Orthopaedic FracturesPhase 3PAINNCT01789216
Improving Pain Management and Long Term Outcomes Following High Energy Orthopedic Trauma (Pain Study)
A Phase 3 study testing NSAID and Gabapentinoids in people with Orthopaedic Fractures, run by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium at 17 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to definitively resolve questions regarding the use of multimodal pharmacologic pain management for orthopedic trauma patients in the context of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthopaedic Fractures
- What is being tested?
- NSAID and Gabapentinoids
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to 31 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with one of the following types of injuries:
- Unilateral, Grade I \&II open or closed pilon (distal tibial plafond), calcaneus, talus fractures and Lisfranc dislocations requiring operative treatment with fixation; or
- Unilateral, open (type I, II, or IIIA) ankle fractures with associated dislocation on presentation (OTA 44B3 or 44C) requiring operative treatment with fixation; or
- Unilateral, open or closed distal and proximal humerus (OTA 11A-C and OTA 13 A-C); or
- Open femoral shaft fracture (OTA 32 A-C; Gustilo Type I-IIIC) or open or closed supracondylar femur fractures (OTA 33 A-C); or
- Open or closed tibial plateau or shaft fractures (OTA 42 A-C or 43 A-C)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Any combination of the above injuries which are surgically treated as a whole
- Patients who present to the admitting hospital acutely or clinic following an initial assessment in the Emergency Department, for care up to 10 days following initial injury.
- Patients 18-80 years old inclusive.
- Patients who are English or Spanish competent.
- Treating physicians agree that none of the study drugs are indicated for standard of care treatment for this patient.
- Patients able to be followed at the METRC facility for at least 12 months following injury.
Who cannot join
- Patients unable to provide informed consent.
- Patients with chronic pain being presently treated with opioid or gabapentinoid prescription or any other alternative therapy.
- Patients who are current IVDA
- Patients with bilateral or ipsilateral injuries requiring surgery
- Patients with other orthopedic or non-orthopedic injuries requiring operative intervention
- Patients with severe osteopenia.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Patients who are skeletally immature (defined as less than 18 years of age or no radiographic evidence of epiphyseal closure).
- Patients who are expected to have a post-surgical stay less than 24 hours.
- Patients with a history of allergy to any drugs in the study.
- Patients unable to swallow oral medications or without adequately functioning GI tract.
- Patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeds or gastric perforation.
- Patients with a history of stroke or heart attack.
- Patients currently receiving an aspirin or NSAID regimen (exception: low dose (81 mg) aspirin. See section 6.5) Patients with any bleeding disorders.
- Patients with severe renal failure. Patients with moderate renal failure may participate in the study at a modified dose. See Section 9.6.
- Patients undergoing daily treatment with systemic glucocorticoids before surgery.
- Patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, who may be at increased risk of developing angioedema with pregabalin.
- Patients likely to have severe problems maintaining follow-up, including patients diagnosed with a severe psychiatric conditions, patients who live too far outside the hospital's catchment area, patients who are incarcerated and patients who have unstable housing situations.
- Patients who experienced a loss of consciousness consistent with a clinical diagnosis of a closed head injury, or concern of a cerebrovascular bleed secondary to traumatic brain injury.
- Patients with a GCS <15
- Patient speaks neither English nor Spanish.
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating at time of screening
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
United States17 sites
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland
University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
Baltimore, Maryland
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas
Penn State University M.S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania
UT Health: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School
Houston, Texas
Eskenazi Health
Indianapolis, Indiana
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa
University of Miami Ryder Trauma Center
Miami, Florida
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth
Portsmouth, Virginia
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
Shreveport, Louisiana
St. Mary's Medical Center
West Palm Beach, Florida
About this study
The purpose of this study is to definitively resolve questions regarding the use of multimodal pharmacologic pain management for orthopedic trauma patients in the context of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
Also, as a significant proportion of this population develops chronic post traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), a sub-objective of this study is to examine the etiology and incidence of chronic pain and PTOA in this population.
Read the detailed description
In this study, will test whether adjunctive analgesic therapy during the pre and peri-operative period, in addition to standard of care pain management, can improve overall pain control and pain related outcomes without increasing analgesic related side effects.
Patients will be randomized into three treatment groups. The intervention will begin within 48 hours of admission and continue for up to the time of definitive fixation.
