietin or an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
  • Subjects who have previously received eltrombopag or any other thrombopoietin receptor agonist.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Subject has consumed aspirin, aspirin-containing compounds, salicylates, anticoagulants, quinine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) for >3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study.
  • Consumption of any herbal or dietary supplements, excluding vitamin or mineral supplements, within 1 week of the study start.
  • History of platelet aggregation that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
  • An abnormality in bone marrow examination result, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study (e.g. ≥MF-2 according to EU consensus scale [Thiele, 2005]) or suggests another primary diagnosis (e.g. Thrombocytopenia is secondary to another disease).
  • Any laboratory or clinical evidence for HIV infection.
  • Any clinical history for hepatitis C infection; chronic hepatitis B infection; or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. Laboratory test shows positive serology for Hepatitis C or Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for HBsAg. In addition, if negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive (regardless of HBsAb status), a HB DNA test will be performed and if positive the subject will be excluded.
  • Patients expected to require rescue on Day 1 of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

18 sites in 1 country.

18 sites in 1 country

China18 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100034

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100044

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100083

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100730

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Changsha, Hunan, 410013

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chengdu, 610041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Jianan, Shandong, 250012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai, 200025

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tianjin, 300020

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528403

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind and Open-label Phase III Study To Compare The Efficacy And Safety Of Eltrombopag With Placebo In Chinese Chronic ITP Patients

This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. This study was be conducted in Chinese adult chronic ITP subjects who had not responded to or had relapsed after previous treatment of ITP, including first line therapy and /or splenectomy.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of oral eltrombopag as a thrombopoietic agent treating previously treated chronic Chinese ITP patients compared to placebo. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag when administered for 6 weeks to previously treated adult chronic ITP patients compared with placebo. In addition, the long-term efficacy and safety of eltrombopag treatment was also evaluated in the 24-week extension open-label phase after the double-blind phase as one of other study objectives. If the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could continue on eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in China. Furthermore, to understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of eltrombopag and to explore the relationship between the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) (platelet response), a PK/PD analysis was embedded in this phase III study and conducted in the same patient population who participated this phase III study.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. This study was conducted in Chinese adult chronic ITP subjects who had not responded to or had relapsed after previous treatment for ITP, including first line therapy and /or splenectomy.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of oral eltrombopag as a thrombopoietic agent treating previously treated chronic Chinese ITP patients compared to placebo. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag when administered for 6 weeks to previously treated adult chronic ITP patients compared to placebo. In addition, the long-term efficacy and safety of eltrombopag treatment was also evaluated in the 24-week extension open-label phase after the double-blind phase as one of other study objectives. If the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could continue the eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in China. Furthermore, to understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of eltrombopag and to explore the relationship between the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) (platelet response), a PK/PD analysis was embedded in this phase III study and conducted in the same patient population who participated this phase III study.

155 eligible subjects were randomized to either eltrombopag or matching placebo treatment in 2:1 ratio in stage 1 (the 8-week double blind stage). Randomization for stage 1 was stratified by splenectomy status (Yes/No), use of concomitant maintenance ITP therapy (Yes/No) and baseline platelet count (no more than 15×109/L, or >15×109/L). This study include 3 stages. The stage 1 was an 8-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled treatment period. Following completion of Stage 1 and after completing the data cleanup of the initial 6 weeks, the investigator was be un-blinded to treatment assignment on an individual subject basis to enable appropriate starting dose selection for stage 2, a 24-week open-label treatment period. PK sampling and assessments occurred at the Week 2 visit during stage 2 of the study, when all subjects were receiving eltrombopag. After the completion of stage 2, subjects could continue the the eltrombopag treatment in stage 3, if he/she benefited from the continuous eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's judgement.

The initial dose of eltrombopag administration was an oral 25 mg once daily. During the 8 weeks double-blind treatment, dose of investigational product was adjusted according to the weekly subject platelet count.

