Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain InjuryPhase 2NCT01812564
Use of Platelet Rich Plasma in the Management of Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury
A Phase 2 study testing Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) and Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in people with Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury, run by Aspetar at 1 site in Qatar.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of utilizing complex growth factor preparations (Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in the management of acute hamstring injuries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) and Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteQatar
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to Oct 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute onset posterior thigh pain
- MRI confirmed Grade I, II hamstring lesions
- < 5 days from injury
- Able to perform Physiotherapy at ASPETAR (5 sessions/week)
- Available for follow-up
- Male
- Age > 18 years
Who cannot join
- Diabetes, immuno-compromised state
- Overlying skin infection
- Re-injury or Chronic ongoing hamstring injury
- Unwilling to comply with follow up
- Contraindication to MRI
- Needle Phobia
Show all 9Show fewer
- Bleeding disorder or other medical contraindication to injection
- Medication increasing bleeding risk (e.g. Plavix)
- Concurrent other injury inhibiting rehabilitation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Utilization of Growth Factors Preparations in the Management of Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of utilizing complex growth factor preparations (Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in the management of acute hamstring injuries.
The hypothesis is that the time to return to sport is shorter in the patient group treated with Complex Growth Factor Preparations (PRP) in combination with exercise therapy in comparison with 2 control groups:
- the patient group treated with Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) injections in combination with exercise therapy (control injection AND usual care).
- the patient group treated with exercise therapy (usual care)
- Conditions
- Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury
- Being tested
- Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP), Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)
- Keywords
- Platelet rich plasma, Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP)Biological
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Biological
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PPP | Placebo comparator | Placebo: Platelet Poor Plasma
Under sterile conditions, patients will receive under ultrasound guidance 3 times, 1 cc injection of PPP each, administered by a sports medicine physician (total 3 cc PPP).
Following the completion of the injections (treatment or control) physiotherapy will commence. Physiotherapy protocols will be based on current ASPETAR best practice models (usual care) Receives: Biological: Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) |
| PRP | Active comparator | Biological: Platelet Rich Plasma
Under sterile ultrasound conditions, patients will receive under ultrasound guidance 3 times, 1 cc injection of PRP each, administered by a sports medicine physician (total 3 cc PRP).
Following the completion of the injections (treatment or control) physiotherapy will commence. Physiotherapy protocols will be based on current ASPETAR best practice models (usual care) Receives: Biological: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) |
| Physiotherapy | No intervention | These patients will not receive an injection. Following the inclusion physiotherapy will commence. Physiotherapy protocols will be based on current ASPETAR best practice models (usual care) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Return to Play
Time to return to full sports activity; either training or match play.
Measured: Patients will be followed for the duration of time to return to play with an expected average of 27 days and up to 1 year.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Recurrent hamstring lesions.
Measured: 2 months after return to play, 1 year after return to play.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionOct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aspetar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hakim Chalabi, MD, Study director, AspetarBruce Hamilton, MD, Principal investigator, Aspetar
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01812564
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GF012
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Ekstrand J, Healy JC, Walden M, Lee JC, English B, Hagglund M. Hamstring muscle injuries in professional football: the correlation of MRI findings with return to play. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;46(2):112-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090155. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
PubMed 22144005de Vos RJ, Weir A, van Schie HT, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Tol JL. Platelet-rich plasma injection for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):144-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1986.
PubMed 20068208Hamilton BH, Best TM. Platelet-enriched plasma and muscle strain injuries: challenges imposed by the burden of proof. Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Jan;21(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318205a658.
PubMed 21200168Hamilton B, Knez W, Eirale C, Chalabi H. Platelet enriched plasma for acute muscle injury. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010 Aug;76(4):443-8.
PubMed 20973348Zein MI, Mokkenstorm MJK, Cardinale M, Holtzhausen L, Whiteley R, Moen MH, Reurink G, Tol JL; Qatari and Dutch Hamstring Study Group. Baseline clinical and MRI risk factors for hamstring reinjury showing the value of performing baseline MRI and delaying return to play: a multicentre, prospective cohort of 330 acute hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 1;58(14):766-776. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107878.
PubMed 38729628Whiteley R, van Dyk N, Wangensteen A, Hansen C. Clinical implications from daily physiotherapy examination of 131 acute hamstring injuries and their association with running speed and rehabilitation progression. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;52(5):303-310. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097616. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
PubMed 29084725Jacobsen P, Witvrouw E, Muxart P, Tol JL, Whiteley R. A combination of initial and follow-up physiotherapist examination predicts physician-determined time to return to play after hamstring injury, with no added value of MRI. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;50(7):431-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095073. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
PubMed 26843538Wangensteen A, Almusa E, Boukarroum S, Farooq A, Hamilton B, Whiteley R, Bahr R, Tol JL. MRI does not add value over and above patient history and clinical examination in predicting time to return to sport after acute hamstring injuries: a prospective cohort of 180 male athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(24):1579-87. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094892. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
PubMed 26305004Hamilton B, Tol JL, Almusa E, Boukarroum S, Eirale C, Farooq A, Whiteley R, Chalabi H. Platelet-rich plasma does not enhance return to play in hamstring injuries: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;49(14):943-50. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094603.
PubMed 26136179De Vos RJ, Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Moen MH, Weir A, Tol JL. Clinical findings just after return to play predict hamstring re-injury, but baseline MRI findings do not. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(18):1377-84. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093737. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
PubMed 25037201
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Utilization of Growth Factors Preparations in the Management of Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01812564
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GF012
- Conditions
- Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury
- Keywords
- Platelet rich plasma, Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AspetarUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2009
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of utilizing complex growth factor preparations (Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in the management of acute hamstring injuries.
