Preconception Care"Gabby"NCT01812824
Study of Virtual Patient Advocate for Preconception Care for African American Women
A study testing Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) in people with Preconception Care, run by Boston Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is to examine the effectiveness of a health communication system (Gabby) that assesses preconception health risks and tailors the intervention to each subject, based on her health risks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Preconception Care
- What is being tested?
- Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- female
- African American
- ages 18-25
- access to telephone and agrees to receive study-related calls
- access to computer with high-speed internet
Who cannot join
- Does not speak English
- Is currently pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Using Innovative Communication Technology to Improve the Health of Young African American Women
This study is to examine the effectiveness of a health communication system (Gabby) that assesses preconception health risks and tailors the intervention to each subject, based on her health risks.
There is a need to develop practical tools that can be used to identify preconception health risks and will facilitate the initiation of intervention for these risks; this project specifically targets young Black or African American women in order to reduce major disparities in birth outcomes. Clinicians do not have time to assess for over 100 preconception health risks that can impact birth outcomes; this system can streamline that assessment and create a personalized list of risks. Patients can then share their list with clinicians to make their healthcare visits more effective.
This study involves a pilot of the system through the Preconception Peer Educator (PPE) Program, which is a program created by the Office of Minority Health. The program began in historically black colleges in the United States, with the purpose of training students to reach out to their community to educate about the increased risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and infant mortality among African Americans. The PPEs teach about preconception health, or getting healthy before pregnancy, to increase the chances of having a healthy baby. Now the PPE program has expanded to colleges in over 20 states across the country.
Read the detailed description
Overview After the development phase, the investigators will first test the Shared Decision Making module with a group of 50 women from the Boston community. Then, a group of 20 other women from the Boston Community will serve as pre-testers of the full system and will then be invited to participate in a focus group to share additional feedback. Then, the investigators will conduct a six month randomized control trial (RCT) of PPEs from across the country to test whether the Gabby system will result in a lower rate of preconception health risks compared to the control group. In the RCT, half of the participants who sign up will use the Gabby system (interventions) and the other half will not use the Gabby system (controls). Outcomes will be assessed via a 6 month follow-up phone call, which will take approximately one hour. Secondary outcomes include: pregnancy rate, Risk Profile for participants who become pregnant, participant satisfaction, and number of stories written and heard.
Pre-Testing Protocol Pre-Testing subjects will be recruited from 3 sources (Family Medicine and Ob/Gyn Clinics, ReSPECT Registry, and local stores and restaurants). Each session will last up to two hours and will take place in the BMC research offices. Subjects will complete the same demographic form that will be used in the RCT, test various components of the system - including the risk assessment, risk dialogue ("scripts" from Gabby), My Health To-Do List, and story authoring. This will allow the investigators to fully test the completed system with members of the target group, debug it, populate the system with additional stories and receive feedback on what works and what does not. The objective is to perform a check of the system logic, content, and usability of the software. The goal is to ensure that the system works as designed. Northeastern investigators will be present for the full system pre-testing in order to assist with technical issues and in order to observe the system in use and identify problems to fix prior to the RCT.
After each user tests the system, Dr. Yinusa-Nyahkoon, an experienced African American investigator, will conduct a one-on-one interview with each subject that will last approximately 30 minutes. Dr. Yinusa-Nyahkoon will use a semi-structured interview guide to ask questions about the subjects' perceptions of the system and gather suggestions for improvement.
All focus group and individual interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim; participants will be informed about the audio recording prior to signing the consent form. Research team members will review transcripts to change subject names and alter identifying information in order to honor subject confidentiality. Audio files of all interviews will be password protected, and paper copies of interview transcripts will be assigned subject identification numbers. Analysis of interview data will begin after the first focus group interview is completed; therefore, data collection and analysis will occur simultaneously, and new points of inquiry for subsequent interviews are generated. Grounded theory techniques will be used to analyze interview data. Content categories, patterns, and themes will be identified across the interview data, and supporting evidence from transcripts will be reviewed with research team members to corroborate these findings. This process, referred to as researcher triangulation, provides a mechanism to reflect on, confirm, and expand data interpretations.
The following information will be collected from each Pretesting subject: (1) Screening Form to determine eligibility(Form A); (2) Signed consent form; (3) Contact Information Sheet (Form C); (4) Subject sociodemographics (Form C); (5) Health literacy will be tested with the 66 word version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM); (6) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; (7) Everyday Discrimination Scale; (8) Social Networking Immersion Measure; (9) General Self-Efficacy Scale; (10) Contraceptive Knowledge Pre-Test; and (11) Nutrition Knowledge Pre-Test.
