Type 2 DiabetesPhase 3GetGoal-Duo-2NCT01768559
Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide Versus Insulin Glulisine on Top of Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Insulin glulisine QD and Insulin glulisine TID in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Sanofi at 199 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To compare lixisenatide versus insulin glulisine in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction and body weight change at Week 26 in type 2 diabetic participants not adequately controlled on insulin glargine ± metformin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Insulin glulisine QD and Insulin glulisine TID
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 894 participants
- Where
- 199 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed at least 1 year before screening visit (V1).
- Participants treated with basal insulin for at least 6 months.
- Participants treated for at least 3 months prior to visit 1 with a stable basal insulin regimen (i.e. type of insulin and time/frequency of the injection). The insulin dose should be stable (± 20%) and ≥20 U/day for at least 2 months prior to visit 1.
- Participants treated with basal insulin alone or in combination with 1 to 3 oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) that could be: metformin (≥1.5 g/day or maximal tolerated dose), a sulfonylurea (SU), a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, a glinide. The dose of OADs should be stable for at least 3 months prior to visit 1.
Who cannot join
- At screening: age < legal age of majority.
- At screening, HbA1c: <7.5% and >10.0% for participants treated with basal insulin alone or in combination with metformin only; < 7.0% and > 10.0% for participants treated with basal insulin and a combination of oral anti-diabetic drugs which included a SU and/or a DPP-4 inhibitor and/or a glinide.
- Women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method, pregnancy or lactation.
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus.
- Treatment with glucose-lowering agent(s) other than stated in the inclusion criteria within 3 months prior to screening.
- Previous treatment with short or rapid acting insulin other than in relation to hospitalization or an acute illness.
Show all 23Show fewer
- Any previous treatment with lixisenatide, or any discontinuation from another glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist due to safety/tolerability issue or lack of efficacy.
- At screening, Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤20 or >40 kg/m^2.
- Weight change of more than 5 kg during the 3 months prior to the screening visit; use of weight loss drugs within 3 months prior to screening.
- Within the last 6 months prior to screening: history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure requiring hospitalization. Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation procedures.
- History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery.
- At screening resting systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >95 mmHg.
- Personal or immediate family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic condition that predisposed to MTC (e.g. multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes).
- Contraindication related to metformin (for participant receiving this treatment), insulin glargine, insulin glulisine or lixisenatide.
- Participants with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min) or end-stage renal disease.
- At screening, amylase and/or lipase >3 times the upper limit of the normal laboratory range (ULN).
- At screening alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 ULN.
- At screening calcitonin ≥20 pg/ml (5.9 pmol/L).
- Exclusion Criteria for randomization at the end of the screening period before randomization:
- HbA1c <7.0% or >9.0%.
- 7-day mean fasting SMPG >140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L).
- Amylase and/or lipase >3 times ULN.
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
199 sites in 18 countries.
199 sites in 18 countries
United States46 sites
Investigational Site Number 840004
Avon, Indiana, 46123
Investigational Site Number 840055
Avon, Indiana, 46123
Investigational Site Number 840016
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
Investigational Site Number 840025
Buckley, Michigan, 49620
Investigational Site Number 840032
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Investigational Site Number 840024
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Investigational Site Number 840034
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Investigational Site Number 840001
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Investigational Site Number 840048
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124
Investigational Site Number 840041
Denver, Colorado, 80246
Investigational Site Number 840027
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Investigational Site Number 840009
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Investigational Site Number 840028
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Investigational Site Number 840020
Houston, Texas, 77081
Investigational Site Number 840026
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49048
Investigational Site Number 840031
La Mesa, California, 91942
Investigational Site Number 840049
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Investigational Site Number 840045
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30045
