Cerebral PalsyNCT01803464
Effect of Botox and Vibration on Bone in Children With Cerebral Palsy
A study testing Low-magnitude vibration and Botox in people with Cerebral Palsy and Muscle Spasticity, run by University of Delaware at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a neuromuscular disorder that affects approximately 800,000 individuals in the U.S. An estimated 70-80% of these individuals have spasticity which affects ambulation and requires management. Therefore, the treatment of spasticity is a primary goal of interventions for children with CP. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Spasticity
- What is being tested?
- Low-magnitude vibration and Botox
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2012to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Have spastic CP
- Between 2-12 years of age
- Recommended for Botox treatment by their physician as part of their clinical care. Those who accept Botox treatment and those who do not accept Botox treatment are both eligible for the study.
- A score of 1-4 on the gross motor function classification scale (GMFCS)
- Between 2 and 12 years of age.
- Match a child with CP for sex, age and race.
Who cannot join
- Botox treatment in the lower extremities within the last year
- Metal rods in both legs
- Neurological disorder
- Surgery in the lower extremities within the last year.
- Chronic medication use
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Delaware
Newark, Delaware, 19716
Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Nemours
Wilmington, Delaware, 19899
About this study
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a neuromuscular disorder that affects approximately 800,000 individuals in the U.S. An estimated 70-80% of these individuals have spasticity which affects ambulation and requires management. Therefore, the treatment of spasticity is a primary goal of interventions for children with CP. One treatment widely used to reduce spasticity is Botox because of its ability to temporarily paralyze a muscle. However, no studies have determined the effect of Botox treatment on bone in humans. Also, a low magnitude vibration treatment has been shown to improve bone structure in the lower extremity bones of children with CP. The aims of this study are: 1) to determine the effect of Botox treatment in conjunction with a daily vibration treatment on bone mass and bone structure in children with spastic CP, and 2) to identify the mechanism that underlies the effect of Botox and vibration on bone.
Read the detailed description
The investigators have been working with children diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP) for the past 10 years. The investigators have found that bone structure is markedly underdeveloped and bone strength is severely compromised in children with CP. Also, an increased fracture rate has been observed in the lower extremity bones of children with CP. There is evidence that Botox, which is used to treat spasticity in CP, can improve motor function; however the effect of Botox on human bone is unknown. There is also evidence that low magnitude vibration treatment can improve bone mass and bone structure. The overall goal of this current research study is to investigate the effect and mechanism of action of Botox and vibration on bone in children with CP. The investigators will also examine the effect of Botox on muscle volume.
A total of 36 participants will participate in this study. The investigators will assess bone structure and muscle volume using MRI. The investigators will assess bone mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Spasticity
- Being tested
- Low-magnitude vibration, Botox
- Keywords
- Botox, Muscle strength
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low-magnitude vibrationDevice
Children will receive a daily low-magnitude vibration treatment.
BotoxDrug
Children who are candidates to receive Botox as part of their standard of care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Botox plus low-magnitude vibration | Experimental | Cerebral palsy and Botox + vibration Receives: Device: Low-magnitude vibration; Drug: Botox |
| Botox | Experimental | Cerebral palsy and Botox Receives: Drug: Botox |
| Cerebral palsy control | No intervention | Cerebral palsy without treatment |
| Typically developing control | No intervention | Typically developing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bone Structure
Change in cortical bone volume of the middle third of the tibia from baseline to 6 months, as measured by MRI.
Measured: baseline to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Muscle Volume
Change in muscle volume of the midleg from baseline to 6 months, as measured by MRI
Measured: baseline to 6 months
Bone Mass
Change in bone mineral content in the distal femur from baseline to 6 months, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Measured: baseline to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2012
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Delaware
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christopher Modlesky, University of Delaware
- Investigators
- Christopher Modlesky, PhD, Principal investigator, University of DelawareFreeman Miller, MD, Principal investigator, Nemours/Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01803464
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1R15HD071397-01
- Other IDs
- IRB # 115648-11, 1R15HD071397-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.
