AzTrials
AzTrials

CellulitisNCT01795092

A Study Assessing the Impact of Dermatology Consultation in Patients Presenting With Possible Cellulitis

A study testing Dermatology Consultation in people with Cellulitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, controlled study to compare patients evaluated by primary care physicians alone versus patients who are additionally evaluated by a dermatologist at the primary care physician"s office, aiming to demonstrate that visits to the primary care physician"s (PCP) office that involve both the PCP and an… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cellulitis
What is being tested?
Dermatology Consultation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
29 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2012to Dec 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to understand and sign informed consent.
  • Able to complete study and comply with study procedures.
  • Presumed clinical diagnosis of cellulitis by primary care physician

Who cannot join

  • Have a known postoperative site infection or abscess
  • Have a human/animal bite
  • Have known osteomyelitis
  • Have a hardware/line infection
  • Are under the age of 18
  • Have a history of transplantation less than six months after initial transplant and/or if they have had an episode of acute rejection in the last 90 days
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Known use of antithymocyte globulin or campath in the last 6 months or more than 20 mg/day of prednisone for more than 30 days
  • Are a known prisoner.
  • Are decisionally-impaired.
  • Have abnormal vital signs defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute or less than 50 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 20, or temperature > 100.5 F.
  • Are known to be pregnant.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized-controlled Study to Assess the Impact of Dermatology Consultations on Reducing Admissions for Patients Presenting to Internal Medicine Clinics for Possible Cellulitis

This is a randomized, controlled study to compare patients evaluated by primary care physicians alone versus patients who are additionally evaluated by a dermatologist at the primary care physician"s office, aiming to demonstrate that visits to the primary care physician"s (PCP) office that involve both the PCP and an on-site dermatology consultation will reduce hospital admission rates. The hypothesis of this study is that obtaining outpatient dermatology consultations during a patient"s initial presentation to a primary care office will reduce admissions for cellulitis with accuracy. The primary objective will be to measure the difference in the proportion of patients requiring hospital admission utilizing a dermatology consultation at the PCP"s office (active arm) versus primary care evaluation alone (control arm) by calculating risk ratios and risk differences. The risk of admission for each arm will be assessed once the study has been completed. The secondary endpoint will be admission versus discharge home at a dermatology follow-up visit to assess accuracy of initial assessment. An additional endpoint will be to determine if any differences in frequencies of cellulitis and admission exist based on age and immunosuppression. Exploratory analyses will assess the percentage of patients with a concomitant known predisposing factor for recurrent cellulitis such as lymphedema, leg ulceration, tinea pedis, or onychomycosis, as well as the association of fever >100.5 F and a history of a prior episode of cellulitis.

Read the detailed description

Patients to be enrolled in the study will be those that present to outpatient internal medicine clinic and are identified by primary care physicians as having pain, redness, and swelling of the skin that the physician believes may represent cellulitis. Patient recruitment will occur at five Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) outpatient internal medicine clinical sites: Medical Walk-In, Internal Medicine Associates, Bulfinch Medical Group, Senior Health, and Women's health. Patients with abnormal vital signs will be excluded, specifically systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute or less than 50 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 20, or temperature >100.5 F. In addition, any patients with a history of transplantation must be more than six months after initial transplant with no treated episodes of acute rejection in the last 90 days, no use of antithymocyte globulin or campath to treat rejection in the last 6 months, or more than 20 mg/day of prednisone for more than 30 days.

Once a patient is identified with potential cellulitis who is a candidate for outpatient treatment, the primary care physician will then approach them regarding their interest in entering our study. Patients will be randomized during this initial presentation to their primary care physician. The patients randomized to the treatment group will obtain a dermatology evaluation at the primary care physician"s office and will be sent to the Emergency Department or discharged home with outpatient dermatology follow-up in two to three days to assess for improvement in their condition versus no change or worsening that requires transfer to the Emergency Department. Patients who are evaluated by a dermatologist and who require hospitalization will have their transition to the Emergency Department managed by the dermatologist with notification of the patient"s PCP. These patients who have follow-up in dermatology clinic will not require a follow-up visit with their primary care physician. The skin and lymph node exam performed by the dermatologist on patients in the treatment group will be documented in the electronic medical record for the subjects" medical records. Patients who are admitted after the initial outpatient discharge or at the follow-up visit will be considered treatment failures. A medical record review will be performed for patients in the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic. A medical record review will be performed for patients who are randomized to the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic.

Those in the control group who do not obtain a dermatology evaluation will follow primary care recommendations alone and will also have chart review two weeks later to assess for admission versus discharge home from clinic and outcome. In the control group, the need for additional clinical follow-up will be at the primary care physician"s discretion. These patients will receive a followup telephone call to confirm the final outcome of their condition two weeks after their visit to internal medicine clinic. The data sets generated from the treatment and control groups will then be compared to look for differences in hospital admission rates. For the treatment arm of the study, this data will be obtained during the follow-up visit and the medical record review. For the control arm, this will be obtained during both the medical record review and the follow-up phone call. The goal of this data collection is to determine what the final outcome is for patients in both groups in terms of need for hospital admission.

Conditions
Cellulitis
Being tested
Dermatology Consultation
Keywords
Cellulitis, Outpatient Medicine
Medical subject headings
Cellulitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dermatology ConsultationOther

    A dermatology consultation will be conducted on patients randomized to this group.

Study groups in NCT01795092
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionThose in the control group do not obtain a dermatology evaluation and will be assessed and treated by their primary care provider. We will perform a chart review two weeks after presentation to assess for admission versus discharge home from clinic and outcome.
Dermatology consultationExperimentalPatients randomized to the treatment group will obtain a dermatology evaluation at the primary care physician's office and will be sent to the Emergency Department (ED) or discharged home with outpatient dermatology follow-up in 2-3 days to assess their condition. Patients who are evaluated by a dermatologist and require hospitalization will have their transition to the ED managed by the dermatologist. Patients who are admitted after the initial outpatient discharge or at the follow-up visit will be considered treatment failures. A medical record review will be performed for patients in the treatment group two weeks after initial evaluation at the internal medicine clinic.
Receives: Other: Dermatology Consultation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Hospital admission

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of patients antibiotic was prescribed, type, dose, and duration of antibiotic prescribed and adverse events related to antibiotic usage.

    We will be recording whether an antibiotic was prescribed, which antibiotic was used, the duration of treatment, the dosage of antibiotic, the cost of the antibiotic, and any adverse events related to antibiotic usage.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01795092
Sponsor's protocol ID
2008A058574
Other IDs
2008A058574
Status last verified
Feb 2013
First submitted
18 Feb 2013
Last updated
20 Feb 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Arakaki RY, Strazzula L, Woo E, Kroshinsky D. The impact of dermatology consultation on diagnostic accuracy and antibiotic use among patients with suspected cellulitis seen at outpatient internal medicine offices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Oct;150(10):1056-61. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1085.

    PubMed 25143179

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dermatology Consultation in people with Cellulitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Hospital admission (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01795092, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in