Investigational Site Number 840047
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Investigational Site Number 840003
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Investigational Site Number 840022
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Investigational Site Number 840012
Miami, Florida, 33136
Investigational Site Number 840061
Miami, Florida, 33142
Investigational Site Number 840010
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53217
Investigational Site Number 840005
Mission Viejo, California, 92691
Investigational Site Number 840052
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572
Investigational Site Number 840036
Nampa, Idaho, 83686
Investigational Site Number 840033
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Investigational Site Number 840029
New Hyde Park, New York, 11042
Investigational Site Number 840018
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Investigational Site Number 840057
Northridge, California, 91325
Investigational Site Number 840007
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Investigational Site Number 840056
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
Investigational Site Number 840021
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Investigational Site Number 840017
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
Investigational Site Number 840015
Salem, Virginia, 24153
Investigational Site Number 840011
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Investigational Site Number 840035
Santa Ana, California, 92704
Investigational Site Number 840060
Smithtown, New York, 11787
Investigational Site Number 840030
Staten Island, New York, 10301-3914
Investigational Site Number 840043
Sun City, Arizona, 85351
Investigational Site Number 840002
Temecula, California, 92591
Investigational Site Number 840042
Tempe, Arizona, 85282
Investigational Site Number 840037
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Investigational Site Number 840023
West Hills, California, 91345
Investigational Site Number 840006
Wichita, Kansas, 67203
Canada18 sites
Investigational Site Number 124008
Brampton, L6R 3J5
Investigational Site Number 124015
Burlington, L7M 4Y1
Investigational Site Number 124018
Chatham, N7L 1C1
Investigational Site Number 124004
Coquitlam, V3K 3P4
Investigational Site Number 124016
Etobicoke, M9R 4E1
Investigational Site Number 124014
Hamilton, L8L 5G8
Investigational Site Number 124020
Montreal, H1Y 3L1
Investigational Site Number 124011
Montreal, H3A 1A1
Investigational Site Number 124017
Newmarket, L3Y 5G8
Investigational Site Number 124021
Québec, G1N 4V3
Investigational Site Number 124003
Red Deer, T4N 6V7
Investigational Site Number 124012
Saint Romuald, G6W 5M6
Investigational Site Number 124002
Sherbrooke, J1H 5N4
Investigational Site Number 124001
Toronto, M4G 3E8
Investigational Site Number 124010
Toronto, M5C 2T2
Investigational Site Number 124005
Vancouver, V5Z 1M9
Investigational Site Number 124006
Victoria, V8V 4A1
Investigational Site Number 124007
Winnipeg, R3E 3P4
Romania17 sites
Investigational Site Number 642105
Bacau, 600114
Investigational Site Number 642108
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
Investigational Site Number 642106
Deva, 330084
Investigational Site Number 642113
Galati, 800098
Investigational Site Number 642107
Hunedoara, 331057
Investigational Site Number 642117
Iași, 700547
Investigational Site Number 642103
Oradea, 410169
Investigational Site Number 642104
Oradea, 410169
Investigational Site Number 642112
Piteşti, 110084
Investigational Site Number 642114
Ploieşti, 100342
Investigational Site Number 642102
Reşiţa, 320076
Investigational Site Number 642111
Sibiu, 550371
Investigational Site Number 642109
Târgu Mureş, 540142
Investigational Site Number 642110
Târgu Mureş, 540142
Investigational Site Number 642116
Timișoara, 300133
Investigational Site Number 642101
Timișoara, 300456
Investigational Site Number 642115
Timișoara, 300723
Germany13 sites
Investigational Site Number 276112
Bad Mergentheim, 97980
Investigational Site Number 276108
Berlin, 13125
Investigational Site Number 276102
Dortmund, 44137
Investigational Site Number 276120
Dresden, 01067
Investigational Site Number 276106
Dresden, 01307
Investigational Site Number 276117
Frankfurt A.M., 60596
Investigational Site Number 276116
Görlitz, 02826
Investigational Site Number 276113
Heidelberg, 69115
Investigational Site Number 276118
Leipzig, 04103
Investigational Site Number 276119
Magdeburg, 39104
Investigational Site Number 276103
Neumünster, 24534
Investigational Site Number 276109
Saint Ingbert-Oberwürzbach, 66386
Investigational Site Number 276115
Speyer, 67346
United Kingdom12 sites
Investigational Site Number 826006
Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 9RW
Investigational Site Number 826002
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Investigational Site Number 826007
Carmarthen, SA31 2AF
Investigational Site Number 826005
Chester, CH2 1UL
Investigational Site Number 826008
Coventry, CV1 4FH
Investigational Site Number 826009
Dundee, DD1 9SI
Investigational Site Number 826001
Durham, DH1 5TW
Investigational Site Number 826011
Haddington, EH41 3PF
Investigational Site Number 826012
Leicester, LE5 4PW
Investigational Site Number 826010
Plymouth, PL6 8BX
Investigational Site Number 826004
Sheffield, S5 7AU
Investigational Site Number 826003
St Helens, WA93DA
Mexico11 sites
Investigational Site Number 484108
Chihuahua City, 31200
Investigational Site Number 484101
Cuernavaca, 62250
