Venous ThrombosesNCT01810237
Validation of a Novel Dabigatran Based Peri-Operative Bridging Anticoagulation Protocol for Patients on Chronic Warfarin Therapy
A study testing Dabigatran. in people with Venous Thromboses, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority.
Trial summary
Research Questions: 1. Does using dabigatran bridging result in consistent therapeutic anticoagulation? What percentage of patients will become subtherapeutic on warfarin once dabigatran is stopped? 2. What is the incidence of bleeding events with the use of dabigatran overlapped with warfarin for bridging? 3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Thromboses
- What is being tested?
- Dabigatran.
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Low risk status VTE
- Chronic warfarin therapy of at least 12 months duration with target INR of 2.0-3.0
Who cannot join
- Increased risk of bleeding: bleeding requiring transfusion in last 12 months, history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage, recent gastrointestinal bleeding {<6 months}, history of a bleeding disorder
- Pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed
- Inhibitors allergy/sensitivity to dabigatran etexilate
- Creatinine Clearance < 30 mls/min
- Concomitant treatment with strong P-glycoprotein
- Known thrombophilia including Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
- Inability to provide written informed consent
About this study
Research Questions:
- Does using dabigatran bridging result in consistent therapeutic anticoagulation? What percentage of patients will become subtherapeutic on warfarin once dabigatran is stopped?
- What is the incidence of bleeding events with the use of dabigatran overlapped with warfarin for bridging?
- What is the cost benefit of using dabigatran instead of dalteparin for bridging anticoagulation?
Read the detailed description
Subject Selection:
The study population will include low risk patients on long-term warfarin therapy for venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) followed by the hematology anticoagulation clinic. Low risk will be defined as status greater than 12 months post thromboembolic event.
The inclusion criteria include: (1) Low risk status as defined above, (2) Chronic warfarin therapy of at least 12 months duration with target INR of 2.0-3.0. Patients will be excluded from the study if one or more of the following are met: (1) increased risk of bleeding: bleeding requiring transfusion in last 12 months, history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage, recent gastrointestinal bleeding {<6 months}, history of a bleeding disorder, (2) Pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed, (3) inhibitors allergy/sensitivity to dabigatran etexilate, (4)Creatinine Clearance < 30 mls/min, (5) Concomitant treatment with strong P-glycoprotein (6) Known thrombophilia including Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and (7) inability to provide written informed consent.
Research Plan:
Patients will be identified by performing a manual search of the anticoagulation clinic database to identify patients on long-term warfarin therapy (>12 months). The results will be gleaned to identify patients who meet the inclusion criteria listed above.
Patients will then be contacted via phone by one of the anticoagulation clinic personnel who will be known to the patient and familiar with their history. If the patient is interested in participating in the study they will be asked to come in for an assessment to elucidate whether they meet inclusion criteria as described above. The coordinator will discuss the study principles, goals, and risks. If they are interested in the study informed consent will be obtained by the study coordinator, If they are not interested in participating in the study they will be excluded.
All patients enrolled in the study will undergo a planned sham surgery bridging protocol. This will take place for all patients over a 2 week period, which is the study period
On day -5, patients will stop taking their warfarin. They will have a baseline CBC, INR, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and thrombin time (TT) drawn. They will have an INR, aPTT and TT drawn daily for the duration of the study period, except the sham surgery day and the following day, until Day +5 post the sham surgery day or longer until the INR is = 2. If INR = 2 by Day -2 after stopping the warfarin, Vitamin K will be adminstered orally to help reversing the INR to normal. When the INR falls to <2.0, dabigatran will be started at a therapeutic dose of 150 mg orally twice daily. This will continue until the sham surgery day,. On the evening of the sham surgery day, warfarin will be restarted at twice the patient's maintenance dose to a maximum of 10 mg orally. Dabigatran will be decreased to a prophylactic dose of 150 mg orally daily. Warfarin dosing will be adjusted for each patient based on the day +2 INR. Dabigatran prophylaxis will continue until the INR is greater or equal to 2.0, at which point it will be discontinued and warfarin maintained. The INR will be checked the day after dabigatran is discontinued.
Basic demographic information will be collected from the study participants including age and sex. Patient's weight, medical history, current medications, and indication for long-term warfarin therapy will be recorded.
