AzTrials
AzTrials

Periampullary CancerNCT01789502

Comparison Between Fully Covered Metal Stents and Plastic Stents in Preoperative Biliary Drainage

A study testing Fully covered metal stents and Plastic stents in people with Periampullary Cancer and Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care, run by Inje University at 3 sites in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective, randomized study to compare of outcome of fully covered metal stents with that of plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in distal common bile duct cancer, pancreas head cancer or ampullary cancer with respect to the incidence of stent-related adverse events, the re-intervention… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Fully covered metal stents and Plastic stents
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
86 participants
Where
3 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
Jan 2012to Feb 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Older than 20 years old of age
  • Obstructive jaundice due to common bile duct cancer and pancreas head cancer, or ampullary cancer
  • No evidence of distant metastases or locally advanced tumor

Who cannot join

  • Unresectable stage of cancer
  • Preoperative gastric operation that preclude ERCP (total gastrectomy and subtotal gastrectomy with B-II anastomosis)
  • Severe gastric outlet obstruction or duodenal obstruction
  • Severe comorbidity (Karnofsky<50%)

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

South Korea3 sites
  • Daejun Eulji University Hospital

    Daejun, Daejun, 302-799

  • Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital

    Koyang, Gyeonggi-do, 411-706

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Are Fully Covered Metal Stents Superior to Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary Decompression in Malignant Distal Bile Duct Obstruction?

This study is a prospective, randomized study to compare of outcome of fully covered metal stents with that of plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in distal common bile duct cancer, pancreas head cancer or ampullary cancer with respect to the incidence of stent-related adverse events, the re-intervention rate, the effectiveness of biliary drainage, surgical outcomes and hospital stays.

Read the detailed description

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is curative option in periampullary tumor. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatog-raphy (ERCP) is usually undertaken in patients with resectable disease to relieve biliary obstruction, which is thought to impair immune response, clotting, and other functions that impact intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Despite conflicting data pertaining to preoperative biliary drainage, ERCP with biliary stenting has become standard practice in patients with periampullary malignancies. In a recent multicenter randomized trial, patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage had a 74% rate of complications compared with 39% for those who directly underwent surgery without preoperative biliary drainage. In this trial, however, all patients underwent placement of plastic stents. In ERCP, self-expandable metal stent are being increasingly placed for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Compared with plastic stents, self-expandable metal stents have large caliber and have demonstrated longer patency duration. Even in patients with resectable malignant disease, self-expandable metal stents which are placed below the level of transection may not impair technical outcomes at surgery and can be safely removed along with the surgical specimen.

This prospective study is designed to compare the incidence of stent-related adverse events, the re-intervention rate, the effectiveness of biliary drainage, surgical outcomes and hospital stays in patients with periamupllary tumors who are undergone with self-expandable metal stents or plastic stents placement for preoperative biliary drainage

Being tested
Fully covered metal stents, Plastic stents
Keywords
self-expandable metal stent; plastic stent

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fully covered metal stentsDevice

    Also called BONASTENT, Standard Sci Tech, Seoul, Korea

    Fully covered metal stents were inserted by ERCP

  • Plastic stentsDevice

    Also called Biliary stents, Cook Endoscopy, Winston-Salem, NC

    Plastic stents were inserted by ERCP

Study groups in NCT01789502
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Plastic stentsActive comparatorPlastic stents are inserted by ERCP
Receives: Device: Plastic stents
Fully covered metal stentsExperimentalFully covered metal stents are inserted by ERCP
Receives: Device: Fully covered metal stents

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adverse events related to the stent insertion

    Primary outcome parameter is adverse events related to the stent insertion includes post-ERCP pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, bowel perforation or hemorrhage.

    Measured: up to 4weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Re-intervention rate

    Re-intervention is defined as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage procedures which are required to achieve adequate preoperative biliary drainage after stent insertion.

    Measured: up to 4weeks

  2. Hospital stay

    Hospital stay is defined as the period between the date of stent insertion and that of discharge.

    Measured: up to 1months

  3. Surgical outcomes

    Surgical outcomes include the complete resection rate, complication rates related to surgery or the amount of transfusion during surgery.

    Measured: up to 1months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
86 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01789502
Sponsor's protocol ID
IB-1210-034
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
5 Feb 2013
Last updated
4 Aug 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Song TJ, Lee JH, Lee SS, Jang JW, Kim JW, Ok TJ, Oh DW, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Kim SC, Kim CN, Yun SC. Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of malignant biliary obstruction before primary surgical resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Nov;84(5):814-821. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.018. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

    PubMed 27109456

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fully covered metal stents and Plastic stents in people with Periampullary Cancer and Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care, run by Inje University at 3 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adverse events related to the stent insertion (time frame: up to 4weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01789502, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in