Urge Urinary IncontinencePhase 3URGENCT01786967
Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly (URGE)
A Phase 3 study testing Fesoterodine Fumarate in people with Urge Urinary Incontinence, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Urge urinary incontinence, characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major health issue for elderly women, as it is incredibly common and significantly impairs quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urge Urinary Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Fesoterodine Fumarate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 61 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to 31 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women ≥ 50 years
- ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary
- Urge-predominant incontinence, >50% of total incontinence episodes
- No history of failure to fesoterodine
- 2-week washout period if currently on an anticholinergic for UUI
- Willingness to avoid off-protocol UUI therapy during the study period
- Post Void Residual (PVR) <150 mL
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to fesoterodine (e.g., bladder outlet obstruction, narrow angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, severe hepatic or renal impairment)
- Inability to complete study-related items and visits - i.e., cognitive impairment based on Mini-Cog test score (exclude if score of 0 or 1-2 (Abnormal))
- Urinary retention requiring catheterization
- Symptomatic, untreated urinary tract infection not resolved prior to starting fesoterodine
- Botulinum toxin injection for UUI in the last year
- Current therapy with peripheral or sacral neuromodulation
- Neurologic conditions that may affect urinary function (stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease)
- Women taking potent CYP3A4 inhibitors
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UNC-Chapel Hill, Dept of Ob/Gyn
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
Official title: Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly
Urge urinary incontinence, characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major health issue for elderly women, as it is incredibly common and significantly impairs quality of life. Although anticholinergic medications are the most common therapy, the investigators are unable to predict an individual's response to a particular drug in terms of both effectiveness and side effects. Through genetic evaluation, the investigators have the potential to personalize and optimize drug therapy for millions of elderly women suffering from urge incontinence.
Read the detailed description
Urge urinary incontinence (UUI), characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major public health burden to elderly women, given its high prevalence, impairment of quality of life, associated caregiver burden, and substantial economic costs. UUI is significantly more prevalent in older adults and disproportionately affects women, with a prevalence of 19% in community-dwelling women over 65 and 60-78% in long-term care female residents.
Anticholinergic medications are the most common first-line therapy for UUI. Although numerous trials have demonstrated that anticholinergics are efficacious for UUI, the response to these medications is variable, as their effectiveness is often limited by poor response or adverse events (AEs), such as cognitive impairment or constipation, which are particularly problematic in older adults. Furthermore, a comprehensive systematic review concluded that no one drug is definitively superior, leaving clinicians without any evidence to guide decision-making regarding drug choice. As a result, UUI pharmacotherapy is empiric and not personalized, even though it is clear that individual variations exist in both response and toxicity. The treatment of UUI is especially challenging in the geriatric population, given their higher risk for AEs, polypharmacy, and pharmacokinetic changes that occur with age. The ability to predict which elderly women with UUI will experience low efficacy or develop significant adverse events from anticholinergic medications would be a paradigm shift in the therapeutic practice to this highly prevalent and bothersome condition.
Pharmacogenetics may provide insight into how to predict response to anticholinergic UUI therapy. Research has already shown that genetic differences in drug metabolism impact a patient's drug response. For example, "fast metabolizers" may metabolize the drug so rapidly that therapeutic levels are never reached, limiting effectiveness. In contrast, "slow metabolizers" may develop high drug concentrations, resulting in significantly more AEs. While pharmacogenetic research exists for numerous classes of drugs, including anticoagulants, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors,14 beta-blockers, immunosuppressants and opioids, this type of translational research does not exist for anticholinergics for UUI. Thus, this proposed project represents a novel concept and unique opportunity to dramatically change UUI pharmacotherapy.
