AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT01804309

Functional Anatomical Examination of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Drainage in the Axillary Subregions in Early Breast Cancer

An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by National Institute of Oncology, Hungary at 1 site in Hungary.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Regional lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer. Accurate nodal staging can be achieved only by surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteHungary
Study dates
Mar 2013to Feb 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Clinical stage T1-2(≤ 5cm)N0M0 primary unilateral invasive breast cancer patients

Who may be able to join

  • women with clinically node negative invasive or microinvasive breast cancer: T1-2(≤ 5cm)N0M0
  • 18 years of age or older

Who cannot join

  • previous ALND
  • clinically positive axillary SLNB
  • pregnant or lactating
  • neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment based on surgeon's discretion (ASCO)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hungary1 site
  • National Institute of Oncology

    Budapest, 1122

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Regional lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer. Accurate nodal staging can be achieved only by surgery. Today, in early-stage invasive breast cancers with clinically negative lymph nodes, minimally invasive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered the gold standard of regional lymph node staging. To optimize the effectiveness of SLNB, precise pre-and intraoperative mapping of lymphatic drainage is important. The (SLNB) technique is not standardized. The most common and most accurate way of lymphatic mapping is performed with the combined application of a gamma-emitting isotope labeled substance and blue dye, the so-called double labeling technique. Functional lymphatic drainage of SLNB double staining in the mammary gland, skin and axilla present a number of uncertainties.

According to the axillary, lateral thoracic and thoracodorsal veins, Ibusuki et al. divided the axillary region into four subregions: brachial (lateral), pectoral (anterior), central and subscapular (posterior) zones. They revealed clear relationship between the anatomic location and status of the SLN, also confirmed by Gallowitsch et al. SLN was detected in Level I in 96% and in Level II in 4% by SPECT/CT.

Read more

Knowedge of relationships between the drainage of sentinel lymph node staining into the axillary subregions, location of the primary tumor, tumor size, SLN positivity and its location within the subregion are of particular importance in the decision making whether or not axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) needs to be performed.

In the prospective randomized phase 3 trial by Giuliano et al. (ACOSOG Z-11) ALND was not performed in early breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla and breast-conserving surgery, for 1-2 macroscopically positive SLNs (10). After an average follow-up of 6.3 years, data were compared to the traditional ALND group and no difference was detected in 5-year overall survival or disease-free survival at 5 years.

Aims of the investigation:

To examine the location of SLN in the axillary subregion (anterior, posterior, central, lateral, apical) in patients with early breast cancer (T <5 cm).

To statistically assess correlations between the location, size, histological parameters of primary breast tumor and the subregion of the SLN.

To statistically assess SLN positivity and its location within the sbregion.

To statistically assess subregional localisation of positive SLN and the number of all positive regional lymph nodes, to predict a limited number of cases with lymph node metastasis, based on the test results of the ACOSOG Z-11 trial, by which ALND could be omitted.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)
Keywords
axyllary lymph node, sentinel lymph node, lymphatic drainage, early breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)Procedure or surgery

    The intervention (SLNB) is no different in the care of patients' in the study then in those who were not included in the past or will not be included after the trial terminates. SLNB is performed according to strict professional guidelines adopted by the National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.

Study groups in NCT01804309
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early breast cancer patientsClinical stage T1-2 N0M0 primary unilateral invasive breast cancer patients
Receives: Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The assessment of any correlations between the subregional location of SLNs within the axillary trench and the clinical-pathological parameters of the tumor.

    Measured: Specimen is processed within 2-4 weeks in pathology. Average time frame maximum: 3 weeks following surgical intervention.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The assessment of any correlations between the subregional location of positive SLNs within the axillary trench and the number of all positive axillary lymph nodes.

    Measured: Same as for primary outcome measure.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
350 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01804309
Sponsor's protocol ID
FANTON-Ebc
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
1 Mar 2013
Last updated
6 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Giuliano AE, Haigh PI, Brennan MB, Hansen NM, Kelley MC, Ye W, Glass EC, Turner RR. Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2553-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2553.

    PubMed 10893286
  • Matrai Z, Toth L, Saeki T, Sinkovics I, Godeny M, Takeuchi H, Bidlek M, Bartal A, Savolt A, Dorogi B, Kasler M. [The potential role of SPECT/CT in the preoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer]. Orv Hetil. 2011 Apr 24;152(17):678-88. doi: 10.1556/OH.2011.29077. Hungarian.

    PubMed 21464026
  • Ibusuki M, Yamamoto Y, Kawasoe T, Shiraishi S, Tomiguchi S, Yamashita Y, Honda Y, Iyama K, Iwase H. Potential advantage of preoperative three-dimensional mapping of sentinel nodes in breast cancer by a hybrid single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT system. Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;19(2):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 12.

    PubMed 19442515
  • Gallowitsch HJ, Kraschl P, Igerc I, Hussein T, Kresnik E, Mikosch P, Kohlfuerst S, Hausegger K, Lind P. Sentinel node SPECT-CT in breast cancer. Can we expect any additional and clinically relevant information? Nuklearmedizin. 2007;46(6):252-6.

    PubMed 18084680
  • Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):569-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90.

    PubMed 21304082

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by National Institute of Oncology, Hungary at 1 site in Hungary.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The assessment of any correlations between the subregional location of SLNs within the axillary trench and the clinical-pathological parameters of the tumor. (time frame: Specimen is processed within 2-4 weeks in pathology. Average time frame maximum: 3 weeks following surgical intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01804309, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in