Endometrial NeoplasmsSTELLANCT01810874
STELLA Trial: Transperitoneal vs. Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic Staging of Endometrial/Ovarian Cancer
A study testing Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy and Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy in people with Endometrial Neoplasms and Ovarian Neoplasms, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the extraperitoneal approach is better than the transperitoneal approach for laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial or ovarian cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy and Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Jun 2012to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of endometrial cancer confirmed by histopathological analysis (endometrial biopsy) requiring surgical staging according to FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) recommendations
- Diagnosis of ovarian cancer confirmed by histopathological analysis after an initial cystectomy or oophorectomy without suspicion of neoplasia thus requiring additional surgical staging according to FIGO recommendations
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of advanced endometrial cancer based on findings on imaging techniques (CT, MRI and/or PET)
- Diagnosis of advanced endometrial or ovarian cancer based on intraoperative findings (e.g. peritoneal carcinomatosis at initial laparoscopy)
- Patients who underwent previous aortic lymphadenectomy
- Patients who received previous pelvic and/or aortic radiotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Bacelona, Barcelona, 08035
About this study
Official title: STELLA Trial: Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer Comparing the Transperitoneal vs. Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy of Aortic Nodes
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the extraperitoneal approach is better than the transperitoneal approach for laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial or ovarian cancer.
- Conditions
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy, Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy
- Keywords
- extraperitoneal, transperitoneal, laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy, endometrial ovarian cancer, ovarian cancer, surgical staging
- Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomyProcedure or surgery
Also called Transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy
Aortic/para-aortic lymph nodes dissection and retrieval by transperitoneal laparoscopy; the intervention may be completed by robotic-assisted or traditional laparoscopy.
Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomyProcedure or surgery
Also called Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy, Retroperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy, Retroperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy
Aortic/para-aortic lymph nodes dissection and retrieval by extraperitoneal laparoscopy; the intervention may be completed by robotic-assisted or traditional laparoscopy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transperitoneal | Active comparator | Patients who where randomized to transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy. Receives: Procedure: Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy |
| Extraperitoneal | Experimental | Patients who where randomized to extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy. Receives: Procedure: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of lymph nodes
The number of lymph nodes (absolute number) is specified by the pathologist on histopathological analysis of the sample sent by the surgeon after surgical staging is realized (laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy). This variable is subdivided into: supra-mesenteric and infra-mesenteric.
Measured: After aortic lymphadenectomy is completed
Secondary outcomes (6)
Operative time
Total duration of surgery (from initial skin incision to end of skin suture), and total aortic lymphadenectomy time (time spent since the beginning of aortic lymphadenectomy to its completion). Metric: minutes.
Measured: At the time of the surgery
Intraoperative complications
Number of patients presenting intraoperative complications. This variable is also classified according to the type of adverse outcome.
Measured: At the time of surgery
Early Postoperative complications
Number of patients presenting postoperative complications. This variable is also classified according to the type of adverse outcome.
Measured: within 30 days after surgery
Late Postoperative complications
Number of patients presenting postoperative complications. This variable is also classified according to the type of adverse outcome.
Measured: past 30 days after surgery
Overall survival
Number of patients alive after surgery.
Measured: up to 3 years
Disease-free survival
Metric: months. Period of time in which there is no appearance of the symptoms or effects of the disease.
Measured: up to 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2012
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionApr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endometrial NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundación Mutua Madrileña
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Antonio Gil Moreno, M.D., PhD, Study chair, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaBerta Díaz Feijoo, M.D., PhD, Study director, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaJose Luis Sánchez, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaAlejandro Correa Paris, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaM. Assumpció Pérez-Benavente, M.D., PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaSilvia Cabrera Díaz, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaSilvia Franco Camps, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaOriol Puig Puig, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01810874
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STELLA
- Acronym
- STELLA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Gil-Moreno A, Franco-Camps S, Cabrera S, Perez-Benavente A, Martinez-Gomez X, Garcia A, Xercavins J. Pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb;18(2):482-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1320-9. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
PubMed 20839058Gil-Moreno A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Perez-Benavente A, del Campo JM, Xercavins J, Martinez-Palones JM. Impact of extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy on treatment and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep;110(3 Suppl 2):S33-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.024. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
PubMed 18538379Gil-Moreno A, Maffuz A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Puig O, Martinez-Palones JM, Perez A, Garcia A, Xercavins J. Modified approach for extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging for locally advanced cervical cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Dec;26(4):451-8.
PubMed 18365538Gil-Moreno A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Morchon S, Xercavins J. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.08.013.
