AzTrials
AzTrials

Influenza, HumanPhase 2/3NCT01810731

Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Influenza Vaccines in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected Pregnant Women in Western Kenya

A Phase 2/3 study testing Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV), Inactivated Polio Vaccine and Double Dose QIV in people with Influenza, Human and HIV, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Kenya.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In 2012, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) concluded that pregnant women are the most important risk group for season influenza vaccination based upon "compelling evidence of substantial risk of severe disease in this group and evidence that seasonal influenza vaccine is safe and effective in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 49 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Influenza, Human, HIV, Malaria
What is being tested?
Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV), Inactivated Polio Vaccine and Double Dose QIV
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteKenya
Study dates
Apr 2014to Apr 2014
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 49 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Resident of HDSS village
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Second or third trimester (after quickening) but before 33 weeks of gestation by fundal height
  • Does not plan to relocate out of the HDSS area or population-based surveillance site in the next 12 months and agrees to all follow-up visits/contact by phone
  • Is not currently enrolled in another intervention study
  • Provides informed consent by signature or thumb print
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Consents to HIV testing and counseling as required
  • Willing to deliver in the labor ward of the study hospital
  • No history of chronic illness requiring multiple hospitalizations or prolonged medical therapy (except HIV on ART)

Who cannot join

  • History of allergic reaction to any component of the study vaccines
  • Residence outside the study area or planning to relocate out in the 9 months following enrollment
  • Received immunoglobulin or blood products within 45 days of study entry
  • Used immunosuppressive medication within 45 days of study entry (inhaled and topical corticosteroids permitted)
  • High risk pregnancy including any pre-existing condition likely to cause complications of pregnancy (hypertension, diabetes, current asthma, eclampsia or pre-eclampsia, epilepsy, heart disease, renal disease, liver disease, fistula repair, leg or spine deformity)
  • Unable to give informed consent (for example due to mental disability)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Previous enrollment in a study with similar interventions
  • Gestational age >32 weeks by last menstrual period or fundal height
  • Acutely ill with temperature ≥37.5°C on the day of randomization/vaccination
  • Hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL
  • Influenza vaccination in previous 12 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Kenya1 site
  • Siaya District Hospital

    Siaya

Other trials in Kenya

About this study

Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of Standard Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, and Double Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Pregnant Women in a Malaria-Endemic Area of Rural Western Kenya

In 2012, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) concluded that pregnant women are the most important risk group for season influenza vaccination based upon "compelling evidence of substantial risk of severe disease in this group and evidence that seasonal influenza vaccine is safe and effective in preventing disease in pregnant women as well as their young infants, in whom disease burden is also high". Recent data from Kenya, similarly suggest rates of influenza-associated hospitalizations in children under age 1 to be as high, or higher, than those observed in the United States. However, TIV may have reduced immunogenicity in HIV-infected adults, and HIV infection has been shown to reduce placental transfer of both tetanus and measles antibodies. Therefore, we propose to conduct a double-blind randomized controlled trial of influenza vaccines stratified by HIV status in up to 720 pregnant women in their second and third trimesters and their infants residing in health and demographic surveillance sites (HDSS) in Nyanza Province, Western Kenya. We propose to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of standard dose QIV and double dose QIV in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected pregnant women. Findings will inform maternal influenza vaccination policies in Kenya and other African countries.

Read the detailed description

Recent investments in influenza surveillance in many African countries confirm results from other countries that young children, pregnant women, and those with chronic medical conditions are at increased risk of hospitalization and death from influenza infection. Annual influenza vaccination is the most effective method for preventing influenza virus infection and its complications. Vaccination is currently recommended in high risk groups in many developed countries and the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization made a recommendation for vaccination of pregnant women in their 2005 position paper on influenza vaccine. In 2012, the SAGE further concluded that pregnant women are the most important risk group for inactivated seasonal influenza vaccination based upon "compelling evidence of substantial risk of severe disease in this group and evidence that seasonal influenza vaccine is safe and effective in preventing disease in pregnant women as well as their young infants, in whom disease burden is also high".