Group 1: standard pain management, plus intravenous and oral placebo for up to 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Group 2: standard pain management, plus intravenous NSAIDs (ketorolac) and oral placebo for up to 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Group 3: standard pain management, plus intravenous placebo and oral pregabalin for up to 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Specific Aim 1: Evaluate the effect of standard pain management (Group 1) vs. standard pain management plus peri-operative NSAIDs (Group 2 - meloxicam + ketorolac) in the treatment of severe limb fractures.
Hypothesis 1a: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with NSAIDs will: (1) have reduced post operative opioid utilization; (2) report reduced levels of persistent pain; and (3) have noninferior rates of surgery for nonunion.
Hypothesis 1b: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with NSAIDs will benefit from (1) improved post operative pain control; (2) improved pre operative pain control; (3) reduced lengths of stay; (4) reduced pain interference; (5) improved functional outcomes; (6) lower levels of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); (7) improved overall health status; and (8) have noninferior rates of analgesic treatment related side effects.
Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of standard pain management (Group 1) vs. standard pain management plus pre and peri-operative pregabalin (Group 3) in the treatment of severe limb fractures.
Hypothesis2a : When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with pregabalin will: (1) have reduced post operative opioid utilization; (2) report reduced levels of persistent pain; and (3) have noninferior rates of surgery for nonunion.
Hypothesis 2b: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with pregabalin will benefit from (1) improved post operative pain control; (2) improved pre operative pain control; (3) reduced lengths of stay; (4) reduced pain interference; (5) improved functional outcomes; (6) lower levels of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); (7) improved overall health status; and (8) have noninferior rates of analgesic treatment related side effects.
Specific Aim 3: Estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of each adjunctive analgesic therapy relative to standard of care analgesic therapy in the treatment of severe limb fractures. Costs will be estimated from both the health care provider perspective and the societal perspective. The time horizon for cost-effectiveness analysis will be based on the actual period of observation. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be calculated for: (a) study group 2 (NSAIDS - meloxicam + ketorolac) relative to standard of care; and (b) study group 3 (pregabalin) relative to standard of care. For purpose of cost-effectiveness analysis, the effect will be measured as unit change in specific outcome metrics at up to 15 months (or longer period as available) compared to baseline. The following cost-effectiveness metrics, all relative to standard of care, will be reported:
- incremental cost per unit change in the Brief Pain Inventory
- incremental cost per unit change in the Short Muscular Function Assessment (SFMA)
- incremental cost per unit change in health state preference ("utility") as derived from the VR-12.
PTOA Pilot Study: Additional funding was received from NIH to conduct a pilot, observational study of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), leveraging current resources of the Pain study. PTOA is an important outcome in the population to be enrolled in the Pain study. The aims of the PTOA Study are to: (1) measure the incidence of PTOA and chronic pain for up to 24 months following fracture reduction surgery and (2) quantify the extent to which fracture severity and post-reduction contact stress are related to the development of PTOA. Accomplishment of these aims will require (1) for all patients with ankle fractures in the Pain study: complete a PTOA survey at 12 months and at any subsequent visits that are conducted as part of standard of care and provide access to all standard of care imaging studies completed during the study period and (2) for a subset of 60 pilon fracture patients enrolled in the Pain study for whom post-operative CT scans are not standard of care, obtain additional consent for completion of a study-funded post-operative CT scan and 24 month radiographic study
- Conditions
- Orthopaedic Fractures
- Being tested
- NSAID, Gabapentinoids, placebo
- Keywords
- Pilon fractures, Calcaneus fractures, Acute pain, Chronic pain, Isolated, unilateral, Grade I, Grade II, open, closed
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Pain, Chronic Pain, Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NSAIDDrug
Also called Meloxicam/Mobic (NDC 68382-000-01; manufacturer: Zydus; encapsulated in size AA, empty capsule shells, backfilled with Avicel by Fisher Clinical Services (Bristol), LLC), Ketorolac/Toradol (NDC 00409-3795-01; manufacturer: Hospira)
GabapentinoidsDrug
Also called Pregablin/Lyrica (NDC 00071-1014-68; manufacturer: Pfizer; encapsulated in size, AA empty capsule shells, backfilled with Avicel by Fisher Clinical Services, (Bristol) LLC,; Lyrica, NDC 00071-1018-68; manufacturer: Pfizer; encapsulated, in size AA empty capsule shells, backfilled with Avicel by Fisher Clinical
placeboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Standard pain management + perioperative intravenous placebo \& oral placebo.
