CellulitisNCT01795092
A Study Assessing the Impact of Dermatology Consultation in Patients Presenting With Possible Cellulitis
A study testing Dermatology Consultation in people with Cellulitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, controlled study to compare patients evaluated by primary care physicians alone versus patients who are additionally evaluated by a dermatologist at the primary care physician"s office, aiming to demonstrate that visits to the primary care physician"s (PCP) office that involve both the PCP and an… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cellulitis
- What is being tested?
- Dermatology Consultation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Able to understand and sign informed consent.
- Able to complete study and comply with study procedures.
- Presumed clinical diagnosis of cellulitis by primary care physician
Who cannot join
- Have a known postoperative site infection or abscess
- Have a human/animal bite
- Have known osteomyelitis
- Have a hardware/line infection
- Are under the age of 18
- Have a history of transplantation less than six months after initial transplant and/or if they have had an episode of acute rejection in the last 90 days
Show all 11Show fewer
- Known use of antithymocyte globulin or campath in the last 6 months or more than 20 mg/day of prednisone for more than 30 days
- Are a known prisoner.
- Are decisionally-impaired.
- Have abnormal vital signs defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute or less than 50 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 20, or temperature > 100.5 F.
- Are known to be pregnant.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: A Randomized-controlled Study to Assess the Impact of Dermatology Consultations on Reducing Admissions for Patients Presenting to Internal Medicine Clinics for Possible Cellulitis
This is a randomized, controlled study to compare patients evaluated by primary care physicians alone versus patients who are additionally evaluated by a dermatologist at the primary care physician"s office, aiming to demonstrate that visits to the primary care physician"s (PCP) office that involve both the PCP and an on-site dermatology consultation will reduce hospital admission rates. The hypothesis of this study is that obtaining outpatient dermatology consultations during a patient"s initial presentation to a primary care office will reduce admissions for cellulitis with accuracy. The primary objective will be to measure the difference in the proportion of patients requiring hospital admission utilizing a dermatology consultation at the PCP"s office (active arm) versus primary care evaluation alone (control arm) by calculating risk ratios and risk differences. The risk of admission for each arm will be assessed once the study has been completed. The secondary endpoint will be admission versus discharge home at a dermatology follow-up visit to assess accuracy of initial assessment. An additional endpoint will be to determine if any differences in frequencies of cellulitis and admission exist based on age and immunosuppression. Exploratory analyses will assess the percentage of patients with a concomitant known predisposing factor for recurrent cellulitis such as lymphedema, leg ulceration, tinea pedis, or onychomycosis, as well as the association of fever >100.5 F and a history of a prior episode of cellulitis.
Read the detailed description
Patients to be enrolled in the study will be those that present to outpatient internal medicine clinic and are identified by primary care physicians as having pain, redness, and swelling of the skin that the physician believes may represent cellulitis. Patient recruitment will occur at five Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) outpatient internal medicine clinical sites: Medical Walk-In, Internal Medicine Associates, Bulfinch Medical Group, Senior Health, and Women's health. Patients with abnormal vital signs will be excluded, specifically systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute or less than 50 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 20, or temperature >100.5 F. In addition, any patients with a history of transplantation must be more than six months after initial transplant with no treated episodes of acute rejection in the last 90 days, no use of antithymocyte globulin or campath to treat rejection in the last 6 months, or more than 20 mg/day of prednisone for more than 30 days.
Once a patient is identified with potential cellulitis who is a candidate for outpatient treatment, the primary care physician will then approach them regarding their interest in entering our study. Patients will be randomized during this initial presentation to their primary care physician. The patients randomized to the treatment group will obtain a dermatology evaluation at the primary care physician"s office and will be sent to the Emergency Department or discharged home with outpatient dermatology follow-up in two to three days to assess for improvement in their condition versus no change or worsening that requires transfer to the Emergency Department. Patients who are evaluated by a dermatologist and who require hospitalization will have their transition to the Emergency Department managed by the dermatologist with notification of the patient"s PCP. These patients who have follow-up in dermatology clinic will not require a follow-up visit with their primary care physician. The skin and lymph node exam performed by the dermatologist on patients in the treatment group will be documented in the electronic medical record for the subjects" medical records. Patients who are admitted after the initial outpatient discharge or at the follow-up visit will be considered treatment failures. A medical record review will be performed for patients in the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic. A medical record review will be performed for patients who are randomized to the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic.