Maternal influenza immunization is viewed as the most effective way to protect infants less than 6 months of age who are not yet eligible for immunization. In the United States, children under 6 months experience very high rates of influenza-associated hospitalization and are among those most at risk of severe outcomes. Recent data from Kenya, similarly suggest rates of influenza-associated hospitalizations in children under age 1 to be as high, or higher, than those observed in the United States. Vaccination of pregnant women provides protection to their infants against laboratory-confirmed influenza illness in the first months of life. Furthermore, vaccination of pregnant women has been associated with a decreased risk of pre-term birth and small for gestational age in Canada and the state of Georgia in the US, and increased birth weight in infants during periods of high transmission in Bangladesh. However, traditional TIV may have reduced immunogenicity in HIV-infected adults, and HIV infection has been shown to reduce placental transfer of both tetanus and measles antibodies. The high prevalence of other diseases, including malaria and malnutrition, may also impact the effectiveness of influenza vaccination for pregnant women and their infants in sub-Saharan Africa.

Use of double dose QIV may produce a greater immune response in pregnant women and increased antibody production may improve transplacental transfer of influenza antibodies to the developing fetus, conferring a better or possibly longer duration of protection from influenza infection. Therefore, we propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial of influenza vaccines in a high HIV-prevalence, malaria-endemic setting in Kenya, using inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) as a comparator/control. We propose to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of standard dose (15 µg) QIV (FLUARIX® (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Dresden, Germany) and double dose (30 µg) QIV in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected pregnant women.

OBJECTIVES:

  1. To evaluate the immunogenicity of standard dose (15 µg) QIV and double dose (30 µg) QIV in HIV-infected and uninfected pregnant women
  2. To evaluate the level of vaccine-induced influenza antibody transfer to infants of HIV-infected and uninfected pregnant women who receive standard dose (15 µg) QIV or double dose (30 µg) QIV
  3. To evaluate the safety of standard dose (15 µg) QIV and double dose (30 µg) QIV in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected pregnant women and fetus

DESIGN:

This trial will be conducted as a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial stratified by HIV status in up to 720 pregnant women in their second and third trimesters and their infants residing in health and demographic surveillance sites (HDSS) around Siaya District Hospital and Lwak Mission Hospital in Nyanza Province, Western Kenya. The study will be conducted in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards. Mothers must agree to be counseled and tested for HIV at the time of screening and enrollment unless there is written documentation of HIV infection or a negative HIV test in the last 3 months. After initial screening for eligibility and informed consent, enrolled women will be stratified by HIV status (infected, uninfected) and block randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive standard dose (15 µg) QIV, double dose (30 µg) QIV or IPV. The day of vaccination will be considered study Day 0 for each subject. Each subject will receive a single vaccination. For the first 240 enrolled women, study personnel will visit their homes on Days 1, 2, and 3 to do active surveillance for adverse events following vaccination. Pregnancy outcomes will be recorded for all subjects (live birth, still birth, or spontaneous abortion). HIV testing will be repeated at birth for all women with negative results at screening. Live and still born infants will be examined by trained study personnel in the first 24 hours after delivery to determine birth weight, length, assess gestational age, and identify possible congenital anomalies associated with vaccination.

All enrolled subjects will be asked to return to the antenatal study clinic on Study Day 7, Day 28, Day 56 (if not delivered), for delivery, and for any febrile or respiratory illness or other concern. During the enrollment process, their mobile telephone number will be recorded (or a number will be recorded for someone they identify in the village with a mobile telephone who will be willing to transmit information to them). Participants will be contacted by phone or in person every 2 weeks to determine if they have had fever and/or cough during the prior 2 weeks. Subjects with fever only will receive a malaria smear and other treatment as appropriate per Kenya Ministry of Health (MOH) guidelines. Subjects with fever or cough will have respiratory specimens collected via placement of NP/OP swabs by trained clinical personnel for influenza testing. After delivery, subjects will be asked to bring infants to the study clinic for evaluation on Days 7, 42, and 70 of life and when the child is approximately 6 months of age. Infants will also be under surveillance for fever, history of fever, hypothermia and/or cough for the first 6 months of life. All febrile, hypothermic, and/or coughing infants will receive testing for malaria and nasopharyngeal (NP)and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs for influenza. Febrile infants under 2 months of age will receive additional testing and treatment per national guidelines. Any infant admitted to the hospital with any respiratory symptom, hypothermia, apnea or fever will receive testing for influenza by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) of NP/OP specimens.