Control group will receive an oral dose of placebo up to two hours prior to surgery and twice daily for up to 48 hours following any surgery, in addition to an intravenous dose of placebo up to two hours prior to surgery and every 6 hours for up to 48 hours following surgery. All study medications will be in addition to standard of care pain medication.
*Previous preoperative protocol was removed due to difficulty of medication adherence and limited importance of preoperative regimen to the intervention overall. Receives: Drug: placebo |
| NSAID | Active comparator | Standard pain management + perioperative intravenous ketorolac \& oral placebo.
The NSAID group will receive 30 mg of intravenous (IV) ketorolac (Ketorolac 30 mg/ml dose vial, NDC 00409-3795-01; manufacturer: Hospira) administered up to two hours prior to the procedure and every 6 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure. In addition, as part of the perioperative protocol, patients will receive an oral dose of placebo up to two hours prior to the procedure and every 12 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure.
*Previous preoperative protocol was removed due to difficulty of medication adherence and limited importance of preoperative regimen to the intervention overall. Receives: Drug: NSAID |
| Gabapentinoid | Active comparator | Standard pain management + perioperative intravenous placebo \& oral pregabalin.
The Pregabalin group will receive an oral bolus dose of 300 mg of pregabalin up to two hours prior to the procedure and a 75 mg dose every 12 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure. In addition, as part of the perioperative protocol, patients will receive an IV dose of placebo up to two hours prior to the procedure and every 6 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure.
*Previous preoperative protocol was removed due to difficulty of medication adherence and limited importance of preoperative regimen to the intervention overall. Receives: Drug: Gabapentinoids |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Opioid Utilization
Morphine equivalent opioid utilization during initial hospitalization through 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Measured: 1 year
Persistent Pain
Patient reported persistent pain states at standard of care visits 3, 6 and 12 months following hospital discharge. Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and an additional battery of questions to assess neuropathic pain (painDETECT).
Measured: 1 year
Surgery for non-union
Defined as non-prophylactic surgery for nonunion performed between six months and a year following initial hospital discharge.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (11)
Post Surgical Pain Intensity
Pain intensity at 12-hour intervals during the 48 hours following definitive fixation surgery. Abstracted from medical record and supplemented by participant pain logs. At least one time point will be assessed using the Multidimensional Post Surgical Pain Scale in order to study multiple pain dimensions.
Measured: 2 days
Pre Surgical Pain Intensity
Pain intensity at 12-hour intervals between study enrollment and definitive fixation surgery. Abstracted from medical record and supplemented by participant pain logs.
Measured: 2 days
Length of Index Hospitalization
Defined as the hospitalization during which the definitive fixation occurs. Length of stay for all other study injury related hospitalizations will also be abstracted.
Measured: 1 year
Adverse Effects and Complications
Will include nonunion, wound closure complications, bleeding complications (particularly perioperative bleeding due to loss of platelet function and gastrointestinal bleeding), as well as pain treatment related adverse effects. These include nausea, vomiting, constipation, sedation, pruritis, respiratory depression, somnolence, dizziness, headaches, coordination problems, peripheral edema, blurred vision, gastrointestinal symptoms and irritation, renal impairment, platelet inhibition, angioedema, and post operative delirium. Adverse effects and complications will be assessed by both patient report of symptoms during the period between enrollment and 48 hours post definitive fixation, and by clinical survey of symptoms during index hospitalization and at discharge from additional surgical admissions up to definitive fixation.
Measured: 2-3 weeks
Functional Outcome
The SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment) is a shorter version of the 101-item Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) questionnaire. The SMFA is a 46-item questionnaire consisting of the dysfunction index and the bother index. The dysfunction index has 34 items for assessment of patient function, while the bother index consists of 12 items designed to detect how much patients are bothered by functional items. The SMFA has been evaluated for reliability, validity and responsiveness in trauma populations. To be assessed at 6 and 12 months.