Investigational Site Number 484111
Durango, 34080
Investigational Site Number 484104
Guadalajara, 44150
Investigational Site Number 484109
Guadalajara, 44210
Investigational Site Number 484107
Guadalajara, 44600
Investigational Site Number 484105
Guadalajara, 44650
Investigational Site Number 484110
Guadalajara, 44656
Investigational Site Number 484102
México, 06700
Investigational Site Number 484103
Mexico City, 11850
Investigational Site Number 484106
Monterrey, 64000
Russia11 sites
Investigational Site Number 643111
Moscow, 117036
Investigational Site Number 643107
Moscow, 119991
Investigational Site Number 643105
Moscow, 129110
Investigational Site Number 643110
Penza, 440026
Investigational Site Number 643101
Saint Petersburg, 194044
Investigational Site Number 643104
Saint Petersburg, 194354
Investigational Site Number 643109
Saint Petersburg, 194354
Investigational Site Number 643106
Saint Petersburg, 194358
Investigational Site Number 643108
Saint Petersburg, 195112
Investigational Site Number 643103
Saint Petersburg, 195257
Investigational Site Number 643102
Saratov, 410030
France9 sites
Investigational Site Number 250108
Bois-Guillaume, 76230
Investigational Site Number 250105
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100
Investigational Site Number 250104
La Rochelle, 17019
Investigational Site Number 250106
Lyon, 69495
Investigational Site Number 250107
Lyon, 69495
Investigational Site Number 250109
Mantes-la-Jolie, 78200
Investigational Site Number 250102
Paris, 75908
Investigational Site Number 250101
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Investigational Site Number 250103
Vénissieux, 69200
Chile8 sites
Investigational Site Number 152103
Santiago, 7500010
Investigational Site Number 152107
Santiago, 7500347
Investigational Site Number 152101
Santiago, 7500710
Investigational Site Number 152105
Santiago, 7591047
Investigational Site Number 152102
Santiago, 7980378
Investigational Site Number 152106
Santiago, 8053095
Investigational Site Number 152108
Santiago, 8053095
Investigational Site Number 152109
Santiago
Czechia8 sites
Investigational Site Number 203107
Beroun, 26601
Investigational Site Number 203103
Jílové u Prahy, 254 01
Investigational Site Number 203101
Ostrava, 702 00
Investigational Site Number 203110
Police nad Metují, 549 54
Investigational Site Number 203105
Prague, 14021
Investigational Site Number 203102
Prague, 148 00
Investigational Site Number 203108
Prague, 14900
Investigational Site Number 203104
Trutnov, 54101
Hungary8 sites
Investigational Site Number 348107
Budapest, 1134
Investigational Site Number 348108
Budapest, 1138
Investigational Site Number 348102
Budapest, 1139
Investigational Site Number 348101
Eger, 3300
Investigational Site Number 348103
Pápa, 8500
Investigational Site Number 348106
Sátoraljaújhely, 3980
Investigational Site Number 348104
Szeged, 6720
Investigational Site Number 348105
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Ukraine8 sites
Investigational Site Number 804104
Chernivtsi, 58022
Investigational Site Number 804107
Donetsk, 83003
Investigational Site Number 804103
Donetsk, 83059
Investigational Site Number 804108
Mykolaiv, 54003
Investigational Site Number 804110
Odesa, 65059
Investigational Site Number 804105
Vinnytsia, 21001
Investigational Site Number 804102
Vinnytsia, 21010
Investigational Site Number 804111
Zaporizhia, 69600
Poland7 sites
Investigational Site Number 616101
Bialystok, 15-435
Investigational Site Number 616103
Bydgoszcz, 85-822
Investigational Site Number 616102
Bytom, 41-902
Investigational Site Number 616106
Krakow, 31-455
Investigational Site Number 616104
Krakow, 31-548
Investigational Site Number 616105
Puławy, 24-100
Investigational Site Number 616107
Warsaw, 02-507
Italy5 sites
Investigational Site Number 380103
Bologna, 40138
Investigational Site Number 380102
Catania, 95122
Investigational Site Number 380101
Milan, 20132
Investigational Site Number 380105
Naples, 80131
Investigational Site Number 380104
Torino, 10126
Latvia5 sites
Investigational Site Number 428103
Jelgava, LV-3001
Investigational Site Number 428104
Ogre, LV-5001
Investigational Site Number 428102
Riga, LV-1002
Investigational Site Number 428105
Riga, LV-1006
Investigational Site Number 428101
Sigulda, LV-2150
Lithuania5 sites
Investigational Site Number 440104
Jonava, LT-55201
Investigational Site Number 440103
Kaunas, LT-48259
Investigational Site Number 440102
Kaunas, LT-49456
Investigational Site Number 440101
Kaunas, LT-51270
Investigational Site Number 440105
Klaipėda, LT-92288
Estonia4 sites
Investigational Site Number 233102
Pärnu, 80018
Investigational Site Number 233103
Tallinn, 13415
Investigational Site Number 233104
Tallinn, 13419
Investigational Site Number 233101
Viljandimaa, 71024
Spain4 sites
Investigational Site Number 724105
A Coruña, 15006
Investigational Site Number 724102
Ferrol, 15403
Investigational Site Number 724103
Málaga, 29010
Investigational Site Number 724104
Seville, 41010
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 3-arm Parallel-group, 26-week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide to That of Insulin Glulisine Once Daily and Insulin Glulisine Three Times Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled With Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin
Primary Objective:
- To compare lixisenatide versus insulin glulisine in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction and body weight change at Week 26 in type 2 diabetic participants not adequately controlled on insulin glargine ± metformin.