The eligible subjects who completed stage 1 (8 weeks of double-blind treatment period: the first 6 weeks data was used for primary endpoint analysis and the last 2 weeks for data cleanup period during which the blinded treatment continued) entered a voluntary open-label stage 2 (24-week open-label extension phase) in which subjects from both the eltrombopag group and placebo group had the opportunity to receive eltrombopag treatment. Subjects unwilling or unqualified (such as the subjects who met the stopping criteria) to participate in extension treatment attended follow-up visits for 4 weeks after the completion of the double-blind phase. During the open-label stage 2 phase all eligible subjects received open label eltrombopag treatment. The dose of eltrombopag was continuously adjusted according to the subject's platelet count.

Following completion of Stage 2, if the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could voluntarily enter stage 3, during which the subject continued eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in C

Being tested
eltrombopag, placebo
Keywords
eltrombopag, TPO-R agonist, Chronic ITP, ETB115, Chinese chronic ITP patients
Medical subject headings
Purpura, Hepatitis C

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • eltrombopagDrug

    Also called ETB115

    TPO-R agonist

  • placeboDrug

    placebo

Study groups in NCT01762761
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eltrombopag (ETB115)ExperimentalThrombopoietin- receptor (TPO-R) agonist
Receives: Drug: eltrombopag
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo
Receives: Drug: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants (Responders) Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L After the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1

    The number of participants (responders) with platelet count >=50x10^9/L after 6 weeks of Stage 1 were compared between treatments using a logistic regression model adjusted for use of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Primary Analysis Data Set: a participant who withdrawals from Stage 1 or is emergently unblinded was classified as a negative response from the time of withdrawal or unblinding date and for all subsequent visits. In the event of a participant dying, information for all subsequent assessments would be considered missing. All intermittent missing data (apart from withdrawals) will be treated as missing.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Number of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L at Least Once During the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1

    The number of participants (responders) with platelet count >=50×10^9/L at least once during the first 6 weeks of Stage 1 were compared between treatments using a logistic regression model adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1

  2. Number of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=30×10^9/L and at Least 2 Times the Baseline Platelet Count at Least Once During the 6 Weeks of Stage 1, the Whole Stage 2 and the Whole Stage 3

    The number of participants achieving a platelet count >=30×10^9/L and at least 2 times the Baseline platelet count at least once during the first 6 weeks of Stage 1 were analyzed. The Baseline platelet count is defined as the platelet count taken on Day 1 of the study or within 48 hours prior to the first dose of investigational product. Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3

  3. Number of Participants With Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale

    The WHO Bleeding Scale is a measure of bleeding severity with the following grades: grade 0 = no bleeding, grade 1= petechiae, grade 2= mild blood loss, grade 3 = gross blood loss, and grade 4 = debilitating blood loss. The WHO Bleeding Scale were dichotomized to indicate no bleeding vs bleeding, i.e. 0=grade 0 and 1=grades 1, 2, 3 or 4. Generalized linear mixed model was applied with a Logit canonical link function for repeated binary data, allowing for Baseline dichotomized WHO bleeding grade, use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment as fixed effects, and the participant was treated as a random effect. Bleeding incidences were recorded at Screening, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6 for Stage 1, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, 24 for Stage 2; Baseline, Weeks 25, 29, 73, 97, 121, 145, 169, 193, 217, 241, 265, 284 for Stage 3. Bleeding incidences at these time points are presented.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3

  4. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale

    The WHO Bleeding Scale is a measure of bleeding severity with the following grades: grade 0 = no bleeding, grade 1= petechiae, grade 2= mild blood loss, grade 3 = gross blood loss, and grade 4 = debilitating blood loss. The WHO Bleeding Scale grades were dichotomized into the following categories: no clinically significant bleeding = Grade 0 to 1; clinically significant bleeding = Grade 2 to 4. Generalized linear mixed model with a Logit canonical link function for repeated binary data, allowing for Baseline dichotomized WHO bleeding grade, use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment as fixed effects, and the participant was treated as a random effect.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3

