AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory FailureTELERESPNCT01807663

Validation of a Dynamic Evaluation Tool in Respiratory Failure

A study testing healthy volonteers and Free breath monitoring in people with Respiratory Failure, run by Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805 at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Determing optimal time of ventilator disconnection is a challenge for both acute and chronic neuromuscular disease. In one case it is helpful for weanning from ventilator and in the other to optimize daytime ventilation in the most severe patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Failure
What is being tested?
healthy volonteers and Free breath monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Nov 2012to Jun 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy volonteers Man or woman of more than 18 years Realization of a preliminary medical examination Patient having signed an informed and written consent Major healthy subjects, presenting no chronic pathology or not chronic patients
  • Chronic patients Man or woman of more than 18 years Affected by neuromuscular pathology Realization of a preliminary medical examination Patient in the stable state at the time of the study for at least 1 month Ventilated in a not invasive or invasive way in diurnal and night-period. Respiratory autonomy > 1:00 am Patient having signed an informed and written consent
  • Acute Patients Man or woman of more than 18 years Affected by syndrome of Guillain blocked in aigue phase having required the invasive ventilation or affected by myasthenia generalized with myasthénique crisis having required the invasive ventilation.
  • Realization of a preliminary medical examination Patient in phase of neurological recovery Vital Capacity > 15 ml / kg Respiratory Autonomy > 1:00 am Patient having signed a lit(enlightened) and written consent

Who cannot join

  • Healthy volonteers subject refusing to participate in the study subject under guardianship or guardianship Pregnant or breast-feeding Woman
  • Chronic patients Patient refusing to participate in the study Patient under guardianship or guardianship Pregnant or breast-feeding Woman Patients ventilated only at night Clinically significant bronchial Dimensions(Congestion) Required by oxygen therapy
  • Acute patients Patient refusing to participate in the study Patient or subject under guardianship or guardianship Pregnant or breast-feeding Woman Clinically significant bronchial Dimensions(Congestion) Required by oxygen therapy FIO2 > 40 % PEP > 5 cms H2O State of shock

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hopital Raymond Poincare

    Garches, Île-de-France Region, 92380

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Validation of a Dynamic Evaluation Tool in Respiratory Failure by Ambulatory Inductance Plethysmography

Determing optimal time of ventilator disconnection is a challenge for both acute and chronic neuromuscular disease. In one case it is helpful for weanning from ventilator and in the other to optimize daytime ventilation in the most severe patients. The investigators propose to validate a new non invasive tool for monitoring respiratroy parameters in neuromuscular patients in both acute and chronic conditions.

Read the detailed description

Context:

Mechanical ventilation transformed the prognosis of neuromuscular diseases whether for acute or chronic diseases. The available tools to estimate the severity of respiratory insufficiency and indicate or follow the efficiency of mechanical ventilation are based on blood gazes explorations, tests respiratory function and sleep evaluation.

These tools give either limited information, or are with difficulty applicable to patients heavily handicapped except during hospitalization.

In patients under mechanical ventilation, it is sometimes difficult to know the daily optimal time of ventilation. The respiratory events are not generally recognized and are unspecific (headaches, drowsiness, dyspnoea, etc.) or are identified by blood gazes abnormalities (hypercapnia. In acute setting, treble is going to raise the problem of the weaning of the mechanical ventilation and the optimal moment of the extubation without risking a reintubation.

These problems are identical and concern the evaluation of the degree of ventilatory autonomy for home care. The development of methods estimating this autonomy is thus fundamental.

Objectives: the objective of this project is to validate a non-invasive system for measure and acquisition of respiratory parameters, incorporating a transmission system working by a "wireless" technology allowing the remote monitoring of these patients.

The secondary objectives are to determine the parameters of success of weaning by using the device in neuromuscular patients intubated for respiratory failure in acute setting and to determine the optimal time of free breathing possibilities in patients ventilated in a chronic way at home.

Methods:

After validation of the device on 10 healthy subjects, continuous acquisition of the ventilatory data by means of the Teleresp system compared with measure of the transcutaneous PCO2, of SaO2 and arterial gazometry at the end of free breath trial in 40 acute and chronic neuromuscular patients.

Selection criteria:

Healthy volunteers Patients affected by acute neuromuscular pathology and starting weaning from invasive ventilation (Guillain Barré and myasthenia).

Patients affected by neuromuscular pathology and home ventilated in a diurnal and night-way by invasive interface or not (respiratory autonomy of at least 1:00 am).

Number of patients, center:

10 healthy volunteers and 40 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit or in the home of ventilation unit of the Raymond Poincaré hospital.

Total duration of the study: 19 months

Being tested
healthy volonteers, Free breath monitoring
Keywords
neuromuscular disease
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency, Neuromuscular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • healthy volonteersDevice

    Also called Visuresp system : wireless inductance plethysmography system

    Monitoring respiratory function of both acute and chronic neuromuscular patients during weaning or free breath period.

