AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR-Activating MutationsPhase 3NCT01774721

ARCHER1050: A Study of Dacomitinib vs. Gefitinib in 1st-Line Treatment Of Advanced NSCLC.

A Phase 3 study testing Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) and Gefitinib in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR-Activating Mutations, run by Pfizer at 52 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with dacomitinib (PF-00299804) to treatment with gefitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, with epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR-activating… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) and Gefitinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
452 participants
Where
52 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
9 May 2013to 27 Jan 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Evidence of histo or cytopathology confirmed, advanced NSCLC (with known histology) with the presence of EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21).
  • It is acceptable for subjects with the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation together with either EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21) to be included in this study
  • No prior treatment with systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Minimum of 12 months disease free interval between completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy and recurrence of NSCLC
  • Adequate tissue sample must be available for central analyses.
  • Adequate renal, hematologic, liver function.
  • ECOG PS of 0-1.
  • Radiologically measurable disease.

Who cannot join

  • Any evidence of mixed histology that includes elements of small cell or carcinoid lung cancer.
  • Any other mutation other than exon 19 deletion or L858R in exon 21, with or without the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation.
  • Any history of brain metastases or leptomeningeal metastases.
  • Any previous anti-cancer systemic treatment of early, locally advanced, or metastatic NSCLC.
  • Any surgery(not including minor procedures such as lymph node biopsy), palliative radiotherapy or pleurodesis within 2 weeks of baseline assessments
  • Any clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities that may impair intake, transit or absorption of the study drug.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Current enrollment in another therapeutic clinical study.
  • History of, or currently suspected, diffuse non-infectious pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease
  • Uncontrolled medical disorders.
  • Prior malignancy and concurrent malignancy except for non melanoma skin cancer or in-situ cervical cancer with no evidence of active disease.
  • Use of narrow therapeutic index drugs that are CYP2D6 substrates from screening to randomization.

Trial locations and contacts

52 sites in 7 countries.

52 sites in 7 countries

China15 sites
  • Study site

    Beijing

  • Study site

    Changchun

  • Study site

    Changsha

  • Study site

    Chengdu

  • Study site

    Chongqing

  • Study site

    Fuzhou

  • Study site

    Guangzhou

  • Study site

    Hangzhou

  • Study site

    Hefei

  • Study site

    Nanning

  • Study site

    Shanghai

  • Study site

    Shenyang

  • Study site

    Tianjin

  • Study site

    Wuhan

  • Study site

    Wuxi

Other trials in China

Italy11 sites
  • Study site

    Catania

  • Study site

    Lecco

  • Study site

    Livorno

  • Study site

    Meldola

  • Study site

    Milan

  • Study site

    Naples

  • Study site

    Perugia

  • Study site

    Ravenna

  • Study site

    Roma

  • Study site

    Trento

  • Study site

    Viterbo

Other trials in Italy

Spain10 sites
  • Study site

    Ávila

  • Study site

    Barcelona

  • Study site

    Bilbao

  • Study site

    Cáceres

  • Study site

    Córdoba

  • Study site

    Donostia / San Sebastian

  • Study site

    Las Palmas

  • Study site

    Madrid

  • Study site

    Málaga

  • Study site

    Seville

Other trials in Spain

Japan9 sites
  • Study site

    Chuo-Ku, Tokyo

  • Study site

    Hokkaido, Asahikawa

  • Study site

    Kashiwa, Chiba

  • Study site

    Matsuyama, Ehime

  • Study site

    Sakai, Osaka

  • Study site

    Sayama, Osaka

  • Study site

    Sunto-gun, Shizouka

  • Study site

    Tokyo, Koto-ku

  • Study site

    Yokohama, Kanagawa

Other trials in Japan

Poland4 sites
  • Study site

    Gdansk

  • Study site

    Olsztyn

  • Study site

    Poznan

  • Study site

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Hong Kong2 sites
  • Study site

    Hong Kong

  • Study site

    Shatin

Other trials in Hong Kong

South Korea1 site
  • Study site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: ARCHER 1050: A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 3, EFFICACY AND SAFETY STUDY OF DACOMITINIB (PF-00299804) VERSUS GEFITINIB FOR THE FIRST LINE TREATMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN SUBJECTS WITH EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR (EGFR) ACTIVATING MUTATION(S)

This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with dacomitinib (PF-00299804) to treatment with gefitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, with epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR-activating mutation (s). Analyses of primary objective (Progression Free Survival) will be done as defined in the protocol.

Read the detailed description

452 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between dacomitinib (PF-00299804 ) vs. gefitinib.

Being tested
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), Gefitinib
Keywords
first-line, locally advanced or metastatic, non-small cell lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, ARCHER, mutation, dacomitinib, PF-00299804
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm Metastasis, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)Drug

    Also called Dacomitinib

    Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.