  5. Time to Response

    Time to response is defined as time from the startin of treatment to the first time of achieving a platelet count >=50x10^9/L during the first 6 weeks of Stage 1. Time to response is summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared between treatment groups using a stratified log-rank test, stratifying for the use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no). The pike estimator of the treatment hazard ratio is based on the stratified log-rank test. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1

  6. Number of Participants Who Required Protocol-defined Rescue Treatment During the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1, Whole Stages 2 & 3

    Rescue treatment is defined as either a new ITP medication, an increase in dose of concomitant ITP medication from Baseline, a platelet transfusion, or a splenectomy. Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3

  7. Number of Participants With a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L During at Least 75% of Their Platelet Count Assessments

    The number of participants with a platelet count >=50×10^9/L during at least 75% of their platelet count assessments was analyzed up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1. Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3

  8. Total Duration of Time a Participant Had a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L

    Total duration of time a participant had platelet count >=50 x 10^9/L was analyzed using the van Elteren stratified rank test with stratification factors including the use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no) and Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no). Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3

  9. Maximum Period of Time a Participant Had a Platelet Count Continuously >= 50 ×10^9/L

    Maximum period of time a participant had a platelet count continously >=50 x 10^9/L was analyzed using the van Elteren stratified rank test with stratification factors including the use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no) and Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no). Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3

  10. Number of Participants That Reduced or Discontinued Baseline Concomitant ITP Medications During Stage 2 and Stage 3

    The number of participants taking concomitant ITP medications on Day 1 of Stage 1 who had a decrease in the dose or frequency of ITP medication or stopped ITP medication at any point during Stage 2 or Stage 3 will be presented. The Baseline concomitant ITP medication for Stage 2 and Stage 3 is defined as ITP medications taken prior to the first dose of investigational product of Stage 1. This study is still ongoing and this endpoint can only be analyzed when the stage 2 and stage 3 complete.

    Measured: From the start of Stage 2 to the end of Stage 3

  11. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is associated with protocol specified liver injury and impaired liver function or is any protocol specific AEs.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 8 of Stage 1

  12. Number of Participants With the Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters

    Clinical chemistry parameters aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), total bilirubin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, potassium, creatinine, glucose and sodium were evaluated at Baseline, at all on therapy visits, and at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4 visits during the follow-up period and were summarized according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (NCI CTCAE V4.0): Grade 0, none; Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe or medically significant; Grade 4, life-threatening consequences; Grade 5, death related to AE. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then Screening assessment is taken as Baseline. For creatinine, Baseline is defined as the average of Screening and Day 1 values if available and prior to first dose. Maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade included any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1

  13. Number of Participants With the Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters

    Clinical hematology parameters hemoglobin, lymphocytes, platelet count, total neutrophils, white blood cell count evaluations were performed at Baseline, at all on-therapy visits, and at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4 visits during the follow-up period and were summarized according to the NCI CTCAE V4.0: Grade 0, none; Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe or medically significant; Grade 4, life-threatening consequences; Grade 5, death related to AE. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then Screening assessment is taken as Baseline. Maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade included any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1

  14. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure

    Systolic blood pressure was measured in the sitting position at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6

  15. Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Diastolic blood pressure was measured in sitting position at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6

  16. Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

    Pulse rate was measured at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6

  17. Number of Participants With the Indicated 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Baseline

    Resting 12-lead ECG was obtained at Baseline. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. ECG was also obtained when there was clinical symptom that potentially related to cardiac dysfunction based on investigator's judgement.

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity is a measure of the spatial resolution of the visual processing system. Acuity is a measure of visual performance and is unrelated to the eyeglass prescription required to correct vision. Normal visual acuity is commonly referred to as 20/20 vision. Evaluation was done for oculus sinister (OS) for the left eye, oculus dexter (OD) for the right eye. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1

  19. Number of Participants With the Indicated Grading of Myelofibrosis Using Bone Marrow Biopsy at Screening

    Bone marrow biopsy was performed at Screening and then obtained when clinically indicated. Whenever a peripheral blood smear confirmed the presence of immature or dysplastic cells, a bone marrow examination was performed. Myelofibrosis (MF) was graded from Grade MF-0 to MF-3 where MF-0=scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal bone marrow; MF-1=loose network of reticulin with many intersections; especially in perivascular areas; MF-2=diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF-3=diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis.

