Bowel Cleansing in Preparation for ColonoscopyPhase 4NCT01788709
PEG-Electrolyte Solution (FORTRANS®) With Mentholyptus Drops (Halls®) Versus Reduced Volume Ascorbic Acid Supplemented PEG-Electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in Colonoscopy Preparation
A Phase 4 study testing preparation cleaning solution in people with Bowel Cleansing in Preparation for Colonoscopy, run by American University of Beirut Medical Center at 1 site in Lebanon.
Trial summary
The colonoscopy accuracy and safety depend on the quality of colon cleansing. An inadequately prepped bowel will increase the risk of missing a lesion, prolong procedure, increase patient discomfort, and eventually increase complication rate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bowel Cleansing in Preparation for Colonoscopy
- What is being tested?
- preparation cleaning solution
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteLebanon
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elective colonoscopy
- Consent to the study
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Age less than 18 years
- Significant gastroparesis
- Gastric outlet obstruction
- Ileus
- Known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation
Show all 18Show fewer
- Phenylketonuria
- Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
- Severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance <30 mL/minute)
- Severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III or IV)
- Dehydration
- Severe acute inflammatory disease
- Compromised swallowing reflex or mental status
- Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP ≥170 mm Hg, DBP ≥100 mm Hg)
- Toxic colitis or megacolon
- Patients with IBD
- Status post partial colon resection
- Severe constipation and laxative dependent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Lebanon1 site
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Beirut, Beirut, 00961
About this study
Official title: PEG-Electrolyte Solution (FORTRANS®) With Mentholyptus Drops (Halls®) Versus Reduced Volume Ascorbic Acid Supplemented PEG-Electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomised Controlled Study
The colonoscopy accuracy and safety depend on the quality of colon cleansing. An inadequately prepped bowel will increase the risk of missing a lesion, prolong procedure, increase patient discomfort, and eventually increase complication rate. Therefore an excellent colon cleansing is of extreme importance to the endoscopist and the patient.
Split Fortrans® prep with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (Halls®) has a better palatability and tolerability than the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.
Read the detailed description
Abstract:
Colorectal cancer is amongst the leading cancers worldwide. Treatment is greatly dependent on the stage of illness, with more favorable outcomes associated with early cancers. For this reason, screening colonoscopies have been increasing, as are efforts to improve the quality of bowel preparations. The colonoscopy accuracy and safety depend on the quality of colon cleansing. An inadequately prepped bowel will increase the risk of missing a lesion, prolong procedure, increase patient discomfort, and eventually increase complication rate. Hence, an Ideal bowel cleansing solution would quickly and reliably clean the colon while having a good tolerability and palatability to the patient. Current colonoscopy preparation regimens require the use of large volume of iso-osmotic PEG-electrolyte solution for adequate cleansing and are often poorly tolerated by patients. We have shown previously that mentholyptus drops significantly improved the palatability of PEG-electrolyte (Fortrans®) solution and the quality of preparation (1). We aim at this study to compare the efficacy of the above-mentioned prep technique and the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®). This is a randomized controlled trial that will include patients undergoing elective colonoscopy at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Patients will be randomized into one of two study arms using a computer generated randomization list. 100 Patients will be asked to have candy (Halls®) during the whole 2 hours period while drinking the PEG solution (Fortrans®). Another 100 patients will be asked to take reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®). All patients will then be interviewed by the research coordinator to evaluate the tolerability of the preparation while taking into account the palatability of the solution as main outcome and the remaining volume of the PEG solution and side effects as secondary outcomes. Based on the results of a pilot study, our sample size calculation showed that 100 patients per arm will be enough to attain significance. As for the statistical analysis, SPSS version 20.0 will be used for data entry and analysis.
I- Aim:
To compare the efficacy of split PEG-electrolyte (Fortrans®) with mentholyptus (Halls®) drops and the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in improving the palatability of solution used in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.