Fesoterodine is an ideal anticholinergic medication to launch a pharmacogenetic study in this field. Fesoterodine's active metabolite, 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), is metabolized by a well-characterized cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP2D6. The CYP2D6 gene has several genetic variants, which result in different metabolizer statuses ranging from poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate metabolizers (IM), extensive metabolizers (EM), to ultrarapid metabolizers (UM). These different CYP2D6 profiles may be clinically important, as they may contribute to the variability in efficacy and AEs. In fact, pharmaceutical company data for fesoterodine demonstrated that PMs have a two-fold higher plasma concentration than EMs; however, no published data exist on how CYP2D6 metabolizer status correlates with clinical outcomes such as efficacy or AEs. The ability to use CYP2D6 metabolizer status to predict which individuals will experience low efficacy or develop AEs to fesoterodine, and to utilize alternative therapies in these women, would challenge existing therapeutic paradigms and would significantly advance clinical practice via a pharmacogenetic approach.
Specific Aim 1: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict efficacy during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. All subjects will be started on fesoterodine 4mg for 2 weeks followed by 8mg for 2 weeks. The primary outcome will be patient-reported treatment response based on a 4-point scale utilized in phase III clinical trials.8,9 We hypothesize that women who rapidly metabolize fesoterodine based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status are more likely to have low efficacy.
Specific Aim 2: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict moderate to severe adverse events during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. In the same study design as Aim #1, we will identify subjects with moderate to severe fesoterodine-related AEs. We hypothesize that women who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are more likely to have moderate to severe AEs.
Specific Aim 3: To utilize preliminary data from this pilot, proof-of-concept study to plan a future large-scale trial to predict outcomes of anticholinergic UUI therapy based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status. Data regarding efficacy rates, risk of moderate-severe AEs, and the impact of CYP2D6 metabolizer status on efficacy and AEs, in addition to information regarding recruitment, drop-out, and questionnaire burden, will critically inform the study design, outcome measures and sample size of future, definitive trials.
This proposal represents an innovative approach to pharmacotherapy for UUI, a highly prevalent condition with significant morbidity. Pharmacogenetics has tremendous potential to identify ideal candidates for anticholinergic UUI therapy and to distinguish individuals who may benefit from alternative treatment options. This pioneering pharmacogenetic research has the potential to lay the necessary groundwork for future long-term research which would optimize and personalize UUI therapy for millions of elderly women.
Design \& Procedures:
Patient Population: All women aged 50 years or older who desire treatment for bothersome UUI will be approached for enrollment. Women with ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary will be included. Although women who have previously failed fesoterodine will be excluded, those who have failed other UUI anticholinergics remain eligible after a 2-week washout period.
Subjects with auditory or visual sensory impairment will be included. If visual impairment exists, the research coordinator will provide assistance to complete the necessary documents. However, those who are unable to complete the study-related items and visits, such as women with cognitive impairment, based on the Mini-Cog validated questionnaire will be excluded.
- Conditions
- Urge Urinary Incontinence
- Being tested
- Fesoterodine Fumarate
- Keywords
- overactive bladder, urge urinary incontinence, pharmacogenetics
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Urge, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fesoterodine FumarateDrug
Also called Toviaz
FDA approved anticholinergic medication used for treatment of urge urinary incontinence
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fesoterodine Fumarate | Experimental | Participants will receive 4 mg of study drug for first 2 weeks, and then 8 mg of study drugs for 2 weeks. Receives: Drug: Fesoterodine Fumarate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage With Treatment Success
Treatment Success (Yes/No) was defined by the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS). TBS is a 4-point scale which was dichotomized into Yes/No for the Treatment Success outcome. The scale asks participants to rate "My condition has been improved: 1= greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed, 4= worsened." If a participant responded 1 (greatly improved) or 2 (improved), they were considered as a "Yes" for Treatment Success. If a participant responded 3 (not changed) or 4 (worsened), then they were considered as a "No" for Treatment Success.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events
Outcome was defined as moderate to severe anticipated adverse events (AE) based on the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Each AE is graded 1-5 with Grade 1=mild AE, Grade 2=moderate AE, Grade 3=severe AE, Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling AE, grade 5=Death-related to AE. Any side effect grade >= 2 considered a moderate to severe AE. Anticipated AEs included dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, confusion, cognitive impairment, dry eyes, blurry vision, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, dyspepsia and urinary retention. Example: dry mouth grades per CTCAE: Grade 1=symptomatic without significant dietary alteration; unstimulated saliva flow > 0.2 mL/min; Grade 2=symptomatic and significant oral intake alteration; unstimulated saliva flow 0.1 to 0.2 mL/min; Grade 3=symptoms leading to inability to adequately aliment orally; IV fluids, tube feedings or total parenteral nutrition indicated; unstimulated saliva < 0.1 mL/min.
