Recurrent Urinary Tract InfectionPhase 3NCT01808755
D Mannose in Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
A Phase 3 study testing D Mannose and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in people with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection, run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Background- In recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs) usual prophylactic antibiotic regimes do not change the long term risk of recurrence. Objective- D-Mannose is a sugar, it sticks to E. coli bacteria, the aim of the study was to evaluate its efficacy in the treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
- What is being tested?
- D Mannose and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Oct 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years old or older
- 3 or more culture documented urinary tract infections in the preceding 12 months
- Patients who had not taken antimicrobials within 4 weeks and were not pregnant or contemplating pregnancy.
Who cannot join
- Patients with evidence of upper urinary tract infection, such as temperature higher than 38 °C, flank/lumbar pain or tenderness.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Urology Department Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100
About this study
Official title: Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Women: a Pilot Study With Oral D Mannose
Background- In recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs) usual prophylactic antibiotic regimes do not change the long term risk of recurrence.
Objective- D-Mannose is a sugar, it sticks to E. coli bacteria, the aim of the study was to evaluate its efficacy in the treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs.
Read more
Design, setting and participants- : In this crossover trial female patient were eligible for the study if they had recurrent UTIs, that is three ore more episodes during the preceding 12 months. Suitable patients were randomly assigned to antibiotic treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or to a regimen of oral D Mannose for 24 weeks, and received the other intervention in the second phase of the study.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis- The time to recurrence of UTI, bladder pain (VAS p) and urinary urgency (VAS u) were evaluated at the end of antibiotic therapy and at the and of 24 weeks fo D Mannose. The results for quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD as they were all normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). T-test for paired data was used to analyze differences of time of recurrence, VAS pain, Vas urgency and number of voidings between treatment. Data analysis was performed with STATA statistical package (release 11,1, 2010, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infectious diseases, with a substantial financial burden to society. In Europe data on the presence of various types of UTIs indicate a high impact on quality of life of people affected, it is important the impact of urinary tract infections on the economy in general and on the health system in particular. In the U.S. urinary tract infections account for more than 7 million doctor visits each year, including more than 2 million visits for cystitis. The bacterium E. coli, which is the source of 90% of urinary tract infections, shows an incredible ability to survive in the human body, and is able to change rapidly to survive antibiotics. An infection of the urinary tract must be stopped before it begins to migrate to the kidneys, where it can cause serious infections. Women with frequent reinfections have a rate of 0.13 to 0.22 UTIs per month (1.6 to 2.6 infections per year). For premenopausal, healthy, and active females, recurrent UTIs are a major healthcare concern. Recurrent urinary tract infection (RUTI) is defined as three episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI) with 3 positive urine cultures in the previous 12 months or two episodes in the last six months. The usual present strategies employing a prophylactic antibiotic regime to prevent recurrent UTIs include long-term low-dose prophylactic antimicrobial treatment or postcoital antibiotic treatment. However, it seems that these strategies do not alter the long-term risk of recurrence. Patients with frequent UTIs who take prophylactic antimicrobial agents for extended periods decrease their infections during prophylaxis, but the rate of infection returns to pre-treatment rates when prophylaxis is stopped . Long-term antibiotics do not appear to positively affect the patient's basic susceptibility to infections. The cell wall of E. coli bacteria has tiny finger-like projections that contain complex molecules called lectins on their surface. These lectins act as a cellular glue that binds the bacteria to the bladder wall so they cannot be easily rinsed out by urination . In this pilot study the aim was to evaluate if oral D Mannose could be used as a safe and effective treatment and as a prophylactic measure for recurrent UTIs in adult women.
PATIENTS AND METHODS Suitable female patients with recurrent urinary tract infections who were visited at the outpatient Clinic of our Urology Department were eligible for study. The work has been conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of World Medical Association. Patients were enrolled in the study after treatment for the most recent urinary tract infection if they had positive urinary cultures at that time.
Each participant entering the trial was assigned to one of the following treatments in a random sequence:
- A regimen of five-day antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg twice a day. Then 1 week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
- A regimen of oral D Mannose 1 gr. 3 times a day, every 8 hours for 2 weeks, and subsequently 1 gr. twice a day for 22 weeks. D-Mannose has the best activity when urine has neutral pH, therefore patients were instructed to measure urinary pH using dipsticks and use oral sodium bicarbonate 250 mg b.i.d.or potassium citrate 1 gr. b.i.d. as alkalinizing agents if pH was <7.