Vaccine immunogenicity will be evaluated by comparing hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers on Day 0 and Day 28 and at delivery in the mother, in cord blood, in the mother and infant at infant Day 70 of life, and in the infant at approximately 6 months of age. We will determine the proportion of vaccinated women who achieve a fourfold rise in HI titers post-vaccination compared to pre-vaccination or an HI titer ≥40 for subjects with baseline HI titer <10, compared to the same outcome in controls. The proportion of HI titers ≥40 in cord blood and in infants will also be measured and compared among vaccine recipients and controls. Geometric means of HI titers will also be compared.

Being tested
Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV), Inactivated Polio Vaccine, Double Dose QIV
Keywords
influenza vaccine immunogenicity, HIV, pregnancy, influenza vaccine safety
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human, Malaria, Tetanus, Poliomyelitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV)Biological

    Also called Fluarix, (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Dresden, Germany)

  • Inactivated Polio VaccineBiological

    Also called Imovax, Sanofi Pasteur SA

  • Double Dose QIVBiological

    Also called Fluarix (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Dresden, Germany)

Study groups in NCT01810731
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV)Experimental15µg of each of 2 influenza A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 influenza B strains in a buffer solution totaling 0.5mL which is administered intramuscularly. Administered as a single dose on the day of enrollment.
Receives: Biological: Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV)
Inactivated Polio VaccineActive comparatorA sterile suspension of three types of poliovirus: Type 1 (Mahoney), Type 2 (MEF1) and Type 3 (Saukett). This vaccine is prepared from types 1, 2 and 3 of poliomyelitis virus cultured on Vero cells, purified and then inactivated by formaldehyde and administered as a 0.5ml intramuscular or subcutaneous injection. A single dose of vaccine will be administered upon enrollment.
Receives: Biological: Inactivated Polio Vaccine
Double Dose QIVExperimental30µg of each of 2 influenza A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 influenza B strains in a buffer solution totaling 1.0mL which is administered intramuscularly. Administered as a single dose on the day of enrollment.
Receives: Biological: Double Dose QIV

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of women with an appropriate rise in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titers

    The proportion of standard dose (15 µg) QIV and double dose (30 µg) QIV recipients with a fourfold rise in HI titers or HI titers ≥40 if baseline HI titer <10 compared to the same proportion in controls

    Measured: Enrollment (Day 0) vs. Day 28 for each study arm

  2. Proportion of infants born to standard dose (15 µg) QIV and double dose (30 µg) QIV recipients with HI titers greater than or equal to 40 in cord blood compared to same in controls.

    Measured: At delivery

  3. Number of solicited and unsolicited adverse events post-vaccination by study arm

    Measured: During follow-up period, approx. 9 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Vaccine efficacy of standard dose (15 µg) QIV and double dose (30 µg) QIV in mothers and infants compared to control mothers and infants.

    Incidence of influenza infection will be measured in all participants by surveillance for influenza-like illness (ILI) throughout the study period. Women with fever and cough will be tested for influenza via rRT-PCR of NP/OP swabs. Infants with fever, hypothermia, apnea or any respiratory symptom will also be tested for influenza via rRT-PCR of NP/OP swabs.

    Measured: Entire follow-up period, approx. 9 months

  2. HIV infection and placental antibody transfer

    Compare geometric mean HI titers and geometric mean tetanus antibody titers at delivery in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected mothers with titers in cord blood.

    Measured: Delivery

  3. Birth weight

    Compare birth weight adjusted for gestational age among standard dose (15 µg) QIV and double dose (30 µg) QIV recipients compared to controls.

    Measured: Delivery

  4. Peripheral and placental parasitemia impact on vaccination

    Compare change in geometric mean HI titers from day 0 to day 28 in women with and without peripheral parasitemia at the time of vaccination. Compare amount of passive antibody transfer to infants in cord blood in mothers with and without placental parasitemia

    Measured: Day 0 and delivery

  5. baseline polio immunity and polio antibody transfer

    Assess baseline immunity to polio types 1, 2, 3 among all study participants. Assess polio antibody transfer to infants from mothers who did and did not receive IPV.

    Measured: day 0 and delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionApr 2014

Why it stopped: Scientific review positive from 3 manufacturers; internal committees did not support due to deploying new flu vaccines in HIV+ pregnant women in Kenya.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01810731
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDC-NCIRD-6393
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
12 Mar 2013
Last updated
10 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV), Inactivated Polio Vaccine and Double Dose QIV in people with Influenza, Human and HIV, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Kenya.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of women with an appropriate rise in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titers (time frame: Enrollment (Day 0) vs. Day 28 for each study arm). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in