II- Background:
The colonoscopy accuracy and safety depend on the quality of colon cleansing. An inadequately prepped bowel will increase the risk of missing a lesion, prolong procedure, increase patient discomfort, and eventually increase complication rate. Therefore an excellent colon cleansing is of extreme importance to the endoscopist and the patient. Hence, An Ideal bowel cleansing solution would quickly and reliably clean the colon while having a good tolerability and palatability to the patient. Poor tolerability by the patient would increase the risk of not finishing the whole solution and hence the risk of having a poor colon cleansing. Many types of bowel cleansing solutions are currently available in the market. Current colonoscopy preparation regimens require the use of large volume of iso-osmotic PEG-electrolyte solution for adequate cleansing and are often poorly tolerated by patients. Therefore, improving the tolerability of the solution by patients is of critical importance. The main side effects of bowel cleansing solution are nausea, vomiting, bloating, and cramps. To decrease their incidence and therefore to improve tolerability, one could either decrease the volume of the solution or improve its palatability. Many studies have tried to decrease the volume of the solution below the standard 4 liters. These studies have largely shown that smaller volume preps are inferior to standard preps. In addition, few studies have shown that improving palatability by adding a flavor improved patients' acceptance of the solution (2-6). MoviPrep® is the only liquid PEG bowel cleansing agent that incorporates ascorbic acid in its formulation, thus contributing to its lemon taste and consequently better patient tolerability. We have proved earlier this year through a randomized trial a high palatability of and hence a better quality of preparation (90% Good/Excellent) using the PEG-electrolyte Fortrans® with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (Halls®) (6).
We aim at comparing the colonoscopy preparation quality and the palatability of our technique and that of the MoviPrep® through a single blinded randomized trial.
III- Hypothesis:
Split Fortrans® prep with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (Halls®) has a better palatability and tolerability than the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.
IV- Setting:
Single university based center (American University of Beirut Medical Center)
V- Study Design:
Prospective randomized single-blinded study
VI- Methods:
- Study population:
- Inclusion criteria: ● Elective colonoscopy
- Consent to the study
- Exclusion criteria: ● Pregnant or lactating women ● Age less than 18 years ● Significant gastroparesis ● Gastric outlet obstruction ● Ileus ● Known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation ● Phenylketonuria
- Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
- Severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance <30 mL/minute)
- Severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III or IV)
- Dehydration
- Severe acute inflammatory disease
- Compromised swallowing reflex or mental status
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg)
- Toxic colitis or megacolon These exclusion criteria are consistent with contraindications of currently approved bowel preparations; therefore, the results of this study may be generalized to the entire target population of patients undergoing colonoscopy, including the elderly.
- Randomization: Patients will be enrolled by the principal investigator or study coordinator (MD) after assessing for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients will then be randomized into one of the two study arms using a pre-set randomization list where patients with an odd number as the last digit of their medical record will be assigned to the control arm and patients with an even number will be assigned to the intervention arm.
- Study arms: ● First arm: 4 Liters of PEG solution (FORTRANS®) split into 2 days with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (2 L at 7-9 pm on the day prior to the colonoscopy with Halls®, and 2 L on the day of the colonoscopy to be completed at least 1.5 hours before the procedure with Halls®). ● Second arm: 2 Liters of reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) + 1 Liter of clear fluids of the patients' choice split into 2 days (1 L of MoviPrep® on the evening of the day prior to the colonoscopy + 500 mL of clear fluids of the patients choice, and another 1 L of MoviPrep® + 500 mL of clear fluids on the day of the colonoscopy to be completed at least 1 hour before the procedure.)
- Instructions to patients: Patients in both arms will be instructed on how they should take the colonoscopy preparation solution, emphasizing the importance of complete intake of the solution in order to ensure a safe and effective procedure. In case of noncompliance, the remainder of the PEG solution shall be brought in by the patient for assessment. They will also be instructed to have a regular breakfast and lunch meals on the day prior to the colonoscopy, a full fluid dinner, and to stay NPO except for the colon prep after midnight till the time of colonoscopy.
- Assessment of tolerability:
Immediately prior to the colonoscopy, patients from both study arms will be interviewed by the research coordinator to evaluate tolerability of the preparation.
