Colorectal AdenomaPhase 4FITSNCT01767870
Efficacy Combined Fecal Immunochemical Test-Sigmoidoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia
A Phase 4 study testing FIT-sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy in people with Colorectal Adenoma, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test combined with sigmoidoscopy (FITS) for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia compared to colonoscopy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Adenoma
- What is being tested?
- FIT-sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,282 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Aug 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Asymptomatic subjects aged 45 - 75 years
- Subjects who will give the written consent
Who cannot join
- Subjects with past history of colorectal cancer
- Subjects with familial histories of familial adenomatous polyposis(FAP) or Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer(HNPCC)
- Subjects with familial history of colorectal cancer more than 2 familial member in direct line
- Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)
- Subjects with more than 3 point of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification
- Subjects with past history of colectomy
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subjects with history of colonoscopy within 5 years
- Subjects with history of sigmoidoscopy within 3 years
- Subjects with history of CT colonoscopy within 10 years
- Subjects with symptoms that could present the colorectal cancer such as hematochezia, melena, weight loss more than 10kg/6months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Wonju Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, 220-701
Hyun-Soo Kim, M.D., ph D., +82-33-741-1224, hyskim@yonsei.ac.kr
Hong Jun Park, M.D., +82-33-741-1226, ppakongs@daum.net
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy vs. Combined Fecal Immunochemical Test-Sigmoidoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia (eCOLO-FITS): A Randomized Multicenter Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test combined with sigmoidoscopy (FITS) for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia compared to colonoscopy.
Read the detailed description
The investigators will evaluate the efficacy of FITS for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia compared to colonoscopy. This study was designed as multicenter randomized interventional study. The expected period are 36months. A total 13 tertiary hospitals will participate in the study.
Subjects will be randomly allocated to FITS group and colonoscopy group. Subjects who undergo FITS will be performed by following colonoscopy to confirm the efficacy of FITS. In colonoscopy group, subjects as a control group would be performed colonoscopy.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Adenoma
- Being tested
- FIT-sigmoidoscopy, Colonoscopy
- Keywords
- advanced colorectal adenoma, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal immunochemical test
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FIT-sigmoidoscopyProcedure or surgery
Also called FITS, sigmoidoscopy
Advanced colorectal adenoma detection by fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy
ColonoscopyProcedure or surgery
Advanced colorectal adenoma detection by colonoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FIT-Sigmoidoscopy | Experimental | This arm (FIT-Sigmoidoscopy) will take fecal immunochemical test (FIT) followed by sigmoidoscopy for evaluation of advanced colorectal adenoma detection rate. Immediately after sigmoidoscopy, a total colonoscopy will be performed as a standard method for advanced colorectal adenoma detection. Receives: Procedure: FIT-sigmoidoscopy |
| Colonoscopy | Experimental | This arm (Colonoscopy) will take a total colonoscopy as a control group that will represent the efficacy of colonoscopy for advanced colorectal adenoma detection rate. Receives: Procedure: Colonoscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Advanced colorectal adenoma detection rate between two groups
We will evaluate the advanced adenoma detection rate on 7 days after sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
Secondary outcomes (12)
Sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma on 7days after intervention when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7days after intervention
Sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
Sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
positive predictive valueof fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma on 7days after intervention when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7days after intervention
specificity of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma on 7days after intervention when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7days after intervention
negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma on 7days after intervention when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7days after intervention
specificity of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
positive predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
negative predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
specificityof fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
positive predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
We will calculate Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer on 7days after sigmoidoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
Measured: on 7 days after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionAug 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal AdenomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yonsei UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,282 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hyun-Soo Kim, M.D., ph D., Study chair, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of KoreaHong Jun Park, M.D., Study director, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of KoreaHwang Choi, M.D., ph D., Principal investigator, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Incheon, KoreaJeong Seon Ji, M.D., Principal investigator, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Incheon, KoreaYoung Suk Cho, M.D., Principal investigator, Department of Internal Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, KoreaYoung-Eun Joo, M.D., ph D., Principal investigator, Departments of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, KoreaJeong Eun Shin, M.D., Principal investigator, Departments of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, KoreaEun Soo Kim, M.D., Principal investigator, Departments of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01767870
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR312033
- Acronym
- FITS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geisser MS, Mongin SJ, Snover DC, Schuman LM. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1603-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011303432203.
PubMed 11096167Rozen P, Levi Z, Hazazi R, Waked A, Vilkin A, Maoz E, Birkenfeld S, Niv Y. Quantitative colonoscopic evaluation of relative efficiencies of an immunochemical faecal occult blood test and a sensitive guaiac test for detecting significant colorectal neoplasms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb 15;29(4):450-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03898.x. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
PubMed 19035980Wong WM, Lam SK, Cheung KL, Tong TS, Rozen P, Young GP, Chu KW, Ho J, Law WL, Tung HM, Choi HK, Lee YM, Lai KC, Hu WH, Chan CK, Yuen MF, Wong BC. Evaluation of an automated immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia detection in a Chinese population. Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2420-4. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11369.
PubMed 12733140Launoy GD, Bertrand HJ, Berchi C, Talbourdet VY, Guizard AV, Bouvier VM, Caces ER. Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test with automated reading in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average-risk population. Int J Cancer. 2005 Jun 20;115(3):493-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20921.
PubMed 15700317Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):638-58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
PubMed 18838718Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, Bresalier R, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Crawford ED, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Johnson CC, Reding DJ, O'Brien B, Carrick DM, Wright P, Riley TL, Purdue MP, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2345-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635. Epub 2012 May 21.
PubMed 22612596Lieberman DA, Weiss DG; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):555-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010328.
