Malignant NeoplasmEROSNCT01806129
Reproductive Health Program in Patients With Cancer
A study testing Standard practice related to reproductive heath and Training modules, algorithm, referral development in people with Malignant Neoplasm, run by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group at 109 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This clinical trial studies reproductive health program in patients with cancer. A reproductive health program may improve patients' understanding of reproductive risks and receipt of appropriate treatment to achieve their reproductive health goals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 55 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Malignant Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Standard practice related to reproductive heath and Training modules, algorithm, referral development
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 434 participants
- Where
- 109 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Sep 2016to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 55 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patients presenting with initial diagnosis of any type of cancer, including patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- Pre-menopausal patients within the reproductive age range of 15-55 years; pre-menopausal is defined as females meeting the following criteria:
- Patients not currently on hormonal contraception with the presence of menses in the past 6 months
- If no menstruation in the past 6 months, without hormonal manipulation, then confirmed follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) < 23mlU/mL
- If age < 47 years and on hormonal contraception, then patient will be eligible regardless of menstrual history
- If age ≥ 47 years and on hormonal contraception, then FSH confirmed < 23mIU/mL
- Pregnant women are eligible to participate in this study
- Patients must have the cognitive ability to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Patients who have initiated chemotherapy, radiation therapy or endocrine therapy prior to registration to this study
- Prior hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or sterilization of any method
Trial locations and contacts
109 sites in 1 country.
109 sites in 1 country
United States109 sites
Pali Momi Medical Center
‘Aiea, Hawaii, 96701
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
AnMed Health Cancer Center
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
MultiCare Auburn Medical Center
Auburn, Washington, 98001
Augusta University Medical Center
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Aurora
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Strecker Cancer Center-Belpre
Belpre, Ohio, 45714
Sanford Joe Lueken Cancer Center
Bemidji, Minnesota, 56601
Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Boulder
Boulder, Colorado, 80304
Aurora Cancer Care-Southern Lakes VLCC
Burlington, Wisconsin, 53105
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Cheyenne Regional Medical Center-West
Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82001
John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Adena Regional Medical Center
Chillicothe, Ohio, 45601
Clackamas Radiation Oncology Center
Clackamas, Oregon, 97015
Providence Cancer Institute Clackamas Clinic
Clackamas, Oregon, 97015
Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates-West Des Moines
Clive, Iowa, 50325
Mercy Cancer Center-West Lakes
Clive, Iowa, 50325
John B Amos Cancer Center
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Columbus Oncology and Hematology Associates Inc
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
The Mark H Zangmeister Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43219
Mercy Hospital
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433
Greater Regional Medical Center
Creston, Iowa, 50801
Carle on Vermilion
Danville, Illinois, 61832
Cancer Center of Colorado at Sloan's Lake
Denver, Colorado, 80204
Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates-Laurel
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Mercy Medical Center - Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Fairview Southdale Hospital
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
Carle Physician Group-Effingham
Effingham, Illinois, 62401
Sanford Broadway Medical Center
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Sanford Roger Maris Cancer Center
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Aurora Health Center-Fond du Lac
Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, 54937
Unity Hospital
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
MultiCare Gig Harbor Medical Park
Gig Harbor, Washington, 98335
Aurora Cancer Care-Grafton
Grafton, Wisconsin, 53024
CHI Health Saint Francis
Grand Island, Nebraska, 68803
Aurora BayCare Medical Center
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54311
Gibbs Cancer Center-Pelham
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
OptumCare Cancer Care at Seven Hills
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Hawaii Cancer Care Inc-POB II
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Queen's Cancer Cenrer - POB I
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Queen's Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Straub Clinic and Hospital
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
University of Hawaii Cancer Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Queen's Cancer Center - Kuakini
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96826
Tripler Army Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96859
Baptist Memorial Hospital and Fowler Family Cancer Center - Jonesboro
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
Aurora Cancer Care-Kenosha South
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53142
Memorial Medical Center - Las Cruces
Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88011
OptumCare Cancer Care at Oakey
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
HealthCare Partners Medical Group Oncology/Hematology-San Martin
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89113
Ann M Wierman MD LTD
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
HealthCare Partners Medical Group Oncology/Hematology-Tenaya
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
OptumCare Cancer Care at Fort Apache
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Saint Joseph Hospital East
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509
Saint Joseph London
London, Kentucky, 40741
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Sky Ridge
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA-Maplewood
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Saint John's Hospital - Healtheast
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Marietta Memorial Hospital
Marietta, Ohio, 45750
Carle Physician Group-Mattoon/Charleston
Mattoon, Illinois, 61938
Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
Aurora Cancer Care-Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209
Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Abbott-Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
Health Partners Inc
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454
Ochsner LSU Health Monroe Medical Center
Monroe, Louisiana, 71202
Knox Community Hospital
Mount Vernon, Ohio, 43050
Meharry Medical College
Nashville, Tennessee, 37208
Cancer Center of Western Wisconsin
New Richmond, Wisconsin, 54017
Licking Memorial Hospital
Newark, Ohio, 43055
Providence Newberg Medical Center
Newberg, Oregon, 97132
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic - Oshkosh
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54904
Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Oxford
Oxford, Mississippi, 38655
Paoli Memorial Hospital
Paoli, Pennsylvania, 19301
Providence Portland Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Southern Ohio Medical Center
Portsmouth, Ohio, 45662
MultiCare Good Samaritan Hospital
Puyallup, Washington, 98372
Virginia Commonwealth University/Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
North Memorial Medical Health Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, 55422
Park Nicollet Clinic - Saint Louis Park
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
United Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
Saint Francis Regional Medical Center
Shakopee, Minnesota, 55379
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic-Sheboygan
Sheboygan, Wisconsin, 53081
LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103
Sanford Cancer Center Oncology Clinic
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
Sanford USD Medical Center - Sioux Falls
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117-5134
Spartanburg Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Lakeview Hospital
Stillwater, Minnesota, 55082
Aurora Medical Center in Summit
Summit, Wisconsin, 53066
MultiCare Tacoma General Hospital
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hospital
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic-Two Rivers
Two Rivers, Wisconsin, 54241
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
The Carle Foundation Hospital
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Aurora Cancer Care-Milwaukee West
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226
Aurora West Allis Medical Center
West Allis, Wisconsin, 53227
Mercy Medical Center-West Lakes
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266
SCL Health Lutheran Medical Center
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Rice Memorial Hospital
Willmar, Minnesota, 56201
Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA-Woodbury
Woodbury, Minnesota, 55125
Lankenau Medical Center
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
About this study
Official title: EROS: Engendering Reproductive Health Within Oncologic Survivorship
This clinical trial studies reproductive health program in patients with cancer. A reproductive health program may improve patients' understanding of reproductive risks and receipt of appropriate treatment to achieve their reproductive health goals.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To evaluate the success of the implementation of reproductive health programming (Didactics, Engendering Reproductive Health Within Oncologic Survivorship [EROS] Reproductive Health Assessment and EROS Trial Algorithm) among reproductive aged females (15-55) with cancer.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To assess the degree of discrepancy between patients and their clinicians in estimates of significance of the reproductive health goals for the patient.
II. To evaluate baseline and follow-up reproductive health assessments for trends in reproductive health choices relating to oncofertility, oncocontraception and pregnancy over the 2-year study period.
III. To identify clinical and demographic factors that predict the adequacy of reproductive health care management.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
- To perform a longitudinal study following endocrine markers of fertility in a cohort of the first 200 registered EROS trial patients who agree to participate.
II. To perform a longitudinal study of sexual function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sexual function survey in all subjects participating in the EROS Trial.
OUTLINE: Participating institutions are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Patients are assigned to a study arm depending on the institutional assignment.
ARM A: Patients undergo usual standard practice related to reproductive health. ARM B: Patients undergo reproductive health program comprising didactics, reproductive health assessment and navigating algorithm, and network development.
