AzTrials
AzTrials

SepsisNCT01790620

Impact of CVVHD With Adsorption Capacity Membranes in Septic Acute Kidney Injury

A study testing CVVHD and CVVH in people with Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge at 2 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Septic patients with acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) present high mortality due to systemic inflammatory response, cytokine liberation, and finally multiorgan dysfunction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Sepsis, Septic Shock, Acute Kidney Injury
What is being tested?
CVVHD and CVVH
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
2 sitesSpain
Study dates
May 2013to Oct 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Less than 72 hours from ICU admission to inclusion
  • Clinical diagnosis of Severe Sepsis or Septic shock (SCCM definitions)
  • Correct therapeutic initial management of septic process (SSC guidelines)
  • Clinical diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury (ADQI definitions)
  • Acute Kidney Injury meeting CRRT initiation criteria (ADQI guidelines)
  • Written informed consent from patient or legal surrogates
  • Coexisting illness with a high probability of death
  • Immunosuppression

Who cannot join

  • End Stage Renal Disease(ESRD)
  • Received previous CRRT or hemodialysis in the last three months

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Spain2 sites
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Impact of a Continuous Dialysis Technique Associated With Adsorption Capacity Membranes in Patients With Sepsis Associated - Acute Kidney Injury.

Septic patients with acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) present high mortality due to systemic inflammatory response, cytokine liberation, and finally multiorgan dysfunction. Cytokine plasmatic elimination with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) presents frequent complications, known as "dialytrauma", and a high resource cost both technical and human. The study primary end-point is to demonstrate a longer filter life with the use of continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) respect to CVVH, both modalities employing the same adsorption capacity membrane. As secondary end-points investigators will try to demonstrate less dialytrauma events of CVVHD respect to CVVH. In order to achieve these objectives investigators have designed a proof of concept exploratory trial that will include those patients whom present SA-AKI meeting CRRT initiation criteria. During the first 72 hours investigators will measure plasmatic elimination capacity of main cytokines, and other clinical and prognostic relevant molecules. Investigators will also measure hemodynamic, respiratory, and metabolic parameters. Adverse effects related to CRRT ("dialytrauma") will also be registrated. Finally, investigators will analyze 90 days survival. Demonstration of a minor complication rate (longer filter patency with less dialytrauma events) with a similar immunomodulating capacity and with its consequent lower cost, should settle the based evidence principles that recommend the use of CVVHD asociated to an adsorption capacity membrane in patients with SA-AKI whom need CRRT.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will warrant a correct protocol application. Study data will be reviewed by an external monitoring committee from the clinical assay research central unit (UCICEC - IDIBELL). Monitors will contrast registered data from the collection data form (CDF) with data from patient´s medical record. All patient´s medical records will be indefinitely saved in electronical format to be reviewed if necessary.

Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized for one of both arms with aleatory assignation using a randomisation sequential (RndSeq) program for Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Adverse events will be reported (in less than 24 hours if severe) to the sponsor center to be properly evaluated. If the severe adverse event (SAE) is finally evaluated by the study board as related to the intervention arm, urgent notification to health authorities must proceed and study should be interrupted until further decision.

As a pilot study of at least 50 cases is advisable in many circumstances (Sim and Lewis, 2012), and we wanted to compare two treatment options, we aimed to recruit at least 100 patients.

Missing data will try to be avoided by an exhaustive patient´s follow up by study investigators. Intention to treat analysis (ITT) will be the main strategy and statistical substitution techniques for missing data will be applied when necessary. Per protocol analysis will also be done to avoid possible bias. Out-of-range results will be identified and processed with adequate statistical techniques.

Data registry has been created to include all variables with written individual data collection forms (DCF). Data will be bedside registered by the study members but final software database registration will be done by the statistics outside investigator who has no contact with patients situation. Cytokines levels will be introduced in DCF when measured (every six months).

Statistical analysis will be done by the statistics investigator who wont have any role in patient´s selection, randomization, or follow up. SPSS v. 18.0 for statistical analysis will be used. Variable distribution will be studied and logarithmic transformation will be used on those variables that don't present normal distribution, presumably cytokine levels. Univariate analysis comparing clinical, demographic, biochemical, metabolic, hemodynamic and respiratory baseline variables between both arms (CVVHD-ST150 and CVVH-ST150), will be done with two-tailed t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Variables determined several times (T0, T24, T48, T72) will be analysed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA test in order to demonstrate differences between both arms. Multivariate analysis will be completed to control those clinically relevant confounding variables as well as to discover baseline differences. According to hypothesis and to the dependent variable on study investigators will use a survival analysis (to study mortality) with a cox regression model, or a hierarchic multiple linear regression model when the dependent variable is continuous (for example dialytrauma score). Arm intervention (CVVHD, CVVH) will be considered as the main independent variable adding other control independent variables.

