Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT01797900
The Role of Induction Chemotherapy for High-risk Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Era of IMRT
A Phase 2 study testing Cisplatin, Paclitaxel and IMRT in people with Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined inductive and concurrent chemotherapy with more intensive regimen (cisplatin and paclitaxel) is feasible and effective than current standard treatment for high-risk locally advanced NPC patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Cisplatin, Paclitaxel and IMRT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- biopsy-proved NPC
- N3 or T4N2 or multiple lymphnodes involved with at least one mass 4 cm or more in maximal diameter according to 7th UICC Staging
- provide written informed consent
- Kps>70
- no dostant metastasis
- Life expectancy≥6 months
- Adequate renal function, defined as follows: Serum creatinine < 2 x institutional upper limitof normal(ULN) within 2 weeks prior to registration or; creatinine clearance rate (CCr) ≥ 50 ml/min within 2 weeks prior to registration determined by 24- hour collection or estimated by Cockcroft-Gault formula: CCr male = [(140 - age) x (wt in kg)] [(Serum Cr mg/dl) x (72)] CCr female = 0.85 x (CCrmale)
- The following assessments are required within 2 weeks prior to the start of registration: Na, K, Cl, glucose, Ca, Mg, and albumin.
Who cannot join
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years; noninvasive cancers (For example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible) are permitted even if diagnosed and treated < 3 years ago
- Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
- Severe, active co-morbidity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021
About this study
Official title: Phase 2 Study of Inductive Plus Concurrent Chemoradiation Versus Concurrent Plus Adjuvant Chemoradiation for High-risk Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Era of IMRT
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined inductive and concurrent chemotherapy with more intensive regimen (cisplatin and paclitaxel) is feasible and effective than current standard treatment for high-risk locally advanced NPC patients.
Read the detailed description
Meta-analysis showed chemotherapy when combined with conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced naso-pharyngeal carcinoma can improve 5-year overall survival with 6%, and beyond all concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin benefits most. However, from Lin's (Lin JC, 2004) study, locally advanced NPC with high risk factors can not benefit from conventional concurrent chemoradiation. Failure pattern analysis revealed that local and distant failure accounted for 50% respectively. Large-scale data has demonstrated that with IMRT, local control can achieve 90%. Previous studies showed inductive chemotherapy can decrease distant metastasis. We need more effective and stronger chemotherapy, and we still need to testify concurrent chemotherapy combined with inductive chemotherapy.
A prospective trial would thus provide valuable information to help physicians and patients more precisely identify the feasibility and effectiveness of inductive + concurrent chemotherapy combined with IMRT for high-risk locally advanced NPC.
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, IMRT
- Keywords
- adjuvants, inductive, concurrent, chemoradiotherapy, high-risk, locally advanced, NPC
- Medical subject headings
- Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CisplatinDrug
induction: Cisplatin: 80mg/m2, d1 and d22 concurrent: Cisplatin: 100mg/m2, d1, 22, 43 adjuvant: cisplatin: 75mg/m2, d1, d22, d43,d64
PaclitaxelDrug
induction: paclitaxel 175mg/m2 d1,d22 adjuvant: paclitaxel 175mg/m2 d1,d22, d43,d64
IMRTRadiation
Also called intensity-modulated radiotherapy
69.96Gy-73.43Gy to gross tumor volume, 60Gy to high-risk clinincal target volume, 50Gy to lower risk clincial target volume
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inductive + concurrent chemotherapy | Experimental | Inductive chemotherapy :paclitaxel 175mg/m2 d1+ cisplatin 80mg/m2d1, every 21 days for two cycles concurrent chemotherapy:cisplatin 80mg/m2 on week 1, 4, 7 radiotherapy: IMRT Receives: Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Radiation: IMRT |
| concurrent + adjuvant chemotherapy | Active comparator | concurrent chemotherapy: cisplatin 80 mg/m2, on week 1, 4, 7 adjuvant chemotherapy: paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + cisplatin 75mg/m2, every 21 days for 4 cycles radiotherapy: IMRT Receives: Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Radiation: IMRT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Distant failure free survival
Measured: three years
Secondary outcomes (4)
overall survival
Measured: three years
acute treatment toxicity
Measured: up to 16 weeks
late treatment toxicity
Measured: three years
Local recurrence rate
Measured: three years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Li Gao, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Li Gao, MD, Study director, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01797900
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CH-HN-002
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 21 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 2 Study of Inductive Plus Concurrent Chemoradiation Versus Concurrent Plus Adjuvant Chemoradiation for High-risk Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Era of IMRT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01797900
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CH-HN-002
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- adjuvants, inductive, concurrent, chemoradiotherapy, high-risk, locally advanced, NPC
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined inductive and concurrent chemotherapy with more intensive regimen (cisplatin and paclitaxel) is feasible and effective than current standard treatment for high-risk locally advanced NPC patients.