Safety Reporting The study will closely follow laboratory testing as it relates to coagulation status (INR, pTT, PTT, and CBC). All serious adverse events will be captured and appropriately assessed by the Principal Investigator as to causality and expectedness.
An adverse drug reaction is any noxious and unintended response to the study drug that is caused by administration of the drug. Lack of efficacy is not considered an adverse drug reaction. Untoward medical occurrences will be considered adverse drug reactions if a causal relationship between the event and the study drug cannot be ruled out.
An adverse event considered "serious" if it meets any of the following criteria:
- Results in death,
- Is life-threatening,
- Requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization,
- Results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity,
- Is a congenital anomaly / birth defect, or
- Is an important medical event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above.
Should any serious unexpected adverse drug reactions occur, it will be reported to Health Canada in accordance with the Regulations Amending the Food \& Drug Regulations (1024 - Clinical Trials), Section C.05.014.
- Where it is neither fatal nor life-threatening, within 15 days after becoming aware of the information
- Where it is fatal or life-threatening, immediately where possible and, in any event, within 7 days after becoming aware of the information, and
- Within 8 days after having informed Health Canada of the ADR, submit as complete a report as possible which includes an assessment of the importance and implication of any findings.
All serious unexpected adverse drug reactions (and other safety events as applicable) will be reported to the Capital Health Research Ethics Board.
Analysis of data:
To address our primary objective, investigators will look at the percentage of patients in our cohort of 40 who have normal INR, on day 0 (sham surgery day) and thus would be ready to proceed with surgial intervention. Simple statistics will be used to calculate this percentage.
For patients who do not have corrected INR on day 0, and thus would have surgery delayed, a multivariate analysis to elucidate which factors contribute to insufficient normalization of bleeding tests will be performed.
Perioperative bridging anticoagulation with dabigatran and warfarin has not been studied previously, and investigators do not know the significance of the overlap on the INR. It is possible that patients will be under-anticoagulated in the post-operative period. An exploratory analysis will be performed to see if this is the case.
Lastly, a cost analysis will be performed comparing this dabigatran based bridging protocol with our current standard of care, a dalteparin based bridging protocol.
Confidentiality:
Patient information will be maintained in paper copy in the office of Dr. Sudeep Shivakumar in a locked cabinet. Only members of the study team will have access to this information. For the purposes of data-analysis, this information will be entered into a database within the CDHA firewall and will be password protected. Patients will be given a study identification number and therefore no identifiable information will be kept in the database. The study team will keep a list of screened and enrolled patients with corresponding study identification number. t
Once data analysis has been completed this information will be stored at the Capital Health Centre for Clinical Research in the Research Archive Room and then at an offsite storage facility leased by Capital Health (Iron Mountain, Hammonds Plains) for 25 years as per ICH-GCP Guidelines.
Drs. Shivakumar, McCurdy, Sharif, Anderson, and Shawwa are bound by physician-patient confidentiality.
Harms:
There is a theoretical risk of bleeding in this study, although exceedingly low.
There is a theoretical risk of bleeding when restarting warfarin while on prophylactic dabigatran. Bleeding laboratory parameters will be followed daily, except the day of Sham surgery and day 1, and this will allow us to detect any abnormalities in coagulation testing.
Lastly, there is a risk of allergy/sensitivity to Dabigatran.
Benefits:
There are three main benefits of this study:
- Dabigatran offers an oral alternative to subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin. Subcutaneous injections can be painful and intimidating for many patients. An oral alternative is painless and easy to administer.
- An increasing number of patients are being managed with dabigatran outside the context of clinical trials. No prior studies have evaluated dabigatran in the peri-operative setting and specifically the re-institution of warfarin.
- LMWH regimens are very costly. Using the protocols as outlined above, the average cost per bridge in the LMWH regimen is $225.00 CDN whereas with Dabigatran it is $18.00 CDN, savings of $207.00 CDN per patient.
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboses
- Being tested
- Dabigatran.
