Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)FASTNCT01791621
The Diagnostic Predictability of Food Allergy Testing
A study testing Elimination/Challenge Diet in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), run by The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) sufferers often find that specific foods can exacerbate their symptoms; identifying which foods involves a long and arduous process. Different food allergy tests are marketed to IBS sufferers and healthcare practitioners as an easy way to identify these offending foods. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- What is being tested?
- Elimination/Challenge Diet
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to May 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female study participants aged 18-64.
- A diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome as per ROME III criteria.
- A classification of moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome as indicated by the Irritable Bowel Severity Scoring System (score >200).
- Not currently eliminating any foods from their diet.
- Female study participants currently using an acceptable form of birth control who agree to maintain its use throughout the study (e.g. abstinence, oral contraceptives, barrier methods).
- Ability to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form.
Who cannot join
- Female study participants who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or are open to becoming pregnant in the next three months.
- Study participants currently receiving medication for the treatment of IBS symptoms. Study participants currently receiving natural health products for treatment of IBS symptoms will be eligible for inclusion in the study is they agree to undergo a two-week washout period.
- Those individuals with celiac disease.
- Study participants currently experiencing nausea, fever, vomiting, bloody diarrhea, or severe abdominal pain.
- Study participants with a previous diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis by another health care provider.
- Study participants who are immune-compromised (e.g. AIDS, lymphoma, patients undergoing long-term corticosteroid treatment).
Show all 11Show fewer
- Study participants who have recently (< 1 month) initiated dietary measures to control IBS symptoms.
- Study participants with a history of major or complicated gastrointestinal surgery.
- Study participants with severe endometriosis.
- Study participants with malignant tumors or study participants undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
- Study participants with known anaphylaxis reactions to specific consumed food items.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E2
About this study
Official title: The Diagnostic Predictability of Food Allergy Testing in Individuals With Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Comparison Between Various Laboratory Methods and an Elimination Diet. (The FAST Study)
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) sufferers often find that specific foods can exacerbate their symptoms; identifying which foods involves a long and arduous process. Different food allergy tests are marketed to IBS sufferers and healthcare practitioners as an easy way to identify these offending foods. Which test method might be best to use? This project compares the results of different food allergy methods versus an elimination/challenge diet to determine which method maybe superior in IBS sufferers.
Read the detailed description
A variety of methods are available to assess food items that an individual with IBS may not tolerate well. No study has compared the predictability of each method to the results of an Elimination/Challenge (E/C) diet in individuals suffering from IBS and, or assessed which method might more accurately identify Non Immune Mediated Food Allergies (NIMFAs) in IBS suffers' An understanding of the relative agreement between these tests may help patients and practitioners make better decisions around how to best investigate NIMFAs for IBS and inform the design of larger studies on this topic.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the ability of each different laboratory method of food testing (IgG titres, Cytotoxic assay and electrodermal screening methods) for food reactivity to predict those foods that an individual with IBS reacts as assessed via an elimination diet in an adult population diagnosed with IBS by ROME III criteria and a score of greater than 200 on the IBS Severity Scoring System.
The secondary objective is determine inter-method agreement, at the individual level, between the sensitivity of food identified via each laboratory method, overall and according to severity of the reaction (high, medium, low, and no reaction).
The third objective is to measure the impact of the elimination of possible food allergies on the symptoms of IBS in the participants.
The fourth objective is to determine whether intestinal permeability maybe contributing to the symptomatology of IBS as assessed via an intestinal permeability test.
The fifth objective is to determine whether, after a period of eliminating potentially reactive foods, this provides some healing benefit to the gastrointestinal tract.
- Study Design
This correlative and hypothesis generating pilot study is to be conducted at a single investigational site. This study will be open to members of the public, staff, and students of Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine (CCNM) and patients of the Robert Schad Naturopathic clinic (RSNC) who suffer from IBS. The study will be conducted at CCNM in the Integrated Health Center (IHC).
Individuals who are interested in participating will be screened by two naturopathic doctors for their suitability. The screening process involves an assessment of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, confirmation of symptoms of IBS and of their ability to commit to and follow through on dietary restrictions. A second meeting with another member of the study team will also occur. Team members will confer and agree upon all study participants selected. The study participants will be contacted by phone and invited to participate in the study. The first visit will be scheduled at this time and a copy of the E/C diet guidelines emailed to the individual.