Patients will be assessed for:
- Primary outcome:
- Quality of preparation: score from 1 to 4
- 2 3 4 Poor Fair Good Excellent
- Secondary outcome:
- Estimated volume remaining of the original PEG solution
- Palatability: score 1 to 5
- 2 3 4 5 Disgusting Moderately poor taste Slightly poor taste Acceptable Tasty
In addition to the following adverse events:
- Nausea
- Vomiting
- Bloating
- Cramps
- Headache
- General acceptance of the solution
- Willingness to take the preparation again in the future if necessary
VII- Sample size calculation and data analysis:
Sample size calculation was conducted based on our previously conducted study that showed a 90% good/excellent prep with Fortrans® + Halls® and the reported results on colonoscopy preparations using the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) that range between 65-85% good/excellent (average: 75%) (1)(7-10). Therefore, based on these results and using an α of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, the sample size required to show significance was calculated to be 97 patients per arm. Hence, it was decided to recruit 100 patients per arm taking into account possible withdrawals.
For the statistical analysis, SPSS version 20.0 will be used for data entry and analysis.
The primary end point is the quality of preparation assessed by the endoscopist (who will be blind to the preparation technique). Secondary end points will be: palatability, residual volume, patient assessment of the quality of preparation, willingness to retake the preparation solution again if needed.
VIII- Study Interval:
1 year starting from the enrollment of the first patient
- Being tested
- preparation cleaning solution
- Keywords
- colonoscopy, preparation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
preparation cleaning solutionOther
Also called Fortrans (split dose) + Mentholyptus drops, MoviPrep (split dose)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Fortrans (split dose) + Mentholyptus drops Receives: Other: preparation cleaning solution |
| B | Active comparator | MoviPrep (split dose) Receives: Other: preparation cleaning solution |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bowel preparation quality
Superiority of Fortrans + Halls to MoviPrep in cleansing the bowels
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bowel Cleansing in Preparation for ColonoscopyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- American University of Beirut Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ala I Sharara, Prof, Principal investigator, American University of Beirut Medical CenterFayez S Sarkis, MD, Study director, American University of Beirut Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01788709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM.AS1.32
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sharara AI, Harb AH, Sarkis FS, Chalhoub JM, Badreddine R, Mourad FH, Othman M, Masri O. Split-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 14;21(6):1938-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1938.
PubMed 25684963
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PEG-Electrolyte Solution (FORTRANS®) With Mentholyptus Drops (Halls®) Versus Reduced Volume Ascorbic Acid Supplemented PEG-Electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomised Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01788709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM.AS1.32
- Keywords
- colonoscopy, preparation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- American University of Beirut Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The colonoscopy accuracy and safety depend on the quality of colon cleansing. An inadequately prepped bowel will increase the risk of missing a lesion, prolong procedure, increase patient discomfort, and eventually increase complication rate. Therefore an excellent colon cleansing is of extreme importance to the endoscopist and the patient.
Split Fortrans® prep with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (Halls®) has a better palatability and tolerability than the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.
Detailed description
Abstract:
Colorectal cancer is amongst the leading cancers worldwide. Treatment is greatly dependent on the stage of illness, with more favorable outcomes associated with early cancers. For this reason, screening colonoscopies have been increasing, as are efforts to improve the quality of bowel preparations. The colonoscopy accuracy and safety depend on the quality of colon cleansing. An inadequately prepped bowel will increase the risk of missing a lesion, prolong procedure, increase patient discomfort, and eventually increase complication rate. Hence, an Ideal bowel cleansing solution would quickly and reliably clean the colon while having a good tolerability and palatability to the patient. Current colonoscopy preparation regimens require the use of large volume of iso-osmotic PEG-electrolyte solution for adequate cleansing and are often poorly tolerated by patients. We have shown previously that mentholyptus drops significantly improved the palatability of PEG-electrolyte (Fortrans®) solution and the quality of preparation (1). We aim at this study to compare the efficacy of the above-mentioned prep technique and the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®). This is a randomized controlled trial that will include patients undergoing elective colonoscopy at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Patients will be randomized into one of two study arms using a computer generated randomization list. 100 Patients will be asked to have candy (Halls®) during the whole 2 hours period while drinking the PEG solution (Fortrans®). Another 100 patients will be asked to take reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®). All patients will then be interviewed by the research coordinator to evaluate the tolerability of the preparation while taking into account the palatability of the solution as main outcome and the remaining volume of the PEG solution and side effects as secondary outcomes. Based on the results of a pilot study, our sample size calculation showed that 100 patients per arm will be enough to attain significance. As for the statistical analysis, SPSS version 20.0 will be used for data entry and analysis.