PubMed 11529208Kato J, Morikawa T, Kuriyama M, Yamaji Y, Wada R, Mitsushima T, Yamamoto K. Combination of sigmoidoscopy and a fecal immunochemical test to detect proximal colon neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.04.025. Epub 2009 May 6.
PubMed 19426835
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy vs. Combined Fecal Immunochemical Test-Sigmoidoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia (eCOLO-FITS): A Randomized Multicenter Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01767870
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FITS / CR312033
- Conditions
- Colorectal Adenoma
- Keywords
- advanced colorectal adenoma, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal immunochemical test
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5,282 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test combined with sigmoidoscopy (FITS) for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia compared to colonoscopy.
Detailed description
The investigators will evaluate the efficacy of FITS for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia compared to colonoscopy. This study was designed as multicenter randomized interventional study. The expected period are 36months. A total 13 tertiary hospitals will participate in the study.
Subjects will be randomly allocated to FITS group and colonoscopy group. Subjects who undergo FITS will be performed by following colonoscopy to confirm the efficacy of FITS. In colonoscopy group, subjects as a control group would be performed colonoscopy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FIT-Sigmoidoscopy | Experimental | Procedure: FIT-sigmoidoscopyThis arm (FIT-Sigmoidoscopy) will take fecal immunochemical test (FIT) followed by sigmoidoscopy for evaluation of advanced colorectal adenoma detection rate. Immediately after sigmoidoscopy, a total colonoscopy will be performed as a standard method for advanced colorectal adenoma detection. |
| Colonoscopy | Experimental | Procedure: ColonoscopyThis arm (Colonoscopy) will take a total colonoscopy as a control group that will represent the efficacy of colonoscopy for advanced colorectal adenoma detection rate. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Asymptomatic subjects aged 45 - 75 years
- Subjects who will give the written consent
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Subjects with past history of colorectal cancer
- Subjects with familial histories of familial adenomatous polyposis(FAP) or Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer(HNPCC)
- Subjects with familial history of colorectal cancer more than 2 familial member in direct line
- Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)
- Subjects with more than 3 point of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FIT-sigmoidoscopyAlso: FITS, sigmoidoscopyAdvanced colorectal adenoma detection by fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy | Procedure or surgery | FIT-Sigmoidoscopy |
| ColonoscopyAdvanced colorectal adenoma detection by colonoscopy | Procedure or surgery | Colonoscopy |
Primary outcome
Advanced colorectal adenoma detection rate between two groups
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
We will evaluate the advanced adenoma detection rate on 7 days after sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy when pathologic diagnosis would be reported.
12 secondary outcomes
Sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
Time frame: on 7days after intervention
Sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
Sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
positive predictive valueof fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
Time frame: on 7days after intervention
specificity of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
Time frame: on 7days after intervention
negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal adenoma
Time frame: on 7days after intervention
specificity of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
positive predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
negative predictive value of sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
specificityof fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
positive predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical test with sigmoidoscopy for right advanced colorectal adenoma and right colon cancer
Time frame: on 7 days after intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 11096167Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geisser MS, Mongin SJ, Snover DC, Schuman LM. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1603-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011303432203.
- Results publication: PubMed 19035980Rozen P, Levi Z, Hazazi R, Waked A, Vilkin A, Maoz E, Birkenfeld S, Niv Y. Quantitative colonoscopic evaluation of relative efficiencies of an immunochemical faecal occult blood test and a sensitive guaiac test for detecting significant colorectal neoplasms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb 15;29(4):450-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03898.x. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 12733140Wong WM, Lam SK, Cheung KL, Tong TS, Rozen P, Young GP, Chu KW, Ho J, Law WL, Tung HM, Choi HK, Lee YM, Lai KC, Hu WH, Chan CK, Yuen MF, Wong BC. Evaluation of an automated immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia detection in a Chinese population. Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2420-4. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11369.
- Results publication: PubMed 15700317Launoy GD, Bertrand HJ, Berchi C, Talbourdet VY, Guizard AV, Bouvier VM, Caces ER. Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test with automated reading in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average-risk population. Int J Cancer. 2005 Jun 20;115(3):493-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20921.
- Results publication: PubMed 18838718Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):638-58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 22612596Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, Bresalier R, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Crawford ED, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Johnson CC, Reding DJ, O'Brien B, Carrick DM, Wright P, Riley TL, Purdue MP, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2345-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635. Epub 2012 May 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 11529208Lieberman DA, Weiss DG; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):555-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010328.
- Results publication: PubMed 19426835Kato J, Morikawa T, Kuriyama M, Yamaji Y, Wada R, Mitsushima T, Yamamoto K. Combination of sigmoidoscopy and a fecal immunochemical test to detect proximal colon neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.04.025. Epub 2009 May 6.
- We use the web-based e-Case report form (CRF) system for collection of data from different area, named 'eVLEOS' system which servers are located on Korean National Cancer CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Colorectal Adenoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-Mesothelin TNaive/SCM hYP218 (TNhYP218) CAR T Cells in Participants With Mesothelin-Expressing Solid Tumors Including Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma, Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Cholecystectomy, Biliary Diseases, and Colorectal Adenoma Risk: A Real-World Retrospective Study
Colorectal Adenoma, Cholecystectomy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingObservational study
KLF4 Epigenetic Modulation
KLF4 Methylation, Epigenetic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Lead-212 PSV359 Therapy for Patients With Solid Tumors
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Gastric Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hyun-Soo Kim, M.D., ph D. study chair
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
Hong Jun Park, M.D. study director
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
Hwang Choi, M.D., ph D. principal investigator
Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing FIT-sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy in people with Colorectal Adenoma, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hyun-Soo Kim, M.D., ph D. (+82-33-741-1224, hyskim@yonsei.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Advanced colorectal adenoma detection rate between two groups (time frame: on 7 days after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01767870, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2013.