Publications
Johnson DL, Miller F, Subramanian P, Modlesky CM. Adipose tissue infiltration of skeletal muscle in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2009 May;154(5):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.10.046. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
PubMed 19111321Modlesky CM, Subramanian P, Miller F. Underdeveloped trabecular bone microarchitecture is detected in children with cerebral palsy using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Feb;19(2):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0433-x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
PubMed 17962918Rubin C, Turner AS, Muller R, Mittra E, McLeod K, Lin W, Qin YX. Quantity and quality of trabecular bone in the femur are enhanced by a strongly anabolic, noninvasive mechanical intervention. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Feb;17(2):349-57. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.349.
PubMed 11811566Judex S, Boyd S, Qin YX, Turner S, Ye K, Muller R, Rubin C. Adaptations of trabecular bone to low magnitude vibrations result in more uniform stress and strain under load. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003 Jan;31(1):12-20. doi: 10.1114/1.1535414.
PubMed 12572652Wren TA, Lee DC, Hara R, Rethlefsen SA, Kay RM, Dorey FJ, Gilsanz V. Effect of high-frequency, low-magnitude vibration on bone and muscle in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Oct-Nov;30(7):732-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181efbabc.
PubMed 20864862Ward K, Alsop C, Caulton J, Rubin C, Adams J, Mughal Z. Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Mar;19(3):360-9. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040129. Epub 2004 Jan 27.
PubMed 15040823Modlesky CM, Whitney DG, Singh H, Barbe MF, Kirby JT, Miller F. Underdevelopment of trabecular bone microarchitecture in the distal femur of nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy becomes more pronounced with distance from the growth plate. Osteoporos Int. 2015 Feb;26(2):505-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2873-4. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PubMed 25199575Modlesky CM, Whitney DG, Carter PT, Allerton BM, Kirby JT, Miller F. The pattern of trabecular bone microarchitecture in the distal femur of typically developing children and its effect on processing of magnetic resonance images. Bone. 2014 Mar;60:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
PubMed 24269277Singh H, Whitney DG, Knight CA, Miller F, Manal K, Kolm P, Modlesky CM. Site-Specific Transmission of a Floor-Based, High-Frequency, Low-Magnitude Vibration Stimulus in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.434. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
PubMed 26392035
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Botox and Vibration on Bone in Children With Cerebral Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01803464
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1R15HD071397-01
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Spasticity
- Keywords
- Botox, Muscle strength
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of DelawareUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- Mar 2012
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Mar 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a neuromuscular disorder that affects approximately 800,000 individuals in the U.S. An estimated 70-80% of these individuals have spasticity which affects ambulation and requires management. Therefore, the treatment of spasticity is a primary goal of interventions for children with CP. One treatment widely used to reduce spasticity is Botox because of its ability to temporarily paralyze a muscle. However, no studies have determined the effect of Botox treatment on bone in humans. Also, a low magnitude vibration treatment has been shown to improve bone structure in the lower extremity bones of children with CP. The aims of this study are: 1) to determine the effect of Botox treatment in conjunction with a daily vibration treatment on bone mass and bone structure in children with spastic CP, and 2) to identify the mechanism that underlies the effect of Botox and vibration on bone.
Detailed description
The investigators have been working with children diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP) for the past 10 years. The investigators have found that bone structure is markedly underdeveloped and bone strength is severely compromised in children with CP. Also, an increased fracture rate has been observed in the lower extremity bones of children with CP. There is evidence that Botox, which is used to treat spasticity in CP, can improve motor function; however the effect of Botox on human bone is unknown. There is also evidence that low magnitude vibration treatment can improve bone mass and bone structure. The overall goal of this current research study is to investigate the effect and mechanism of action of Botox and vibration on bone in children with CP. The investigators will also examine the effect of Botox on muscle volume.
