Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical EfficacyNCT01795846
Evaluation of Immunological Changes and Clinical Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With Der p House Dust Mite Allergen in Polysensitized and Monosensitized Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma.
An observational study of Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical Efficacy, run by Ankara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The incidence of allergic rhinitis and asthma is increasing in throughout the world as well as our country. Allergen-specific immunotherapy has been in use for almost 100 years. Since then, it is recommended for the management of Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases as the only immune modulator… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical Efficacy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Mar 2014
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: The study population will included adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites. No patient will previously had been performed allergen immunotherapy.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with moderate or persistent allergic rhinitis with or without mild asthma are selected in the study. They have to sensitized to only house dust mites or at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites.
- -
- Exclusion Criteria:The presence of severe asthma, previously received allergen immunotherapy and other contraindications of allergen specific immunotherapy.
- -
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine
Ankara, 06100
Sadan Soyyigit, M.D., 0-90-312 595 65 83, sadansoyyigit@gmail.com
Sadan Soyyigit, M.D.
About this study
The incidence of allergic rhinitis and asthma is increasing in throughout the world as well as our country. Allergen-specific immunotherapy has been in use for almost 100 years. Since then, it is recommended for the management of Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases as the only immune modulator therapeutic tool. It is well documented that allergen immunotherapy performed using single allergen is efficacious in monosensitized patients. Hence, polysensitization is much more prevalent than monosensitization in patients with respiratory allergy. On the other hand, polysensitization may have a paramount relevance in clinical practice; for example, many allergists have doubts in choosing the allergen extract for allergen specific immunotherapy. In this regard, the evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy in polysensitized patients still represents an unanswered question and there are very few studies on this issue. However, most clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy have been performed with multiple different allergen extracts using sublingual route. To the best of our knowledge, no common single-allergen (house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Der p) subcutaneous immunotherapy trials have been specifically designed to compare efficacy in monosensitized and polysensitized patients. Furthermore, few studies have demonstrated that monosensitized and polysensitized patients appear to differ in terms of their immune reactivity. But, it is unknown whether single-allergen immunotherapy protocol elicit distinct immune responses in monosensitized and polysensitized patients.
The aim of this study was to investigate the immunological changes and clinical effectiveness of most relevant single-allergen immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. The study population will included 40 adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites. No patient will previously had been performed allergen immunotherapy. The study plan is prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Both groups will first received placebo injections for 3 months, and followed by a cluster immunotherapy schedule. After the maintenance dose will be reached within 6 weeks, injections will be received at monthly intervals. Standardized depot preparations of Der p extract (Alutard Standard Quality SQ, ALK-Abello (Company Name), Madrid, Spain ) were administered by means of subcutaneous injection. All eligible patients will underwent 8 weeks run-in period to evaluate their baseline clinical status based on history of allergy, symptom and medication usage for rhinitis and asthma, skin prick testing, pulmonary function tests and methacholine bronchoprovocation tests. According to the sensitizations, patients will be divided to 2 parallel groups either as polysensitized or monosensitized. Afterwards, both patient groups will be followed by symptom and medication scales, visual analog scores, quality-of-life scores for 1 month before placebo and immunotherapy. During this period, total serum IgE, specific IgE levels will be measured using the method of UNI-CAP 100 (Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) and repeated after placebo and immunotherapy injections. At baseline, after placebo (3 months) and immunotherapy injections (at third months of maintenance period), nasal allergen provocation test with Der p extract will applied to the study groups. Peripheral whole blood will drawn for the analysis of basophil activation marker CD203c (CD, cell differentiation) expression at this three time points. For the clinical assessment, all patients will record on diary cards their symptom scores, visual analog scale scores, medication usage, quality-of-life measures for rhinitis and asthma. On each clinical visit, physical examination and side effects will be collected from diary card data. In conclusion, we believe that this study may be help for more understanding of the immune response to allergen specific immunotherapy at early stage. On the other hand, if the similar clinical improvement is demonstrated between the two groups with common single-allergen (Der p) immunotherapy, unnecessary usage of multiple allergens may be prevented as well as therapeutic side affects and cost.
- Conditions
- Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical Efficacy
- Being tested
- Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injections
- Keywords
- allergen specific immunotherapy, house dust mite (Der p), monosensitization, polysensitization, allergic rhinitis, asthma,
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injectionsOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| monosensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma | adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites Receives: Other: Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injections | |
| polysensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma | adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites. Receives: Other: Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injections |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary outcome is the assessment data from all patients whom will record on diary cards their symptom scores, visual analog scale scores, medication usage, quality-of-life measures for rhinitis and asthma.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome is the significant changes in total serum IgE, specific IgE levels, basophil activation marker CD203c expression, and nasal allergen provocation tests obtained from all patients during the study period.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionJan 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2014 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical EfficacyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ankara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Betul Ayse Sin, Ankara University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01795846
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12L3330001
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Calderon MA, Cox L, Casale TB, Moingeon P, Demoly P. Multiple-allergen and single-allergen immunotherapy strategies in polysensitized patients: looking at the published evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr;129(4):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
PubMed 22244595Soyyigit S, Guloglu D, Ikinciogullari A, Secil D, Oztuna D, Mungan D, Misirligil Z, Sin BA. Immunologic alterations and efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in monosensitized and polysensitized patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Mar;116(3):244-251.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.01.002.
