SarcomaNCT01763970
Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Sarcomas
A study testing SBRT in people with Sarcoma and Metastatic Disease, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) literature focuses on clinical outcomes in the adult population. However, SBRT has a particularly strong rationale for application in pediatrics given that high biologically effective doses have been shown to increase control in histologies, such as sarcoma, which are… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sarcoma, Metastatic Disease, Bony Sites
- What is being tested?
- SBRT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic sarcoma of the soft tissue or bone
- must have measurable disease
- disease must be surgically unresectable as determined by a tumor board or surgeon
- greater than 3 years of age
- less than or equal to 40 years of age
- life expectancy of at least 9 months
- adequate performance status (Lansky Performance Status greater than or equal to 50).
- ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent document
Who cannot join
- patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to entering the study
- patients who have had any prior radiotherapy to the treatment site(s)
- patients may not participate on any other treatment protocol while they are receiving treatment on this protocol and for up to 3 months after these protocol treatments have ended
- pregnant women
- refusal of women of child bearing potential to take a pregnancy test prior to treatment
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105-3678
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55902
Stanford Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5847
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study of Hyperfractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Pediatric Sarcomas of Bony Sites
The stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) literature focuses on clinical outcomes in the adult population. However, SBRT has a particularly strong rationale for application in pediatrics given that high biologically effective doses have been shown to increase control in histologies, such as sarcoma, which are common in the pediatrics population. With stereotactic radiation therapy techniques, a reduction in normal tissue dose surrounding the target lesion of interest may also be accomplished resulting in lower toxicity. Given that pediatric patients with sarcomas, presenting with limited metastases in lung and bone, are still considered to be a curable population with aggressive local therapy, SBRT could have a significant impact on outcomes in oligometastatic patients who may be otherwise unresectable.
Read the detailed description
Pediatric patients with sarcoma who have limited metastases are still potentially curable with aggressive local therapy. However, conventional moderate dose radiation is unlikely to provide durable local control. Given the recent technologic advances in radiation delivery, it is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses, using stereotactic radiation over a short time course with highly focal techniques. Stereotactic radiation has proven efficacious in the intracranial setting and in multiple extracranial sites in adults. It has not yet been well studied in the pediatrics population where there is a particularly strong rationale due to the ablative doses that can be delivered to tumor while simultaneously reducing high dose to normal tissues. The proposed trial is a single arm phase II study to determine the efficacy of SBRT in pediatric sarcomas with surgically unresectable metastatic disease. Oligometastatic sites eligible for treatment in this study include bony sites of disease. SBRT will be delivered to each eligible site to a total dose of 4000 delivered in 5 fractions of 800 per fractions each day. Following completion of SBRT, patients will undergo treatment response assessment with the use of diagnostic imaging, clinical examination, and completion of the Brief Pain Inventory to assess quality of life. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of SBRT delivered to a dose of 4000 centigray (cGy) in 5 fractions of 800 cGy each for patients greater than 3 years of age and < 40 years of age with metastatic disease of bone secondary to pediatric sarcoma. The secondary objectives of this study include describing the toxicity of SBRT with this regimen; assessing clinical response rate of each target lesion; assessing long-term clinical outcomes; and assessing quality of life following completion of treatment. For patients with potentially curable oligometastatic disease, surgical resection in conjunction with systemic therapy remains the standard of care. Patients on this study will continue to receive chemotherapy outside of the 2 week window for SBRT. Issues that may limit participation include our inability to assess late effects that may not develop till at least 10 years after therapy. For this reason, we will limit the population in this study to patients who are surgically unresectable and would be otherwise incurable with current standard systemic therapies.
- Conditions
- Sarcoma, Metastatic Disease, Bony Sites
- Being tested
- SBRT
- Keywords
- Stereotactic, Radiotherapy, Hypofractionated
- Medical subject headings
- Sarcoma, Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SBRTRadiation
Also called Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionated SBRT | Experimental | 800 cGy delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 cGy Receives: Radiation: SBRT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled
Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as:
- (1) the development of a new soft tissue mass ≥1 cm at a site without a soft tissue component or with a soft tissue component <1 cm in at baseline
- (2) an increase in the largest axial dimension of the soft tissue component by >20% in lesions with a ≥ 1 cm in soft tissue component at baseline
- (3) a previous bone metastasis that was avid on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), became non-avid after SBRT, and then became avid again.
The Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Measured: 6 months post-SBRT
Secondary outcomes (5)
Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled
Patient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up.
Measured: 6 months post-SBRT
Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
To assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up.
Measured: 6 months post-SBRT
Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up.