Patients were randomly assigned to antibiotic treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or to a regimen of oral D Mannose for 24 weeks, and received the other intervention in the second phase of the study.
VAS score for bladder pain (VASp) and for urgency (VASu) was evaluated before starting D Mannose and at 24 weeks. The 24 hour number of voidings was obtained filling a voiding diary before and at the end of treatment with D Mannose. Cure was defined as the resolution of symptoms and no post-treatment bacteriuria at the 24 week follow-up visit. Cure with recurrence was defined as having resolution of symptoms with negative cultures at 12 week followed by significant UTI with bacteriuria before 24 weeks. Failure was defined as having persistent symptoms and significant bacteriuria before 24 weeks. The cure rate was determined for patients who met infection criteria, returned for the follow-up visits and had been treated with an antimicrobial for recurrent urinary tract infection occurring twice or more times during the 6 months preceding the 24 weeks course of daily oral D Mannose. The time to recurrence of UTI, VAS pain and VAS urgency were evaluated at the end of antibiotic therapy and at the end of 24 week treatment with oral D Mannose. Statistical Analysis- The results for quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD as they were all normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). T-test for paired data was used to analyze differences of time of recurrence, VAS pain, Vas urgency and number of voidings between treatment. Data analysis was performed with STATA statistical package (release 11,1, 2010, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
DISCUSSION- The approach in the management of recurrent urinary tract infections is usually to treat adequately an episode of infection and after the completion should document complete eradication with a urine culture; if infection reoccurs or persists then imaging is required. In the management of recurrent UTIs in women it is a common practice to fight the resistance of the bacterium E. coli by varying the type of antibiotics, or increasing the dose and duration of therapy. However, in doing so the bacteria become even more resistant to broad spectrum antibiotics. Moreover, the resistance of the bacterium would not increase if the infection was due to a new E. coli contamination of the faeces or to sexual contact. What actually appears to occur is the survival of a part of the old colony of bacteria in the urinary tract, they remain latent and are reactivated by various favourable conditions, the relentless recurrences are therefore not considered as reinfection. It could be learnt a lot from patients and from research done on the causes of repeated urinary tract infections, especially due to the bacterium E. coli. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains may contain virulence factors that allow the bacteria to penetrate into the transitional cells and form quiescent intracellular reservoirs (QIRs). Establishment of QIRs throughout the underlying transitional epithelium may predispose an individual to an increased likelihood of recurrence and may account for some of the frequent same-strain recurrences that are seen clinically despite appropriate antibiotic therapy. A difficult aspect of treating urinary tract infections in women is the high likelihood of recurrence. In a series of trials a group of susceptible women averaged 2.6 infections per patient per year despite the apparent effectiveness of short-term therapy. While long-term prophylaxis was relatively effective in that series, resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by urinary pathogens increased to 19% in a 5-year period. Although there is debate regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy, emergence of drug-resistant organisms has to be considered with prolonged antibiotic use, even in healthy women with uncomplicated UTIs. A number of triggers lead to the reactivation of dormant E.coli already in the bladder, or the release of E.coli pods from behind biofilms in the bladder. When a first UTI is caused by E. coli, the risk of a second infection within 6 months is greater than when a first infection is cause by another uropathogen. Although E. coli was the most frequently isolated microorganism in our group of patients, the limited number of patients studied could not confirm this assumption. The chemical structure of D-Mannose causes it to stick to E. coli bacteria, maybe even more tenaciously than E. coli adheres to human cells. Although the mechanism of how it works is complicated, theoretically, if enough D-mannose is present in the urine, it binds to the bacteria and prevents them from attaching to the urinary tract lining. Our clinical experience shows that D Mannose represents a useful choice to address the problem of recurrent UTIs. The time required to develop a new infection, or for the re-emergence of the bacterial reservoir, as can be assumed from new data, is significantly longer with a prolonged course of oral D Mannose than with antibiotic treatment, even when these are used for long periods at a low dose, or in cycles. We actually know mannose has no bactericidal properties, and it might well be that the dosage and duration of therapy have to be individualized according to bacterial growth and replication speed in the bladder and urinary tract. The major part of mannose ingested is eliminated with urine and works by binding to bacteria concentrated in infected urine and attempting to perpetuate infection by binding to mannose receptors of urothelial bladder cells, this mechanism being the one involved in most cases of recurrences. In most cases recurrences are wrongly regarded as re-infections: it is highly likely that bactericidal molecules not possessing the same properties cannot produce the same consistent effect, that is the elimination of more and more loads of bacteria with urine, "alive" albeit inactivated, motionless, devoid of pathogenic potential due to mannose linked to them.
