Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaNCT01765036
Contrast-harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
A study testing SonoVue® in people with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most frequent pancreatic solid lesion and the most common tumor of the pancreas. Given its poor prognosis and the major therapeutic consequences, the discrimination between PA and other pancreatic solid lesions is mandatory. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- What is being tested?
- SonoVue®
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Sep 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with a solid pancreatic mass of indeterminate origin
Who cannot join
- presence of a cystic component greater than 25 % of the total volume of the lesion, pregnancy, lactation, age <18 years, and usual contraindications to SonoVue® injection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Contrast-harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results of the First Multicenter Prospective Study With Intra- and Interobserver Concordances Evaluation
Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most frequent pancreatic solid lesion and the most common tumor of the pancreas. Given its poor prognosis and the major therapeutic consequences, the discrimination between PA and other pancreatic solid lesions is mandatory. EUS is admitted as the most sensitive imaging procedure for the detection and characterization of pancreatic tumors [1-3]. Nevertheless it remains difficult to differentiate, on morphological features, PA from other solid masses. For 15 years, endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has demonstrated its efficiency for tissue sampling and cyto-histologic diagnosis of PA. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) remains low (30-70%) in the published prospective series [4]. So, in case of negative result, the choice between surgery and follow-up remains difficult. Additional criteria to get the decision are then warranted.
The assessment of pancreatic tumor enhancement using ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in real time with imaging specific methods seems useful to improve their characterization [4-8] either by contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) or, more recently, by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS).
Read more
The aims of this prospective multicenter study is:
- to compare the NPV of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) and EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of PA;
- to assess the intra- and inter-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA.
Read the detailed description
100 patients with a solid pancreatic mass of indeterminate origin must be prospectively included in 3 French centers Exclusion criteria: presence of a cystic component greater than 25 % of the total volume of the lesion, pregnancy, lactation, age <18 years, and usual contraindications to SonoVue® injection.
All EUS procedure will be performed by 5 experienced endosonographers as follows:
- Conventional gray-scale B-mode and conventional power Doppler EUS to assess the EUS characteristics of the pancreatic lesion (localization, size, echogenicity, cystic component), the aspect of the surrounding parenchyma as well as the presence of proximal duct dilation, vessels infiltration, and collateral veins; tumor and nodes (uTN) staging. A systematic video of the 2 modes will be recorded.
- CH-EUS will be performed to assess the microvascularization of the lesion and of the surrounding parenchyma: the echoendoscope will be placed in front of the pancreatic lesion and the contrast-specific mode will be engaged with simultaneous monitoring by fundamental B mode. A mecanical index (MI) of 0.4 will be chose based on previous studies [4-6]. An intravenous 4.8 ml SonoVue® bolus injection will be administrated through an antecubital vein, using a 20 Gauges catheter, followed by 20 ml saline flush. Examination of pancreatic lesion will be evaluated in real time and a video of each examination will be record and store. The examination lasted up to 3 minutes after SonoVue® injection to ensure full examination of the lesion in arterial (hyper echogenicity of the aorta, superior mesenteric, hepatic or splenic arteries) and venous phases (hyper echogenicity of the splenic-mesenteric-portal vessels). The pancreatic lesion enhancement pattern will be compare to the adjacent pancreatic parenchyma. We differentiated 3 patterns: hypo-, iso- or hyperenhancement. The operator classified the lesion as pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) or non PA. Based on previous pilot studies, lesion in hypoenhancement consider as PA while lesion in hyper or isoenhancement as non-PA [4-6]. In case of tumors with mixed pattern the lesion was considered as PA if a significant area (>10% of the surface) is in hypoenhancement.
- EUS-FNA: a specimen will be obtain from all lesions using a 22 Gauge needle. Final diagnosis will be based on pathological findings obtained either surgically or by EUS-FNA. In the absence of histological evidence, follow-up (F-U) of patients for 12 months will be carried out. The diagnosis of PA ruled out if no sign of malignancy (disease regression or absence of disease progression) present at the end of F-U.
- Images reviewing: at the end of the study an anonymous digital video recording of each procedure including B mode, power Doppler mode and CHE mode will be performed.
