Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT01778192
A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Polyethylene Glycol and Sodium Picosulphate With Magnesium Citrate
A Phase 3 study testing Polyethylene glycol and Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate in people with Colorectal Cancer and Colon Adenoma, run by Korea University Anam Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Adequate bowel cleansing is important for a completeness of colonoscopy and detection of colon polyps. Inadequate bowel preparation leads to longer duration of colonoscopy and obscured mucosal visualization resulting in missed lesions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Colon Adenoma
- What is being tested?
- Polyethylene glycol and Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients, aged between18 and 75 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study
Who cannot join
- gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, severe uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, previous colorectal resection, congestive heart failure, recent acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, renal insufficiency with glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/minute/1.73 m2, liver cirrhosis or ascites, pregnancy, lactation, and history of hypersensitivity to any bowel cleansing agents.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine
Seoul, ASI|KR|KS013|SEOUL
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Different Regimens of Polyethylene Glycol-based Lavage and Sodium Picosulphate With Magnesium Citrate in the Preparation of Patients for Colonoscopy
Adequate bowel cleansing is important for a completeness of colonoscopy and detection of colon polyps. Inadequate bowel preparation leads to longer duration of colonoscopy and obscured mucosal visualization resulting in missed lesions.
Bowel cleansing agents are simply classified into the large volume, iso-osmotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) based solutions or the small volume osmotically active agents, such as sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC).
Read more
There are rare reports that compare directly conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution and sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) for bowel preparation in korea.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different regimens of SPMC and PEG solution.
Read the detailed description
- Study design: endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial
- Subjects
- Entry criteria: Male or female patients, aged between18 and 75 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study.
- Exclusion criteria: gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, severe uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, previous colorectal resection, congestive heart failure, recent acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, renal insufficiency with glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/minute/1.73 m2, liver cirrhosis or ascites, pregnancy, lactation, and history of hypersensitivity to any bowel cleansing agents.
- Sampling design: Consecutive recruitment of consenting patients
- Variables Predictor
- group 1 (same day PEG) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy
- group 2 (split PEG) received 2 L of PEG at 6:00 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and 2 L of PEG at 4-6 hours before procedure
- group 3 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure;
- group 4 (SPMC 3) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m and the other sachet at 9 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet at 4-6 hours before procedure.
- Primary Outcome: Quality of bowel preparation (Ottawa scale)
- Secondary Outcome: Tolerability, palatability, side effect of the cleansing agents
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Colon Adenoma
- Being tested
- Polyethylene glycol, Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate
- Keywords
- Bowel preparation, Polyethylene glycol, Sodium picosulphate
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Polyethylene glycolDrug
Also called Colyte(Taejoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea)
-group 1 (same day PEG) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy
Polyethylene glycolDrug
Also called Colyte(Taejoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea)
-group 2 (split PEG, N=50) received 2 L of PEG at 6:00 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and 2 L of PEG at 4-6 hours before procedure
Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrateDrug
Also called Picolight(Pharmbio korea, Seoul, Korea)
-group 3 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure
Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrateDrug
Also called Picolight(Pharmbio korea, Seoul, Korea)
-group 4 (SPMC 3) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m and the other sachet at 9 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet at 4-6 hours before procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Same day PEG | Active comparator | group 1 (same day PEG, N=50) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy Receives: Drug: Polyethylene glycol |
| split PEG | Active comparator | group 2 (split PEG, N=50) received 2 L of PEG at 6:00 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and 2 L of PEG at 4-6 hours before procedure Receives: Drug: Polyethylene glycol |
| SPMC 2 | Active comparator | group 3 (SPMC 2, N=50) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure Receives: Drug: Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate |
| SPMC 3 | Active comparator | group 4 (SPMC 3, N=50) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m and the other sachet at 9 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet at 4-6 hours before procedure. Receives: Drug: Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the quality of the bowel preparation using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (OBPS)
Immediately following the colonoscopy, the endoscopist who were unaware of the preparation regimen scored the quality of the bowel preparation using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (OBPS).
Measured: 20 minutes
Secondary outcomes (3)
Completeness of the bowel preparation
Patient compliance was recorded by checking the completeness of the prescribed preparation methods including bowel cleansing agent solution and recommended clear liquid.
Measured: 30 minutes before the colonoscopy
the patient's tolerability
Patients were asked with questionnaires about the symptoms associated with the preparation to assess the patients' tolerability before the colonoscopy. Patients were asked whether they experienced any of the following : abdominal fullness, cramping, nausea, vomiting, sleep disturbance, and overall discomfort, and these symptoms were scored on a 5-point scale where 1 = "none", 2 = "mild", 3 = "moderate", 4 = "severe", and 5 = "very severe".
Measured: 30 minutes before the colonoscopy
the side effects of the sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate
Biochemical measures detected outrange of serum electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate), blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and serum osmolality only for the sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate.
