AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaNCT01765036

Contrast-harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

A study testing SonoVue® in people with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most frequent pancreatic solid lesion and the most common tumor of the pancreas. Given its poor prognosis and the major therapeutic consequences, the discrimination between PA and other pancreatic solid lesions is mandatory. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
What is being tested?
SonoVue®
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jul 2009to Sep 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients with a solid pancreatic mass of indeterminate origin

Who cannot join

  • presence of a cystic component greater than 25 % of the total volume of the lesion, pregnancy, lactation, age <18 years, and usual contraindications to SonoVue® injection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Société Française d'Endoscopie Digrestive

    Paris, 75006

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Contrast-harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results of the First Multicenter Prospective Study With Intra- and Interobserver Concordances Evaluation

Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most frequent pancreatic solid lesion and the most common tumor of the pancreas. Given its poor prognosis and the major therapeutic consequences, the discrimination between PA and other pancreatic solid lesions is mandatory. EUS is admitted as the most sensitive imaging procedure for the detection and characterization of pancreatic tumors [1-3]. Nevertheless it remains difficult to differentiate, on morphological features, PA from other solid masses. For 15 years, endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has demonstrated its efficiency for tissue sampling and cyto-histologic diagnosis of PA. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) remains low (30-70%) in the published prospective series [4]. So, in case of negative result, the choice between surgery and follow-up remains difficult. Additional criteria to get the decision are then warranted.

The assessment of pancreatic tumor enhancement using ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in real time with imaging specific methods seems useful to improve their characterization [4-8] either by contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) or, more recently, by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS).

Read more

The aims of this prospective multicenter study is:

  1. to compare the NPV of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) and EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of PA;
  2. to assess the intra- and inter-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA.
Read the detailed description

100 patients with a solid pancreatic mass of indeterminate origin must be prospectively included in 3 French centers Exclusion criteria: presence of a cystic component greater than 25 % of the total volume of the lesion, pregnancy, lactation, age <18 years, and usual contraindications to SonoVue® injection.

All EUS procedure will be performed by 5 experienced endosonographers as follows:

  1. Conventional gray-scale B-mode and conventional power Doppler EUS to assess the EUS characteristics of the pancreatic lesion (localization, size, echogenicity, cystic component), the aspect of the surrounding parenchyma as well as the presence of proximal duct dilation, vessels infiltration, and collateral veins; tumor and nodes (uTN) staging. A systematic video of the 2 modes will be recorded.
  2. CH-EUS will be performed to assess the microvascularization of the lesion and of the surrounding parenchyma: the echoendoscope will be placed in front of the pancreatic lesion and the contrast-specific mode will be engaged with simultaneous monitoring by fundamental B mode. A mecanical index (MI) of 0.4 will be chose based on previous studies [4-6]. An intravenous 4.8 ml SonoVue® bolus injection will be administrated through an antecubital vein, using a 20 Gauges catheter, followed by 20 ml saline flush. Examination of pancreatic lesion will be evaluated in real time and a video of each examination will be record and store. The examination lasted up to 3 minutes after SonoVue® injection to ensure full examination of the lesion in arterial (hyper echogenicity of the aorta, superior mesenteric, hepatic or splenic arteries) and venous phases (hyper echogenicity of the splenic-mesenteric-portal vessels). The pancreatic lesion enhancement pattern will be compare to the adjacent pancreatic parenchyma. We differentiated 3 patterns: hypo-, iso- or hyperenhancement. The operator classified the lesion as pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) or non PA. Based on previous pilot studies, lesion in hypoenhancement consider as PA while lesion in hyper or isoenhancement as non-PA [4-6]. In case of tumors with mixed pattern the lesion was considered as PA if a significant area (>10% of the surface) is in hypoenhancement.
  3. EUS-FNA: a specimen will be obtain from all lesions using a 22 Gauge needle. Final diagnosis will be based on pathological findings obtained either surgically or by EUS-FNA. In the absence of histological evidence, follow-up (F-U) of patients for 12 months will be carried out. The diagnosis of PA ruled out if no sign of malignancy (disease regression or absence of disease progression) present at the end of F-U.
  4. Images reviewing: at the end of the study an anonymous digital video recording of each procedure including B mode, power Doppler mode and CHE mode will be performed.

Statistical analysis. The McNemar test will be use to compare the CH-EUS performance for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Spe), predictive positive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) will be calculate. A p value of 0.05 considered statistically significant. Intra- and interobserver agreements of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA will assess using kappa statistics and associated 95% CI. Depending on Kappa values, agreement will considered as minor (0.01-0.20), fair (0.21-0.40), moderate (0.41-0.60), high (0.61-0.80), or almost perfect (0.81-1.00), beyond chance.

Being tested
SonoVue®
Keywords
contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound, pancreatic adenocarcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SonoVue®Drug

    Also called soufre hexafluorure

    An intravenous 4.8 ml SonoVue® bolus injection was administered to each patient during the procedure

Study groups in NCT01765036
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SonoVue®ExperimentalNon randomised study Sonovue 4,8 ml intravenous administration, in 1 bolus, during the EUS examination
Receives: Drug: SonoVue®

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)

    To evaluate the NPV of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. to asses intra-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA

    an anonymous digital video recording of each procedure including B mode, power Doppler mode and CHE mode was created. A 2-days joint work session was organized with 7 endosonographers: the 5 senior endoscopists who had performed the examinations and 2 juniors. To harmonizing the interpretation a short teaching session was done with some cases not included in the series. The different types of enhancement of solid pancreatic masses histologically proven (PA, benign and malignant NET, pancreatic metastases, and focal mass of CP) were shown. During day 1 the 7 operators reviewed independently and in a random order all 100 anonymous videotapes. One senior and 1 junior reviewed all videotapes a second time in a different random order. Each observer had to independently classify the lesion as PA or not. During day 2 a joint review was done with the cases where a discrepancy of interpretation has been observed. A final consensus for the diagnosis was proposed if possible.

    Measured: two days

  2. to asses inter-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA

    an anonymous digital video recording of each procedure including B mode, power Doppler mode and CHE mode was created. A 2-days joint work session was organized with 7 endosonographers: the 5 senior endoscopists who had performed the examinations and 2 juniors. To harmonizing the interpretation a short teaching session was done with some cases not included in the series. The different types of enhancement of solid pancreatic masses histologically proven (PA, benign and malignant NET, pancreatic metastases, and focal mass of CP) were shown. During day 1 the 7 operators reviewed independently and in a random order all 100 anonymous videotapes. One senior and 1 junior reviewed all videotapes a second time in a different random order. Each observer had to independently classify the lesion as PA or not. During day 2 a joint review was done with the cases where a discrepancy of interpretation has been observed. A final consensus for the diagnosis was proposed if possible.

    Measured: two days

  3. sensibility (Se) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)

    To evaluate the Se of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis

    Measured: one year

  4. Specificity (Spe) of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)

    To evaluate the specificity (Spe) of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis

    Measured: one year

  5. Positive predictive value (PPV) of CH-EUS for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)

    To evaluate the PPV of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis

    Measured: one year

  6. Accuracy of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA

    To evaluate the accuracy of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis value (PPV)

    Measured: one year

  7. Accuracy of CH-EUS compared to EUS-FNA

    To compare the accuracy of CH-EUS and EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of PA with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01765036
Sponsor's protocol ID
2008-004676-44
Other IDs
2008
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
3 Jan 2013
Last updated
10 Jan 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SonoVue® in people with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in