Measured: 1 year
Generic Health Status
The generic health status will be measured by the VR-12 instrument from which a VR-6D can be computed for the purpose of a cost-utility analysis. The VR-12 is a multipurpose self-administered generic measure of health status. It was developed to measure health-related quality of life, estimate disease burden and compare disease-specific benchmarks across populations. The VR-12 items measure eight health domains: general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. The instrument produces a physical health and mental health summary measure. To be assessed at 6 and 12 months.
Measured: 1 year
Depressive Symptoms
The presence of depressive symptoms will be measured using the nine item depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a well validated tool for assisting clinicians in diagnosing depression. There are two components of the PHQ-9: (1) assessing symptoms and functional impairment to make a tentative depression diagnosis, and (2) deriving a severity score. The PHQ-9 is based directly on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). To be assessed at 12 months.
Measured: 1 year
Post Traumatic Stress (PTSD)
PTSD will be measured using the standard PTSD Checklist (PCL), a 17-item measure that elicits responses for each of the DSM-IV disorders that comprise the diagnostic criteria for PTSD (intrusive, avoidant, and arousal symptoms). The psychometric properties of the PCL have been well established and it is the most widely used measure of PTSD. Both civilian and military versions are available. The military version will be used for all those patients on active duty at the time of their injury. To be assessed at 12 months.
Measured: 1 year
Medical Costs
Costs for the index hospitalization and subsequent hospitalizations (within one year) will be derived using hospital bills, outpatient bills and professional fees. Hospital costs will be calculated from charges at the revenue center/cost department line level using cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) computed from the hospital-specific Medicare Cost Reports. Billing data will be supplemented or imputed by identifying medical resource utilization as documented in study case report forms, categorizing resources using standard medical billing codes, and assigning costs based on Medicare fee schedules. Of particular interest will be resource utilization and costs associated with the index hospital admission, surgical procedures for bone grafting and nonunion, subsequent admissions for complications, and post-operative follow-up care.
Measured: 1 year
Fracture Severity
Fracture severity will be measured using standard of care CT scans. In severe fractures, this image will be obtained after application of a temporary joint spanning external fixator. Thus, the fracture severity analysis will be based on fractured distal tibias with limb alignment provisionally controlled. After definitive fracture reconstruction, a second CT scan will be obtained at the 3 month follow up time point, for assessment of chronic contact stress challenge. The second CT scan will be obtained for all patients for whom it is standard of care.
Measured: 1-2 years
Fracture Classification
Fracture classification will be obtained using radiographs of the patient's injured ankle at presentation and after each surgical intervention according to standard of care practice. These radiographs will be used for clinical care, to classify the fractures, and at follow-up to assess outcome. Radiographs will be obtained at the time of initial hospital evaluation, immediately following treatment and at follow up clinic visits according to standard of care. Final clinical assessments and radiographs will be obtained as close to 12 months as routine practice allows. At practices where patients are routinely followed for more than 12 months and 24 month clinical assessments and radiographs will be conducted, at which point all study-related activities will be completed. A subset of 60 patients, identified prospectively, will provide an additional CT 3 months following definitive fixation, and will provide a final set of radiographs 24 months following definitive fixation.
Measured: 1-2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completion31 Dec 2018
- Study completion31 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Orthopaedic FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Renan Castillo, PhD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthLawrence Marsh, MD, Principal investigator, University of Iowa Hospitals & ClinicsKatherine Frey, RN, MPH, MS, Study director, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01789216
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- W81XWH1020090
- Acronym
- PAIN
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Pain Management and Long Term Outcomes Following High Energy Orthopedic Trauma (Pain Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01789216
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAIN / W81XWH1020090
- Conditions
- Orthopaedic Fractures
- Keywords
- Pilon fractures, Calcaneus fractures, Acute pain, Chronic pain, Isolated, unilateral, Grade I, Grade II
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Major Extremity Trauma Research ConsortiumUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to definitively resolve questions regarding the use of multimodal pharmacologic pain management for orthopedic trauma patients in the context of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
Also, as a significant proportion of this population develops chronic post traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), a sub-objective of this study is to examine the etiology and incidence of chronic pain and PTOA in this population.
Detailed description
In this study, will test whether adjunctive analgesic therapy during the pre and peri-operative period, in addition to standard of care pain management, can improve overall pain control and pain related outcomes without increasing analgesic related side effects.
Patients will be randomized into three treatment groups. The intervention will begin within 48 hours of admission and continue for up to the time of definitive fixation.