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completion31 Dec 2017
- Study completion31 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Urge Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer M Wu, MD, Principal investigator, UNC-CH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01786967
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13-2066
- Other IDs
- 1R03AG042335-01, Pro00036147
- Acronym
- URGE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01786967
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- URGE / 13-2066
- Conditions
- Urge Urinary Incontinence
- Keywords
- overactive bladder, urge urinary incontinence, pharmacogenetics
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Oct 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Urge urinary incontinence, characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major health issue for elderly women, as it is incredibly common and significantly impairs quality of life. Although anticholinergic medications are the most common therapy, the investigators are unable to predict an individual's response to a particular drug in terms of both effectiveness and side effects. Through genetic evaluation, the investigators have the potential to personalize and optimize drug therapy for millions of elderly women suffering from urge incontinence.
Detailed description
Urge urinary incontinence (UUI), characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major public health burden to elderly women, given its high prevalence, impairment of quality of life, associated caregiver burden, and substantial economic costs. UUI is significantly more prevalent in older adults and disproportionately affects women, with a prevalence of 19% in community-dwelling women over 65 and 60-78% in long-term care female residents.
Anticholinergic medications are the most common first-line therapy for UUI. Although numerous trials have demonstrated that anticholinergics are efficacious for UUI, the response to these medications is variable, as their effectiveness is often limited by poor response or adverse events (AEs), such as cognitive impairment or constipation, which are particularly problematic in older adults. Furthermore, a comprehensive systematic review concluded that no one drug is definitively superior, leaving clinicians without any evidence to guide decision-making regarding drug choice. As a result, UUI pharmacotherapy is empiric and not personalized, even though it is clear that individual variations exist in both response and toxicity. The treatment of UUI is especially challenging in the geriatric population, given their higher risk for AEs, polypharmacy, and pharmacokinetic changes that occur with age. The ability to predict which elderly women with UUI will experience low efficacy or develop significant adverse events from anticholinergic medications would be a paradigm shift in the therapeutic practice to this highly prevalent and bothersome condition.
Pharmacogenetics may provide insight into how to predict response to anticholinergic UUI therapy. Research has already shown that genetic differences in drug metabolism impact a patient's drug response. For example, "fast metabolizers" may metabolize the drug so rapidly that therapeutic levels are never reached, limiting effectiveness. In contrast, "slow metabolizers" may develop high drug concentrations, resulting in significantly more AEs. While pharmacogenetic research exists for numerous classes of drugs, including anticoagulants, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors,14 beta-blockers, immunosuppressants and opioids, this type of translational research does not exist for anticholinergics for UUI. Thus, this proposed project represents a novel concept and unique opportunity to dramatically change UUI pharmacotherapy.
Fesoterodine is an ideal anticholinergic medication to launch a pharmacogenetic study in this field. Fesoterodine's active metabolite, 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), is metabolized by a well-characterized cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP2D6. The CYP2D6 gene has several genetic variants, which result in different metabolizer statuses ranging from poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate metabolizers (IM), extensive metabolizers (EM), to ultrarapid metabolizers (UM). These different CYP2D6 profiles may be clinically important, as they may contribute to the variability in efficacy and AEs. In fact, pharmaceutical company data for fesoterodine demonstrated that PMs have a two-fold higher plasma concentration than EMs; however, no published data exist on how CYP2D6 metabolizer status correlates with clinical outcomes such as efficacy or AEs. The ability to use CYP2D6 metabolizer status to predict which individuals will experience low efficacy or develop AEs to fesoterodine, and to utilize alternative therapies in these women, would challenge existing therapeutic paradigms and would significantly advance clinical practice via a pharmacogenetic approach.