I- Aim:
To compare the efficacy of split PEG-electrolyte (Fortrans®) with mentholyptus (Halls®) drops and the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in improving the palatability of solution used in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.
II- Background:
The colonoscopy accuracy and safety depend on the quality of colon cleansing. An inadequately prepped bowel will increase the risk of missing a lesion, prolong procedure, increase patient discomfort, and eventually increase complication rate. Therefore an excellent colon cleansing is of extreme importance to the endoscopist and the patient. Hence, An Ideal bowel cleansing solution would quickly and reliably clean the colon while having a good tolerability and palatability to the patient. Poor tolerability by the patient would increase the risk of not finishing the whole solution and hence the risk of having a poor colon cleansing. Many types of bowel cleansing solutions are currently available in the market. Current colonoscopy preparation regimens require the use of large volume of iso-osmotic PEG-electrolyte solution for adequate cleansing and are often poorly tolerated by patients. Therefore, improving the tolerability of the solution by patients is of critical importance. The main side effects of bowel cleansing solution are nausea, vomiting, bloating, and cramps. To decrease their incidence and therefore to improve tolerability, one could either decrease the volume of the solution or improve its palatability. Many studies have tried to decrease the volume of the solution below the standard 4 liters. These studies have largely shown that smaller volume preps are inferior to standard preps. In addition, few studies have shown that improving palatability by adding a flavor improved patients' acceptance of the solution (2-6). MoviPrep® is the only liquid PEG bowel cleansing agent that incorporates ascorbic acid in its formulation, thus contributing to its lemon taste and consequently better patient tolerability. We have proved earlier this year through a randomized trial a high palatability of and hence a better quality of preparation (90% Good/Excellent) using the PEG-electrolyte Fortrans® with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (Halls®) (6).
We aim at comparing the colonoscopy preparation quality and the palatability of our technique and that of the MoviPrep® through a single blinded randomized trial.
III- Hypothesis:
Split Fortrans® prep with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (Halls®) has a better palatability and tolerability than the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.
IV- Setting:
Single university based center (American University of Beirut Medical Center)
V- Study Design:
Prospective randomized single-blinded study
VI- Methods:
- Study population:
- Inclusion criteria: ● Elective colonoscopy
- Consent to the study
- Exclusion criteria: ● Pregnant or lactating women ● Age less than 18 years ● Significant gastroparesis ● Gastric outlet obstruction ● Ileus ● Known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation ● Phenylketonuria
- Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
- Severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance <30 mL/minute)
- Severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III or IV)
- Dehydration
- Severe acute inflammatory disease
- Compromised swallowing reflex or mental status
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg)
- Toxic colitis or megacolon These exclusion criteria are consistent with contraindications of currently approved bowel preparations; therefore, the results of this study may be generalized to the entire target population of patients undergoing colonoscopy, including the elderly.
- Randomization: Patients will be enrolled by the principal investigator or study coordinator (MD) after assessing for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients will then be randomized into one of the two study arms using a pre-set randomization list where patients with an odd number as the last digit of their medical record will be assigned to the control arm and patients with an even number will be assigned to the intervention arm.
- Study arms: ● First arm: 4 Liters of PEG solution (FORTRANS®) split into 2 days with sugar-free mentholyptus drops (2 L at 7-9 pm on the day prior to the colonoscopy with Halls®, and 2 L on the day of the colonoscopy to be completed at least 1.5 hours before the procedure with Halls®). ● Second arm: 2 Liters of reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) + 1 Liter of clear fluids of the patients' choice split into 2 days (1 L of MoviPrep® on the evening of the day prior to the colonoscopy + 500 mL of clear fluids of the patients choice, and another 1 L of MoviPrep® + 500 mL of clear fluids on the day of the colonoscopy to be completed at least 1 hour before the procedure.)