PubMed 16431320Dowdy SC, Aletti G, Cliby WA, Podratz KC, Mariani A. Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy--a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.021. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
PubMed 18835020Magrina JF, Kho R, Montero RP, Magtibay PM, Pawlina W. Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: Development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.038. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
PubMed 19157527Franco-Camps S, Cabrera S, Perez-Benavente A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Bradbury M, Xercavins J, Gil-Moreno A. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of aortic lymph node recurrence in gynecologic malignancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.020. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PubMed 20580322Diaz-Feijoo B, Correa-Paris A, Perez-Benavente A, Franco-Camps S, Sanchez-Iglesias JL, Cabrera S, de la Torre J, Centeno C, Puig OP, Gil-Ibanez B, Colas E, Magrina J, Gil-Moreno A. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer: The STELLA Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;23(9):2966-74. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5229-9. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
PubMed 27098143
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- STELLA Trial: Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer Comparing the Transperitoneal vs. Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy of Aortic Nodes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01810874
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STELLA / STELLA
- Conditions
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms
- Keywords
- extraperitoneal, transperitoneal, laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy, endometrial ovarian cancer, ovarian cancer, surgical staging
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundación Mutua Madrileña
- Study start
- Jun 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the extraperitoneal approach is better than the transperitoneal approach for laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial or ovarian cancer.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transperitoneal | Active comparator | Procedure: Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomyPatients who where randomized to transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy. |
| Extraperitoneal | Experimental | Procedure: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomyPatients who where randomized to extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of endometrial cancer confirmed by histopathological analysis (endometrial biopsy) requiring surgical staging according to FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) recommendations
- Diagnosis of ovarian cancer confirmed by histopathological analysis after an initial cystectomy or oophorectomy without suspicion of neoplasia thus requiring additional surgical staging according to FIGO recommendations
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of advanced endometrial cancer based on findings on imaging techniques (CT, MRI and/or PET)
- Diagnosis of advanced endometrial or ovarian cancer based on intraoperative findings (e.g. peritoneal carcinomatosis at initial laparoscopy)
- Patients who underwent previous aortic lymphadenectomy
- Patients who received previous pelvic and/or aortic radiotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomyAlso: Transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomyAortic/para-aortic lymph nodes dissection and retrieval by transperitoneal laparoscopy; the intervention may be completed by robotic-assisted or traditional laparoscopy. | Procedure or surgery | Transperitoneal |
| Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomyAlso: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy, Retroperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy, Retroperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomyAortic/para-aortic lymph nodes dissection and retrieval by extraperitoneal laparoscopy; the intervention may be completed by robotic-assisted or traditional laparoscopy. | Procedure or surgery | Extraperitoneal |
Primary outcome
Number of lymph nodes
Time frame: After aortic lymphadenectomy is completed
The number of lymph nodes (absolute number) is specified by the pathologist on histopathological analysis of the sample sent by the surgeon after surgical staging is realized (laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy). This variable is subdivided into: supra-mesenteric and infra-mesenteric.
6 secondary outcomes
Operative time
Time frame: At the time of the surgery
Intraoperative complications
Time frame: At the time of surgery
Early Postoperative complications
Time frame: within 30 days after surgery
Late Postoperative complications
Time frame: past 30 days after surgery
Overall survival
Time frame: up to 3 years
Disease-free survival
Time frame: up to 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2015.
- Background: PubMed 20839058Gil-Moreno A, Franco-Camps S, Cabrera S, Perez-Benavente A, Martinez-Gomez X, Garcia A, Xercavins J. Pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb;18(2):482-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1320-9. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
- Background: PubMed 18538379Gil-Moreno A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Perez-Benavente A, del Campo JM, Xercavins J, Martinez-Palones JM. Impact of extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy on treatment and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep;110(3 Suppl 2):S33-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.024. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 18365538Gil-Moreno A, Maffuz A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Puig O, Martinez-Palones JM, Perez A, Garcia A, Xercavins J. Modified approach for extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging for locally advanced cervical cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Dec;26(4):451-8.
- Background: PubMed 16431320Gil-Moreno A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Morchon S, Xercavins J. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.08.013.
- Background: PubMed 18835020Dowdy SC, Aletti G, Cliby WA, Podratz KC, Mariani A. Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy--a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.021. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 19157527Magrina JF, Kho R, Montero RP, Magtibay PM, Pawlina W. Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: Development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.038. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 20580322Franco-Camps S, Cabrera S, Perez-Benavente A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Bradbury M, Xercavins J, Gil-Moreno A. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of aortic lymph node recurrence in gynecologic malignancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.020. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27098143Diaz-Feijoo B, Correa-Paris A, Perez-Benavente A, Franco-Camps S, Sanchez-Iglesias JL, Cabrera S, de la Torre J, Centeno C, Puig OP, Gil-Ibanez B, Colas E, Magrina J, Gil-Moreno A. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer: The STELLA Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;23(9):2966-74. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5229-9. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
Related trials for Endometrial Neoplasms
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Endometrial Cancer Patientes MMR Deficient Comparing Chemotherapy vs Dostarlimab in First Line
Endometrial Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of an Antiangiogenic Drug (Bevacizumab) to Chemotherapy (Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) Combined With Immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab) for pMMR, TP53 Mutated Endometrial Cancer
Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma, Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping on Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction in Stage I Endometrial Cancer
Stage I Uterine Corpus Carcinoma or Carcinosarcoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Antonio Gil Moreno, M.D., PhD study chair
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Berta Díaz Feijoo, M.D., PhD study director
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Jose Luis Sánchez, M.D. principal investigator
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy and Extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy in people with Endometrial Neoplasms and Ovarian Neoplasms, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of lymph nodes (time frame: After aortic lymphadenectomy is completed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01810874, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2015.