Statistical analysis. The McNemar test will be use to compare the CH-EUS performance for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Spe), predictive positive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) will be calculate. A p value of 0.05 considered statistically significant. Intra- and interobserver agreements of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA will assess using kappa statistics and associated 95% CI. Depending on Kappa values, agreement will considered as minor (0.01-0.20), fair (0.21-0.40), moderate (0.41-0.60), high (0.61-0.80), or almost perfect (0.81-1.00), beyond chance.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- Being tested
- SonoVue®
- Keywords
- contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound, pancreatic adenocarcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SonoVue®Drug
Also called soufre hexafluorure
An intravenous 4.8 ml SonoVue® bolus injection was administered to each patient during the procedure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SonoVue® | Experimental | Non randomised study
Sonovue 4,8 ml intravenous administration, in 1 bolus, during the EUS examination Receives: Drug: SonoVue® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
To evaluate the NPV of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (7)
to asses intra-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA
an anonymous digital video recording of each procedure including B mode, power Doppler mode and CHE mode was created. A 2-days joint work session was organized with 7 endosonographers: the 5 senior endoscopists who had performed the examinations and 2 juniors. To harmonizing the interpretation a short teaching session was done with some cases not included in the series. The different types of enhancement of solid pancreatic masses histologically proven (PA, benign and malignant NET, pancreatic metastases, and focal mass of CP) were shown. During day 1 the 7 operators reviewed independently and in a random order all 100 anonymous videotapes. One senior and 1 junior reviewed all videotapes a second time in a different random order. Each observer had to independently classify the lesion as PA or not. During day 2 a joint review was done with the cases where a discrepancy of interpretation has been observed. A final consensus for the diagnosis was proposed if possible.
Measured: two days
to asses inter-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA
an anonymous digital video recording of each procedure including B mode, power Doppler mode and CHE mode was created. A 2-days joint work session was organized with 7 endosonographers: the 5 senior endoscopists who had performed the examinations and 2 juniors. To harmonizing the interpretation a short teaching session was done with some cases not included in the series. The different types of enhancement of solid pancreatic masses histologically proven (PA, benign and malignant NET, pancreatic metastases, and focal mass of CP) were shown. During day 1 the 7 operators reviewed independently and in a random order all 100 anonymous videotapes. One senior and 1 junior reviewed all videotapes a second time in a different random order. Each observer had to independently classify the lesion as PA or not. During day 2 a joint review was done with the cases where a discrepancy of interpretation has been observed. A final consensus for the diagnosis was proposed if possible.
Measured: two days
sensibility (Se) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
To evaluate the Se of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis
Measured: one year
Specificity (Spe) of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
To evaluate the specificity (Spe) of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis
Measured: one year
Positive predictive value (PPV) of CH-EUS for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
To evaluate the PPV of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis
Measured: one year
Accuracy of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA
To evaluate the accuracy of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis value (PPV)
Measured: one year
Accuracy of CH-EUS compared to EUS-FNA
To compare the accuracy of CH-EUS and EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of PA with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionSep 2010
- Study completionSep 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gincul Rodica, Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
- Investigators
- Rodica Gincul, MD, Principal investigator, Société Française d'Endoscopie DigestiveBertrand Napoleon, MD, Study chair, Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01765036
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008-004676-44
- Other IDs
- 2008
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Contrast-harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results of the First Multicenter Prospective Study With Intra- and Interobserver Concordances Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01765036
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2008-004676-44
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- Keywords
- contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound, pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Société Française d'Endoscopie DigestiveUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most frequent pancreatic solid lesion and the most common tumor of the pancreas. Given its poor prognosis and the major therapeutic consequences, the discrimination between PA and other pancreatic solid lesions is mandatory. EUS is admitted as the most sensitive imaging procedure for the detection and characterization of pancreatic tumors [1-3]. Nevertheless it remains difficult to differentiate, on morphological features, PA from other solid masses. For 15 years, endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has demonstrated its efficiency for tissue sampling and cyto-histologic diagnosis of PA. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) remains low (30-70%) in the published prospective series [4]. So, in case of negative result, the choice between surgery and follow-up remains difficult. Additional criteria to get the decision are then warranted.
The assessment of pancreatic tumor enhancement using ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in real time with imaging specific methods seems useful to improve their characterization [4-8] either by contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) or, more recently, by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS).
The aims of this prospective multicenter study is:
- to compare the NPV of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) and EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of PA;
- to assess the intra- and inter-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA.
