Postmenopausal OsteoporosisPhase 3STRUCTURENCT01796301
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Romosozumab or Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women
A Phase 3 study testing Romozosumab and Teriparatide in people with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, run by Amgen at 50 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of 12 months of treatment with romosozumab compared with teriparatide on total hip bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were previously treated with bisphosphonate therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 90 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Romozosumab and Teriparatide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 436 participants
- Where
- 50 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Jan 2013to 14 May 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 90 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Postmenopausal women, aged ≥ 55 to ≤ 90.
- Received oral bisphosphonate therapy for at least 3 years immediately prior to screening
- BMD T-score ≤ -2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck
- History of nonvertebral fracture after age 50, or vertebral fracture.
Who cannot join
- Use of other agents affecting bone metabolism including Strontium ranelate, fluoride (for osteoporosis), odanacatib (MK-0822) or any other cathepsin K inhibitor, IV bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide (TPTD) or any parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs, Systemic oral or transdermal estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), activated vitamin D3, vitamin K2, calcitonin, tibolone, cinacalcet, systemic glucocorticosteroids:
- History of metabolic or bone disease (except osteoporosis) that may interfere with the interpretation of study results, such as sclerosteosis, Paget's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, and malabsorption syndrome.
- Vitamin D insufficiency, defined as 25 (OH) vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL, as determined by the central laboratory.
- Current hyper- or hypocalcemia
- Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism
Trial locations and contacts
50 sites in 11 countries.
50 sites in 11 countries
Denmark7 sites
Research Site
Aalborg, 9000
Research Site
Aarhus C, 8000
Research Site
Ballerup Municipality, 2750
Research Site
Esbjerg, 6700
Research Site
Hillerød, 3400
Research Site
Hvidovre, 2650
Research Site
Odense, 5000
Spain6 sites
Research Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08041
Research Site
Granada, Andalusia, 18012
Research Site
LHospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Research Site
Madrid, 28041
Research Site
Madrid, 28046
Research Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223
United Kingdom6 sites
Research Site
Cardiff, CF14 5GJ
Research Site
Chorley, PR7 7NA
Research Site
Liverpool, L22 0LG
Research Site
Northwood, HA6 2RN
Research Site
Reading, RG2 0TG
Research Site
Sidcup, DA14 6LT
United States5 sites
Research Site
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131
Research Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
Research Site
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Canada5 sites
Research Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2T2
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Research Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3X8
Czechia5 sites
Research Site
Brno, 602 00
Research Site
Ostrava, 702 00
Research Site
Pilsen, 305 99
Research Site
Praha 11 - Chodov, 148 00
Research Site
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
Belgium4 sites
Research Site
Genk, 3600
Research Site
Ghent, 9000
Research Site
Leuven, 3000
Research Site
Liège, 4000
Poland4 sites
Research Site
Gdynia, 81-384
Research Site
Katowice, 40-040
Research Site
Warsaw, 01-192
Research Site
Wroclaw, 50-088
Argentina3 sites
Research Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1012AAR
Research Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1128AAF
Research Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, X5000BNB
Hungary3 sites
Research Site
Budapest, 1036
Research Site
Budapest, 1083
Research Site
Budapest, 1123
Colombia2 sites
Research Site
Barranquilla, Atlántico, 08001000
Research Site
Medellín, Antioquia
About this study
Official title: An Open-label, Randomized, Teriparatide-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Bisphosphonate Therapy
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of 12 months of treatment with romosozumab compared with teriparatide on total hip bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were previously treated with bisphosphonate therapy.
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Romozosumab, Teriparatide
- Keywords
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RomozosumabDrug
Also called AMG 785
Administered by subcutaneous injection once a month.
TeriparatideDrug
Also called Forteo, Forsteo
Administered by subcutaneous injection once a day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab | Experimental | Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. Receives: Drug: Romozosumab |
| Teriparatide | Active comparator | Participants received 20 μg/day teriparatide administered by subcutaneous injection for 12 months. Receives: Drug: Teriparatide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline Through Month 12 in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Percent change from baseline through month 12 is the average of the treatment effect at months 6 and 12.
Measured: Baseline, month 6 and month 12
Secondary outcomes (14)
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 6
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) at the Total Hip at Month 6
Cortical BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Measured: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
Cortical BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Measured: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 6
Integral BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Measured: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
Integral BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Measured: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 6
Total hip estimated strength was assessed by finite element analysis (FEA) of QCT scans.
Measured: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 12
Total hip estimated strength was assessed by finite element analysis (FEA) of QCT scans.