Randomized Control Trial Protocol Subject Identification and Recruitment: Subjects will be recruited from the Preconception Peer Educator (PPE) program in the Office of Minority Health (OMH). The investigators will work with OMH, who will send recruitment emails to their contact list of those who have completed the PPE training, to inform them of the study and provide the contact information of the Program Manager. If interested, potential subjects can email the Program Manager to receive more information about the study and set up a phone call to complete the screening and enrollment process and give verbal consent. Potential subjects will be emailed the consent form and REALM form prior to the phone call, as well as a flyer with basic study information, and instructed to have access to their computer during the phone call.
Inclusion and Enrollment Procedures. The investigators will enroll women age 18 years and older, who self-identify as "Black or African American," meet all other eligibility criteria and who have participated in the OMH-PPE program. During enrollment the investigators will ask them to select their race and ethnicity from a list based on the US standard census categories and a list of ethnicities, based on the demographic information used US Census Bureau. Participants will be eligible if they choose "Black or African American." Prior to obtaining verbal consent, the research staff will then explain: (1) the purpose of the project; (2) potential risks and benefits to enrolling in the study; (3) possible randomization to a control group; and (4) IRB safeguards. BUMC investigators will obtain verbal consent from all participants and fill out enrollment forms.
Baseline Data Collection. Before randomization, the following information will be collected: (1) Eligibility Form A to determine eligibility; (2) Verbal consent; (3) Contact Information Sheet (Form C); (4) Demographic Form B; (5) Health literacy will be tested with the 66 word version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM); (6) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; (7) Everyday Discrimination Scale; (8) Social Networking Immersion Measure; (9) General Self-Efficacy Scale; (10) Contraceptive Knowledge Pre-Test; and (11) Nutrition Knowledge Pre-Test.
Randomization. Using a random numbers table, the statistician will prepare a numbered set of sealed study allocation envelopes prior to study start that will be used to determine the 75 subjects who are in the intervention group and the 75 who are in the control group. The control group will receive a letter listing the preconception risks identified in the risk assessment and they will be encouraged to see their clinician to discuss them.
- Conditions
- Preconception Care
- Being tested
- Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)
- Keywords
- Preconception Health, Health Information Technology, Reproductive Life Plan, Healthcare Disparities, Low birth-weight, Preterm Delivery
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)Behavioural
Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) participants will have access to the "Gabby" system for 6 months. There is no required "dose" or frequency that they have to log on to the system, but the investigators will suggest that they log on once a week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) | Experimental | Participants assigned to the Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) arm will have access to the Virtual Patient Advocate system on-line for 6 months; they will be encouraged, but not required, to log on once a week. Receives: Behavioral: Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) |
| Control (Letter) | No intervention | Participants in the Control (Letter) arm will take the online Preconception Risk Assessment at baseline, but not have access to the Virtual Patient Advocate system during the 6 month study period. They will be sent a list of the Preconception Risks identified through their answers to the Risk Assessment, which they can choose to share with their healthcare provider(s). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction in number of Preconception Health Risks
Number of preconception risks will be tallied for each participant at baseline and 6 months after enrollment. Participants will complete the Preconception Risk assessment at both time points.
Measured: Baseline and at 6 months after enrollment
Secondary outcomes (2)
Pregnancy Rate
During the outcome phone call the investigators will assess whether or not the participant has become pregnant during the study period.
Measured: Assessed 6 months after enrollment
Subject Satisfaction with Virtual Patient Advocate
During the follow-up phone call, the investigators will ask all intervention participants a series of satisfaction questions about various features of the Virtual Patient Advocate system.
Measured: Assessed at 6 months after enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionJan 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Preconception CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Northeastern University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian Jack, Boston Medical Center
- Investigators
- Brian W Jack, MD, Principal investigator, Boston University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01812824
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-31014
- Other IDs
- R40MC21510
- Acronym
- "Gabby"
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Gardiner P, Hempstead MB, Ring L, Bickmore T, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L, Tran H, Paasche-Orlow M, Damus K, Jack B. Reaching women through health information technology: the Gabby preconception care system. Am J Health Promot. 2013 Jan-Feb;27(3 Suppl):eS11-20. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.1200113-QUAN-18.