Biochemical measurement was done done for the patients in the polyethylene glycol groups due to the well established safety date of the polyethylene glycol solutions.
Measured: 1 hour before the colonoscopy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Korea University Anam Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Woo-Jin Lee, Korea University Anam Hospital
- Investigators
- Yoon Tae Jeen, Study director, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaEun Sun Kim, Principal investigator, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaWoo Jin Lee, Principal investigator, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01778192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Korea University
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Different Regimens of Polyethylene Glycol-based Lavage and Sodium Picosulphate With Magnesium Citrate in the Preparation of Patients for Colonoscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01778192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Korea University
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Colon Adenoma
- Keywords
- Bowel preparation, Polyethylene glycol, Sodium picosulphate
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Korea University Anam HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adequate bowel cleansing is important for a completeness of colonoscopy and detection of colon polyps. Inadequate bowel preparation leads to longer duration of colonoscopy and obscured mucosal visualization resulting in missed lesions.
Bowel cleansing agents are simply classified into the large volume, iso-osmotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) based solutions or the small volume osmotically active agents, such as sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC).
There are rare reports that compare directly conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution and sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) for bowel preparation in korea.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different regimens of SPMC and PEG solution.
Detailed description
- Study design: endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial
- Subjects
- Entry criteria: Male or female patients, aged between18 and 75 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study.
- Exclusion criteria: gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, severe uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, previous colorectal resection, congestive heart failure, recent acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, renal insufficiency with glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/minute/1.73 m2, liver cirrhosis or ascites, pregnancy, lactation, and history of hypersensitivity to any bowel cleansing agents.
- Sampling design: Consecutive recruitment of consenting patients
- Variables Predictor
- group 1 (same day PEG) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy
- group 2 (split PEG) received 2 L of PEG at 6:00 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and 2 L of PEG at 4-6 hours before procedure
- group 3 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure;
- group 4 (SPMC 3) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m and the other sachet at 9 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet at 4-6 hours before procedure.
- Primary Outcome: Quality of bowel preparation (Ottawa scale)
- Secondary Outcome: Tolerability, palatability, side effect of the cleansing agents
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Same day PEG | Active comparator | Drug: Polyethylene glycolgroup 1 (same day PEG, N=50) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy |
| split PEG | Active comparator | Drug: Polyethylene glycolgroup 2 (split PEG, N=50) received 2 L of PEG at 6:00 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and 2 L of PEG at 4-6 hours before procedure |
| SPMC 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrategroup 3 (SPMC 2, N=50) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure |
| SPMC 3 | Active comparator | Drug: Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrategroup 4 (SPMC 3, N=50) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m and the other sachet at 9 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet at 4-6 hours before procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Male or female patients, aged between18 and 75 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, severe uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, previous colorectal resection, congestive heart failure, recent acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, renal insufficiency with glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/minute/1.73 m2, liver cirrhosis or ascites, pregnancy, lactation, and history of hypersensitivity to any bowel cleansing agents.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Polyethylene glycolAlso: Colyte(Taejoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea)-group 1 (same day PEG) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy | Drug | Same day PEG |
| Polyethylene glycolAlso: Colyte(Taejoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea)-group 2 (split PEG, N=50) received 2 L of PEG at 6:00 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and 2 L of PEG at 4-6 hours before procedure | Drug | split PEG |
| Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrateAlso: Picolight(Pharmbio korea, Seoul, Korea)-group 3 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure | Drug | SPMC 2 |
| Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrateAlso: Picolight(Pharmbio korea, Seoul, Korea)-group 4 (SPMC 3) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m and the other sachet at 9 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet at 4-6 hours before procedure. | Drug | SPMC 3 |
Primary outcome
the quality of the bowel preparation using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (OBPS)
Time frame: 20 minutes
Immediately following the colonoscopy, the endoscopist who were unaware of the preparation regimen scored the quality of the bowel preparation using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (OBPS).
3 secondary outcomes
Completeness of the bowel preparation
Time frame: 30 minutes before the colonoscopy
the patient's tolerability
Time frame: 30 minutes before the colonoscopy
the side effects of the sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate
Time frame: 1 hour before the colonoscopy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2013.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of MGC030 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Urothelial Cancer, GastroEsophageal Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The IMPACT Study - Identification of Men With a Genetic Predisposition to ProstAte Cancer
Prostate Cancer, BRCA Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
ABCSG R07 Rectal Cancer Registry
Rectal Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of Rectum
Recruiting
Mainstreaming Genetics: Evaluation of a Digital Application to Scale and Spread Oncologist-initiated Genetic Testing
Cancer, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yoon Tae Jeen study director
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Eun Sun Kim principal investigator
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Woo Jin Lee principal investigator
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Polyethylene glycol and Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate in people with Colorectal Cancer and Colon Adenoma, run by Korea University Anam Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the quality of the bowel preparation using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (OBPS) (time frame: 20 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2013.