AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress Urinary IncontinenceNCT01763762

A Comparison of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Female Stress Incontinence

A study testing Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training and Transvaginal ES in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Shanghai Institute of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether electrical pudendal nerve stimulation is more effective than pelvic floor muscle training with Transvaginal electrical stimulation in treating female stress incontinence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 85 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Stress Urinary Incontinence
What is being tested?
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training and Transvaginal ES
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2013to Feb 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 85 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • SUI history
  • Positive stress test result
  • Urodynamically confirmed SUI
  • Postvoid residual urine volume <50ml

Who cannot join

  • Urge incontinence (overactive bladder or detrusor overactivity incontinence)
  • Neurogenic bladder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Shanghai research institute of acupuncture and meridian

    Shanghai, 200030

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of the Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With Transvaginal Electrical Stimulation in Treating Female Stress Incontinence

The purpose of this study is to determine whether electrical pudendal nerve stimulation is more effective than pelvic floor muscle training with Transvaginal electrical stimulation in treating female stress incontinence.

Read the detailed description

Conservative therapy could be considered a choice of treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) as it seems to have no side effects and causes significant and long-term improvement in symptoms. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and electrical stimulation are two commonly used forms of conservative treatment for SUI.

PFMT improves the structural support of the pelvis. However, many patients-especially women-have difficulty identifying and isolating their pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and are unable to perform the exercise effectively. Furthermore, patients who can identify the PFM often find that the required daily exercise routine is burdensome. Hence, the primary disadvantage of PFMT is lack of long-term patient compliance.

Electrical stimulation (ES) is a non-invasive, passive treatment that produces a muscle contraction. Transvaginal electrical stimulation (TES) has almost no side-effects and patient compliance in published reports is 70-85%. TES will result in PFM contraction by indirect nerve stimulation, mainly by polysynaptic reflex responses. The indirect stimulation and reflexive contraction may be the reason why the effect of electrical stimulation is not as good as that of PFMT when performed correctly.

By combining the advantages of PFMT and TES and incorporating the technique of deep insertion of long acupuncture needles, we developed electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (EPNS). In EPNS, long acupuncture needles of 0.40 Х 100 or 125 mm were deeply inserted into four sacral points and electrified to stimulate the pudendal nerves (PN) and contract the PFM. CT transverse plane at the coccygeal apex has showed that the position of the lower needle tip is similar to where (adjacent to PN at Alcock's canal) the Bion device is implanted for chronic PN stimulation. Besides the radiographic evidence, simultaneous records of perineal ultrasonographic PFM contraction, vaginal pressure and pelvic floor surface electromyogram in our previous study have proved that EPNS can exactly excite PN,contract the PFM and simulate PFMT. Our previous study has also proved that EPNS has a good therapeutic effect on female SUI. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of EPNS to PFMT with TES in treating female SUI.

Being tested
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training, Transvaginal ES
Keywords
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, Pelvic floor muscle training, Transvaginal electrical stimulation, Stress urinary incontinence, Comparative study
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Stress

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electrical pudendal nerve stimulationBehavioural

    Four sacral points are selected. The two upper points are located about 1 cm bilateral to the sacrococcygeal joint. On the upper points, a needle of 0.40 Х 100 mm is inserted perpendicularly to a depth of 80 to 90 mm to produce a sensation referred to the urethra or the anus. The locations of the two lower points are about 1 cm bilateral to the tip of the coccyx. On the lower points, a needle of 0.40 Х 100 or 125 mm is inserted obliquely towards the ischiorectal fossa to a depth of 90 to 110 mm to produce a sensation referred to the urethra. After the sensation referred to the above regions is produced, each of two pairs of electrodes from a G6805-2 Multi-Purpose Health Device is connected with the two ipsilaterally inserted needles.

  • PFM trainingBehavioural

    A nerve function reconstruction treatment system (AM1000B; Shenzhen Creative Industry Co.Ltd, China) is used for EMG-biofeedback assisted PFMT.

  • Transvaginal ESBehavioural

    A neuromuscular stimulation therapy system (PHENIX USB 4,Electronic Concept Lignon Innovation, France) is used for TES

Study groups in NCT01763762
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulationExperimentalAt a frequency of 2.5 Hz and an intensity (45~55 mA) as high as the patient can tolerate without discomfort; 60 minutes three times a week for a total of four weeks
Receives: Behavioral: Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation
PFM training with Transvaginal ESActive comparatorPFM training: EMG-biofeedback assisted PFMT was performed by specially trained therapists, 20 min three times a week for a total of four weeks. Patients conduct 30 maximal high intensity PFM contractions for 2-6 sec (with 2-6 sec rest), three sessions a day at home for a total of four weeks. Transvaginal ES: At a current intensity of < 60 mA (as high as possible to get a contraction) and frequencies of 15 Hz and 85 Hz (alternate 3-min periods of stimulation); 20 min three times a week for a total of four weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: PFM training; Behavioral: Transvaginal ES

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stress test

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. A questionnaire to measure the severity of symptoms and the quality of life in SUI women

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionJan 2014
  4. Study completionFeb 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01763762
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZYSNXD-CC-ZDYJ010
Status last verified
Sep 2013
First submitted
7 Jan 2013
Last updated
20 Nov 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Wang S, Zhang S. Simultaneous perineal ultrasound and vaginal pressure measurement prove the action of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation in treating female stress incontinence. BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1338-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11029.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

    PubMed 22417077
  • Wang S, Lv J, Feng X, Wang G, Lv T. Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Treating Female Stress Incontinence. Urology. 2016 May;91:64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.027. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

    PubMed 26921645

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training and Transvaginal ES in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Shanghai Institute of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stress test (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01763762, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in