PubMed 23286652
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Innovative Communication Technology to Improve the Health of Young African American Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01812824
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- "Gabby" / H-31014
- Conditions
- Preconception Care
- Keywords
- Preconception Health, Health Information Technology, Reproductive Life Plan, Healthcare Disparities, Low birth-weight, Preterm Delivery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Northeastern University
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to examine the effectiveness of a health communication system (Gabby) that assesses preconception health risks and tailors the intervention to each subject, based on her health risks.
There is a need to develop practical tools that can be used to identify preconception health risks and will facilitate the initiation of intervention for these risks; this project specifically targets young Black or African American women in order to reduce major disparities in birth outcomes. Clinicians do not have time to assess for over 100 preconception health risks that can impact birth outcomes; this system can streamline that assessment and create a personalized list of risks. Patients can then share their list with clinicians to make their healthcare visits more effective.
This study involves a pilot of the system through the Preconception Peer Educator (PPE) Program, which is a program created by the Office of Minority Health. The program began in historically black colleges in the United States, with the purpose of training students to reach out to their community to educate about the increased risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and infant mortality among African Americans. The PPEs teach about preconception health, or getting healthy before pregnancy, to increase the chances of having a healthy baby. Now the PPE program has expanded to colleges in over 20 states across the country.
Detailed description
Overview After the development phase, the investigators will first test the Shared Decision Making module with a group of 50 women from the Boston community. Then, a group of 20 other women from the Boston Community will serve as pre-testers of the full system and will then be invited to participate in a focus group to share additional feedback. Then, the investigators will conduct a six month randomized control trial (RCT) of PPEs from across the country to test whether the Gabby system will result in a lower rate of preconception health risks compared to the control group. In the RCT, half of the participants who sign up will use the Gabby system (interventions) and the other half will not use the Gabby system (controls). Outcomes will be assessed via a 6 month follow-up phone call, which will take approximately one hour. Secondary outcomes include: pregnancy rate, Risk Profile for participants who become pregnant, participant satisfaction, and number of stories written and heard.
Pre-Testing Protocol Pre-Testing subjects will be recruited from 3 sources (Family Medicine and Ob/Gyn Clinics, ReSPECT Registry, and local stores and restaurants). Each session will last up to two hours and will take place in the BMC research offices. Subjects will complete the same demographic form that will be used in the RCT, test various components of the system - including the risk assessment, risk dialogue ("scripts" from Gabby), My Health To-Do List, and story authoring. This will allow the investigators to fully test the completed system with members of the target group, debug it, populate the system with additional stories and receive feedback on what works and what does not. The objective is to perform a check of the system logic, content, and usability of the software. The goal is to ensure that the system works as designed. Northeastern investigators will be present for the full system pre-testing in order to assist with technical issues and in order to observe the system in use and identify problems to fix prior to the RCT.
After each user tests the system, Dr. Yinusa-Nyahkoon, an experienced African American investigator, will conduct a one-on-one interview with each subject that will last approximately 30 minutes. Dr. Yinusa-Nyahkoon will use a semi-structured interview guide to ask questions about the subjects' perceptions of the system and gather suggestions for improvement.
All focus group and individual interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim; participants will be informed about the audio recording prior to signing the consent form. Research team members will review transcripts to change subject names and alter identifying information in order to honor subject confidentiality. Audio files of all interviews will be password protected, and paper copies of interview transcripts will be assigned subject identification numbers. Analysis of interview data will begin after the first focus group interview is completed; therefore, data collection and analysis will occur simultaneously, and new points of inquiry for subsequent interviews are generated. Grounded theory techniques will be used to analyze interview data. Content categories, patterns, and themes will be identified across the interview data, and supporting evidence from transcripts will be reviewed with research team members to corroborate these findings. This process, referred to as researcher triangulation, provides a mechanism to reflect on, confirm, and expand data interpretations.
The following information will be collected from each Pretesting subject: (1) Screening Form to determine eligibility(Form A); (2) Signed consent form; (3) Contact Information Sheet (Form C); (4) Subject sociodemographics (Form C); (5) Health literacy will be tested with the 66 word version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM); (6) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; (7) Everyday Discrimination Scale; (8) Social Networking Immersion Measure; (9) General Self-Efficacy Scale; (10) Contraceptive Knowledge Pre-Test; and (11) Nutrition Knowledge Pre-Test.