Group 1: standard pain management, plus intravenous and oral placebo for up to 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Group 2: standard pain management, plus intravenous NSAIDs (ketorolac) and oral placebo for up to 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Group 3: standard pain management, plus intravenous placebo and oral pregabalin for up to 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Specific Aim 1: Evaluate the effect of standard pain management (Group 1) vs. standard pain management plus peri-operative NSAIDs (Group 2 - meloxicam + ketorolac) in the treatment of severe limb fractures.
Hypothesis 1a: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with NSAIDs will: (1) have reduced post operative opioid utilization; (2) report reduced levels of persistent pain; and (3) have noninferior rates of surgery for nonunion.
Hypothesis 1b: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with NSAIDs will benefit from (1) improved post operative pain control; (2) improved pre operative pain control; (3) reduced lengths of stay; (4) reduced pain interference; (5) improved functional outcomes; (6) lower levels of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); (7) improved overall health status; and (8) have noninferior rates of analgesic treatment related side effects.
Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of standard pain management (Group 1) vs. standard pain management plus pre and peri-operative pregabalin (Group 3) in the treatment of severe limb fractures.
Hypothesis2a : When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with pregabalin will: (1) have reduced post operative opioid utilization; (2) report reduced levels of persistent pain; and (3) have noninferior rates of surgery for nonunion.
Hypothesis 2b: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with pregabalin will benefit from (1) improved post operative pain control; (2) improved pre operative pain control; (3) reduced lengths of stay; (4) reduced pain interference; (5) improved functional outcomes; (6) lower levels of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); (7) improved overall health status; and (8) have noninferior rates of analgesic treatment related side effects.
Specific Aim 3: Estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of each adjunctive analgesic therapy relative to standard of care analgesic therapy in the treatment of severe limb fractures. Costs will be estimated from both the health care provider perspective and the societal perspective. The time horizon for cost-effectiveness analysis will be based on the actual period of observation. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be calculated for: (a) study group 2 (NSAIDS - meloxicam + ketorolac) relative to standard of care; and (b) study group 3 (pregabalin) relative to standard of care. For purpose of cost-effectiveness analysis, the effect will be measured as unit change in specific outcome metrics at up to 15 months (or longer period as available) compared to baseline. The following cost-effectiveness metrics, all relative to standard of care, will be reported:
- incremental cost per unit change in the Brief Pain Inventory
- incremental cost per unit change in the Short Muscular Function Assessment (SFMA)
- incremental cost per unit change in health state preference ("utility") as derived from the VR-12.
PTOA Pilot Study: Additional funding was received from NIH to conduct a pilot, observational study of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), leveraging current resources of the Pain study. PTOA is an important outcome in the population to be enrolled in the Pain study. The aims of the PTOA Study are to: (1) measure the incidence of PTOA and chronic pain for up to 24 months following fracture reduction surgery and (2) quantify the extent to which fracture severity and post-reduction contact stress are related to the development of PTOA. Accomplishment of these aims will require (1) for all patients with ankle fractures in the Pain study: complete a PTOA survey at 12 months and at any subsequent visits that are conducted as part of standard of care and provide access to all standard of care imaging studies completed during the study period and (2) for a subset of 60 pilon fracture patients enrolled in the Pain study for whom post-operative CT scans are not standard of care, obtain additional consent for completion of a study-funded post-operative CT scan and 24 month radiographic study
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboStandard pain management + perioperative intravenous placebo \& oral placebo. Control group will receive an oral dose of placebo up to two hours prior to surgery and twice daily for up to 48 hours following any surgery, in addition to an intravenous dose of placebo up to two hours prior to surgery and every 6 hours for up to 48 hours following surgery. All study medications will be in addition to standard of care pain medication. *Previous preoperative protocol was removed due to difficulty of medication adherence and limited importance of preoperative regimen to the intervention overall. |
| NSAID | Active comparator | Drug: NSAIDStandard pain management + perioperative intravenous ketorolac \& oral placebo. The NSAID group will receive 30 mg of intravenous (IV) ketorolac (Ketorolac 30 mg/ml dose vial, NDC 00409-3795-01; manufacturer: Hospira) administered up to two hours prior to the procedure and every 6 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure. In addition, as part of the perioperative protocol, patients will receive an oral dose of placebo up to two hours prior to the procedure and every 12 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure. *Previous preoperative protocol was removed due to difficulty of medication adherence and limited importance of preoperative regimen to the intervention overall. |
| Gabapentinoid | Active comparator | Drug: GabapentinoidsStandard pain management + perioperative intravenous placebo \& oral pregabalin. The Pregabalin group will receive an oral bolus dose of 300 mg of pregabalin up to two hours prior to the procedure and a 75 mg dose every 12 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure. In addition, as part of the perioperative protocol, patients will receive an IV dose of placebo up to two hours prior to the procedure and every 6 hours for up to 48 hours following the procedure. *Previous preoperative protocol was removed due to difficulty of medication adherence and limited importance of preoperative regimen to the intervention overall. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients with one of the following types of injuries:
- Patients who present to the admitting hospital acutely or clinic following an initial assessment in the Emergency Department, for care up to 10 days following initial injury.