Secondary Objectives:
- To compare the treatments/regimens on:
- The percentage of participants reaching the target of HbA1c <7% or ≤6.5%,
- Body weight,
- Self-Monitored Glucose profiles,
- Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG),
- Post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG) /glucose excursions during a standardized meal test (subset of participants),
- Daily doses of insulins,
- Safety and tolerability.
Read the detailed description
Approximately 41 weeks including a 26 week treatment period.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Insulin glulisine QD, Insulin glulisine TID, Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug), Metformin (Background drug)
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Drug
Also called Lyxumia®, Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Delta 14®)
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection 30 to 60 minutes before breakfast or dinner.
Insulin glulisine QDDrug
Also called HMR1964, Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Apidra® Solostar®)
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection within 15 minutes before breakfast or dinner. The initial dose was 3-5 units and then individually titrated to obtain the SMPG value >5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) and ≤7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) before lunch (if administered at breakfast) or at bedtime (if administered at dinner).
Insulin glulisine TIDDrug
Also called HMR1964, Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Apidra® Solostar®)
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection within 15 minutes before each meal. The initial dose was 3-5 units for each meal and then individually titrated to obtain the SMPG value >5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) and ≤7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) before the next meal or at bedtime (for injection at dinner).
Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug)Drug
Also called Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Lantus® Solostar®)
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection at breakfast or dinner. Doses were adjusted to maintain a fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) between 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L (80 to 100 mg/dL).
Metformin (Background drug)Drug
Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral administration. If previously taken, Metformin to be continued at stable dose (≥1.5 g/day) throughout the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide | Experimental | Lixisenatide 10 mcg once daily (QD) for 2 weeks post-randomization, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 26 on top of insulin glargine with or without metformin. Receives: Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010); Drug: Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug); Drug: Metformin (Background drug) |
| Insulin Glulisine QD | Active comparator | Insulin glulisine QD from randomization up to Week 26 on top of Insulin glargine with or without metformin. Receives: Drug: Insulin glulisine QD; Drug: Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug); Drug: Metformin (Background drug) |
| Insulin Glulisine TID | Active comparator | Insulin glulisine thrice daily (TID) from randomization up to Week 26 on top of Insulin glargine with or without metformin. Receives: Drug: Insulin glulisine TID; Drug: Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug); Drug: Metformin (Background drug) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
Change in HbA1C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
Primary outcome was the comparison between Lixisenatide versus Insulin Glulisine TID.
Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Level <7% and ≤6.5% at Week 26
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With no Weight Gain at Week 26
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug.
Measured: Week 26
Change in Average 7-point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 26
Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime three times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit week 26 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 26
Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Change in PPG From Baseline to Week 26 (in Participants Who Had an Injection of Investigational Medicinal Product [IMP] Before Breakfast)
The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Glucose Excursions From Baseline to Week 26 (in Participants Who Had an Injection of IMP Before Breakfast)
Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change in glucose excursions was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Insulin Glargine Dose From Baseline to Week 26
Change in Insulin glargine dose was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Insulin Glulisine Dose at Week 26
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.
Measured: Week 26
Total Insulin Dose at Week 26
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.