Those in the control group who do not obtain a dermatology evaluation will follow primary care recommendations alone and will also have chart review two weeks later to assess for admission versus discharge home from clinic and outcome. In the control group, the need for additional clinical follow-up will be at the primary care physician"s discretion. These patients will receive a followup telephone call to confirm the final outcome of their condition two weeks after their visit to internal medicine clinic. The data sets generated from the treatment and control groups will then be compared to look for differences in hospital admission rates. For the treatment arm of the study, this data will be obtained during the follow-up visit and the medical record review. For the control arm, this will be obtained during both the medical record review and the follow-up phone call. The goal of this data collection is to determine what the final outcome is for patients in both groups in terms of need for hospital admission.
- Conditions
- Cellulitis
- Being tested
- Dermatology Consultation
- Keywords
- Cellulitis, Outpatient Medicine
- Medical subject headings
- Cellulitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dermatology ConsultationOther
A dermatology consultation will be conducted on patients randomized to this group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Those in the control group do not obtain a dermatology evaluation and will be assessed and treated by their primary care provider. We will perform a chart review two weeks after presentation to assess for admission versus discharge home from clinic and outcome. |
| Dermatology consultation | Experimental | Patients randomized to the treatment group will obtain a dermatology evaluation at the primary care physician's office and will be sent to the Emergency Department (ED) or discharged home with outpatient dermatology follow-up in 2-3 days to assess their condition. Patients who are evaluated by a dermatologist and require hospitalization will have their transition to the ED managed by the dermatologist. Patients who are admitted after the initial outpatient discharge or at the follow-up visit will be considered treatment failures. A medical record review will be performed for patients in the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic. Receives: Other: Dermatology Consultation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Hospital admission
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of patients antibiotic was prescribed, type, dose, and duration of antibiotic prescribed and adverse events related to antibiotic usage.
We will be recording whether an antibiotic was prescribed, which antibiotic was used, the duration of treatment, the dosage of antibiotic, the cost of the antibiotic, and any adverse events related to antibiotic usage.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CellulitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniela Kroshinsky, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Daniela Kroshinsky, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01795092
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008A058574
- Other IDs
- 2008A058574
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Arakaki RY, Strazzula L, Woo E, Kroshinsky D. The impact of dermatology consultation on diagnostic accuracy and antibiotic use among patients with suspected cellulitis seen at outpatient internal medicine offices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Oct;150(10):1056-61. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1085.
PubMed 25143179
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized-controlled Study to Assess the Impact of Dermatology Consultations on Reducing Admissions for Patients Presenting to Internal Medicine Clinics for Possible Cellulitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01795092
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2008A058574
- Conditions
- Cellulitis
- Keywords
- Cellulitis, Outpatient Medicine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, controlled study to compare patients evaluated by primary care physicians alone versus patients who are additionally evaluated by a dermatologist at the primary care physician"s office, aiming to demonstrate that visits to the primary care physician"s (PCP) office that involve both the PCP and an on-site dermatology consultation will reduce hospital admission rates. The hypothesis of this study is that obtaining outpatient dermatology consultations during a patient"s initial presentation to a primary care office will reduce admissions for cellulitis with accuracy. The primary objective will be to measure the difference in the proportion of patients requiring hospital admission utilizing a dermatology consultation at the PCP"s office (active arm) versus primary care evaluation alone (control arm) by calculating risk ratios and risk differences. The risk of admission for each arm will be assessed once the study has been completed. The secondary endpoint will be admission versus discharge home at a dermatology follow-up visit to assess accuracy of initial assessment. An additional endpoint will be to determine if any differences in frequencies of cellulitis and admission exist based on age and immunosuppression. Exploratory analyses will assess the percentage of patients with a concomitant known predisposing factor for recurrent cellulitis such as lymphedema, leg ulceration, tinea pedis, or onychomycosis, as well as the association of fever >100.5 F and a history of a prior episode of cellulitis.
Detailed description
Patients to be enrolled in the study will be those that present to outpatient internal medicine clinic and are identified by primary care physicians as having pain, redness, and swelling of the skin that the physician believes may represent cellulitis. Patient recruitment will occur at five Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) outpatient internal medicine clinical sites: Medical Walk-In, Internal Medicine Associates, Bulfinch Medical Group, Senior Health, and Women's health. Patients with abnormal vital signs will be excluded, specifically systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute or less than 50 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 20, or temperature >100.5 F. In addition, any patients with a history of transplantation must be more than six months after initial transplant with no treated episodes of acute rejection in the last 90 days, no use of antithymocyte globulin or campath to treat rejection in the last 6 months, or more than 20 mg/day of prednisone for more than 30 days.