Randomized Control Trial Protocol Subject Identification and Recruitment: Subjects will be recruited from the Preconception Peer Educator (PPE) program in the Office of Minority Health (OMH). The investigators will work with OMH, who will send recruitment emails to their contact list of those who have completed the PPE training, to inform them of the study and provide the contact information of the Program Manager. If interested, potential subjects can email the Program Manager to receive more information about the study and set up a phone call to complete the screening and enrollment process and give verbal consent. Potential subjects will be emailed the consent form and REALM form prior to the phone call, as well as a flyer with basic study information, and instructed to have access to their computer during the phone call.
Inclusion and Enrollment Procedures. The investigators will enroll women age 18 years and older, who self-identify as "Black or African American," meet all other eligibility criteria and who have participated in the OMH-PPE program. During enrollment the investigators will ask them to select their race and ethnicity from a list based on the US standard census categories and a list of ethnicities, based on the demographic information used US Census Bureau. Participants will be eligible if they choose "Black or African American." Prior to obtaining verbal consent, the research staff will then explain: (1) the purpose of the project; (2) potential risks and benefits to enrolling in the study; (3) possible randomization to a control group; and (4) IRB safeguards. BUMC investigators will obtain verbal consent from all participants and fill out enrollment forms.
Baseline Data Collection. Before randomization, the following information will be collected: (1) Eligibility Form A to determine eligibility; (2) Verbal consent; (3) Contact Information Sheet (Form C); (4) Demographic Form B; (5) Health literacy will be tested with the 66 word version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM); (6) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; (7) Everyday Discrimination Scale; (8) Social Networking Immersion Measure; (9) General Self-Efficacy Scale; (10) Contraceptive Knowledge Pre-Test; and (11) Nutrition Knowledge Pre-Test.
Randomization. Using a random numbers table, the statistician will prepare a numbered set of sealed study allocation envelopes prior to study start that will be used to determine the 75 subjects who are in the intervention group and the 75 who are in the control group. The control group will receive a letter listing the preconception risks identified in the risk assessment and they will be encouraged to see their clinician to discuss them.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) | Experimental | Behavioral: Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)Participants assigned to the Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) arm will have access to the Virtual Patient Advocate system on-line for 6 months; they will be encouraged, but not required, to log on once a week. |
| Control (Letter) | No intervention | –Participants in the Control (Letter) arm will take the online Preconception Risk Assessment at baseline, but not have access to the Virtual Patient Advocate system during the 6 month study period. They will be sent a list of the Preconception Risks identified through their answers to the Risk Assessment, which they can choose to share with their healthcare provider(s). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- female
- African American
- ages 18-25
- access to telephone and agrees to receive study-related calls
- access to computer with high-speed internet
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Does not speak English
- Is currently pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) participants will have access to the "Gabby" system for 6 months. There is no required "dose" or frequency that they have to log on to the system, but the investigators will suggest that they log on once a week. | Behavioural | Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) |
Primary outcome
Reduction in number of Preconception Health Risks
Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months after enrollment
Number of preconception risks will be tallied for each participant at baseline and 6 months after enrollment. Participants will complete the Preconception Risk assessment at both time points.
2 secondary outcomes
Pregnancy Rate
Time frame: Assessed 6 months after enrollment
Subject Satisfaction with Virtual Patient Advocate
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months after enrollment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2017.
- Background: PubMed 23286652Gardiner P, Hempstead MB, Ring L, Bickmore T, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L, Tran H, Paasche-Orlow M, Damus K, Jack B. Reaching women through health information technology: the Gabby preconception care system. Am J Health Promot. 2013 Jan-Feb;27(3 Suppl):eS11-20. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.1200113-QUAN-18.
Related trials for Preconception Care
Active, not recruiting
Healthy for my Baby- RCT of a Lifestyle Intervention for Overweight Women in Preconception
Overweight and Obesity, Pregnancy Complications
Active, not recruiting
Promoting Preconception Care and Diabetes Self-Management Among Reproductive-Aged Women With Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Electronic Health Record
Active, not recruiting
Group Preconception Care for Fertility Patients
Infertility
Recruiting
Improving Alcohol and Substance Use Care Access, Outcome, Equity During the Reproductive Years
Alcohol-Related Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Lifestyle, Education, Activity, Nutrition (LEAN) Into Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Preconception Education
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian W Jack, MD principal investigator
Boston University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) in people with Preconception Care, run by Boston Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction in number of Preconception Health Risks (time frame: Baseline and at 6 months after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01812824, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2017.