The outcome is reporting results of total insulin (amounts of Insulin Glargine plus Insulin Glulisine ) only for the arms in which Insulin Glulisine was administered and is not applicable for the lixisenatide arm in which only Insulin Glargine is administered. Change in dose of the insulin used by patients in the Lixisenatide arm (i.e. Insulin Glargine) is reported in the secondary Outcome Measure 9.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L). Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the participant required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available.
Measured: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration (maximum of 185 days)
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% at Week 26 and Did Not Experienced Documented (Plasma Glucose <60 mg/dL) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 26 Week Treatment Period
The on-treatment period for HbA1c assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for symptomatic hypoglycemia assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% and Had no Weight Gain at Week 26
The on-treatment period for HbA1c assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for body weight assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7%, Had no Weight Gain at Week 26, and Did Not Experience Documented (Plasma Glucose <60 mg/dL) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 26-Week Treatment Period
The on-treatment period for HbA1c assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for body weight assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for symptomatic hypoglycemia assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug. Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values (HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (HbA1c and/or body weight) was available and showed non-response, or if they experienced at least one documented symptomatic hypoglycemia during the on-treatment period. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data.
Measured: Week 26
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 894 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01768559
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC12626
- Other IDs
- 2012-004096-38, U1111-1131-4936
- Acronym
- GetGoal-Duo-2
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rosenstock J, Guerci B, Hanefeld M, Gentile S, Aronson R, Tinahones FJ, Roy-Duval C, Souhami E, Wardecki M, Ye J, Perfetti R, Heller S; GetGoal Duo-2 Trial Investigators. Prandial Options to Advance Basal Insulin Glargine Therapy: Testing Lixisenatide Plus Basal Insulin Versus Insulin Glulisine Either as Basal-Plus or Basal-Bolus in Type 2 Diabetes: The GetGoal Duo-2 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Aug;39(8):1318-28. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0014. Epub 2016 May 23.
PubMed 27222510Tabak AG, Anderson J, Aschner P, Liu M, Saremi A, Stella P, Tinahones FJ, Wysham C, Meier JJ. Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi, Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide, Compared with Basal-Bolus Regimen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00735-7. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
PubMed 31848983Rosenstock J, Handelsman Y, Vidal J, Ampudia Blasco FJ, Giorgino F, Liu M, Perfetti R, Meier JJ. Propensity-score-matched comparative analyses of simultaneously administered fixed-ratio insulin glargine 100 U and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs sequential administration of insulin glargine and lixisenatide in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2821-2829. doi: 10.1111/dom.13462. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
PubMed 29974618
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 3-arm Parallel-group, 26-week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide to That of Insulin Glulisine Once Daily and Insulin Glulisine Three Times Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled With Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01768559
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GetGoal-Duo-2 / EFC12626
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 894 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
- To compare lixisenatide versus insulin glulisine in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction and body weight change at Week 26 in type 2 diabetic participants not adequately controlled on insulin glargine ± metformin.
Secondary Objectives:
- To compare the treatments/regimens on:
- The percentage of participants reaching the target of HbA1c <7% or ≤6.5%,
- Body weight,
- Self-Monitored Glucose profiles,
- Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG),
- Post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG) /glucose excursions during a standardized meal test (subset of participants),
- Daily doses of insulins,
- Safety and tolerability.
Detailed description
Approximately 41 weeks including a 26 week treatment period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide | Experimental | Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Drug: Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug), Drug: Metformin (Background drug)Lixisenatide 10 mcg once daily (QD) for 2 weeks post-randomization, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 26 on top of insulin glargine with or without metformin. |
| Insulin Glulisine QD | Active comparator | Drug: Insulin glulisine QD, Drug: Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug), Drug: Metformin (Background drug)Insulin glulisine QD from randomization up to Week 26 on top of Insulin glargine with or without metformin. |
| Insulin Glulisine TID | Active comparator | Drug: Insulin glulisine TID, Drug: Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug), Drug: Metformin (Background drug)Insulin glulisine thrice daily (TID) from randomization up to Week 26 on top of Insulin glargine with or without metformin. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed at least 1 year before screening visit (V1).
- Participants treated with basal insulin for at least 6 months.
- Participants treated for at least 3 months prior to visit 1 with a stable basal insulin regimen (i.e. type of insulin and time/frequency of the injection). The insulin dose should be stable (± 20%) and ≥20 U/day for at least 2 months prior to visit 1.
