Ankylosing SpondylitisRELOADETNCT01793285
An Observational, Retrospective, Multicenter, National Study for the Monitoring of Subjects Who Participated in the LoadET Clinical Trial
An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 15 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Previous studies suggest that an increase in doses of weekly etanercept from 50 mg to 100 mg improves the efficacy of the treatment in patients with cutaneous psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- What is being tested?
- ETANERCEPT
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to Feb 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Ankylosing Spondylitis subjects who were treated with ETN when participating in the previous LoadET study (0881A3-102090)
Who may be able to join
- AS patients who had previously participated in the LoadET study (0881A3-102090).
- Subjects who completed the LoadET Study.
- Patients who grant their informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients who participated in the LoadET study but who discontinued treatment and, therefore, did not complete the study.
- Patients without standard follow-up by the physician since the end of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
Spain15 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
A Coruña, 15006
Pfizer Investigational Site
Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907
Pfizer Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08036
Pfizer Investigational Site
Córdoba, 14004
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madrid, Alcorcón, 28922
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28007
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madrid, Madrid
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madrid, Majadahonda, 28222
Pfizer Investigational Site
Murcia, El Palmar, 20120
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oviedo, 30012
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oviedo, 33006
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pamplona_Iruña_, 31004
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seville, 41009
Pfizer Investigational Site
Valencia, 46017
About this study
Official title: Retrospective, Multicentric, National, Observational Study, to Follow-up the Patients Who Participated in the Loadet Study (RELOADET Study)
Previous studies suggest that an increase in doses of weekly etanercept from 50 mg to 100 mg improves the efficacy of the treatment in patients with cutaneous psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. In this same line of study, during the 2007 2008 period, we conducted a multicenter, double-blind, 12-week Study (LoadET, 0881A3-102090) comparing the efficacy of etanercept at a standard dose (50 mg/week) versus a double dose (100 mg/week) in subjects with AS refractory to conventional therapy. The interim results of said study do not appear to support the value of doubling the dose of etanercept in the treatment of subjects with AS. Once this study was finalised, the subjects continued to be monitored by their regular physician, who decided on the dose and treatment to follow according to the conditions of standard clinical practice.
The objective of this observational study is to evaluate the course of the disease in the long-term (three years) under the conditions of standard clinical practice, in subjects who had participated in the LoadET study. Therefore, we would like to follow-up on those patients by reviewing their clinical histories for the three-year period between the finalisation of their participation in the LoadET Study (0881A3-102090) and now. This will allow us to assess the efficacy and survival of the drug, as well as the possible appearance of side effects in the three years following the finalisation of the study by comparing the results according to if the subjects had received 50 mg/week or 100 mg/week during the LoadET study (0881A3 102090).
Read the detailed description
Given that this is a follow-up study of subjects who participated in the LoadET study (0881A3-102090), we have planned the inclusion of all subjects who completed said study, that is, 97 of the 108 subjects in the LoadET study.
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Being tested
- ETANERCEPT
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ETANERCEPTDrug
During the LoadET study (0881A3-102090), subjects were treated with etanercept 100 mg versus 50 mg weekly. After completing this study, the subjects were allowed to continue the treatment with etanercept 50 mg weekly, etanercept 100 mg weekly, another drug, or abandoned medication at the discretion of their physician.
This is a non-interventional study in which historic data will be collected retrospectively from the patient's clinical history. During the historical period covered in the Study, patients would have received the treatment and the medical care that their treating physicians considered appropriate under the conditions of standard clinical practice.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment With Etanercept
Participants who discontinued etanercept following 3 years after finalization of LoadET study 0881A3-102090 (NCT00873730) due to any of these reason were reported: adverse events, failure in therapeutic response, disease remission and discontinued for other causes.
Measured: Baseline up to Year 3
Secondary outcomes (16)
Time Between the Onset of Ankylosing Spondylitis Symptoms and First Visit to the Rheumatologist
Time passed since the ankylosing spondylitis symptoms started until the participant arrived for the first time to visit the rheumatologist was reported. Ankylosing spondylitis symptoms may include pain, stiffness, axial manifestations, and enthesitis etc.
Measured: Baseline
Time to Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Time to first diagnosis of alkylosing spondylitis was reported.