- Instructions to patients: Patients in both arms will be instructed on how they should take the colonoscopy preparation solution, emphasizing the importance of complete intake of the solution in order to ensure a safe and effective procedure. In case of noncompliance, the remainder of the PEG solution shall be brought in by the patient for assessment. They will also be instructed to have a regular breakfast and lunch meals on the day prior to the colonoscopy, a full fluid dinner, and to stay NPO except for the colon prep after midnight till the time of colonoscopy.
- Assessment of tolerability:
Immediately prior to the colonoscopy, patients from both study arms will be interviewed by the research coordinator to evaluate tolerability of the preparation.
Patients will be assessed for:
- Primary outcome:
- Quality of preparation: score from 1 to 4
- 2 3 4 Poor Fair Good Excellent
- Secondary outcome:
- Estimated volume remaining of the original PEG solution
- Palatability: score 1 to 5
- 2 3 4 5 Disgusting Moderately poor taste Slightly poor taste Acceptable Tasty
In addition to the following adverse events:
- Nausea
- Vomiting
- Bloating
- Cramps
- Headache
- General acceptance of the solution
- Willingness to take the preparation again in the future if necessary
VII- Sample size calculation and data analysis:
Sample size calculation was conducted based on our previously conducted study that showed a 90% good/excellent prep with Fortrans® + Halls® and the reported results on colonoscopy preparations using the reduced volume ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG-electrolyte (MoviPrep®) that range between 65-85% good/excellent (average: 75%) (1)(7-10). Therefore, based on these results and using an α of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, the sample size required to show significance was calculated to be 97 patients per arm. Hence, it was decided to recruit 100 patients per arm taking into account possible withdrawals.
For the statistical analysis, SPSS version 20.0 will be used for data entry and analysis.
The primary end point is the quality of preparation assessed by the endoscopist (who will be blind to the preparation technique). Secondary end points will be: palatability, residual volume, patient assessment of the quality of preparation, willingness to retake the preparation solution again if needed.
VIII- Study Interval:
1 year starting from the enrollment of the first patient
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Other: preparation cleaning solutionFortrans (split dose) + Mentholyptus drops |
| B | Active comparator | Other: preparation cleaning solutionMoviPrep (split dose) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Elective colonoscopy
- Consent to the study
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Age less than 18 years
- Significant gastroparesis
- Gastric outlet obstruction
- Ileus
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| preparation cleaning solutionAlso: Fortrans (split dose) + Mentholyptus drops, MoviPrep (split dose) | Other | A, B |
Primary outcome
Bowel preparation quality
Time frame: 6 months
Superiority of Fortrans + Halls to MoviPrep in cleansing the bowels
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25684963Sharara AI, Harb AH, Sarkis FS, Chalhoub JM, Badreddine R, Mourad FH, Othman M, Masri O. Split-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 14;21(6):1938-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1938.
Related trials for Bowel Cleansing in Preparation for Colonoscopy
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Bowel Cleansing With PLENVU® Compared to Sodium Picosulfate in Participants Aged 1 to < 18 Years of Age in Preparation for Colonoscopy
Bowel Cleansing Prior to Clinical Procedures
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study Assessing CLENPIQ as Bowel Preparation for Pediatric Colonoscopy
Bowel Preparation
Recruiting
Comparing Three Rescue Bowel Preparation Regimens for Colonoscopy After Failed Cleansing
Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy, Inadequate Bowel Preparation
RecruitingPhase 3
Clinical Trial on Bowel Preparation Comparing Mannitol 100g to Plenvu Both in a Same Day Regimen (CLEARWAY)
Elective Colonoscopy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ala I Sharara, Prof principal investigator
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Fayez S Sarkis, MD study director
American University of Beirut Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing preparation cleaning solution in people with Bowel Cleansing in Preparation for Colonoscopy, run by American University of Beirut Medical Center at 1 site in Lebanon.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Lebanon. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bowel preparation quality (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01788709, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2014.