- Participants treated with basal insulin alone or in combination with 1 to 3 oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) that could be: metformin (≥1.5 g/day or maximal tolerated dose), a sulfonylurea (SU), a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, a glinide. The dose of OADs should be stable for at least 3 months prior to visit 1.
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- At screening: age < legal age of majority.
- At screening, HbA1c: <7.5% and >10.0% for participants treated with basal insulin alone or in combination with metformin only; < 7.0% and > 10.0% for participants treated with basal insulin and a combination of oral anti-diabetic drugs which included a SU and/or a DPP-4 inhibitor and/or a glinide.
- Women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method, pregnancy or lactation.
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus.
- Treatment with glucose-lowering agent(s) other than stated in the inclusion criteria within 3 months prior to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Also: Lyxumia®, Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Delta 14®)Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection 30 to 60 minutes before breakfast or dinner. | Drug | Lixisenatide |
| Insulin glulisine QDAlso: HMR1964, Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Apidra® Solostar®)Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection within 15 minutes before breakfast or dinner. The initial dose was 3-5 units and then individually titrated to obtain the SMPG value >5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) and ≤7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) before lunch (if administered at breakfast) or at bedtime (if administered at dinner). | Drug | Insulin Glulisine QD |
| Insulin glulisine TIDAlso: HMR1964, Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Apidra® Solostar®)Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection within 15 minutes before each meal. The initial dose was 3-5 units for each meal and then individually titrated to obtain the SMPG value >5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) and ≤7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) before the next meal or at bedtime (for injection at dinner). | Drug | Insulin Glulisine TID |
| Insulin Glargine (Mandatory background drug)Also: Device: Disposable self-injector prefilled pen (Lantus® Solostar®)Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Self-administered by subcutaneous injection at breakfast or dinner. Doses were adjusted to maintain a fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) between 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L (80 to 100 mg/dL). | Drug | Insulin Glulisine QD, Insulin Glulisine TID, Lixisenatide |
| Metformin (Background drug)Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral administration. If previously taken, Metformin to be continued at stable dose (≥1.5 g/day) throughout the study. | Drug | Insulin Glulisine QD, Insulin Glulisine TID, Lixisenatide |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in HbA1C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Primary outcome was the comparison between Lixisenatide versus Insulin Glulisine TID. Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug.
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Level <7% and ≤6.5% at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With no Weight Gain at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Change in Average 7-point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in PPG From Baseline to Week 26 (in Participants Who Had an Injection of Investigational Medicinal Product [IMP] Before Breakfast)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Glucose Excursions From Baseline to Week 26 (in Participants Who Had an Injection of IMP Before Breakfast)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in Insulin Glargine Dose From Baseline to Week 26
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Insulin Glulisine Dose at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Total Insulin Dose at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration (maximum of 185 days)
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% at Week 26 and Did Not Experienced Documented (Plasma Glucose <60 mg/dL) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 26 Week Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% and Had no Weight Gain at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7%, Had no Weight Gain at Week 26, and Did Not Experience Documented (Plasma Glucose <60 mg/dL) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 26-Week Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 26
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 27222510Rosenstock J, Guerci B, Hanefeld M, Gentile S, Aronson R, Tinahones FJ, Roy-Duval C, Souhami E, Wardecki M, Ye J, Perfetti R, Heller S; GetGoal Duo-2 Trial Investigators. Prandial Options to Advance Basal Insulin Glargine Therapy: Testing Lixisenatide Plus Basal Insulin Versus Insulin Glulisine Either as Basal-Plus or Basal-Bolus in Type 2 Diabetes: The GetGoal Duo-2 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Aug;39(8):1318-28. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0014. Epub 2016 May 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31848983Tabak AG, Anderson J, Aschner P, Liu M, Saremi A, Stella P, Tinahones FJ, Wysham C, Meier JJ. Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi, Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide, Compared with Basal-Bolus Regimen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00735-7. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29974618Rosenstock J, Handelsman Y, Vidal J, Ampudia Blasco FJ, Giorgino F, Liu M, Perfetti R, Meier JJ. Propensity-score-matched comparative analyses of simultaneously administered fixed-ratio insulin glargine 100 U and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs sequential administration of insulin glargine and lixisenatide in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2821-2829. doi: 10.1111/dom.13462. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
199 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Insulin glulisine QD and Insulin glulisine TID in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Sanofi at 199 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 199 sites in United States, Canada, Romania, Germany, United Kingdom and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26 (time frame: Baseline, Week 26). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01768559, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2017.