At the first visit, study participants will complete the Study Case Report, provide the necessary blood samples for the laboratory tests, undergo the electrodermal screening for food allergies, complete necessary symptoms tracking forms and provided with an intestinal permeability test to complete at home prior to initiating the elimination phase of the study. The E/C diet guidelines will be reviewed and any questions answered.
Study participants will be contacted by telephone during week 2 of the study by a member of the study team to address any dietary questions that may have arisen during the first week of the elimination diet.
Subjects will return to the clinic at weeks 3, 5, 7 and 9 for completion of the validated questionnaires, review of study diary, query of adverse events, and compliance monitoring.
At visit 3 (week 5), study participants will also receive the list of food items that will be introduced during the challenge portion of the study. The study participants will be provided with a second intestinal permeability test to complete at home prior to initiating the challenge phase of the study.
The study participants and study team members will remain blinded to the results of the all tests until the completion of the study.
The primary endpoint of the study is the degree of agreement between the food items identified as eliciting a reaction through an elimination/challenge diet versus those food items identified through laboratory testing. Cohen's kappa will be the statistical measure to assess agreement.
The secondary endpoint of the study is the degree of inter-laboratory agreement of reactionary food items across all of the methods (laboratory and electrodermal screening) used in the study. Cohen's kappa will be the statistical measure to assess agreement.
The third endpoint of the study is the change in the scores on the irritable bowel severity scoring system and FAST symptom checklist between the end of the elimination diet phase and baseline (start of the study). The irritable bowel severity scoring system is a validated questionnaire used to monitor irritable bowel syndrome. This scoring system incorporates measures of pain, distension and bloating due to gas, bowel dysfunction (constipation and diarrhea) and quality of life/global well being and has been validated as a reproducible and sensitive means of measuring symptoms associated with IBS.
A numerical scale, from 0 to 10 will be used as a measure of symptom severity on the FAST Study Diet \& Symptoms Diary tracking forms.
The FAST symptom checklist was documented by Dick Thom, a naturopathic doctor, in his book "Coping with Food Intolerances: Surviving the nineties." This checklist serves as a quick and easy method for study participants to note the symptoms that they are experiencing and their severity according to a rating scale provided on the checklist.
Study Duration Upon successful screening, washout period (if necessary), study participants will participate for the full 9 week active treatment duration. At baseline (week 1), study participants will complete validated IBS symptom questionnaire, the FAST Study Symptom checklist, blood samples will be taken for the necessary food allergy testing and electrodermal screening will be performed. Study participants will return to the clinic at weeks 3, and 5, 7, and 9 to complete the validated IBS symptom questionnaire and FAST Study Symptom checklist. During all study visits, study participants are queried for adverse events, study diaries will be reviewed, and compliance will be monitored via diet diary. Study participants will also be re-queried for compliance with the exclusion criteria of the protocol primarily with respect to confounding factors such as new medications, or natural health products. Study visits 3 through 7 are expected to take approximately 30 minutes. The first visit will take 1.5 hours and the final visit 45 minutes.
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- Being tested
- Elimination/Challenge Diet
- Keywords
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Elimination diet, Food allergies
- Medical subject headings
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Food Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Elimination/Challenge DietOther
An pre-specified elimination diet contains a list of food items permitted to be consumed by the study participants. These food items, selected to be consumed are whole foods of low allergenicity.
The challenge phase of the diet involves introducing 8 different foods at three days intervals. the selected challenge foods will be selected based on a review of the non-IgE mediated food allergy test results by a third-party, not directly associated with the project team.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Elimination/Challenge Diet | Experimental | Once non-IgE mediated food allergy testing has been administered, study participants will follow food choices according to a pre-specified elimination diet for three weeks (Elimination phase). After the Elimination phase, study participants will introduce one food every three days (Challenge phase)and monitor their symptoms. Eight different foods will be introduced in the Challenge phase of the study. Receives: Other: Elimination/Challenge Diet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intra-individual agreement: food elimination challenge versus non-immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy test results
For each participant, a summary and analysis of agreement, using Cohen's kappa, will be undertaken comparing the results of each non-IgE mediated food allergy assessment method and the Elimination/Challenge diet for the 8 food items challenged. Similarly, secondary analysis will compare the degree of agreement between the intensity (high, medium, low and no reaction) on the non-IgE mediated food allergy results and the food reaction numerical scores.