After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up periodically.
- Conditions
- Malignant Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Standard practice related to reproductive heath, Training modules, algorithm, referral development
- Keywords
- reproductive health
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard practice related to reproductive heathOther
Patients undergo usual standard practice related to reproductive health.
Training modules, algorithm, referral developmentOther
Patients undergo reproductive health program comprising didactics, reproductive health assessment and navigating algorithm, and network development.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (no intervention) | Active comparator | Patients undergo usual standard practice related to reproductive health. Receives: Other: Standard practice related to reproductive heath |
| Arm B (reproductive health program) | Experimental | Patients undergo reproductive health program comprising didactics, reproductive health assessment and navigating algorithm, and network development. Receives: Other: Training modules, algorithm, referral development |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Patients With Appropriate Reproductive Health Management
Appropriate reproductive health management was determined using the followings: (1) Females that were pregnant or interested in immediate pregnancy (defined as within 1 year of enrollment) were given referral to obstetrician/gynecologist or counseled about pregnancy options (2) Females interested in future childbearing were counseled or given a referral for fertility preservation if requested (3) Females who were not interested in immediate pregnancy were given a referral or counseling to select family planning that was consistent with plans for sexual activity and future childbearing. If a female fell into category 1, 2, or 3, and the appropriate referral occurred within 3 months of enrollment, then appropriate reproductive health management was achieved. For patients with appropriate reproductive health management in place before the baseline visit, they were included in the analysis and counted as having appropriate reproductive health management.
Measured: At baseline and 3 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Difference in Rating Between Patients and Their Clinicians in Importance of Fertility Maintenance
The rating on the importance of fertility maintenance was assessed among patients and the corresponding treating physicians. The rating scale ranges between 1 and 10. Higher scores indicate more importance of fertility maintenance. The difference in rating was calculated by subtracting patient rating from physician's rating.
Measured: At baseline
The Changes in Reproductive Health Status From Baseline to 3 Months
Patient's reproductive health choices relating to oncofertility, oncocontraception and pregnancy was assessed at baseline and 3 months. Patient's reproductive health status is categorized into the following categories:
- Sextually active \& childbearing not completed
- Sextually active \& childbearing completed
- Sextually not active \& childbearing not completed
- Sextually not active \& childbearing completed
- Sexuality unknown \& childbearing not completed
- Sexuality unknown \& childbearing completed
- Pregnant/Pregnancy in 1 year
- Missing/Unknown
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Associations Between Clinical and Demographic Factors and Adequacy of Reproductive Health Care Management
Appropriate reproductive health management was determined using the followings: (1) Females that were pregnant or interested in immediate pregnancy (defined as within 1 year of enrollment) were given referral to obstetrician/gynecologist or counseled about pregnancy options (2) Females interested in future childbearing were counseled or given a referral for fertility preservation if requested (3) Females who were not interested in immediate pregnancy were given a referral or counseling to select family planning that was consistent with plans for sexual activity and future childbearing. If a female fell into category 1, 2, or 3, and the appropriate referral occurred within 3 months of enrollment, then appropriate reproductive health management was achieved. For patients with appropriate reproductive health management in place before the baseline visit, they were included in the analysis and counted as having appropriate reproductive health management.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study start2 Sep 2016
- Primary completion31 Jul 2021
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Malignant NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research GroupThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 434 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ashlesha Patel, Principal investigator, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01806129
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E1Q11
- Other IDs
- NCI-2012-02869, U10CA037403
- Acronym
- EROS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data may be made available upon request as per the ECOG-ACRIN Data Sharing Policy.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EROS: Engendering Reproductive Health Within Oncologic Survivorship
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01806129
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EROS / E1Q11
- Conditions
- Malignant Neoplasm
- Keywords
- reproductive health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 434 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 2 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Oct 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial studies reproductive health program in patients with cancer. A reproductive health program may improve patients' understanding of reproductive risks and receipt of appropriate treatment to achieve their reproductive health goals.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To evaluate the success of the implementation of reproductive health programming (Didactics, Engendering Reproductive Health Within Oncologic Survivorship [EROS] Reproductive Health Assessment and EROS Trial Algorithm) among reproductive aged females (15-55) with cancer.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To assess the degree of discrepancy between patients and their clinicians in estimates of significance of the reproductive health goals for the patient.