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dabigatran.Drug
Dabigatran will be used instead of LMWH for anticoagulation bridging.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dabigtran instead of LMWH for perioperative bridging. | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Dabigatran. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Validation of a novel Dabigatran Based Peri-Operative Bridging Anticoagulation Protocol for Patients on Chronic Warfarin Therapy
Measured: 1 Year.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionJul 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Why it stopped: No patients recruited
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Venous ThrombosesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nova Scotia Health AuthorityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sudeep Shivakumar, Nova Scotia Health Authority
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01810237
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SS001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of a Novel Dabigatran Based Peri-Operative Bridging Anticoagulation Protocol for Patients on Chronic Warfarin Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01810237
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SS001
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboses
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: No patients recruited
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Research Questions:
- Does using dabigatran bridging result in consistent therapeutic anticoagulation? What percentage of patients will become subtherapeutic on warfarin once dabigatran is stopped?
- What is the incidence of bleeding events with the use of dabigatran overlapped with warfarin for bridging?
- What is the cost benefit of using dabigatran instead of dalteparin for bridging anticoagulation?
Detailed description
Subject Selection:
The study population will include low risk patients on long-term warfarin therapy for venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) followed by the hematology anticoagulation clinic. Low risk will be defined as status greater than 12 months post thromboembolic event.
The inclusion criteria include: (1) Low risk status as defined above, (2) Chronic warfarin therapy of at least 12 months duration with target INR of 2.0-3.0. Patients will be excluded from the study if one or more of the following are met: (1) increased risk of bleeding: bleeding requiring transfusion in last 12 months, history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage, recent gastrointestinal bleeding {<6 months}, history of a bleeding disorder, (2) Pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed, (3) inhibitors allergy/sensitivity to dabigatran etexilate, (4)Creatinine Clearance < 30 mls/min, (5) Concomitant treatment with strong P-glycoprotein (6) Known thrombophilia including Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and (7) inability to provide written informed consent.
Research Plan:
Patients will be identified by performing a manual search of the anticoagulation clinic database to identify patients on long-term warfarin therapy (>12 months). The results will be gleaned to identify patients who meet the inclusion criteria listed above.
Patients will then be contacted via phone by one of the anticoagulation clinic personnel who will be known to the patient and familiar with their history. If the patient is interested in participating in the study they will be asked to come in for an assessment to elucidate whether they meet inclusion criteria as described above. The coordinator will discuss the study principles, goals, and risks. If they are interested in the study informed consent will be obtained by the study coordinator, If they are not interested in participating in the study they will be excluded.
All patients enrolled in the study will undergo a planned sham surgery bridging protocol. This will take place for all patients over a 2 week period, which is the study period
On day -5, patients will stop taking their warfarin. They will have a baseline CBC, INR, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and thrombin time (TT) drawn. They will have an INR, aPTT and TT drawn daily for the duration of the study period, except the sham surgery day and the following day, until Day +5 post the sham surgery day or longer until the INR is = 2. If INR = 2 by Day -2 after stopping the warfarin, Vitamin K will be adminstered orally to help reversing the INR to normal. When the INR falls to <2.0, dabigatran will be started at a therapeutic dose of 150 mg orally twice daily. This will continue until the sham surgery day,. On the evening of the sham surgery day, warfarin will be restarted at twice the patient's maintenance dose to a maximum of 10 mg orally. Dabigatran will be decreased to a prophylactic dose of 150 mg orally daily. Warfarin dosing will be adjusted for each patient based on the day +2 INR. Dabigatran prophylaxis will continue until the INR is greater or equal to 2.0, at which point it will be discontinued and warfarin maintained. The INR will be checked the day after dabigatran is discontinued.
Basic demographic information will be collected from the study participants including age and sex. Patient's weight, medical history, current medications, and indication for long-term warfarin therapy will be recorded.
Safety Reporting The study will closely follow laboratory testing as it relates to coagulation status (INR, pTT, PTT, and CBC). All serious adverse events will be captured and appropriately assessed by the Principal Investigator as to causality and expectedness.
An adverse drug reaction is any noxious and unintended response to the study drug that is caused by administration of the drug. Lack of efficacy is not considered an adverse drug reaction. Untoward medical occurrences will be considered adverse drug reactions if a causal relationship between the event and the study drug cannot be ruled out.
An adverse event considered "serious" if it meets any of the following criteria:
- Results in death,
- Is life-threatening,
- Requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization,
- Results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity,
- Is a congenital anomaly / birth defect, or
- Is an important medical event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above.
Should any serious unexpected adverse drug reactions occur, it will be reported to Health Canada in accordance with the Regulations Amending the Food \& Drug Regulations (1024 - Clinical Trials), Section C.05.014.