- Patients 18-80 years old inclusive.
- Patients who are English or Spanish competent.
- Treating physicians agree that none of the study drugs are indicated for standard of care treatment for this patient.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Patients unable to provide informed consent.
- Patients with chronic pain being presently treated with opioid or gabapentinoid prescription or any other alternative therapy.
- Patients who are current IVDA
- Patients with bilateral or ipsilateral injuries requiring surgery
- Patients with other orthopedic or non-orthopedic injuries requiring operative intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NSAIDAlso: Meloxicam/Mobic (NDC 68382-000-01; manufacturer: Zydus; encapsulated in size AA, empty capsule shells, backfilled with Avicel by Fisher Clinical Services (Bristol), LLC), Ketorolac/Toradol (NDC 00409-3795-01; manufacturer: Hospira) | Drug | NSAID |
| GabapentinoidsAlso: Pregablin/Lyrica (NDC 00071-1014-68; manufacturer: Pfizer; encapsulated in size, AA empty capsule shells, backfilled with Avicel by Fisher Clinical Services, (Bristol) LLC,; Lyrica, NDC 00071-1018-68; manufacturer: Pfizer; encapsulated, in size AA empty capsule shells, backfilled with Avicel by Fisher Clinical | Drug | Gabapentinoid |
| placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Opioid Utilization
Time frame: 1 year
Morphine equivalent opioid utilization during initial hospitalization through 48 hours following definitive fixation.
Persistent Pain
Time frame: 1 year
Patient reported persistent pain states at standard of care visits 3, 6 and 12 months following hospital discharge. Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and an additional battery of questions to assess neuropathic pain (painDETECT).
Surgery for non-union
Time frame: 1 year
Defined as non-prophylactic surgery for nonunion performed between six months and a year following initial hospital discharge.
11 secondary outcomes
Post Surgical Pain Intensity
Time frame: 2 days
Pre Surgical Pain Intensity
Time frame: 2 days
Length of Index Hospitalization
Time frame: 1 year
Adverse Effects and Complications
Time frame: 2-3 weeks
Functional Outcome
Time frame: 1 year
Generic Health Status
Time frame: 1 year
Depressive Symptoms
Time frame: 1 year
Post Traumatic Stress (PTSD)
Time frame: 1 year
Medical Costs
Time frame: 1 year
Fracture Severity
Time frame: 1-2 years
Fracture Classification
Time frame: 1-2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2021.
Related trials for Orthopaedic Fractures
Recruiting
Trial of Social Work Services in Fracture Clinic Setting
Orthopaedic Fractures, Socioeconomic Factors
Not yet recruiting
One Inch Punch High Impact Training Randomized Control Trial (1'' Punch HIT RCT)
Distal Radius Fracture
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Suzetrigine (Journavx) as Multimodal Therapy for Pain Management in Adults Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fracture
Hip Fractures (ICD-10 72.01-72.2), Post Operative Analgesia
Not yet recruiting
Nerve Block Resolution Time Display and Pain Complaints
Postoperative Pain, Rebound Pain
Recruiting
Assessment of the Rehabilitative Effects of Curved-walking Training in Stroke, Parkinson and Orthopaedic Populations
Stroke, Acute, Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Renan Castillo, PhD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Lawrence Marsh, MD principal investigator
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Katherine Frey, RN, MPH, MS study director
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing NSAID and Gabapentinoids in people with Orthopaedic Fractures, run by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium at 17 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Opioid Utilization (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2021.