Aplastic AnemiaPhase 4NCT01818726
Safety and Efficacy of Exjade in the Treatment of Transfusion-dependent Iron Overload in Aplastic Anemia Patients
A Phase 4 study testing ICL670, Chelation and No chelation in people with Aplastic Anemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in Russia.
Trial summary
Evaluated Exjade efficacy and safety in patients with aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent iron overload, undergoing treatment programs of immunosuppressive treatment (Cyclosporine A) , in comparison with a group of patients undergoing treatment programs of immunosuppressive treatment (Cyclosporine A) without… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aplastic Anemia
- What is being tested?
- ICL670, Chelation and No chelation
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRussia
- Study dates
- 23 Jun 2014to 17 Oct 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Main diagnosis: aplastic anemia
- Absence of severe and/or uncontrolled comorbidities
- Confirmed iron overload (serum ferritin ≥ 1000 mkg/L)
- Serum creatinine is not higher than the upper limit of normal for the given age
- Absence of severe proteinuria. Protein/Creatinine ratio should be < 0.5 mg/mg
- Liver enzymes are < 5 ULN
- Completion of a scheduled cycle of immunosuppressive treatment program, with no severe infectious or generalized hemorrhagic complications
- WHO (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2
Who cannot join
- No signed informed consent form
- Patient is under 18 years old
- Severe concomitant condition
- Severe infectious and generalized haemorrhagic complication following regular planned cycle of programmed immune suppressive treatment.
- History of increased sensitivity to active substance and any other ingredient of the medicinal product.
- Creatinine clearance (CC) < 60 ml/min and/or creatinine concentration in blood serum is 2 or more times higher than upper limit of age normal by results of 2 tests at Visits 1 and 2.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Severe liver disorders (class C by Child-Pugh scale).
- Patients with aplastic anaemia in which chelator treatment will be ineffective due to rapid progression of the disease.
- Significant proteinuria basing on protein creatinine ratio > 1.0 mg/ml in urine sample from second urination at Visits 1 and 2 (or as an alternative in 2 of 3 urine samples at screening);
- Rare hereditary disorders related to galactose intolerance, severe deficit of lactase or glucose-galactose malabsorption;
- Pregnancy, lactation;
- Level of liver enzymes higher than 5 upper limits of age normal at Visits 1 and 2.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Open-label Study of Exjade in the Treatment of Transfusion-dependent Iron Overload in Aplastic Anemia Patients Undergoing Treatment Programs in Comparison With Control Group
Evaluated Exjade efficacy and safety in patients with aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent iron overload, undergoing treatment programs of immunosuppressive treatment (Cyclosporine A) , in comparison with a group of patients undergoing treatment programs of immunosuppressive treatment (Cyclosporine A) without chelation therapy.
Read the detailed description
The secondary endpoints that were originally planned for this study were not analyzed as the study ended prematurely.
- Conditions
- Aplastic Anemia
- Being tested
- ICL670, Chelation, No chelation
- Keywords
- Aplastic anemia, deferasirox, ICL670, renal function, transfusion-dependent iron overload, immunosuppressive treatment, Cyclosporine A, unosuppressive treatment without chelation therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Aplastic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ICL670Drug
Also called Deferasirox
ICL670 was supplied in registered packages as 250mg or 500mg dispersible tablets.
ChelationDrug
Main group of patients with aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent iron overload underwent treatment programs of standard immunosuppressive treatment (immunosupressant - Cyclosporine A) and received chelation with ICL670 (deferasirox).
No chelationDrug
Comparative group of patients with aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent iron overload underwent treatment programs of standard immunosuppressive treatment ( immunosupressant -Cyclosporine A)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Serum ferritin level ≥ 1,000 μg/l | Experimental | Transfusion-dependent adult patients with AA and serum ferritin ≥ 1000 mg/L on programmed immune suppressive treatment with cyclosporine A who were receiving chelation with Exjade (deferasirox) during the study Receives: Drug: ICL670; Drug: Chelation |
| Serum ferritin level < 1,000 μg/l | Experimental | Transfusion-dependent adult patients with AA and serum ferritin < 1,000 mg/L on programmed immune suppressive treatment with cyclosporine A who were not receiving the investigational product Receives: Drug: No chelation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Serum Ferritin Values
Change from baseline was be summarized descriptively for all on-treatment study visits.
Changes to the planned statistical analysis were related to significant withdrawal of patients from the Per-Protocol Analysis Set due to a large number of patients who discontinued the study (lack of assessments of iron exchange parameters at visits) and deviations from the Protocol affecting the assessment of efficacy parameters. Because of that, the additional efficacy analysis in the Per-Protocol Analysis Set was not performed.
Measured: Screening, Week (Wk) 4, Wk 8, Wk 12, Wk 16, Wk 20, Wk 24, Wk 28, Wk 32, Wk 36, Wk 40, Wk 44, Wk 48, Wk 52
Change in Transferrin Saturation With Iron (TSI) Values
Mean percentage change from baseline in transferrin saturation with iron was summarized descriptively for all on-treatment study visits.