The hypothesis is that the time to return to sport is shorter in the patient group treated with Complex Growth Factor Preparations (PRP) in combination with exercise therapy in comparison with 2 control groups:
- the patient group treated with Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) injections in combination with exercise therapy (control injection AND usual care).
- the patient group treated with exercise therapy (usual care)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PPP | Placebo comparator | Biological: Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP)Placebo: Platelet Poor Plasma Under sterile conditions, patients will receive under ultrasound guidance 3 times, 1 cc injection of PPP each, administered by a sports medicine physician (total 3 cc PPP). Following the completion of the injections (treatment or control) physiotherapy will commence. Physiotherapy protocols will be based on current ASPETAR best practice models (usual care) |
| PRP | Active comparator | Biological: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Biological: Platelet Rich Plasma Under sterile ultrasound conditions, patients will receive under ultrasound guidance 3 times, 1 cc injection of PRP each, administered by a sports medicine physician (total 3 cc PRP). Following the completion of the injections (treatment or control) physiotherapy will commence. Physiotherapy protocols will be based on current ASPETAR best practice models (usual care) |
| Physiotherapy | No intervention | –These patients will not receive an injection. Following the inclusion physiotherapy will commence. Physiotherapy protocols will be based on current ASPETAR best practice models (usual care) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Acute onset posterior thigh pain
- MRI confirmed Grade I, II hamstring lesions
- < 5 days from injury
- Able to perform Physiotherapy at ASPETAR (5 sessions/week)
- Available for follow-up
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Diabetes, immuno-compromised state
- Overlying skin infection
- Re-injury or Chronic ongoing hamstring injury
- Unwilling to comply with follow up
- Contraindication to MRI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) | Biological | PPP |
| Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) | Biological | PRP |
Primary outcome
Time to Return to Play
Time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of time to return to play with an expected average of 27 days and up to 1 year.
Time to return to full sports activity; either training or match play.
1 secondary outcome
Recurrent hamstring lesions.
Time frame: 2 months after return to play, 1 year after return to play.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2015.
- Background: PubMed 22144005Ekstrand J, Healy JC, Walden M, Lee JC, English B, Hagglund M. Hamstring muscle injuries in professional football: the correlation of MRI findings with return to play. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;46(2):112-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090155. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 20068208de Vos RJ, Weir A, van Schie HT, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Tol JL. Platelet-rich plasma injection for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):144-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1986.
- Background: PubMed 21200168Hamilton BH, Best TM. Platelet-enriched plasma and muscle strain injuries: challenges imposed by the burden of proof. Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Jan;21(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318205a658.
- Background: PubMed 20973348Hamilton B, Knez W, Eirale C, Chalabi H. Platelet enriched plasma for acute muscle injury. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010 Aug;76(4):443-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38729628Zein MI, Mokkenstorm MJK, Cardinale M, Holtzhausen L, Whiteley R, Moen MH, Reurink G, Tol JL; Qatari and Dutch Hamstring Study Group. Baseline clinical and MRI risk factors for hamstring reinjury showing the value of performing baseline MRI and delaying return to play: a multicentre, prospective cohort of 330 acute hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 1;58(14):766-776. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107878.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29084725Whiteley R, van Dyk N, Wangensteen A, Hansen C. Clinical implications from daily physiotherapy examination of 131 acute hamstring injuries and their association with running speed and rehabilitation progression. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;52(5):303-310. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097616. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26843538Jacobsen P, Witvrouw E, Muxart P, Tol JL, Whiteley R. A combination of initial and follow-up physiotherapist examination predicts physician-determined time to return to play after hamstring injury, with no added value of MRI. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;50(7):431-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095073. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26305004Wangensteen A, Almusa E, Boukarroum S, Farooq A, Hamilton B, Whiteley R, Bahr R, Tol JL. MRI does not add value over and above patient history and clinical examination in predicting time to return to sport after acute hamstring injuries: a prospective cohort of 180 male athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(24):1579-87. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094892. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26136179Hamilton B, Tol JL, Almusa E, Boukarroum S, Eirale C, Farooq A, Whiteley R, Chalabi H. Platelet-rich plasma does not enhance return to play in hamstring injuries: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;49(14):943-50. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094603.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25037201De Vos RJ, Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Moen MH, Weir A, Tol JL. Clinical findings just after return to play predict hamstring re-injury, but baseline MRI findings do not. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(18):1377-84. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093737. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Related trials for Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury
Recruiting
Acute Effects of Neurodynamics on Strength and Endurance in Athletes
Sciatic Leg Pain, Hamstring Muscle Tightness
Recruiting
High Frequency RF Current Effects on Muscle Pain and Function
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Chronic Low-back Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
System Dynamics Model for Acute Non-contact Lower Extremity Injuries Prediction
Sport Injury, Hamstring Injury
RecruitingPhase 2
BPC 157 for Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Repair
Hamstring Muscle Strain, Skeletal Muscle Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hakim Chalabi, MD study director
Aspetar
Bruce Hamilton, MD principal investigator
Aspetar
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) and Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in people with Acute Hamstring Muscle Strain Injury, run by Aspetar at 1 site in Qatar.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Return to Play (time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of time to return to play with an expected average of 27 days and up to 1 year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01812564, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2015.