As the study is measuring cytokine levels in five different moments (T0, T24, T48, T72), in order to maximize statistical power and reduce control variables number, the area under the curve (AUC) we´ll be determined for every cytokine and LPS during the first 72 hours. Due to this statistical maneuver investigators will obtain a continuous variable that represents each cytokine level during the biochemical study period (72 hours). To evaluate if the arm intervention improvement in terms of efficacy and safety could be related to cytokine levels during the first 72 hours, a mediation complementary analysis will be done considering cytokine (represented by AUC) as a mediator between the independent variable (intervention arm) and the effect we study.

Data dictionary. ICU: Intensive Care Unit; AKI: Acute Kidney Injury; CRRT: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies; IL-1β: interleukin 1β; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor α; IL-6: interleukin 6, IL-10: interleukin 10; IL-4: interleukin 4; CVVH: Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration; CVVHD: Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis; SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.

Being tested
CVVHD, CVVH
Keywords
Sepsis, Septic shock, Acute renal failure, Acute kidney injury, Continuous renal replacement therapies CRRT
Medical subject headings
Sepsis, Shock, Septic, Acute Kidney Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CVVHDOther

    Also called Continuous venovenous hemodialysis

    CVVHD will be used during 72 hours with a prescribed dose of 30 ml/Kg/h Prismasol® 4 as dialysate fluid. Blood flow of 200-250 ml/min, to achieve 12 - 15 L/h will be prescribed. Isovolemic CRRT will be encouraged during this 72 hours if volume overload status is not present. After 72 hours, CVVHD will be continued and dialysate dose (ml/kg/h) will be adjusted to achieve creatinine levels between 80-120 umol/L until patient recovers urine output and / or tolerates intermittent hemodialysis.

  • CVVHOther

    Also called Continuous venovenous hemofiltration

    CVVH will be used during 72 hours with a prescribed dose of 30 ml/Kg/h Prismasol® 4 as reposition fluid. Blood flow of 200-250 ml/min, to achieve 12 - 15 L/h will be prescribed adjusting the adequate percentage of prefilter reinfusion to maintain a theorical filtration fraction between 18-22%. Isovolemic CRRT will be encouraged if volume overload status is not present. After 72 hours, CVVH will be continued and filtration dose (ml/kg/h) will be adjusted to achieve creatinine levels between 80-120 umol/L until patient recovers urine output and / or tolerates intermittent hemodialysis.

Study groups in NCT01790620
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CVVHD-ST150ExperimentalPatients with sepsis whom present AKI meeting CRRT initiation criteria will be started on CVVHD with PrismafleX eXeed™ II (Hospal) using an ST150SET copolymer of acrylonitrile and sodium methylsulfonate (AN 69) with polyethylenimine treated surface. Anticoagulation of the ST150 set with unfractioned heparin will only be initiated if there´s no clinical contraindication. ST150 set will be changed when clotted and every 24 hours during the first 72 hours of CVVHD. No citrate anticoagulation will be used.
Receives: Other: CVVHD
CVVH-ST150Active comparatorPatients with sepsis whom present AKI meeting CRRT initiation criteria will be started on CVVH with PrismafleX eXeed™ II (Hospal) using an ST150SET copolymer of acrylonitrile and sodium methylsulfonate (AN 69) with polyethylenimine treated surface. Anticoagulation of the ST150 set with unfractioned heparin will only be initiated if there´s no clinical contraindication. ST150 set will be changed when clotted and every 24 hours during the first 72 hours of CVVH. No citrate anticoagulation will be used.
Receives: Other: CVVH

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Technical CRRT efficiency

    Number of times set was changed.

    Measured: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Safety technical superiority.

    Less adverse events related to CRRT known as "dialytrauma". Red blood cells transfusions related with filter clotting, thrombocytopenia (less than 100.000), hypophosphatemia (less than 0.7 mmol/L), hypokaliemia (less than 3.3 mmol/L), and hypothermia (less than 35.5ºC rectal temperature).

    Measured: 72 hours

  2. Survival at 90 days after randomization

    Kaplan Meyer survival analysis and cox proportional hazard ratio for death will be both done at 90 days after CRRT initiation.

    Measured: 90 days.

  3. Immunomodulating capacity

    Cytokine removal: interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin-4 (IL-4), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels will be determined in plasma (pre and postfilter) and in ultrafiltrate.

    Determinations will be measured baseline (0hours), and at times 24hours, 48hours, and 72hours. 24h, 48h, and 72h determinations should only be done when ST150 set has been working for at least 6 continuous hours. This means that determinations can be advanced or delayed +/- 4 hours to scheduled time (for example 20 - 28 hours for T24).