- Conditions
- Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
- Being tested
- D Mannose, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
- Keywords
- recurrent urinary tract infections, D Mannose, cystitis, antibiotic treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Tract Infections, Cystitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
D MannoseDietary supplement
Also called sugar
1 gr. every 8 hours
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazoleDrug
Also called trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg
one cp b.i.d. for 5 days. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| D Mannose | Experimental | 1 gr. every 8 hours for 2 weeks, subsequently 1 gr. every 12 hours for 22 weeks Receives: Dietary Supplement: D Mannose; Drug: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole |
| trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | Active comparator | intervention was a 5-days course of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole cp 160 mg/800 mg twice a day. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks Receives: Dietary Supplement: D Mannose; Drug: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Days
time required to develop the next urinary tract infection; evaluation by means of urine analysis and urine culture
Measured: 168
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionOct 2012
- Study completionOct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Recurrent Urinary Tract InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniele Porru, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
- Investigators
- Daniele Porru, MD, Principal investigator, Urology Dept. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01808755
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DMannose UTIs
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 21 May 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Mulvey MA, Lopez-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Roth R, Parks WC, Heuser J, Hultgren SJ. Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998 Nov 20;282(5393):1494-7. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1494.
PubMed 9822381Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Hultgren SJ. Establishment of a persistent Escherichia coli reservoir during the acute phase of a bladder infection. Infect Immun. 2001 Jul;69(7):4572-9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4572-4579.2001.
PubMed 11402001Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Martinez JJ, Hultgren SJ. Bad bugs and beleaguered bladders: interplay between uropathogenic Escherichia coli and innate host defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):8829-35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8829.
PubMed 10922042Cooper TE, Teng C, Howell M, Teixeira-Pinto A, Jaure A, Wong G. D-mannose for preventing and treating urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;8(8):CD013608. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013608.pub2.
PubMed 36041061
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Women: a Pilot Study With Oral D Mannose
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01808755
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DMannose UTIs
- Conditions
- Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
- Keywords
- recurrent urinary tract infections, D Mannose, cystitis, antibiotic treatment
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background- In recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs) usual prophylactic antibiotic regimes do not change the long term risk of recurrence.
Objective- D-Mannose is a sugar, it sticks to E. coli bacteria, the aim of the study was to evaluate its efficacy in the treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs.
Design, setting and participants- : In this crossover trial female patient were eligible for the study if they had recurrent UTIs, that is three ore more episodes during the preceding 12 months. Suitable patients were randomly assigned to antibiotic treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or to a regimen of oral D Mannose for 24 weeks, and received the other intervention in the second phase of the study.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis- The time to recurrence of UTI, bladder pain (VAS p) and urinary urgency (VAS u) were evaluated at the end of antibiotic therapy and at the and of 24 weeks fo D Mannose. The results for quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD as they were all normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). T-test for paired data was used to analyze differences of time of recurrence, VAS pain, Vas urgency and number of voidings between treatment. Data analysis was performed with STATA statistical package (release 11,1, 2010, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infectious diseases, with a substantial financial burden to society. In Europe data on the presence of various types of UTIs indicate a high impact on quality of life of people affected, it is important the impact of urinary tract infections on the economy in general and on the health system in particular. In the U.S. urinary tract infections account for more than 7 million doctor visits each year, including more than 2 million visits for cystitis. The bacterium E. coli, which is the source of 90% of urinary tract infections, shows an incredible ability to survive in the human body, and is able to change rapidly to survive antibiotics. An infection of the urinary tract must be stopped before it begins to migrate to the kidneys, where it can cause serious infections. Women with frequent reinfections have a rate of 0.13 to 0.22 UTIs per month (1.6 to 2.6 infections per year). For premenopausal, healthy, and active females, recurrent UTIs are a major healthcare concern. Recurrent urinary tract infection (RUTI) is defined as three episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI) with 3 positive urine cultures in the previous 12 months or two episodes in the last six months. The usual present strategies employing a prophylactic antibiotic regime to prevent recurrent UTIs include long-term low-dose prophylactic antimicrobial treatment or postcoital antibiotic treatment. However, it seems that these strategies do not alter the long-term risk of recurrence. Patients with frequent UTIs who take prophylactic antimicrobial agents for extended periods decrease their infections during prophylaxis, but the rate of infection returns to pre-treatment rates when prophylaxis is stopped . Long-term antibiotics do not appear to positively affect the patient's basic susceptibility to infections. The cell wall of E. coli bacteria has tiny finger-like projections that contain complex molecules called lectins on their surface. These lectins act as a cellular glue that binds the bacteria to the bladder wall so they cannot be easily rinsed out by urination . In this pilot study the aim was to evaluate if oral D Mannose could be used as a safe and effective treatment and as a prophylactic measure for recurrent UTIs in adult women.