  • GefitinibDrug

    Also called Iressa

    Gefitinib 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.

Study groups in NCT01774721
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)ExperimentalDacomitinib (PF-00299804) is provided as 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
Receives: Drug: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)
gefitinibActive comparatorGefitinib is provided as 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
Receives: Drug: Gefitinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review

    PFS: time from randomization to date of progression of disease (PD) as determined by IRC review as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: >=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of >=5 mm, appearance of >=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS (month)=[death date or last known alive date - randomization date + 1]/30.4375.

    Measured: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 45 months

  2. OS at 30 Months (OS30m)

    OS30m was defined as the probability of a participant being alive at 30 months from date of randomization.

    Measured: Up to 30 months from date of randomization

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment

    PFS: time from randomization to date of PD as determined by investigator assessment as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD for target lesions: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm; for non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

  4. Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review

    BOR for CR/PR:>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:>=1 OBS of stable documented >=8 weeks (wks) post treatment \& before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment \& no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis); PR:>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of >=5 mm, appearance of >=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

  5. Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment

    BOR for CR/PR:>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:>=1 OBS of stable documented >=8 weeks (wks) post treatment \& before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment \& no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis); PR:>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of >=5 mm, appearance of >=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

  6. Duration of Response (DoR)

    DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis); PR:>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of >=5 mm, appearance of >=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

  7. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review

    Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on IRC review recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis); PR:>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of >=5 mm, appearance of >=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

  8. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment

    Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on investigator assessment recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis); PR:>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of >=5 mm, appearance of >=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.AEs included both serious and non- serious adverse events. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28-35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

    Measured: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 91 months

  10. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology

    Parameters included anaemia, activated partial thromboplastin time, haemoglobin, international normalized ratio, lymphocyte count, lymphopenia, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, prothrombin time and white blood cells. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (increased), alkaline phosphatase (increased), aspartate aminotransferase (increased), bilirubin (total), creatinine (increased), hypercalcaemia, hyperglycaemia, hyperkalaemia, hypermagnesaemia, hypernatraemia, hypoalbuminaemia, hypocalcaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hyponatraemia. Test abnormalities were graded by AEs according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=life-threatening; Grade 5=death related to AE. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

  11. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis

    Urinalysis parameter included urine protein, urine blood/haemoglobin, urine glucose and urine sediment. Test abnormalities was defined as deviation from normal range (higher or lower). Normal range of 24-hour urine protein test: less than 150 mg of protein per day, urine glucose: 0 to 0.8 mmol/L (millimole per liter), urine protein: 0 to 20 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). Urine blood/haemoglobin abnormality was defined as presence and absence of blood/haemoglobin in urine of participants. Urine sediment abnormality was defined as the presence of any bacteria, casts, crystals, and epithelial cells. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

  12. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Criteria for vital signs abnormalities: postbaseline pulse rate less than (<) 50 beats per minute (bpm) or greater than (>)130 bpm and maximum increase from baseline in pulse rate >=30 bpm and maximum decrease from baseline in pulse rate <=30 bpm. Systolic blood pressure (BP) of maximum increase from baseline (MIB) >=40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), maximum decrease from baseline (MDB) in systolic blood pressure =<60 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure of MIB >=20 mmHg and MDB in diastolic blood pressure >-40 and =<-20 mm Hg. And MDB in diastolic BP<=-40 mmHg. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

  13. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    ECG parameters included corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG criteria for abnormality: absolute value 450 - <480 msec, 480 - <500 msec, >=500msec. The number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG findings at any visit were reported.

    Measured: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

  14. Number of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

    An ejection fraction (EF) was the volumetric fraction of blood ejected from a ventricle of the heart with each heartbeat; it was a measure of the pumping efficiency of the heart. The EF of the left heart, known as the left ventricular ejection fraction, was a measure of the efficiency of pumping into the body's systemic circulation.

    Measured: From baseline up to 7 days of Cycle 4 (up to 91 days)

  15. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough

    HRQOL was measured by standardized questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) quality of life questionnaires (OLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13). TTD in pain (chest, arm/shoulder), dyspnea, fatigue or cough was defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline in any of these 4 symptoms for at least two consecutive cycles. For those who had not shown deterioration, the data was censored at the last date when the participants completed an assessment for pain, dyspnea, fatigue or cough.

    Measured: Baseline until the end of treatment (up to 48 months)

  16. Overall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)

    The Euro Quality of Life-5 dimension (EQ-5D) is a brief self-administered, validated reliable generic health status instrument. EQ-5D general health status can also be measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

    Measured: From Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 48 months

  17. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

    Cmax was defined as maximum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.