Measured: Weeks 5 through 9 is the challenge phase of the study. Results will be compared between the participants recorded symptoms during this phase to each challenged food item and the results of the non-IgE mediated food allergy test results from Week 1.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Deborah Kennedy, The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
- Investigators
- Deborah A Kennedy, ND, PhD, Principal investigator, The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01791621
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCNM1301
- Acronym
- FAST
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 18 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Diagnostic Predictability of Food Allergy Testing in Individuals With Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Comparison Between Various Laboratory Methods and an Elimination Diet. (The FAST Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01791621
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FAST / CCNM1301
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- Keywords
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Elimination diet, Food allergies
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Canadian College of Naturopathic MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) sufferers often find that specific foods can exacerbate their symptoms; identifying which foods involves a long and arduous process. Different food allergy tests are marketed to IBS sufferers and healthcare practitioners as an easy way to identify these offending foods. Which test method might be best to use? This project compares the results of different food allergy methods versus an elimination/challenge diet to determine which method maybe superior in IBS sufferers.
Detailed description
A variety of methods are available to assess food items that an individual with IBS may not tolerate well. No study has compared the predictability of each method to the results of an Elimination/Challenge (E/C) diet in individuals suffering from IBS and, or assessed which method might more accurately identify Non Immune Mediated Food Allergies (NIMFAs) in IBS suffers' An understanding of the relative agreement between these tests may help patients and practitioners make better decisions around how to best investigate NIMFAs for IBS and inform the design of larger studies on this topic.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the ability of each different laboratory method of food testing (IgG titres, Cytotoxic assay and electrodermal screening methods) for food reactivity to predict those foods that an individual with IBS reacts as assessed via an elimination diet in an adult population diagnosed with IBS by ROME III criteria and a score of greater than 200 on the IBS Severity Scoring System.
The secondary objective is determine inter-method agreement, at the individual level, between the sensitivity of food identified via each laboratory method, overall and according to severity of the reaction (high, medium, low, and no reaction).
The third objective is to measure the impact of the elimination of possible food allergies on the symptoms of IBS in the participants.
The fourth objective is to determine whether intestinal permeability maybe contributing to the symptomatology of IBS as assessed via an intestinal permeability test.
The fifth objective is to determine whether, after a period of eliminating potentially reactive foods, this provides some healing benefit to the gastrointestinal tract.
- Study Design
This correlative and hypothesis generating pilot study is to be conducted at a single investigational site. This study will be open to members of the public, staff, and students of Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine (CCNM) and patients of the Robert Schad Naturopathic clinic (RSNC) who suffer from IBS. The study will be conducted at CCNM in the Integrated Health Center (IHC).
Individuals who are interested in participating will be screened by two naturopathic doctors for their suitability. The screening process involves an assessment of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, confirmation of symptoms of IBS and of their ability to commit to and follow through on dietary restrictions. A second meeting with another member of the study team will also occur. Team members will confer and agree upon all study participants selected. The study participants will be contacted by phone and invited to participate in the study. The first visit will be scheduled at this time and a copy of the E/C diet guidelines emailed to the individual.
At the first visit, study participants will complete the Study Case Report, provide the necessary blood samples for the laboratory tests, undergo the electrodermal screening for food allergies, complete necessary symptoms tracking forms and provided with an intestinal permeability test to complete at home prior to initiating the elimination phase of the study. The E/C diet guidelines will be reviewed and any questions answered.
Study participants will be contacted by telephone during week 2 of the study by a member of the study team to address any dietary questions that may have arisen during the first week of the elimination diet.
Subjects will return to the clinic at weeks 3, 5, 7 and 9 for completion of the validated questionnaires, review of study diary, query of adverse events, and compliance monitoring.
At visit 3 (week 5), study participants will also receive the list of food items that will be introduced during the challenge portion of the study. The study participants will be provided with a second intestinal permeability test to complete at home prior to initiating the challenge phase of the study.
The study participants and study team members will remain blinded to the results of the all tests until the completion of the study.
The primary endpoint of the study is the degree of agreement between the food items identified as eliciting a reaction through an elimination/challenge diet versus those food items identified through laboratory testing. Cohen's kappa will be the statistical measure to assess agreement.
The secondary endpoint of the study is the degree of inter-laboratory agreement of reactionary food items across all of the methods (laboratory and electrodermal screening) used in the study. Cohen's kappa will be the statistical measure to assess agreement.
The third endpoint of the study is the change in the scores on the irritable bowel severity scoring system and FAST symptom checklist between the end of the elimination diet phase and baseline (start of the study). The irritable bowel severity scoring system is a validated questionnaire used to monitor irritable bowel syndrome. This scoring system incorporates measures of pain, distension and bloating due to gas, bowel dysfunction (constipation and diarrhea) and quality of life/global well being and has been validated as a reproducible and sensitive means of measuring symptoms associated with IBS.