PATIENTS AND METHODS Suitable female patients with recurrent urinary tract infections who were visited at the outpatient Clinic of our Urology Department were eligible for study. The work has been conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of World Medical Association. Patients were enrolled in the study after treatment for the most recent urinary tract infection if they had positive urinary cultures at that time.
Each participant entering the trial was assigned to one of the following treatments in a random sequence:
- A regimen of five-day antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg twice a day. Then 1 week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
- A regimen of oral D Mannose 1 gr. 3 times a day, every 8 hours for 2 weeks, and subsequently 1 gr. twice a day for 22 weeks. D-Mannose has the best activity when urine has neutral pH, therefore patients were instructed to measure urinary pH using dipsticks and use oral sodium bicarbonate 250 mg b.i.d.or potassium citrate 1 gr. b.i.d. as alkalinizing agents if pH was <7.
Patients were randomly assigned to antibiotic treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or to a regimen of oral D Mannose for 24 weeks, and received the other intervention in the second phase of the study.
VAS score for bladder pain (VASp) and for urgency (VASu) was evaluated before starting D Mannose and at 24 weeks. The 24 hour number of voidings was obtained filling a voiding diary before and at the end of treatment with D Mannose. Cure was defined as the resolution of symptoms and no post-treatment bacteriuria at the 24 week follow-up visit. Cure with recurrence was defined as having resolution of symptoms with negative cultures at 12 week followed by significant UTI with bacteriuria before 24 weeks. Failure was defined as having persistent symptoms and significant bacteriuria before 24 weeks. The cure rate was determined for patients who met infection criteria, returned for the follow-up visits and had been treated with an antimicrobial for recurrent urinary tract infection occurring twice or more times during the 6 months preceding the 24 weeks course of daily oral D Mannose. The time to recurrence of UTI, VAS pain and VAS urgency were evaluated at the end of antibiotic therapy and at the end of 24 week treatment with oral D Mannose. Statistical Analysis- The results for quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD as they were all normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). T-test for paired data was used to analyze differences of time of recurrence, VAS pain, Vas urgency and number of voidings between treatment. Data analysis was performed with STATA statistical package (release 11,1, 2010, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
DISCUSSION- The approach in the management of recurrent urinary tract infections is usually to treat adequately an episode of infection and after the completion should document complete eradication with a urine culture; if infection reoccurs or persists then imaging is required. In the management of recurrent UTIs in women it is a common practice to fight the resistance of the bacterium E. coli by varying the type of antibiotics, or increasing the dose and duration of therapy. However, in doing so the bacteria become even more resistant to broad spectrum antibiotics. Moreover, the resistance of the bacterium would not increase if the infection was due to a new E. coli contamination of the faeces or to sexual contact. What actually appears to occur is the survival of a part of the old colony of bacteria in the urinary tract, they remain latent and are reactivated by various favourable conditions, the relentless recurrences are therefore not considered as reinfection. It could be learnt a lot from patients and from research done on the causes of repeated urinary tract infections, especially due to the bacterium E. coli. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains may contain virulence factors that allow the bacteria to penetrate into the transitional cells and form quiescent intracellular reservoirs (QIRs). Establishment of QIRs throughout the underlying transitional epithelium may predispose an individual to an increased likelihood of recurrence and may account for some of the frequent same-strain recurrences that are seen clinically despite appropriate antibiotic therapy. A difficult aspect of treating urinary tract infections in women is the high likelihood of recurrence. In a series of trials a group of susceptible women averaged 2.6 infections per patient per year despite the apparent effectiveness of short-term therapy. While long-term prophylaxis was relatively effective in that series, resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by urinary pathogens increased to 19% in a 5-year period. Although there is debate regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy, emergence of drug-resistant organisms has to be considered with prolonged antibiotic use, even in healthy women with uncomplicated UTIs. A number of triggers lead to the reactivation of dormant E.coli already in the bladder, or the release of E.coli pods from behind biofilms in the bladder. When a first UTI is caused by E. coli, the risk of a second infection within 6 months is greater than when a first infection is cause by another uropathogen. Although E. coli was the most frequently isolated microorganism in our group of patients, the limited number of patients studied could not confirm this assumption. The chemical structure of D-Mannose causes it to stick to E. coli bacteria, maybe even more tenaciously than E. coli adheres to human cells. Although the mechanism of how it works is