Detailed description
100 patients with a solid pancreatic mass of indeterminate origin must be prospectively included in 3 French centers Exclusion criteria: presence of a cystic component greater than 25 % of the total volume of the lesion, pregnancy, lactation, age <18 years, and usual contraindications to SonoVue® injection.
All EUS procedure will be performed by 5 experienced endosonographers as follows:
- Conventional gray-scale B-mode and conventional power Doppler EUS to assess the EUS characteristics of the pancreatic lesion (localization, size, echogenicity, cystic component), the aspect of the surrounding parenchyma as well as the presence of proximal duct dilation, vessels infiltration, and collateral veins; tumor and nodes (uTN) staging. A systematic video of the 2 modes will be recorded.
- CH-EUS will be performed to assess the microvascularization of the lesion and of the surrounding parenchyma: the echoendoscope will be placed in front of the pancreatic lesion and the contrast-specific mode will be engaged with simultaneous monitoring by fundamental B mode. A mecanical index (MI) of 0.4 will be chose based on previous studies [4-6]. An intravenous 4.8 ml SonoVue® bolus injection will be administrated through an antecubital vein, using a 20 Gauges catheter, followed by 20 ml saline flush. Examination of pancreatic lesion will be evaluated in real time and a video of each examination will be record and store. The examination lasted up to 3 minutes after SonoVue® injection to ensure full examination of the lesion in arterial (hyper echogenicity of the aorta, superior mesenteric, hepatic or splenic arteries) and venous phases (hyper echogenicity of the splenic-mesenteric-portal vessels). The pancreatic lesion enhancement pattern will be compare to the adjacent pancreatic parenchyma. We differentiated 3 patterns: hypo-, iso- or hyperenhancement. The operator classified the lesion as pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) or non PA. Based on previous pilot studies, lesion in hypoenhancement consider as PA while lesion in hyper or isoenhancement as non-PA [4-6]. In case of tumors with mixed pattern the lesion was considered as PA if a significant area (>10% of the surface) is in hypoenhancement.
- EUS-FNA: a specimen will be obtain from all lesions using a 22 Gauge needle. Final diagnosis will be based on pathological findings obtained either surgically or by EUS-FNA. In the absence of histological evidence, follow-up (F-U) of patients for 12 months will be carried out. The diagnosis of PA ruled out if no sign of malignancy (disease regression or absence of disease progression) present at the end of F-U.
- Images reviewing: at the end of the study an anonymous digital video recording of each procedure including B mode, power Doppler mode and CHE mode will be performed.
Statistical analysis. The McNemar test will be use to compare the CH-EUS performance for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Spe), predictive positive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) will be calculate. A p value of 0.05 considered statistically significant. Intra- and interobserver agreements of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA will assess using kappa statistics and associated 95% CI. Depending on Kappa values, agreement will considered as minor (0.01-0.20), fair (0.21-0.40), moderate (0.41-0.60), high (0.61-0.80), or almost perfect (0.81-1.00), beyond chance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SonoVue® | Experimental | Drug: SonoVue®Non randomised study Sonovue 4,8 ml intravenous administration, in 1 bolus, during the EUS examination |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients with a solid pancreatic mass of indeterminate origin
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- presence of a cystic component greater than 25 % of the total volume of the lesion, pregnancy, lactation, age <18 years, and usual contraindications to SonoVue® injection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SonoVue®Also: soufre hexafluorureAn intravenous 4.8 ml SonoVue® bolus injection was administered to each patient during the procedure | Drug | SonoVue® |
Primary outcome
negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
Time frame: one year
To evaluate the NPV of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA to EUS-FNA and final diagnosis
7 secondary outcomes
to asses intra-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA
Time frame: two days
to asses inter-observer concordances of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA
Time frame: two days
sensibility (Se) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
Time frame: one year
Specificity (Spe) of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
Time frame: one year
Positive predictive value (PPV) of CH-EUS for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)
Time frame: one year
Accuracy of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PA
Time frame: one year
Accuracy of CH-EUS compared to EUS-FNA
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2013.
Related trials for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Zoldonrasib + Chemo of Investigator's Choice vs Placebo + Chemo of Investigator's Choice as First-line Treatment in Metastatic KRAS G12D-mutated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ( RASolute 305 )
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rodica Gincul, MD principal investigator
Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
Bertrand Napoleon, MD study chair
Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SonoVue® in people with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2013.