Once a patient is identified with potential cellulitis who is a candidate for outpatient treatment, the primary care physician will then approach them regarding their interest in entering our study. Patients will be randomized during this initial presentation to their primary care physician. The patients randomized to the treatment group will obtain a dermatology evaluation at the primary care physician"s office and will be sent to the Emergency Department or discharged home with outpatient dermatology follow-up in two to three days to assess for improvement in their condition versus no change or worsening that requires transfer to the Emergency Department. Patients who are evaluated by a dermatologist and who require hospitalization will have their transition to the Emergency Department managed by the dermatologist with notification of the patient"s PCP. These patients who have follow-up in dermatology clinic will not require a follow-up visit with their primary care physician. The skin and lymph node exam performed by the dermatologist on patients in the treatment group will be documented in the electronic medical record for the subjects" medical records. Patients who are admitted after the initial outpatient discharge or at the follow-up visit will be considered treatment failures. A medical record review will be performed for patients in the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic. A medical record review will be performed for patients who are randomized to the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic.
Those in the control group who do not obtain a dermatology evaluation will follow primary care recommendations alone and will also have chart review two weeks later to assess for admission versus discharge home from clinic and outcome. In the control group, the need for additional clinical follow-up will be at the primary care physician"s discretion. These patients will receive a followup telephone call to confirm the final outcome of their condition two weeks after their visit to internal medicine clinic. The data sets generated from the treatment and control groups will then be compared to look for differences in hospital admission rates. For the treatment arm of the study, this data will be obtained during the follow-up visit and the medical record review. For the control arm, this will be obtained during both the medical record review and the follow-up phone call. The goal of this data collection is to determine what the final outcome is for patients in both groups in terms of need for hospital admission.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Those in the control group do not obtain a dermatology evaluation and will be assessed and treated by their primary care provider. We will perform a chart review two weeks after presentation to assess for admission versus discharge home from clinic and outcome. |
| Dermatology consultation | Experimental | Other: Dermatology ConsultationPatients randomized to the treatment group will obtain a dermatology evaluation at the primary care physician's office and will be sent to the Emergency Department (ED) or discharged home with outpatient dermatology follow-up in 2-3 days to assess their condition. Patients who are evaluated by a dermatologist and require hospitalization will have their transition to the ED managed by the dermatologist. Patients who are admitted after the initial outpatient discharge or at the follow-up visit will be considered treatment failures. A medical record review will be performed for patients in the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Able to understand and sign informed consent.
- Able to complete study and comply with study procedures.
- Presumed clinical diagnosis of cellulitis by primary care physician
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Have a known postoperative site infection or abscess
- Have a human/animal bite
- Have known osteomyelitis
- Have a hardware/line infection
- Are under the age of 18
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dermatology ConsultationA dermatology consultation will be conducted on patients randomized to this group. | Other | Dermatology consultation |
Primary outcome
Rate of Hospital admission
Time frame: 1 year
1 secondary outcome
Number of patients antibiotic was prescribed, type, dose, and duration of antibiotic prescribed and adverse events related to antibiotic usage.
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25143179Arakaki RY, Strazzula L, Woo E, Kroshinsky D. The impact of dermatology consultation on diagnostic accuracy and antibiotic use among patients with suspected cellulitis seen at outpatient internal medicine offices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Oct;150(10):1056-61. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1085.
Related trials for Cellulitis
RecruitingPhase 4
A Single Dose of Intravenous Penicillin as an Adjunct to Oral Penicillin in the Treatment of Acute Tonsillitis, Peritonsillar Phlegmon, and Peritonsillar Abscess
Acute Tonsillitis, Peritonsillar Abscess
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Infection After Hysterectomy by Addition of Vaginal Clindamycin
Surgical Site Infection, Vaginal Cuff Cellulitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Naproxen Versus Placebo as Adjunct Treatment of Cellulitis
Cellulitis, Skin Disease, Infectious
Not yet recruiting
Moxifloxacin Versus Clindamycin in the Management of Odontogenic Maxillofacial Infectious Processes
Odontogenic Infection, Maxillofacial Infection
Recruiting
Perspectives on Antibiotics and Tracking Symptoms in Children
Urinary Tract Infection, Cellulitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniela Kroshinsky, MD, MPH principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dermatology Consultation in people with Cellulitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Hospital admission (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01795092, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2013.