complicated, theoretically, if enough D-mannose is present in the urine, it binds to the bacteria and prevents them from attaching to the urinary tract lining. Our clinical experience shows that D Mannose represents a useful choice to address the problem of recurrent UTIs. The time required to develop a new infection, or for the re-emergence of the bacterial reservoir, as can be assumed from new data, is significantly longer with a prolonged course of oral D Mannose than with antibiotic treatment, even when these are used for long periods at a low dose, or in cycles. We actually know mannose has no bactericidal properties, and it might well be that the dosage and duration of therapy have to be individualized according to bacterial growth and replication speed in the bladder and urinary tract. The major part of mannose ingested is eliminated with urine and works by binding to bacteria concentrated in infected urine and attempting to perpetuate infection by binding to mannose receptors of urothelial bladder cells, this mechanism being the one involved in most cases of recurrences. In most cases recurrences are wrongly regarded as re-infections: it is highly likely that bactericidal molecules not possessing the same properties cannot produce the same consistent effect, that is the elimination of more and more loads of bacteria with urine, "alive" albeit inactivated, motionless, devoid of pathogenic potential due to mannose linked to them.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| D Mannose | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: D Mannose, Drug: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole1 gr. every 8 hours for 2 weeks, subsequently 1 gr. every 12 hours for 22 weeks |
| trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: D Mannose, Drug: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazoleintervention was a 5-days course of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole cp 160 mg/800 mg twice a day. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients 18 years old or older
- 3 or more culture documented urinary tract infections in the preceding 12 months
- Patients who had not taken antimicrobials within 4 weeks and were not pregnant or contemplating pregnancy.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with evidence of upper urinary tract infection, such as temperature higher than 38 °C, flank/lumbar pain or tenderness.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| D MannoseAlso: sugar1 gr. every 8 hours | Dietary supplement | D Mannose, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole |
| trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazoleAlso: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mgone cp b.i.d. for 5 days. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks | Drug | D Mannose, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole |
Primary outcome
Days
Time frame: 168
time required to develop the next urinary tract infection; evaluation by means of urine analysis and urine culture
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 9822381Mulvey MA, Lopez-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Roth R, Parks WC, Heuser J, Hultgren SJ. Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998 Nov 20;282(5393):1494-7. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1494.
- Background: PubMed 11402001Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Hultgren SJ. Establishment of a persistent Escherichia coli reservoir during the acute phase of a bladder infection. Infect Immun. 2001 Jul;69(7):4572-9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4572-4579.2001.
- Background: PubMed 10922042Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Martinez JJ, Hultgren SJ. Bad bugs and beleaguered bladders: interplay between uropathogenic Escherichia coli and innate host defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):8829-35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8829.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36041061Cooper TE, Teng C, Howell M, Teixeira-Pinto A, Jaure A, Wong G. D-mannose for preventing and treating urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;8(8):CD013608. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013608.pub2.
- related referenceLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Characterization of Vaginal, Urinary and Fecal Microbiomes in Women With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
Urinary Tract Infections, Menopause
Active, not recruiting
Probiotic Supplement for Recurrent UTIs in Healthy Women (L. Plantarum, L. Rhamnosus, B. Lactis)
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
RecruitingPhase 3
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of U101 Oral Capsules in the Prevention of Uncomplicated rUTIs in Women
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Women
Active, not recruiting
Effect of a Probiotic on the Urinary Tract Microbiota of Participants With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection.
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Topical Steroids to Prevent Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Uncircumcised Male Infants: a Pilot Study
Urinary Tract Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniele Porru, MD principal investigator
Urology Dept. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing D Mannose and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in people with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection, run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Days (time frame: 168). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01808755, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2014.