Measured: Screening, Week (Wk) 4, Wk 8, Wk 12, Wk 16, Wk 20, Wk 24, Wk 28, Wk 32, Wk 36, Wk 40, Wk 44, Wk 48, Wk 52
Change in Serum Total Iron-binding Capacity (TIBC)
Mean change from baseline in serum total iron-binding capacity was summarized descriptively for all on-treatment study visits.
Measured: Screening, Week (Wk) 4, Wk 8, Wk 12, Wk 16, Wk 20, Wk 24, Wk 28, Wk 32, Wk 36, Wk 40, Wk 44, Wk 48, Wk 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study start23 Jun 2014
- Primary completion17 Oct 2016
- Study completion17 Oct 2016
Why it stopped: Failure to meet the schedule of patient recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Aplastic AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01818726
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CICL670ARU02
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 5 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open-label Study of Exjade in the Treatment of Transfusion-dependent Iron Overload in Aplastic Anemia Patients Undergoing Treatment Programs in Comparison With Control Group
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01818726
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CICL670ARU02
- Conditions
- Aplastic Anemia
- Keywords
- Aplastic anemia, deferasirox, ICL670, renal function, transfusion-dependent iron overload, immunosuppressive treatment, Cyclosporine A, unosuppressive treatment without chelation therapy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Failure to meet the schedule of patient recruitment
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 Jun 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Aug 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluated Exjade efficacy and safety in patients with aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent iron overload, undergoing treatment programs of immunosuppressive treatment (Cyclosporine A) , in comparison with a group of patients undergoing treatment programs of immunosuppressive treatment (Cyclosporine A) without chelation therapy.
Detailed description
The secondary endpoints that were originally planned for this study were not analyzed as the study ended prematurely.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Serum ferritin level ≥ 1,000 μg/l | Experimental | Drug: ICL670, Drug: ChelationTransfusion-dependent adult patients with AA and serum ferritin ≥ 1000 mg/L on programmed immune suppressive treatment with cyclosporine A who were receiving chelation with Exjade (deferasirox) during the study |
| Serum ferritin level < 1,000 μg/l | Experimental | Drug: No chelationTransfusion-dependent adult patients with AA and serum ferritin < 1,000 mg/L on programmed immune suppressive treatment with cyclosporine A who were not receiving the investigational product |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Main diagnosis: aplastic anemia
- Absence of severe and/or uncontrolled comorbidities
- Confirmed iron overload (serum ferritin ≥ 1000 mkg/L)
- Serum creatinine is not higher than the upper limit of normal for the given age
- Absence of severe proteinuria. Protein/Creatinine ratio should be < 0.5 mg/mg
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- No signed informed consent form
- Patient is under 18 years old
- Severe concomitant condition
- Severe infectious and generalized haemorrhagic complication following regular planned cycle of programmed immune suppressive treatment.
- History of increased sensitivity to active substance and any other ingredient of the medicinal product.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ICL670Also: DeferasiroxICL670 was supplied in registered packages as 250mg or 500mg dispersible tablets. | Drug | Serum ferritin level ≥ 1,000 μg/l |
| ChelationMain group of patients with aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent iron overload underwent treatment programs of standard immunosuppressive treatment (immunosupressant - Cyclosporine A) and received chelation with ICL670 (deferasirox). | Drug | Serum ferritin level ≥ 1,000 μg/l |
| No chelationComparative group of patients with aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent iron overload underwent treatment programs of standard immunosuppressive treatment ( immunosupressant -Cyclosporine A) | Drug | Serum ferritin level < 1,000 μg/l |
Primary outcome
Change in Serum Ferritin Values
Time frame: Screening, Week (Wk) 4, Wk 8, Wk 12, Wk 16, Wk 20, Wk 24, Wk 28, Wk 32, Wk 36, Wk 40, Wk 44, Wk 48, Wk 52
Change from baseline was be summarized descriptively for all on-treatment study visits. Changes to the planned statistical analysis were related to significant withdrawal of patients from the Per-Protocol Analysis Set due to a large number of patients who discontinued the study (lack of assessments of iron exchange parameters at visits) and deviations from the Protocol affecting the assessment of efficacy parameters. Because of that, the additional efficacy analysis in the Per-Protocol Analysis Set was not performed.
Change in Transferrin Saturation With Iron (TSI) Values
Time frame: Screening, Week (Wk) 4, Wk 8, Wk 12, Wk 16, Wk 20, Wk 24, Wk 28, Wk 32, Wk 36, Wk 40, Wk 44, Wk 48, Wk 52
Mean percentage change from baseline in transferrin saturation with iron was summarized descriptively for all on-treatment study visits.
Change in Serum Total Iron-binding Capacity (TIBC)
Time frame: Screening, Week (Wk) 4, Wk 8, Wk 12, Wk 16, Wk 20, Wk 24, Wk 28, Wk 32, Wk 36, Wk 40, Wk 44, Wk 48, Wk 52
Mean change from baseline in serum total iron-binding capacity was summarized descriptively for all on-treatment study visits.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Aplastic Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing ICL670, Chelation and No chelation in people with Aplastic Anemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Serum Ferritin Values (time frame: Screening, Week (Wk) 4, Wk 8, Wk 12, Wk 16, Wk 20, Wk 24, Wk 28, Wk 32, Wk 36, Wk 40, Wk 44, Wk 48, Wk 52). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2019.