Detailed description
Meta-analysis showed chemotherapy when combined with conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced naso-pharyngeal carcinoma can improve 5-year overall survival with 6%, and beyond all concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin benefits most. However, from Lin's (Lin JC, 2004) study, locally advanced NPC with high risk factors can not benefit from conventional concurrent chemoradiation. Failure pattern analysis revealed that local and distant failure accounted for 50% respectively. Large-scale data has demonstrated that with IMRT, local control can achieve 90%. Previous studies showed inductive chemotherapy can decrease distant metastasis. We need more effective and stronger chemotherapy, and we still need to testify concurrent chemotherapy combined with inductive chemotherapy.
A prospective trial would thus provide valuable information to help physicians and patients more precisely identify the feasibility and effectiveness of inductive + concurrent chemotherapy combined with IMRT for high-risk locally advanced NPC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inductive + concurrent chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Cisplatin, Drug: Paclitaxel, Radiation: IMRTInductive chemotherapy :paclitaxel 175mg/m2 d1+ cisplatin 80mg/m2d1, every 21 days for two cycles concurrent chemotherapy:cisplatin 80mg/m2 on week 1, 4, 7 radiotherapy: IMRT |
| concurrent + adjuvant chemotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: Cisplatin, Drug: Paclitaxel, Radiation: IMRTconcurrent chemotherapy: cisplatin 80 mg/m2, on week 1, 4, 7 adjuvant chemotherapy: paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + cisplatin 75mg/m2, every 21 days for 4 cycles radiotherapy: IMRT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- biopsy-proved NPC
- N3 or T4N2 or multiple lymphnodes involved with at least one mass 4 cm or more in maximal diameter according to 7th UICC Staging
- provide written informed consent
- Kps>70
- no dostant metastasis
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years; noninvasive cancers (For example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible) are permitted even if diagnosed and treated < 3 years ago
- Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
- Severe, active co-morbidity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cisplatininduction: Cisplatin: 80mg/m2, d1 and d22 concurrent: Cisplatin: 100mg/m2, d1, 22, 43 adjuvant: cisplatin: 75mg/m2, d1, d22, d43,d64 | Drug | Inductive + concurrent chemotherapy, concurrent + adjuvant chemotherapy |
| Paclitaxelinduction: paclitaxel 175mg/m2 d1,d22 adjuvant: paclitaxel 175mg/m2 d1,d22, d43,d64 | Drug | Inductive + concurrent chemotherapy, concurrent + adjuvant chemotherapy |
| IMRTAlso: intensity-modulated radiotherapy69.96Gy-73.43Gy to gross tumor volume, 60Gy to high-risk clinincal target volume, 50Gy to lower risk clincial target volume | Radiation | Inductive + concurrent chemotherapy, concurrent + adjuvant chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Distant failure free survival
Time frame: three years
4 secondary outcomes
overall survival
Time frame: three years
acute treatment toxicity
Time frame: up to 16 weeks
late treatment toxicity
Time frame: three years
Local recurrence rate
Time frame: three years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2014.
Related trials for Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of BMS-986016 (Relatlimab) to the Usual Immunotherapy After Initial Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Biopsy Decision Model for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Serological Markers and Endoscopic Features
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Li Gao, MD study director
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cisplatin, Paclitaxel and IMRT in people with Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Distant failure free survival (time frame: three years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2014.