Measured: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Received Non-pharmacological Treatment
Participants who received any non-pharmacological treatment (participant education, regular exercises and physical therapy) in the 3 years since the last LoadET study 0881A3-102090 (NCT00873730) visit were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Year 3
Number of Participants Who Received Pharmacological Treatment
Participants who received any pharmacological treatment (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs], corticosteroids and other treatments including anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNFalpha] or other biological agents etc.) in the 3 years since the last LoadET study 0881A3-102090 (NCT00873730) visit were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Year 3
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score
Participants disease activity assessed using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 = very good to 100 = very bad.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
BASFI is a validated self-assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10, 0 = easy, 10 = impossible, participants answered 10 questions assessing their ability in completing normal daily activities or physically demanding activities. The BASFI score is a sum of the scores of the 10 questions, final score ranged from 0-100, where higher score referred to higher impairment in the functional ability.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10, 0=none and 10=very severe participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score is a sum of the individual assessments. Final score ranged from 0-60, higher score indicates higher disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Spinal Pain as Assessed Using Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Participant's spinal pain - was assessed by answering question 2 of BASDAI on a 0 to10 VAS; participants were asked: "How would you describe the overall level of ankylosing spondylitis neck, back or hip pain you have had?" 0 =none and 10 =very severe.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Fatigue as Assessed Using Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Participant's fatigue was assessed by answering question 1 of BASDAI on a 0 to 10 VAS; participants were asked: "How would you describe the overall level of fatigue/tiredness you have experienced?" 0=none and 10=very severe.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Modified Schober's Test
Measurement in centimeters (cm) of the distance between marks originally placed while the participant was standing erect 10 cm above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joints the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was re-measured (in cm rounded to the nearest 0.1 cm) with participant maximally bend forward, knees fully extended, with spine in full flexion. The measurement of two attempts was made.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Occiput-to-wall Distance
Occiput-to-wall distance: distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight. The distance between the occiput and the wall was measured in cm (rounded to the nearest 0.1 cm), in two attempts.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Chest Expansion Measurement
Chest expansion, measured in cm (rounded to the nearest 0.1 cm), is defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line). Chest expansion was measured for both maximum and minimum inhalation. The measurement of two attempts was made.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
C-reactive Protein (CRP)
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Lipid Profile: Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Triglycerides Levels
Lipid profile included following parameters: Total Cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides (TGs).
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Time to Treatment Discontinuation With Etanercept
Time to treatment discontinuation with etanercept was assessed retrospectively at Year 3 for participants who did not discontinue treatment at the end of previous LoadET study 0881A3-102090 (NCT00873730). It was defined as time from first dose of etanercept received in the previous LoadET study 0881A3-102090 (NCT00873730) to last dose of etanercept.
Measured: Year 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2012
- Study completionFeb 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Ankylosing SpondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01793285
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B1801136
- Other IDs
- RELOADET
- Acronym
- RELOADET
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Retrospective, Multicentric, National, Observational Study, to Follow-up the Patients Who Participated in the Loadet Study (RELOADET Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01793285
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RELOADET / B1801136
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- Primary completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Feb 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Previous studies suggest that an increase in doses of weekly etanercept from 50 mg to 100 mg improves the efficacy of the treatment in patients with cutaneous psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. In this same line of study, during the 2007 2008 period, we conducted a multicenter, double-blind, 12-week Study (LoadET, 0881A3-102090) comparing the efficacy of etanercept at a standard dose (50 mg/week) versus a double dose (100 mg/week) in subjects with AS refractory to conventional therapy. The interim results of said study do not appear to support the value of doubling the dose of etanercept in the treatment of subjects with AS. Once this study was finalised, the subjects continued to be monitored by their regular physician, who decided on the dose and treatment to follow according to the conditions of standard clinical practice.
The objective of this observational study is to evaluate the course of the disease in the long-term (three years) under the conditions of standard clinical practice, in subjects who had participated in the LoadET study. Therefore, we would like to follow-up on those patients by reviewing their clinical histories for the three-year period between the finalisation of their participation in the LoadET Study (0881A3-102090) and now. This will allow us to assess the efficacy and survival of the drug, as well as the possible appearance of side effects in the three years following the finalisation of the study by comparing the results according to if the subjects had received 50 mg/week or 100 mg/week during the LoadET study (0881A3 102090).
Detailed description
Given that this is a follow-up study of subjects who participated in the LoadET study (0881A3-102090), we have planned the inclusion of all subjects who completed said study, that is, 97 of the 108 subjects in the LoadET study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Ankylosing Spondylitis subjects who were treated with ETN when participating in the previous LoadET study (0881A3-102090)
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- AS patients who had previously participated in the LoadET study (0881A3-102090).
- Subjects who completed the LoadET Study.
- Patients who grant their informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who participated in the LoadET study but who discontinued treatment and, therefore, did not complete the study.
- Patients without standard follow-up by the physician since the end of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ETANERCEPTDuring the LoadET study (0881A3-102090), subjects were treated with etanercept 100 mg versus 50 mg weekly. After completing this study, the subjects were allowed to continue the treatment with etanercept 50 mg weekly, etanercept 100 mg weekly, another drug, or abandoned medication at the discretion of their physician. This is a non-interventional study in which historic data will be collected retrospectively from the patient's clinical history. During the historical period covered in the Study, patients would have received the treatment and the medical care that their treating physicians considered appropriate under the conditions of standard clinical practice. | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment With Etanercept
Time frame: Baseline up to Year 3
Participants who discontinued etanercept following 3 years after finalization of LoadET study 0881A3-102090 (NCT00873730) due to any of these reason were reported: adverse events, failure in therapeutic response, disease remission and discontinued for other causes.
16 secondary outcomes
Time Between the Onset of Ankylosing Spondylitis Symptoms and First Visit to the Rheumatologist
Time frame: Baseline
Time to Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Received Non-pharmacological Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to Year 3
Number of Participants Who Received Pharmacological Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to Year 3
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Spinal Pain as Assessed Using Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Fatigue as Assessed Using Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Modified Schober's Test
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Occiput-to-wall Distance
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Chest Expansion Measurement
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Lipid Profile: Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Triglycerides Levels
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Time to Treatment Discontinuation With Etanercept
Time frame: Year 3
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Serum Level of Glutathione Peroxidase 4
Spondyloarthropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of GKL-006Allo Injection in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Neuropathic Spinal Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 15 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Feb 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment With Etanercept (time frame: Baseline up to Year 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2013.