- Where it is neither fatal nor life-threatening, within 15 days after becoming aware of the information
- Where it is fatal or life-threatening, immediately where possible and, in any event, within 7 days after becoming aware of the information, and
- Within 8 days after having informed Health Canada of the ADR, submit as complete a report as possible which includes an assessment of the importance and implication of any findings.
All serious unexpected adverse drug reactions (and other safety events as applicable) will be reported to the Capital Health Research Ethics Board.
Analysis of data:
To address our primary objective, investigators will look at the percentage of patients in our cohort of 40 who have normal INR, on day 0 (sham surgery day) and thus would be ready to proceed with surgial intervention. Simple statistics will be used to calculate this percentage.
For patients who do not have corrected INR on day 0, and thus would have surgery delayed, a multivariate analysis to elucidate which factors contribute to insufficient normalization of bleeding tests will be performed.
Perioperative bridging anticoagulation with dabigatran and warfarin has not been studied previously, and investigators do not know the significance of the overlap on the INR. It is possible that patients will be under-anticoagulated in the post-operative period. An exploratory analysis will be performed to see if this is the case.
Lastly, a cost analysis will be performed comparing this dabigatran based bridging protocol with our current standard of care, a dalteparin based bridging protocol.
Confidentiality:
Patient information will be maintained in paper copy in the office of Dr. Sudeep Shivakumar in a locked cabinet. Only members of the study team will have access to this information. For the purposes of data-analysis, this information will be entered into a database within the CDHA firewall and will be password protected. Patients will be given a study identification number and therefore no identifiable information will be kept in the database. The study team will keep a list of screened and enrolled patients with corresponding study identification number. t
Once data analysis has been completed this information will be stored at the Capital Health Centre for Clinical Research in the Research Archive Room and then at an offsite storage facility leased by Capital Health (Iron Mountain, Hammonds Plains) for 25 years as per ICH-GCP Guidelines.
Drs. Shivakumar, McCurdy, Sharif, Anderson, and Shawwa are bound by physician-patient confidentiality.
Harms:
There is a theoretical risk of bleeding in this study, although exceedingly low.
There is a theoretical risk of bleeding when restarting warfarin while on prophylactic dabigatran. Bleeding laboratory parameters will be followed daily, except the day of Sham surgery and day 1, and this will allow us to detect any abnormalities in coagulation testing.
Lastly, there is a risk of allergy/sensitivity to Dabigatran.
Benefits:
There are three main benefits of this study:
- Dabigatran offers an oral alternative to subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin. Subcutaneous injections can be painful and intimidating for many patients. An oral alternative is painless and easy to administer.
- An increasing number of patients are being managed with dabigatran outside the context of clinical trials. No prior studies have evaluated dabigatran in the peri-operative setting and specifically the re-institution of warfarin.
- LMWH regimens are very costly. Using the protocols as outlined above, the average cost per bridge in the LMWH regimen is $225.00 CDN whereas with Dabigatran it is $18.00 CDN, savings of $207.00 CDN per patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dabigtran instead of LMWH for perioperative bridging. | Experimental | Drug: Dabigatran. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Low risk status VTE
- Chronic warfarin therapy of at least 12 months duration with target INR of 2.0-3.0
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Increased risk of bleeding: bleeding requiring transfusion in last 12 months, history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage, recent gastrointestinal bleeding {<6 months}, history of a bleeding disorder
- Pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed
- Inhibitors allergy/sensitivity to dabigatran etexilate
- Creatinine Clearance < 30 mls/min
- Concomitant treatment with strong P-glycoprotein
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dabigatran.Dabigatran will be used instead of LMWH for anticoagulation bridging. | Drug | Dabigtran instead of LMWH for perioperative bridging. |
Primary outcome
Validation of a novel Dabigatran Based Peri-Operative Bridging Anticoagulation Protocol for Patients on Chronic Warfarin Therapy
Time frame: 1 Year.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2017.
Related trials for Venous Thromboses
RecruitingPhase 2
SBRT With Immunotherapy and Atezo-Bev in HCC With Major Portal Vein Thrombosis
HCC
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dabigatran. in people with Venous Thromboses, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Validation of a novel Dabigatran Based Peri-Operative Bridging Anticoagulation Protocol for Patients on Chronic Warfarin Therapy (time frame: 1 Year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2017.