A total of 36 participants will participate in this study. The investigators will assess bone structure and muscle volume using MRI. The investigators will assess bone mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Botox plus low-magnitude vibration | Experimental | Device: Low-magnitude vibration, Drug: BotoxCerebral palsy and Botox + vibration |
| Botox | Experimental | Drug: BotoxCerebral palsy and Botox |
| Cerebral palsy control | No intervention | –Cerebral palsy without treatment |
| Typically developing control | No intervention | –Typically developing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Have spastic CP
- Between 2-12 years of age
- Recommended for Botox treatment by their physician as part of their clinical care. Those who accept Botox treatment and those who do not accept Botox treatment are both eligible for the study.
- A score of 1-4 on the gross motor function classification scale (GMFCS)
- Between 2 and 12 years of age.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Botox treatment in the lower extremities within the last year
- Metal rods in both legs
- Neurological disorder
- Surgery in the lower extremities within the last year.
- Chronic medication use
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low-magnitude vibrationChildren will receive a daily low-magnitude vibration treatment. | Device | Botox plus low-magnitude vibration |
| BotoxChildren who are candidates to receive Botox as part of their standard of care. | Drug | Botox, Botox plus low-magnitude vibration |
Primary outcome
Bone Structure
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Change in cortical bone volume of the middle third of the tibia from baseline to 6 months, as measured by MRI.
2 secondary outcomes
Muscle Volume
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Bone Mass
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19111321Johnson DL, Miller F, Subramanian P, Modlesky CM. Adipose tissue infiltration of skeletal muscle in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2009 May;154(5):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.10.046. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
- Background: PubMed 17962918Modlesky CM, Subramanian P, Miller F. Underdeveloped trabecular bone microarchitecture is detected in children with cerebral palsy using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Feb;19(2):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0433-x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 11811566Rubin C, Turner AS, Muller R, Mittra E, McLeod K, Lin W, Qin YX. Quantity and quality of trabecular bone in the femur are enhanced by a strongly anabolic, noninvasive mechanical intervention. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Feb;17(2):349-57. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.349.
- Background: PubMed 12572652Judex S, Boyd S, Qin YX, Turner S, Ye K, Muller R, Rubin C. Adaptations of trabecular bone to low magnitude vibrations result in more uniform stress and strain under load. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003 Jan;31(1):12-20. doi: 10.1114/1.1535414.
- Background: PubMed 20864862Wren TA, Lee DC, Hara R, Rethlefsen SA, Kay RM, Dorey FJ, Gilsanz V. Effect of high-frequency, low-magnitude vibration on bone and muscle in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Oct-Nov;30(7):732-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181efbabc.
- Background: PubMed 15040823Ward K, Alsop C, Caulton J, Rubin C, Adams J, Mughal Z. Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Mar;19(3):360-9. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040129. Epub 2004 Jan 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 25199575Modlesky CM, Whitney DG, Singh H, Barbe MF, Kirby JT, Miller F. Underdevelopment of trabecular bone microarchitecture in the distal femur of nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy becomes more pronounced with distance from the growth plate. Osteoporos Int. 2015 Feb;26(2):505-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2873-4. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 24269277Modlesky CM, Whitney DG, Carter PT, Allerton BM, Kirby JT, Miller F. The pattern of trabecular bone microarchitecture in the distal femur of typically developing children and its effect on processing of magnetic resonance images. Bone. 2014 Mar;60:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26392035Singh H, Whitney DG, Knight CA, Miller F, Manal K, Kolm P, Modlesky CM. Site-Specific Transmission of a Floor-Based, High-Frequency, Low-Magnitude Vibration Stimulus in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.434. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Functional Outcomes and Control Using Synchron BCI - Australia
Neurologic Disorder, Neurologic Diseases
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christopher Modlesky, PhD principal investigator
University of Delaware
Freeman Miller, MD principal investigator
Nemours/Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low-magnitude vibration and Botox in people with Cerebral Palsy and Muscle Spasticity, run by University of Delaware at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bone Structure (time frame: baseline to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01803464, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2018.