Type 2 Diabetes MellitusNCT01817595
Evaluation of Iphone Technology in Diabetes Treatment
A study testing BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose Reporting and iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose Method in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Endocrine Research Society at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Background With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose Reporting and iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose Method
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 1s
- Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
- Internet Access
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Background
With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).
Read more
Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to encourage patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).
Purpose and Rationale
Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.
Objectives
Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.
Primary Outcomes Include:
- Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
- Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
- Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
- Time taken to teach each patient the platforms
Research Design/Methods
Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:
BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.
IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.
Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.
Inclusion criteria:
- Type 1s
- Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
- Internet Access
Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
Read the detailed description
Background/Hypothesis
Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Although diabetes is a chronic disease, it can be controlled with use of medications (oral agents or insulin), and/or changes in life-style and diet.
With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).
Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).
Purpose and Rationale
Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.
Objectives
Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.
Primary Outcomes Include:
- Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
- Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
- Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
- Time taken to teach each patient the platforms
Research Design/Methods
Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:
BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.
IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.
Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.
Inclusion criteria:
- Type 1s
- Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
- Internet Access
Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
Confidentiality According to the guidelines of the University of British Columbia (UBC)/Providence Health Care Research Ethics Boards, the identity of participants will be kept confidential.
Data for each patient will be collected from the Clinical Research Coordinator and the Internet based glucose monitoring system. These data will only be accessed by the investigators and will be inputted into an Excel® spreadsheet where each patient will be given a unique identifier. All data pertaining to individual patients will be kept locked in the office of the study investigators.
Calculations and Statistics Statistical analysis will be performed on site by the researchers. Each group will complete the DTSQ. Questions revolve around satisfaction of treatment and are to be answered on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very Satisfied). Frequency of reporting will be determined through number of reports sent in per month. Total strip count will be recorded for each group. Time will be measured for the time it takes to train each patient in their respective meter/platform. All outcome measurements will be analysed using independent samples t-tests. Participants will only be identified by coded initials and a number to protect privacy.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose Reporting, iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose Method
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring, iphone, meter
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose ReportingOther
Patients in BG Star Meter Group will report using BG software through uploading information onto a computer and sending readings to their endocrinologist via email
iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose MethodOther
25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BG Star (Conventional Meter) | Active comparator | 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email. Receives: Other: BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose Reporting |
| IBG Star Group (iPhone) | Active comparator | 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone. Receives: Other: iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose Method |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Satisfaction
Measured: 6 months
Frequency of SMBG testing
Measured: 6 months
Frequency of Reporting
How often patient sends report in to endocrinologist
Measured: 6 months
Time required to teach meter/internet platform
Measured: Measured at beginning of study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Endocrine Research Society
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Hugh Tildesley, Endocrine Research Society
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01817595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IBG star study
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Tildesley HD, Mazanderani AB, Ross SA. Effect of Internet therapeutic intervention on A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1738-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2256.
PubMed 20668152
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Iphone Technology in Diabetes Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01817595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IBG star study
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring, iphone, meter
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Endocrine Research SocietyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background
With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).
Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to encourage patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).
Purpose and Rationale
Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.
Objectives
Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.
Primary Outcomes Include:
- Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
- Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
- Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
- Time taken to teach each patient the platforms
Research Design/Methods
Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:
BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.
IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.
Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.
Inclusion criteria:
- Type 1s
- Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
- Internet Access
Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
Detailed description
Background/Hypothesis
Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Although diabetes is a chronic disease, it can be controlled with use of medications (oral agents or insulin), and/or changes in life-style and diet.
With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).
Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).
Purpose and Rationale
Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.
Objectives
Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.
Primary Outcomes Include:
- Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
- Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
- Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
- Time taken to teach each patient the platforms
Research Design/Methods
Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:
BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.
IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.
Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.
Inclusion criteria:
- Type 1s
- Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
- Internet Access
Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
Confidentiality According to the guidelines of the University of British Columbia (UBC)/Providence Health Care Research Ethics Boards, the identity of participants will be kept confidential.
Data for each patient will be collected from the Clinical Research Coordinator and the Internet based glucose monitoring system. These data will only be accessed by the investigators and will be inputted into an Excel® spreadsheet where each patient will be given a unique identifier. All data pertaining to individual patients will be kept locked in the office of the study investigators.
Calculations and Statistics Statistical analysis will be performed on site by the researchers. Each group will complete the DTSQ. Questions revolve around satisfaction of treatment and are to be answered on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very Satisfied). Frequency of reporting will be determined through number of reports sent in per month. Total strip count will be recorded for each group. Time will be measured for the time it takes to train each patient in their respective meter/platform. All outcome measurements will be analysed using independent samples t-tests. Participants will only be identified by coded initials and a number to protect privacy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BG Star (Conventional Meter) | Active comparator | Other: BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose Reporting25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email. |
| IBG Star Group (iPhone) | Active comparator | Other: iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose Method25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Type 1s
- Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose ReportingPatients in BG Star Meter Group will report using BG software through uploading information onto a computer and sending readings to their endocrinologist via email | Other | BG Star (Conventional Meter) |
| iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose Method25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone. | Other | IBG Star Group (iPhone) |
Primary outcome
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 6 months
Frequency of SMBG testing
Time frame: 6 months
Frequency of Reporting
Time frame: 6 months
How often patient sends report in to endocrinologist
Time required to teach meter/internet platform
Time frame: Measured at beginning of study
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 20668152Tildesley HD, Mazanderani AB, Ross SA. Effect of Internet therapeutic intervention on A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1738-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2256.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BG Star Meter (Conventional) Internet Blood Glucose Reporting and iBG Star (iphone) Internet Blood Glucose Method in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Endocrine Research Society at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Satisfaction (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01817595, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2014.