PubMed 26945497
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Immunological Changes and Clinical Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With Der p House Dust Mite Allergen in Polysensitized and Monosensitized Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01795846
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12L3330001
- Conditions
- Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical Efficacy
- Keywords
- allergen specific immunotherapy, house dust mite (Der p), monosensitization, polysensitization, allergic rhinitis, asthma,
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The incidence of allergic rhinitis and asthma is increasing in throughout the world as well as our country. Allergen-specific immunotherapy has been in use for almost 100 years. Since then, it is recommended for the management of Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases as the only immune modulator therapeutic tool. It is well documented that allergen immunotherapy performed using single allergen is efficacious in monosensitized patients. Hence, polysensitization is much more prevalent than monosensitization in patients with respiratory allergy. On the other hand, polysensitization may have a paramount relevance in clinical practice; for example, many allergists have doubts in choosing the allergen extract for allergen specific immunotherapy. In this regard, the evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy in polysensitized patients still represents an unanswered question and there are very few studies on this issue. However, most clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy have been performed with multiple different allergen extracts using sublingual route. To the best of our knowledge, no common single-allergen (house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Der p) subcutaneous immunotherapy trials have been specifically designed to compare efficacy in monosensitized and polysensitized patients. Furthermore, few studies have demonstrated that monosensitized and polysensitized patients appear to differ in terms of their immune reactivity. But, it is unknown whether single-allergen immunotherapy protocol elicit distinct immune responses in monosensitized and polysensitized patients.
The aim of this study was to investigate the immunological changes and clinical effectiveness of most relevant single-allergen immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. The study population will included 40 adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites. No patient will previously had been performed allergen immunotherapy. The study plan is prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Both groups will first received placebo injections for 3 months, and followed by a cluster immunotherapy schedule. After the maintenance dose will be reached within 6 weeks, injections will be received at monthly intervals. Standardized depot preparations of Der p extract (Alutard Standard Quality SQ, ALK-Abello (Company Name), Madrid, Spain ) were administered by means of subcutaneous injection. All eligible patients will underwent 8 weeks run-in period to evaluate their baseline clinical status based on history of allergy, symptom and medication usage for rhinitis and asthma, skin prick testing, pulmonary function tests and methacholine bronchoprovocation tests. According to the sensitizations, patients will be divided to 2 parallel groups either as polysensitized or monosensitized. Afterwards, both patient groups will be followed by symptom and medication scales, visual analog scores, quality-of-life scores for 1 month before placebo and immunotherapy. During this period, total serum IgE, specific IgE levels will be measured using the method of UNI-CAP 100 (Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) and repeated after placebo and immunotherapy injections. At baseline, after placebo (3 months) and immunotherapy injections (at third months of maintenance period), nasal allergen provocation test with Der p extract will applied to the study groups. Peripheral whole blood will drawn for the analysis of basophil activation marker CD203c (CD, cell differentiation) expression at this three time points. For the clinical assessment, all patients will record on diary cards their symptom scores, visual analog scale scores, medication usage, quality-of-life measures for rhinitis and asthma. On each clinical visit, physical examination and side effects will be collected from diary card data. In conclusion, we believe that this study may be help for more understanding of the immune response to allergen specific immunotherapy at early stage. On the other hand, if the similar clinical improvement is demonstrated between the two groups with common single-allergen (Der p) immunotherapy, unnecessary usage of multiple allergens may be prevented as well as therapeutic side affects and cost.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| monosensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma | – | Other: Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injectionsadult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites |
| polysensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma | – | Other: Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injectionsadult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- The study population will included adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites. No patient will previously had been performed allergen immunotherapy.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with moderate or persistent allergic rhinitis with or without mild asthma are selected in the study. They have to sensitized to only house dust mites or at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites.
- -
- Exclusion Criteria:The presence of severe asthma, previously received allergen immunotherapy and other contraindications of allergen specific immunotherapy.
- -
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injections | Other | monosensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma, polysensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma |
Primary outcome
Primary outcome is the assessment data from all patients whom will record on diary cards their symptom scores, visual analog scale scores, medication usage, quality-of-life measures for rhinitis and asthma.
Time frame: 1 year
1 secondary outcome
Secondary outcome is the significant changes in total serum IgE, specific IgE levels, basophil activation marker CD203c expression, and nasal allergen provocation tests obtained from all patients during the study period.
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 22244595Calderon MA, Cox L, Casale TB, Moingeon P, Demoly P. Multiple-allergen and single-allergen immunotherapy strategies in polysensitized patients: looking at the published evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr;129(4):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26945497Soyyigit S, Guloglu D, Ikinciogullari A, Secil D, Oztuna D, Mungan D, Misirligil Z, Sin BA. Immunologic alterations and efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in monosensitized and polysensitized patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Mar;116(3):244-251.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.01.002.
- American Academy of Allergy Asthma ImmunologyLink provided by the sponsor.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical Efficacy, run by Ankara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary outcome is the assessment data from all patients whom will record on diary cards their symptom scores, visual analog scale scores, medication usage, quality-of-life measures for rhinitis and asthma. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01795846, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2013.