Measured: 6 months post-SBRT
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Quality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Measured: Baseline and one-month post-SBRT
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT
To describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Measured: 12 months after treatment starts
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completion24 Sep 2018
- Study completionApr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for SarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Matthew Ladra, M.D., Principal investigator, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01763970
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- J1367
- Other IDs
- NA_00070109
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study of Hyperfractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Pediatric Sarcomas of Bony Sites
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01763970
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- J1367
- Conditions
- Sarcoma, Metastatic Disease, Bony Sites
- Keywords
- Stereotactic, Radiotherapy, Hypofractionated
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Aug 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) literature focuses on clinical outcomes in the adult population. However, SBRT has a particularly strong rationale for application in pediatrics given that high biologically effective doses have been shown to increase control in histologies, such as sarcoma, which are common in the pediatrics population. With stereotactic radiation therapy techniques, a reduction in normal tissue dose surrounding the target lesion of interest may also be accomplished resulting in lower toxicity. Given that pediatric patients with sarcomas, presenting with limited metastases in lung and bone, are still considered to be a curable population with aggressive local therapy, SBRT could have a significant impact on outcomes in oligometastatic patients who may be otherwise unresectable.
Detailed description
Pediatric patients with sarcoma who have limited metastases are still potentially curable with aggressive local therapy. However, conventional moderate dose radiation is unlikely to provide durable local control. Given the recent technologic advances in radiation delivery, it is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses, using stereotactic radiation over a short time course with highly focal techniques. Stereotactic radiation has proven efficacious in the intracranial setting and in multiple extracranial sites in adults. It has not yet been well studied in the pediatrics population where there is a particularly strong rationale due to the ablative doses that can be delivered to tumor while simultaneously reducing high dose to normal tissues. The proposed trial is a single arm phase II study to determine the efficacy of SBRT in pediatric sarcomas with surgically unresectable metastatic disease. Oligometastatic sites eligible for treatment in this study include bony sites of disease. SBRT will be delivered to each eligible site to a total dose of 4000 delivered in 5 fractions of 800 per fractions each day. Following completion of SBRT, patients will undergo treatment response assessment with the use of diagnostic imaging, clinical examination, and completion of the Brief Pain Inventory to assess quality of life. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of SBRT delivered to a dose of 4000 centigray (cGy) in 5 fractions of 800 cGy each for patients greater than 3 years of age and < 40 years of age with metastatic disease of bone secondary to pediatric sarcoma. The secondary objectives of this study include describing the toxicity of SBRT with this regimen; assessing clinical response rate of each target lesion; assessing long-term clinical outcomes; and assessing quality of life following completion of treatment. For patients with potentially curable oligometastatic disease, surgical resection in conjunction with systemic therapy remains the standard of care. Patients on this study will continue to receive chemotherapy outside of the 2 week window for SBRT. Issues that may limit participation include our inability to assess late effects that may not develop till at least 10 years after therapy. For this reason, we will limit the population in this study to patients who are surgically unresectable and would be otherwise incurable with current standard systemic therapies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionated SBRT | Experimental | Radiation: SBRT800 cGy delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 cGy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic sarcoma of the soft tissue or bone
- must have measurable disease
- disease must be surgically unresectable as determined by a tumor board or surgeon
- greater than 3 years of age
- less than or equal to 40 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to entering the study
- patients who have had any prior radiotherapy to the treatment site(s)
- patients may not participate on any other treatment protocol while they are receiving treatment on this protocol and for up to 3 months after these protocol treatments have ended
- pregnant women
- refusal of women of child bearing potential to take a pregnancy test prior to treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SBRTAlso: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) | Radiation | Hypofractionated SBRT |
Primary outcome
Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled
Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT
Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as: * (1) the development of a new soft tissue mass ≥1 cm at a site without a soft tissue component or with a soft tissue component <1 cm in at baseline * (2) an increase in the largest axial dimension of the soft tissue component by >20% in lesions with a ≥ 1 cm in soft tissue component at baseline * (3) a previous bone metastasis that was avid on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), became non-avid after SBRT, and then became avid again. The Kaplan-Meier method was used.
5 secondary outcomes
Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled
Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT
Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT
Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time frame: Baseline and one-month post-SBRT
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT
Time frame: 12 months after treatment starts
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Calderasib (MK-1084) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With KRAS G12C Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% (MK-1084-004/KANDLELIT-004)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase II Trial of Tebentafusp in HLA-A*02:01 Positive Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Sarcoma
HLA-A*0201 Positive Cells Present, Clear Cell Sarcoma (CCS)
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Exploratory Study of Personalized mRNA Vaccine in Patients With Refractory Rhabdomyosarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Cobimetinib in Refractory Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH), and Other Histiocytic Disorders
Langerhan's Cell Histiocytosis, Juvenile Xanthogranuloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matthew Ladra, M.D. principal investigator
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SBRT in people with Sarcoma and Metastatic Disease, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled (time frame: 6 months post-SBRT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2020.