A numerical scale, from 0 to 10 will be used as a measure of symptom severity on the FAST Study Diet \& Symptoms Diary tracking forms.
The FAST symptom checklist was documented by Dick Thom, a naturopathic doctor, in his book "Coping with Food Intolerances: Surviving the nineties." This checklist serves as a quick and easy method for study participants to note the symptoms that they are experiencing and their severity according to a rating scale provided on the checklist.
Study Duration Upon successful screening, washout period (if necessary), study participants will participate for the full 9 week active treatment duration. At baseline (week 1), study participants will complete validated IBS symptom questionnaire, the FAST Study Symptom checklist, blood samples will be taken for the necessary food allergy testing and electrodermal screening will be performed. Study participants will return to the clinic at weeks 3, and 5, 7, and 9 to complete the validated IBS symptom questionnaire and FAST Study Symptom checklist. During all study visits, study participants are queried for adverse events, study diaries will be reviewed, and compliance will be monitored via diet diary. Study participants will also be re-queried for compliance with the exclusion criteria of the protocol primarily with respect to confounding factors such as new medications, or natural health products. Study visits 3 through 7 are expected to take approximately 30 minutes. The first visit will take 1.5 hours and the final visit 45 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Elimination/Challenge Diet | Experimental | Other: Elimination/Challenge DietOnce non-IgE mediated food allergy testing has been administered, study participants will follow food choices according to a pre-specified elimination diet for three weeks (Elimination phase). After the Elimination phase, study participants will introduce one food every three days (Challenge phase)and monitor their symptoms. Eight different foods will be introduced in the Challenge phase of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male and female study participants aged 18-64.
- A diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome as per ROME III criteria.
- A classification of moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome as indicated by the Irritable Bowel Severity Scoring System (score >200).
- Not currently eliminating any foods from their diet.
- Female study participants currently using an acceptable form of birth control who agree to maintain its use throughout the study (e.g. abstinence, oral contraceptives, barrier methods).
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Female study participants who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or are open to becoming pregnant in the next three months.
- Study participants currently receiving medication for the treatment of IBS symptoms. Study participants currently receiving natural health products for treatment of IBS symptoms will be eligible for inclusion in the study is they agree to undergo a two-week washout period.
- Those individuals with celiac disease.
- Study participants currently experiencing nausea, fever, vomiting, bloody diarrhea, or severe abdominal pain.
- Study participants with a previous diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis by another health care provider.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Elimination/Challenge DietAn pre-specified elimination diet contains a list of food items permitted to be consumed by the study participants. These food items, selected to be consumed are whole foods of low allergenicity. The challenge phase of the diet involves introducing 8 different foods at three days intervals. the selected challenge foods will be selected based on a review of the non-IgE mediated food allergy test results by a third-party, not directly associated with the project team. | Other | Elimination/Challenge Diet |
Primary outcome
Intra-individual agreement: food elimination challenge versus non-immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy test results
Time frame: Weeks 5 through 9 is the challenge phase of the study. Results will be compared between the participants recorded symptoms during this phase to each challenged food item and the results of the non-IgE mediated food allergy test results from Week 1.
For each participant, a summary and analysis of agreement, using Cohen's kappa, will be undertaken comparing the results of each non-IgE mediated food allergy assessment method and the Elimination/Challenge diet for the 8 food items challenged. Similarly, secondary analysis will compare the degree of agreement between the intensity (high, medium, low and no reaction) on the non-IgE mediated food allergy results and the food reaction numerical scores.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jul 2013.
Related trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Constipation (IBS-C)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation
Recruiting
Lactic Acid Bacteria in Functional Diarrheal Disorders
IBS-D (Diarrhea-predominant), IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Epetôme on Gastrointestinal Function, Inflammation and Wellbeing in Adults With IBS-like Symptoms (EPEGUT)
IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Gastrointestinal Motility Disorder
Recruiting
Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Vitamin D Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deborah A Kennedy, ND, PhD principal investigator
The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Elimination/Challenge Diet in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), run by The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intra-individual agreement: food elimination challenge versus non-immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy test results (time frame: Weeks 5 through 9 is the challenge phase of the study. Results will be compared between the participants recorded symptoms during this phase to each challenged food item and the results of the non-IgE mediated food allergy test results from Week 1.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2013.