    Measured: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

  18. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

    Tmax was defined as time to first occurrence of Cmax and can be observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

    Measured: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose (sample collection time points had window of +/- 10% of nominal time) on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

  19. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

    AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over dosing interval tau and was determined by Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

    Measured: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

  20. Averaged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

    Cavg was defined as averaged plasma concentration at steady state, and was calculated as AUCtau/tau.

    Measured: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

  21. Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

    Cmin was defined as minimum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.

    Measured: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

  22. Fluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

    Fluctuation coefficient between trough and peak plasma concentration was determined as Cmax-Ctrough divided by Cavg, where Cmax was the maximum observed concentration within the dosing interval, Ctrough was the observed concentration prior to dose administration and Cavg was averaged plasma concentration at steady state.

    Measured: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

  23. Apparent Clearance (CL) of Dacomitinib

    Drug clearance was a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance was removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes).

    Measured: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

  24. Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

    Trough plasma concentration was defined as the measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval at steady state (taken directly before next administration).

    Measured: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 May 2013
  3. Primary completion29 Jul 2016
  4. Study completion27 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
452 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01774721
Sponsor's protocol ID
A7471050
Other IDs
DP312804
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
21 Jan 2013
Last updated
14 Nov 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Pu X, Li J, Zhang B, Zhang J, K Mok TS, Nakagawa K, Rosell R, Cheng Y, Zhou X, Miglorino MR, Niho S, Lee KH, Corral J, Pluzanski A, Li J, Linke R, Pan F, Tang Y, Tan W, Wu L. Efficacy in patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer treated with dacomitinib who had skin adverse events: post hoc analyses from ARCHER 1050. Future Oncol. 2024;20(37):2971-2982. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2404762. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

    PubMed 39360943
  • Li J, Nickens D, Wilner K, Tan W. Evaluation of the Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Efficacy of Dacomitinib and Gefitinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR-Activating Mutations. Oncol Ther. 2021 Dec;9(2):525-539. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00156-2. Epub 2021 Jun 13.

    PubMed 34120312
  • Cheng Y, Mok TS, Zhou X, Lu S, Zhou Q, Zhou J, Du Y, Yu P, Liu X, Hu C, Lu Y, Zhang Y, Lee KH, Nakagawa K, Linke R, Wong CH, Tang Y, Zhu F, Wilner KD, Wu YL. Safety and efficacy of first-line dacomitinib in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (ARCHER 1050). Lung Cancer. 2021 Apr;154:176-185. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

    PubMed 33721611
  • Mok TS, Cheng Y, Zhou X, Lee KH, Nakagawa K, Niho S, Chawla A, Rosell R, Corral J, Migliorino MR, Pluzanski A, Noonan K, Tang Y, Pastel M, Wilner KD, Wu YL. Updated Overall Survival in a Randomized Study Comparing Dacomitinib with Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR-Activating Mutations. Drugs. 2021 Feb;81(2):257-266. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01441-6.

    PubMed 33331989
  • Corral J, Mok TS, Nakagawa K, Rosell R, Lee KH, Migliorino MR, Pluzanski A, Linke R, Devgan G, Tan W, Quinn S, Wang T, Wu YL. Effects of dose modifications on the safety and efficacy of dacomitinib for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(24):2795-2805. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0299. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

    PubMed 31313942
  • Nagano T, Tachihara M, Nishimura Y. Dacomitinib, a second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) to treat non-small cell lung cancer. Drugs Today (Barc). 2019 Apr;55(4):231-236. doi: 10.1358/dot.2019.55.4.2965337.

    PubMed 31050691
  • Mok TS, Cheng Y, Zhou X, Lee KH, Nakagawa K, Niho S, Lee M, Linke R, Rosell R, Corral J, Migliorino MR, Pluzanski A, Sbar EI, Wang T, White JL, Wu YL. Improvement in Overall Survival in a Randomized Study That Compared Dacomitinib With Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR-Activating Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2244-2250. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.7994. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

    PubMed 29864379
  • Wu YL, Cheng Y, Zhou X, Lee KH, Nakagawa K, Niho S, Tsuji F, Linke R, Rosell R, Corral J, Migliorino MR, Pluzanski A, Sbar EI, Wang T, White JL, Nadanaciva S, Sandin R, Mok TS. Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1454-1466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30608-3. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

    PubMed 28958502
  • Ramalingam SS, O'Byrne K, Boyer M, Mok T, Janne PA, Zhang H, Liang J, Taylor I, Sbar EI, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): pooled subset analyses from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv593. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

    PubMed 26768165

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) and Gefitinib in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR-Activating Mutations, run by Pfizer at 52 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 52 sites in China, Italy, Spain, Japan, Poland and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review (time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01774721, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in