    Measured: 72 hours

  4. Renal depuration capacity.

    Sieving coefficients for plasma solutes (creatinine, urea, potassium, albumine, magnesium, phosphate, and others) will be determined after measuring blood (pre and postfilter) and ultrafiltrate levels at 24hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours. 24h, 48h, and 72h determinations should only be done when ST150 set has been working for at least 6 continuous hours. This means that determinations can be advanced or delayed +/- 4 hours to scheduled time (for example 20 - 28 hours for T24).

    Measured: 72 hours.

  5. Hemodynamics and respiratory variations.

    Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters will be registered every hour. Arterial and venous gasometries with arterial lactate will be determined every 6 hours during the first 72 hours.

    Measured: 72 hours.

  6. Clinical efficiency

    Days on CRRT. Days on Dialysis. Days of ICU. Days of hospital. Renal recovery at hospital discharge (free from dialysis).

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2013
  3. Primary completionAug 2017
  4. Study completionOct 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01790620
Sponsor's protocol ID
SIRAKI 00-2012
Other IDs
PR 148/12
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
8 Feb 2013
Last updated
29 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G; SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B.

    PubMed 12682500
  • Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P; Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R204-12. doi: 10.1186/cc2872. Epub 2004 May 24.

    PubMed 15312219
  • Messer J, Mulcahy B, Fissell WH. Middle-molecule clearance in CRRT: in vitro convection, diffusion and dialyzer area. ASAIO J. 2009 May-Jun;55(3):224-6. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318194b26c.

    PubMed 19282753
  • Hofmann CL, Fissell WH. Middle-molecule clearance at 20 and 35 ml/kg/h in continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Blood Purif. 2010;29(3):259-63. doi: 10.1159/000266483. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

    PubMed 20016150
  • Ricci Z, Ronco C, Bachetoni A, D'amico G, Rossi S, Alessandri E, Rocco M, Pietropaoli P. Solute removal during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: convection versus diffusion. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R67. doi: 10.1186/cc4903.

    PubMed 16646985
  • Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.

    PubMed 18158437
  • Kellum JA, Johnson JP, Kramer D, Palevsky P, Brady JJ, Pinsky MR. Diffusive vs. convective therapy: effects on mediators of inflammation in patient with severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec;26(12):1995-2000. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199812000-00027.

    PubMed 9875910
  • Saudan P, Niederberger M, De Seigneux S, Romand J, Pugin J, Perneger T, Martin PY. Adding a dialysis dose to continuous hemofiltration increases survival in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2006 Oct;70(7):1312-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001705. Epub 2006 Jul 19.

    PubMed 16850022
  • RENAL Replacement Therapy Study Investigators; Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, Gallagher M, Lo S, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Myburgh J, Norton R, Scheinkestel C, Su S. Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 22;361(17):1627-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902413.

    PubMed 19846848
  • VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network; Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O'Connor TZ, Chertow GM, Crowley ST, Choudhury D, Finkel K, Kellum JA, Paganini E, Schein RM, Smith MW, Swanson KM, Thompson BT, Vijayan A, Watnick S, Star RA, Peduzzi P. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):7-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802639. Epub 2008 May 20.

    PubMed 18492867
  • Maynar Moliner J, Honore PM, Sanchez-Izquierdo Riera JA, Herrera Gutierrez M, Spapen HD. Handling continuous renal replacement therapy-related adverse effects in intensive care unit patients: the dialytrauma concept. Blood Purif. 2012;34(2):177-85. doi: 10.1159/000342064. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

    PubMed 23095418
  • Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, Brendolan A, Dan M, Piccinni P, La Greca G. Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2000 Jul 1;356(9223):26-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02430-2.

    PubMed 10892761
  • Rogiers P, Zhang H, Smail N, Pauwels D, Vincent JL. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration improves cardiac performance by mechanisms other than tumor necrosis factor-alpha attenuation during endotoxic shock. Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1848-55. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00024.

    PubMed 10507609
  • De Vriese AS, Colardyn FA, Philippe JJ, Vanholder RC, De Sutter JH, Lameire NH. Cytokine removal during continuous hemofiltration in septic patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Apr;10(4):846-53. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V104846.

    PubMed 10203370
  • Bozza FA, Salluh JI, Japiassu AM, Soares M, Assis EF, Gomes RN, Bozza MT, Castro-Faria-Neto HC, Bozza PT. Cytokine profiles as markers of disease severity in sepsis: a multiplex analysis. Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R49. doi: 10.1186/cc5783.

    PubMed 17448250

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CVVHD and CVVH in people with Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge at 2 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Technical CRRT efficiency (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01790620, which also lists 19 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in