  • Free breath monitoringDevice

    Also called Visuresp system : wireless inductance plethysmography system

    Monitoring respiratory function of both acute and chronic neuromuscular patients during weaning or free breath period.

Study groups in NCT01807663
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
healthy volunteersExperimentalFree breath monitoring. Correlation between two device for recording parameters of ventilation.
Receives: Device: healthy volonteers; Device: Free breath monitoring
Chronic patientExperimentalFree breath monitoring. Number of pathological respiratory events (apneas, hypopneas, paradoxical breath) compared with the recording of the PtCO2 and the SpO2)
Receives: Device: healthy volonteers; Device: Free breath monitoring
ACUTE PATIENTExperimentalFree breath monitoring. Number of pathological respiratory events (apneas, hypopneas, paradoxical breath) compared with the recording of the PtCO2 and the SpO2)
Receives: Device: healthy volonteers; Device: Free breath monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of pathological respiratory events (apneas, hypopneas, paradoxical breath) detected with regard to the recording of the PtCO2 and the SpO2

    Healthy subjects will be recorded for one hour in seated positions 30 minutes and slept 30 min.

    Pneumotachograph recording will be realized during 5 minutes at the beginning and at the end of every phase of recording. The computer assuring the reception of the signals being remotely located to estimate of the transmission.

    All the patients will be registered in parallel with the VISURESP ® system (RBI Grenoble, France) and the measure of the transcutaneous PCO2 and SpO2(SenTec AG, Therwil, Switzerland) during free breath. The measure beginning 30 minutes before the logout and finishing 30 minutes later.

    Acute patients being able to like at least 2 H of free breath will be recorded. A first measure will be made dice that a free breath of at least 2H will be possible, then 3 days later and the day the extubation. Aterial blood gazes will be obtained before reconnection. Chronic patients willbe recorded if able to be disconnected from ventilator for more than 1 hour.

    Measured: 1 to 12 hours

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Respiratory events in healthy volonteers

    Quality of data transmission of respiratory paramaters

    Measured: 1h

  2. Respiratory events in chronic Patients

    Correlation between the number of event detected by VISURESP ®, the duration of hypercapnie superior to 45 mmHg on the PtCO2 and the gazométrie at the end of free Breath.

    Measured: 1-12h

  3. Respiratory events in acute patients

    Correlations between the number of events detected by the technology VISURESP ®, the duration of hypercapnie superior to 45 mmHg on the PtCO2 and the success of the extubation (at least 24 a hour)

    Measured: 1-12h

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Why it stopped: Healthy volonteers study results show that the device is not enough reliable

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01807663
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012-A01280-43
Acronym
TELERESP
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
26 Feb 2013
Last updated
26 Sep 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Modalités pratiques de la ventialtion non invasive en pression positive, au long cours, a domicile, dans les maladies neuromusculaires. Rev Mal Respir 2006;23:S3-S40. Toussaint M, Steens M, Wasteels G, Soudon P. Diurnal ventilation via mouthpiece: survival in end-stage Duchenne patients. Eur Respir J 2006;28(3):549-55. Seneviratne J, Mandrekar J, Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA. Predictors of extubation failure in myasthenic crisis. Arch Neurol 2008;65(7):929-33. Prigent H, Orlikowski D, Letilly N, Falaize L, Annane D, Sharshar T, et al. Vital Capacity Versus Maximal Inspiratory Pressure in Patients with Guillain-Barre Syndrome and Myasthenia Gravis. Neurocrit Care. Kohler M, Clarenbach CF, Bahler C, Brack T, Russi EW, Bloch KE. Disability and survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80(3):320-5. Brouillette RT, Morrow AS, Weese-Mayer DE, Hunt CE. Comparison of respiratory inductive plethysmography and thoracic impedance for apnea monitoring. J Pediatr 1987;111(3):377-83. Calabrese P, Besleaga T, Eberhard A, Vovc V, Baconnier P. Respiratory inductance plethysmography is suitable for voluntary hyperventilation test. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:1055-7. Eberhard A, Calabrese P, Baconnier P, Benchetrit G. Comparison between the respiratory inductance plethysmography signal derivative and the airflow signal. Adv Exp Med Biol 2001;499:489-94. Redline S, Budhiraja R, Kapur V, Marcus CL, Mateika JH, Mehra R, et al. The scoring of respiratory events in sleep: reliability and validity. J Clin Sleep Med 2007;3(2):169-200.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing healthy volonteers and Free breath monitoring in people with Respiratory Failure, run by Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805 at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Healthy volonteers study results show that the device is not enough reliable). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of pathological respiratory events (apneas, hypopneas, paradoxical breath) detected with regard to the recording of the PtCO2 and the SpO2 (time frame: 1 to 12 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01807663, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
TELERESP Clinical Trial NCT01807663 | AzTrials