Measured: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 6
Total hip integral BMC was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT).
Measured: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 12
Total hip integral BMC was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT).
Measured: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and month 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study start31 Jan 2013
- Primary completion14 May 2015
- Study completion14 May 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postmenopausal OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 436 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01796301
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20080289
- Other IDs
- 2012-002948-24
- Acronym
- STRUCTURE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Langdahl BL, Libanati C, Crittenden DB, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Daizadeh NS, Dokoupilova E, Engelke K, Finkelstein JS, Genant HK, Goemaere S, Hyldstrup L, Jodar-Gimeno E, Keaveny TM, Kendler D, Lakatos P, Maddox J, Malouf J, Massari FE, Molina JF, Ulla MR, Grauer A. Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 30;390(10102):1585-1594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31613-6. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
PubMed 28755782Takada J, Dinavahi R, Miyauchi A, Hamaya E, Hirama T, Libanati C, Nakamura Y, Milmont CE, Grauer A. Relationship between P1NP, a biochemical marker of bone turnover, and bone mineral density in patients transitioned from alendronate to romosozumab or teriparatide: a post hoc analysis of the STRUCTURE trial. J Bone Miner Metab. 2020 May;38(3):310-315. doi: 10.1007/s00774-019-01057-1. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
PubMed 31707465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label, Randomized, Teriparatide-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Bisphosphonate Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01796301
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STRUCTURE / 20080289
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 436 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Jan 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Nov 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of 12 months of treatment with romosozumab compared with teriparatide on total hip bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were previously treated with bisphosphonate therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab | Experimental | Drug: RomozosumabParticipants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. |
| Teriparatide | Active comparator | Drug: TeriparatideParticipants received 20 μg/day teriparatide administered by subcutaneous injection for 12 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 90 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Postmenopausal women, aged ≥ 55 to ≤ 90.
- Received oral bisphosphonate therapy for at least 3 years immediately prior to screening
- BMD T-score ≤ -2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck
- History of nonvertebral fracture after age 50, or vertebral fracture.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Use of other agents affecting bone metabolism including Strontium ranelate, fluoride (for osteoporosis), odanacatib (MK-0822) or any other cathepsin K inhibitor, IV bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide (TPTD) or any parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs, Systemic oral or transdermal estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), activated vitamin D3, vitamin K2, calcitonin, tibolone, cinacalcet, systemic glucocorticosteroids:
- History of metabolic or bone disease (except osteoporosis) that may interfere with the interpretation of study results, such as sclerosteosis, Paget's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, and malabsorption syndrome.
- Vitamin D insufficiency, defined as 25 (OH) vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL, as determined by the central laboratory.
- Current hyper- or hypocalcemia
- Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RomozosumabAlso: AMG 785Administered by subcutaneous injection once a month. | Drug | Romosozumab |
| TeriparatideAlso: Forteo, ForsteoAdministered by subcutaneous injection once a day. | Drug | Teriparatide |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline Through Month 12 in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time frame: Baseline, month 6 and month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Percent change from baseline through month 12 is the average of the treatment effect at months 6 and 12.
14 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) at the Total Hip at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28755782Langdahl BL, Libanati C, Crittenden DB, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Daizadeh NS, Dokoupilova E, Engelke K, Finkelstein JS, Genant HK, Goemaere S, Hyldstrup L, Jodar-Gimeno E, Keaveny TM, Kendler D, Lakatos P, Maddox J, Malouf J, Massari FE, Molina JF, Ulla MR, Grauer A. Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 30;390(10102):1585-1594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31613-6. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
- Background: PubMed 31707465Takada J, Dinavahi R, Miyauchi A, Hamaya E, Hirama T, Libanati C, Nakamura Y, Milmont CE, Grauer A. Relationship between P1NP, a biochemical marker of bone turnover, and bone mineral density in patients transitioned from alendronate to romosozumab or teriparatide: a post hoc analysis of the STRUCTURE trial. J Bone Miner Metab. 2020 May;38(3):310-315. doi: 10.1007/s00774-019-01057-1. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Sensorimotor Balance Training vs Digitally Augmented Core Stabilization in Women With Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Abaloparatide Added to Ongoing Denosumab vs Continued Denosumab Alone
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
RecruitingPhase 4
Combined Anabolic Therapy
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
50 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Romozosumab and Teriparatide in people with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, run by Amgen at 50 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 50 sites in Denmark, Spain, United Kingdom, United States, Canada and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Nov 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline Through Month 12 in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) (time frame: Baseline, month 6 and month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01796301, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2022.