II. To evaluate baseline and follow-up reproductive health assessments for trends in reproductive health choices relating to oncofertility, oncocontraception and pregnancy over the 2-year study period.
III. To identify clinical and demographic factors that predict the adequacy of reproductive health care management.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
- To perform a longitudinal study following endocrine markers of fertility in a cohort of the first 200 registered EROS trial patients who agree to participate.
II. To perform a longitudinal study of sexual function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sexual function survey in all subjects participating in the EROS Trial.
OUTLINE: Participating institutions are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Patients are assigned to a study arm depending on the institutional assignment.
ARM A: Patients undergo usual standard practice related to reproductive health. ARM B: Patients undergo reproductive health program comprising didactics, reproductive health assessment and navigating algorithm, and network development.
After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up periodically.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (no intervention) | Active comparator | Other: Standard practice related to reproductive heathPatients undergo usual standard practice related to reproductive health. |
| Arm B (reproductive health program) | Experimental | Other: Training modules, algorithm, referral developmentPatients undergo reproductive health program comprising didactics, reproductive health assessment and navigating algorithm, and network development. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 55 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Female patients presenting with initial diagnosis of any type of cancer, including patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- Pre-menopausal patients within the reproductive age range of 15-55 years; pre-menopausal is defined as females meeting the following criteria:
- Pregnant women are eligible to participate in this study
- Patients must have the cognitive ability to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who have initiated chemotherapy, radiation therapy or endocrine therapy prior to registration to this study
- Prior hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or sterilization of any method
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard practice related to reproductive heathPatients undergo usual standard practice related to reproductive health. | Other | Arm A (no intervention) |
| Training modules, algorithm, referral developmentPatients undergo reproductive health program comprising didactics, reproductive health assessment and navigating algorithm, and network development. | Other | Arm B (reproductive health program) |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Patients With Appropriate Reproductive Health Management
Time frame: At baseline and 3 months
Appropriate reproductive health management was determined using the followings: (1) Females that were pregnant or interested in immediate pregnancy (defined as within 1 year of enrollment) were given referral to obstetrician/gynecologist or counseled about pregnancy options (2) Females interested in future childbearing were counseled or given a referral for fertility preservation if requested (3) Females who were not interested in immediate pregnancy were given a referral or counseling to select family planning that was consistent with plans for sexual activity and future childbearing. If a female fell into category 1, 2, or 3, and the appropriate referral occurred within 3 months of enrollment, then appropriate reproductive health management was achieved. For patients with appropriate reproductive health management in place before the baseline visit, they were included in the analysis and counted as having appropriate reproductive health management.
3 secondary outcomes
Difference in Rating Between Patients and Their Clinicians in Importance of Fertility Maintenance
Time frame: At baseline
The Changes in Reproductive Health Status From Baseline to 3 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Associations Between Clinical and Demographic Factors and Adequacy of Reproductive Health Care Management
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data may be made available upon request as per the ECOG-ACRIN Data Sharing Policy.
Related trials for Malignant Neoplasm
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruiting
Augmented-Reality ICG Fluorescence Second-Look for Residual Nodal Disease After Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 3
Somatostatin Analogues vs. Observation After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Nonfunctional Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm, Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ashlesha Patel principal investigator
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
109 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standard practice related to reproductive heath and Training modules, algorithm, referral development in people with Malignant Neoplasm, run by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group at 109 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 109 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Oct 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Patients With Appropriate Reproductive Health Management (time frame: At baseline and 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2026.