    Measured: Screening

  20. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for Apparent Volume of Distribution of Central Compartment (Vc/F), Apparent Volume of Distribution of Peripheral Compartment (Vp/F)

    Vc/F is apparent volume of distribution of plasma (VDP) in central compartment and Vp/F is apparent VDP in peripheral compartment. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hr and 5 to 8 hr post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hr prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 minutes(min) for samples collected between 1 and 6 hrs and within 30 mins for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameters are presented.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  21. Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Apparent Clearance (CL/F), Apparent Inter-compartmental Clearance (Q/F)

    CL/F is defined as the apparent oral clearance from plasma and Q/F is defined as apparent intercompartmental clearance. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hr and 5 to 8 hr post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hr prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 min for samples collected between 1 and 6 hr and within 30 min for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameters are presented.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  22. Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Absorption Rate Constant (Ka)

    Ka is defined as the absorption rate constant. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hr and 5 to 8 hr post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hrs prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 min for samples collected between 1 and 6 hrs and within 30 mins for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameter is presented.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  23. Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Absorption Lag Time (ALAG)

    Absorption lag time (ALAG) is defined as the time taken for a drug to appear in the systemic circulation following administration. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hrs and 5 to 8 hrs post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hrs prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 min for samples collected between 1 and 6 hr and within 30 min for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameter is presented.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  24. Post-hoc Estimates of Plasma Eltrombopag Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over a Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) After 50 mg Once Daily Dose of Eltrombopag

    AUC[0-tau] is defined as area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (24 hr) of Eltrombopag atsteady-state after 50 mg once daily dose of eltrombopag. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Post-hoc estimates of steady-state eltrombopag was determined based on the final PK model. Individual PK parameters were derived from the final PK model by an empirical Bayes estimation. Summary of steady-state AUC(0-tau) of eltrombopag is presented here.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  25. Post-hoc Estimates of Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) for Eltrombopag After 50 mg Once Daily Dose of Eltrombopag

    Cmax is defined as maximum observed concentration after 50 mg once daily dose of eltrombopag. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Post-hoc estimates of steady-state eltrombopag Cmax was determined based on the final PK model. Individual PK parameters were derived from the final PK model by an empirical Bayes estimation. Summary of steady-state Cmax of eltrombopag .is presented here.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  26. Percentage of Participants Estimated as Responders to Eltrombopag by the Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic Model

    Responders are participants whose SLOP estimates are larger than zero. The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  27. Pharmacodynamic Parameter-Linear Proportionality Constant of Drug Effect (SLOP): the Proportional Increase of Platelet Production Rate With Each 1-μg/mL Increase in Eltrombopag Plasma Concentration

    The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  28. Pharmacodynamic Parameter- Production Rate of Platelet Precursors (KIN)

    The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment. The estimate of KIN was fixed to 1.43x10^9/L.hr.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

  29. Pharmacodynamic Parameter-Maturation Rate of Platelet Precursors (KOUT)

    The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment. The estimate of KOUT was fixed to 0.0253 /hr.

    Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start18 Feb 2013
  3. Primary completion5 Jun 2014
  4. Study completion22 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
155 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01762761
Sponsor's protocol ID
113765
Other IDs
CETB115B2301
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
19 Dec 2012
Last updated
3 Dec 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Publications

  • Liu X, Hou M, Li J, Jin J, Huang M, Yu Z, Xu X, Zhang X, Yang R. Efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: stage 2 results from a multicenter phase III study. Platelets. 2022 Jan 2;33(1):82-88. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1847267. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

    PubMed 33251910

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing eltrombopag in people with Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis C, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 18 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 18 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants (Responders) Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L After the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1 (time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01762761, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in