Specific Aim 1: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict efficacy during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. All subjects will be started on fesoterodine 4mg for 2 weeks followed by 8mg for 2 weeks. The primary outcome will be patient-reported treatment response based on a 4-point scale utilized in phase III clinical trials.8,9 We hypothesize that women who rapidly metabolize fesoterodine based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status are more likely to have low efficacy.
Specific Aim 2: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict moderate to severe adverse events during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. In the same study design as Aim #1, we will identify subjects with moderate to severe fesoterodine-related AEs. We hypothesize that women who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are more likely to have moderate to severe AEs.
Specific Aim 3: To utilize preliminary data from this pilot, proof-of-concept study to plan a future large-scale trial to predict outcomes of anticholinergic UUI therapy based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status. Data regarding efficacy rates, risk of moderate-severe AEs, and the impact of CYP2D6 metabolizer status on efficacy and AEs, in addition to information regarding recruitment, drop-out, and questionnaire burden, will critically inform the study design, outcome measures and sample size of future, definitive trials.
This proposal represents an innovative approach to pharmacotherapy for UUI, a highly prevalent condition with significant morbidity. Pharmacogenetics has tremendous potential to identify ideal candidates for anticholinergic UUI therapy and to distinguish individuals who may benefit from alternative treatment options. This pioneering pharmacogenetic research has the potential to lay the necessary groundwork for future long-term research which would optimize and personalize UUI therapy for millions of elderly women.
Design \& Procedures:
Patient Population: All women aged 50 years or older who desire treatment for bothersome UUI will be approached for enrollment. Women with ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary will be included. Although women who have previously failed fesoterodine will be excluded, those who have failed other UUI anticholinergics remain eligible after a 2-week washout period.
Subjects with auditory or visual sensory impairment will be included. If visual impairment exists, the research coordinator will provide assistance to complete the necessary documents. However, those who are unable to complete the study-related items and visits, such as women with cognitive impairment, based on the Mini-Cog validated questionnaire will be excluded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fesoterodine Fumarate | Experimental | Drug: Fesoterodine FumarateParticipants will receive 4 mg of study drug for first 2 weeks, and then 8 mg of study drugs for 2 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Women ≥ 50 years
- ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary
- Urge-predominant incontinence, >50% of total incontinence episodes
- No history of failure to fesoterodine
- 2-week washout period if currently on an anticholinergic for UUI
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Contraindications to fesoterodine (e.g., bladder outlet obstruction, narrow angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, severe hepatic or renal impairment)
- Inability to complete study-related items and visits - i.e., cognitive impairment based on Mini-Cog test score (exclude if score of 0 or 1-2 (Abnormal))
- Urinary retention requiring catheterization
- Symptomatic, untreated urinary tract infection not resolved prior to starting fesoterodine
- Botulinum toxin injection for UUI in the last year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fesoterodine FumarateAlso: ToviazFDA approved anticholinergic medication used for treatment of urge urinary incontinence | Drug | Fesoterodine Fumarate |
Primary outcome
Percentage With Treatment Success
Time frame: 4 weeks
Treatment Success (Yes/No) was defined by the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS). TBS is a 4-point scale which was dichotomized into Yes/No for the Treatment Success outcome. The scale asks participants to rate "My condition has been improved: 1= greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed, 4= worsened." If a participant responded 1 (greatly improved) or 2 (improved), they were considered as a "Yes" for Treatment Success. If a participant responded 3 (not changed) or 4 (worsened), then they were considered as a "No" for Treatment Success.
1 secondary outcome
Percentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urge Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
RecruitingPhase 2
Surface Electrical Stimulation for Urinary Incontinence in Men Treated for Prostate Cancer
Urinary Urge Incontinence, Stress Urinary Incontinence
Active, not recruiting
APPROVE Trial: Evaluating a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Treatment of OAB in Women
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urinary Urgency
Recruiting
Post Approval Effectiveness and Durability Evaluation of the Altaviva™ Tibial Device
Urge Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer M Wu, MD principal investigator
UNC-CH
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fesoterodine Fumarate in people with Urge Urinary Incontinence, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage With Treatment Success (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2020.